[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord


File: 1714344877857.jpg ( 245.97 KB , 850x1958 , sample_d359b9949d0f23e7ca6….jpg )

 No.480952

I hate banks. I hate CEOs. I hate Capitalism. I hate israel. why can't we be friends?
>>

 No.480953

Sounds good. Of course you know actual Nazis love all four of those things, right?
>>

 No.480954

>>480952
hatred is a flimsy basis for friendship, what happens after we overcome capitalism ?
We try to stab each other in the back ?

A soldid friendship would be based on shared goals.
Do you think we share goals ?
>>

 No.480955

File: 1714347010743.png ( 536.86 KB , 774x581 , 17141030131.png )

>>480952
it's not a smart move to support far right
>>

 No.480957

>Of course you know actual Nazis love all four of those things
what?
>>

 No.480958

>>480957
Hitler:
-loved banks
-was financed by and supported German corporate officers
-was a champion of German capitalism
-supported Israel and wanted to deport all the Jews there

And that's just in Germany. Modern Ukrainian Nazis are puppeteered to a humorous degree by Ukrainian billionaires (some of them Jews!) and have both supported and received military support by Israel.
>>

 No.480959

>>480958
Proofs?
>>

 No.480960

File: 1714361526272.mp4 ( 4.48 MB , 854x488 , 0vmcgg.mp4 )

>>480959
? it's no secret
>>

 No.480962

File: 1714400562785.png ( 6.03 MB , 3000x3300 , so much for the intolerant….png )

>>480952
Nice try Shlomo but you will not get away from this fuck up unscathed.

>>480959
Zionazist nazionism is der grossest ally of our national socialist revolution, mein kamerad! Now gobble up that nazi beans™ package provided to us by herr Goldstein to get the super sigma powers of our fuhrer, Adolf "Shekelgrabber" Hitler!
>>

 No.480964

>>480962
Wait a moment.

Do you think the nazi-flag-poster is the same guy as the jdif-click-farm-guy from the other day ? The one that was posting Zionist hate-propaganda against the peaceful democratic student protests, in the Gaza thread ?
>>

 No.480981

Because you blame workers for your problems like a retard.
>>

 No.480982

>>480964
came here at the same time. let's see if he starts spamming cp next. probably an .orgre fag
>>

 No.480983

>>480962
skorzeny only collaborated with mossad because they threatened to expose him as a cuck THOUGH (and he actually was)
>>

 No.480985

>>480983
>they threatened to expose him as a cuck THOUGH (and he actually was)
source?
>>

 No.480986

>>480983
Why didn't he just simply claim it was an open relationship like Destiny does?
>>

 No.480994

>>480985
https://newlinesmag.com/review/the-nazi-fugitives-hired-by-israel/
>The “hook” used by the Mossad was Skorzeny’s beautiful wife, Countess Ilse von Finkenstein, with whom he was in an open relationship. Described by a CIA informant as a “very attractive and highly intelligent woman,”

>>480986
Because open relationships aren't exactly approved of by most Nazis
>>

 No.480995

>>480955
do you have that clussy in a higher resolution?
>>

 No.480996

>>480995
What would you say if you were accused of being autistic?
>>

 No.480997


>>480996
hw would start quoting age of consent in different countries while waving the bandera blood and soil flag while holding his copy of "Leninism or Marxism" by Rosa
>>

 No.480999

>>480952
post video of yourself bombing a bank
>>

 No.481003

Why do Nazis persist in being the most disingenuous fags in all things? They only know the Germanic sneer and insult. What a disgusting race. They always throw their fake friendship in your face and insist all politics must be as fake and gay as their (very foreign I should make clear) ideology.
>>

 No.481004

This is the funny thing about the post-war revisionists' hot takes on fascism. The idea that fascism is "not for export" is the exact opposite of what fascists really were. They were funded from day one by pallets of money airlifted from the Anglos to prop up something that was good for eugenics. That was the stated purpose of the Nazis. None of this faggotry where they pretend they're going to help anyone who isn't part of their gay cult.
>>

 No.481021

>>480952
We are not compatible, die.
>>

 No.481052

>>480964
Dunno, I don't visit that thread much. But considering how retarded op's points are it looks like a bait & nothing else.

>>480994
>Because open relationships aren't exactly approved of by most Nazis
Not @ all, maybe only the ones who are @ the lowest point in their hierarchy but everybody above them are on the constant fucconquista mode thanks to the '68 sexual revolution, which liberated only the middle classes, as usual.
Btw weren't ww2 nutsoys reversing this idea later on into something like "aryan sexual superiority"? Idk where I heard about it.
>>

 No.481152

File: 1714771155637.png ( 812.18 KB , 1521x1081 , ClipboardImage.png )

>the nazis were tra-ACK!!!!
>>

 No.481165

File: 1714817650621.png ( 80.78 KB , 1230x291 , not national not socialist.png )

>reject mod-AAACK
>>

 No.481168

File: 1714833281383.png ( 45.06 KB , 339x149 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>481165
IN 2035 Nazism will be nothing more than antisemitism + civic nationalism. They'll basically take anyone as long as they think the holocaust never happened and that Hitler was just some Malcom X type figure.
>>

 No.481172

>>481165
Most of hose "kids" are failed adults
>>

 No.481377

>>480952
i am a far left wing a i really believe racism is a intellectual disability .
BUT I am really think you are right.
If the right and the left do not work together it will never work out for workers worldwide.
The people let divide them selfs and who profit of it are some rich assholes.
>>

 No.481426

File: 1715210713892.jpg ( 47.51 KB , 378x575 , 480995.jpg )

>>

 No.481428

>>481377
>Class collaboration
This uygha
>>

 No.481448

>>481428
That's not what class collaboration is.
Do you know what a class even is?
>>

 No.481486

Right wing, left-wing. Tired of these moronic distinctions
>>

 No.481487

>>481486
What do you propose?
>>

 No.481488

>>481487
Not that guy, but i'll reply anyway.

Left vs right politics goes back to the transition between monarchy to capitalist bourgeois democracy. The right wanted to preserve monarchy, while the left wanted to abolish it. There simply are no monarchies anymore, even the gulf states where the people with actual political power have monarchical titles, function like bourgeois cartels. So the original right is gone. What counted as left way back when, would probably be called classical liberalism today. What counts as left in bourgeois politics today has little in common with that.

We probably should use political categories based on actual material interests, as they exist in the present system.
>>

 No.481504

>>481488
They referred not just to the monarchy as a form, but what the monarchy was there for - the consolidation of state power. At that time in France, the monarchist ideology was absolutism, where the king took more power for himself at the expense of vassals. The "bourgeois cartels" were already part of the monarchical system, as they were in England.

In my (probably not approved) model - and we should not put too much credit in models - the left/right distinction was between technology and the authority of institutions and property and the right of state authority. The left represented the interest of a growing technological interest, and one result of that was industrialism and the normalization of corporate government and the corporate person. The right to this day trades in the projection of personal authority, but "personal authority" of the sort they imply ceased to exist many decades ago. The last vestiges of it were blown to bits repeatedly during the last half of the 20th century.

A curious thing happened where the "left" rebranded around all of the traditional prerogatives of the right - consolidation of state authority, limited access of technology because of fear of popular revolt - and the "right" feigned populism and claimed they represented the personal rights and interest of "good people". This reversal was only possible with tacit approval of the leaders of both "factions", who saw it as a complete joke. The original contention was settled, because oligarchy won. The left's aim with mass politics was to bring the masses into the technological interest that they controlled, and once that was accomplished, they shunned the very idea of mass politics at its heart.

We today inherit the results of that struggle, because we are made to relitigate it in our personal lives if we want to live. It is a struggle within the institutions for the office-holders, who long ago abandoned any vision other than power itself. Government by crisis and coup became the only idea that could rule in their mind, and so that is what we do - lurching from one crisis to the next, always manipulated by some power that we're not allowed to acknowledge.

For most of humanity, there are no material interests that you can represent in a political arena. If you want to do politics, there is only the institutions. Within the institutions, the left/right distinction in its original sense is still alive, but it purely concerns those who have business in the institutions. They are united in purpose of commanding the commons and suppressing the lower orders, so that history never changes.

For what it's worth, "leftist" and "rightist" never had mass appeal, nor do people vote for ideology. Behind the stories and narratives of public relations, there were men who represented certain interests in the society - "special interests" if you will. Most of politics is about schmoozing and knowing what your core constituents want, so you can keep getting rich and get what you really want - all of the kickbacks of political office. Electoral politics is always going to produce that, rather than this idea that through abstractions and stories, the people as a whole are somehow served by this. The very act of elections is alien to the people having what they want, down to the process itself being a charade that can easily be rigged if needed. Still, if you asked what people voted for, they voted for the guy who they believed would make their life a little better. Voters do not believe in self-abasement, and exhorting them to do so is a sign of the politicians' contempt for groups who have no one to fight for them, sectioned off from the rest of society. That process continued generation after generation until "democracy" only existed for a favored group who would be told they must march in lockstep and make "the ultimate sacrifice" to continue having their privileges - and this required them to declare a war against those outside of society, for the sake of society. That is where we are today.
>>

 No.481505

It was with the Nazis that the "change-up" happened. If you told people that the right was about "small government" or "social conservatism", they'd laugh in your face. The right's canonical position was everything for the state, because the state was imagined as the thing that kept the masses down and allowed proprietors to hold their fiefdoms. The right wants the state to be nothing but that. It was the tacit approval of the left that allowed them to get what they wanted, at least as far as they have.

What ultimately happened, despite the efforts to pretend it wasn't happening, is that technology and the interested parties continued to extract rent, and as they finish cannibalizing labor, the commons are looking to seize the last shreds of independence. And so, the traditional left thinks more like a barbarian warlord - because for the masses, this is the world they want. They want a world where those selected to live have everything, and those selected to die will be attacked by their rightist allies, who will be told that their path to victory is "more blood for the blood god". But, technology always wins - it always has in the long run, because the human spirit is fickle, and the aristocratic and proprietor spirit is more fickle still. What was needed, and this was accomplished during the 20th century, was the complete demoralization of the lower classes, who represented a world that had been untouched by modernity and the drive to enclose them in the aristocratic game played since ancient times. The true aims of the masses have always been to leave this condition and never speak of being ruled by it again, and the masses were defeated on all fronts, for they would not be allowed anything they ever wanted.
>>

 No.481506

For the commons of the 19th century - including many of the people who made anything in technocratic society that actually worked - the left/right distinction was incidental to what they wanted. They weren't invested in this idea that history was made of narratives. The left/right distinction was useful for understanding the historical conflict and roughly why we're here, but the real politics was always about who and what held power, and who and what held the machines that allowed rule. Personal honor had a lot more to do with politics than any ideology or claims of institutional authority. The genius of the smarter political writers is that they worked through that instead of insisting reality matches a technological conceit or ideology.
>>

 No.481596

>I hate banks.
Based
>I hate CEOs.
Based
>I hate Capitalism
Based
>I hate Israel
Left-wing antisemitism is actually cringe
>>

 No.481607

I made this thread as a shitpost guys…
:/
>>

 No.481608

>>481596
People hate the Zionreich for bombing children, schools, hospitals, aid trucks, for mass murdering a population via starvation, the list is extensive, and it's easy to list the war-crimes they haven't committed.
Those despicable actions deserve all that hate. Zionists attempting to claim victimhood while actively committing a genocide is fooling nobody anymore. Cry-bullying doesn't work for mass murderers.

We also have to talk about the 4 Zionist antisemitisms
1 holocausting the Palestinians who are ethnically Semites.
2 claiming that all this horror is done in the name of Jews.
3 weaponizing false accusations of antisemitism to attack democracy, eroding the protections for Jews
4 equating Zionism with Judaism
>>

 No.481609

File: 1715991866835.png ( 22.46 KB , 500x500 , shatpost.png )

>>481607
Right and you're complaining that not enough people shat in it ?
>>

 No.481642

>>481608
>Zionreich
lol'd
>>

 No.482542

>>480952

Because you killed people for being NEETs or neurodivergent. Also makes the Soviet Union shit though and why socialists in general here are cringe.
>>

 No.483921

because leftists are jews
literally and figuratively
>>

 No.483923

>I hate banks. I hate CEOs. I hate Capitalism
no you dont you want to replace le bad ceos with wholesome aryan ceos who will stop doing all the bad profitable things out of the goodness of their hearts
>>

 No.483944

In practice, Nazi Germany cut wages by at least 30%.

We reject three things primarily: your racism, your genocides, and your hypocrisy.

You are, of course, free to smooch your face in jew-boobs and deprogram your Naziism and become a leftist, but don't think it'll be an easy journey and won't require a lot of repentance.
>>

 No.483948

>>483944
You habe to keeo in mind that the imperialkst west came and destroyed their achievements. Is that real wage decrease befofe or after monopoly capital rallied against them
>>

 No.483949

>>483944
the USSR starved people bro
lets not compare economic prosperity
>>

 No.483950

>>483949
LOL, I'm a USSR hater but why are you lying glow uyghur.
>>

 No.483953

>>483950
how am i lying? USSR was poor asf. literally everyone knows this.
>>

 No.483955

>>483949
THE COMMUNIST State didn't starve the People. The Kulaks created the famines to maximize profits. They wefe liquidated
>>

 No.483956

>>483949
>bro
>here's a CIA talking point bro
<doesn't further elaborate

I think we should compare economic prosperity. We should do exactly that. Because by any metric, the USSR saw unprecedented rate of economic growth.
>>

 No.483958

>>483953
How did they win WWII then if they were poor as fuck?
>>

 No.483959

>>483956
>ur a fed if you notice that russia is a peasant backward country incapable of modernizing
then call me a fed bro. idc.
>development
what, from dispirate farms to collectivized farms? doesnt even compare to mao's genocidal "great leap forward", if you want to call it that.
>>483958
by throwing millions of bodies at germans when they ran out of ammo for their rifles
>>483955
le eternal kulak. no wonder commie copers want to glass ukraine to this day lole.
>>

 No.483962

>>483959
>peasant backward country incapable of modernizing
Is that why they sent a man into space first?
>by throwing millions of bodies at germans when they ran out of ammo for their rifles
Are you seriously suggesting that wwii was won without ammo or equipment?
>kulak
Omg this again? See >>483357
>>

 No.483963

File: 1725985439428.jpg ( 35.69 KB , 602x485 , ezgif-5-7b7ea47026.jpg )

>>483956
>>483959
>picrel
Communist China has the most value per person, above the whole world. The Communist mode of production is supreme.
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/field/real-gdp-purchasing-power-parity/country-comparison/
Russia today is the fourth best economy, by value per person. Better than Germany, the UK, Japan, etc. This would be impossible without Communism. Germany, the UK, Japan, every country besides Communist China, etc., are all just "poor as fuck." Capitalism doesn't work. That's why capitalist society is clearly degenerating
>>

 No.483964

File: 1725985580125.jpg ( 13.28 KB , 303x335 , 0a6.jpg )

>>483962
>first man into space
america sent a monkey. same difference.
>wwii
no i am suggesting that the USSR had ammo, but not enough to just fight with guns. expendable flesh was used as cannon fodder.
>>

 No.483965

>>483963
china will never be "communist" but always cosign to asiatic despotism. they worship the totemic emporer and never serve universal freedom.
>capitalism is degemerating
i agree, but for many particular reasons, not just MCU "bad guy fails" capeshit.
>>

 No.483966

>no i am suggesting that the USSR had ammo, but not enough to just fight with guns. expendable flesh was used as cannon fodder.
And you never questioned this narrative? Like maybe it actually takes better equipment to win against an industrialized army?
>>

 No.483967

>>483965
>It's not real communism when they're winning
t. coping American
>>

 No.483968

>>483966
did the russians have plasma rays or something? what real industrial competition could russians have against german engineering?
cannon fodder is used in every war. USA used blacks for example. doesnt seem far fetched you woukd get martyrs for the motherland while the fascists are invading. but it must also be admitted that many wars can come down to sheer numbers in the end.
>>

 No.483969

>>483967
>communism is when the government forces you to build hardware for international corporations, and you cant even kill yourself bc they have nets that prevent you
china is also poisoning the oceans
a better policy is to bring back western industry and let china shrivel
>>

 No.483970

>>483968
Why is russia's economy better than germany's on this very day?
>>

 No.483971

>>483970
what is this "economy" you refer to? smith in 1776 already defined wealth as access to resources, not any supertitious idols like GDP and other macroeconomic illusions
as far as i see, germans are personally richer than russians, so i dont know what you refer to
>>

 No.483974

>>483972
the "economy" is something immediate.
if i have a billion dollars yet bread costs a billion dollars then i experience my own poverty, even in the illusion of my wealth.
likewise, i do not see russians being richer than germans in general, so your abstractions are uninteresting to me
>communism is when you uphold global capitalism
so why is liberal capitalism wrong in the first place? i never understood this about dengists.
>>

 No.483975

>>483969
Saftey nets are standard Communist saftey requirements. A mere cost to the bourgeois, but a vital requirement for safe workers. Communist production utterly depends on productive forces, so Communist China spreads Communism by contributing to the global productive forces.
>>483971
I'm not defining what a national economy, nominal terms, or what GDP adjusted for PPP means for you. Google them
>>

 No.483976

>>483974
Russians have more value per person when adjusted for costs of living within their nation, but less than germany in nominal terms because costs of livimg in germany are higher
>>

 No.483977

>>483976
do basically, rent is cheaper in russia? i expect energy bills to be cheaper too since they have all that oil.
>>

 No.483978

>>483977
Russians are richer because they have more value in real terms per person than germany
>>

 No.483980

>>483978
idk what that means in real terms
if russia was a haven then more people would be moving there
but as far as ive heard, putler is attempting to bribe christians over into the motherland out of desperation. this war must be expensive also.
>>

 No.483982

>>483965
>universal freedom
brain dead liberal talking
>>

 No.483983

>>483982
i'd rather be a liberal than a simp for china
>>

 No.483985

we can be friends
>>

 No.483987

>>483983
Not defending China, just calling a spade a spade.
>>

 No.483989

>>480952
>why can't we be friends?
National Socialists want a state run economy for the exclusive benefit of the "aryan race". Leftists want a state run economy for the exclusive benefit of the "proletariat". If a white CEO and a black farmer were both drowning you would save the former and they would save the latter. That's why you can't be friends.
>>

 No.483997

File: 1725996272473.png ( 1.58 MB , 1280x960 , Ukranazis_328.png )

>>

 No.484052

File: 1726041822504.jpg ( 66.43 KB , 851x623 , 10581f94d5adbaaf6289d16a3a….jpg )

>>480952
Nazis fooled us once with their "socialism" and tens of thousands of leftists died in death camps. Never again.
>>

 No.484193

>>483965
>asiatic despotism
>totemic emporer
Racist drivel.
Langley's not sending their best.
>>

 No.484483

>>484193
china is an ancient civilisation like india; it has no (World-)History but only prehistory. it cannot be entered into the epic of the species, but only belongs to itself.
as marx writes in the preface to das kapital, the american revolution was a calling to the european middle class, and its civil war was a calling to the working class.
USA is the "the new world" which orients the bourgeois epoch in its self-transformation to socialist enlightenment.

Unique IPs: 40

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome