[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1736891119336.jpg ( 86.16 KB , 770x514 , pro palestine rally havana….jpg )

 No.486889

Thread for news, books, info, etc. about Cuba.
>>

 No.486890

File: 1736891200043.jpg ( 100.33 KB , 793x1161 , white house rescinds cuba ….jpg )

First things first, the White House just rescinded the "state sponsor of terrorism" designation for Cuba, admitting that Cuba hasn't actually sponsored any terrorism, and I didn't want to make an entire thread just for this one item.
>>

 No.486895

How's that re-legitimization of private property working out for Cuba lately?
>>

 No.486897

>>486890
That's great. I guess the terror-list is now a slightly less ridicules politicized contrivance.

>>486895
>How's that re-legitimization of private property working out
It's not, since the US tightened the blockade-screw.
>>

 No.486910

>>486897
>It's not, since the US tightened the blockade-screw.
Why can't they trade with China?
>>

 No.486921

>>486910
>Why can't they trade with China?
I'm not sure that they aren't. However Cuba is a tiny Island with a tiny economy, it's probably rarely worth it for the Chinese mega container ships to make the detour. It probably would be cheaper to send stuff from the US by Airplane.

I think Cuba is trading with Russia tho. The Russians are also rumored to have parked a attack submarine in Cuba.

Cuba joining BRICS might enable them to trade more easily, maybe that fixes administrative hurdles.
>>

 No.496027

https://x.com/MintPressNews/status/2049262212653392034
🚨The US Senate Has Voted To Block A Bill Aimed At Stopping A War On Cuba

The vote ended 51-47.
>>

 No.496029

>>486895
Turns out really badly. A new stratum of porkies has emerged and the divide between them and everyone else is very prominent during this recent blockade choking Cuba off from oil. Without a doubt the United States is going to instrumentalize this class to go after whatever is left of the revolution. Revisionist state capitalist worms one again have dug the grave of socialism.
>>

 No.496076

File: 1777664729635-0.jpg ( 188.64 KB , 1000x750 , Cuban May Day 2026.jpg )

File: 1777664729635-1.jpg ( 159.4 KB , 1008x756 , Cuban May Day 2026 2.jpg )

Hundreds of thousands of Cubans march at the Malecón for May Day 2026.
>>

 No.496126

File: 1777935984347.jpg ( 63.54 KB , 447x394 , Russian Nuclear Submarine ….jpg )

A Russian nuclear submarine arrived in Havana today.
>>

 No.496383

File: 1778742628584.png ( 812.46 KB , 960x540 , ClipboardImage.png )

U.S. bullies Canada’s Sherritt corporation out of Cuba

TORONTO—A sweeping new executive order signed by President Donald Trump has forced one of Canada’s most significant foreign investors out of Cuba, drawing sharp condemnation from solidarity groups who say Washington is using financial coercion to override the sovereign economic decisions of other nations.

Toronto-based Sherritt International Corporation, the largest foreign investor in Cuba for over three decades, announced on May 7 that it was suspending all direct participation in its joint venture activities on the island and immediately bringing back its Canadian employees currently stationed in Cuba—a direct fallout from Executive Order 14404, which Trump signed on May 1.

After attacking Venezuela and kidnapping its president, Nicolás Maduro, in January, Trump said “Cuba is next.” Step by step, he seems to be making good on the threat.

His May 1 order, framed as a measure to hold the Cuban government “responsible for repression” and supposed threats to U.S. national security, does far more than target Cuban officials. Legal experts say its secondary sanctions provisions—which threaten foreign financial institutions with loss of access to U.S. correspondent banking accounts if they process transactions involving designated Cuban entities—are effectively an attempt to extend Washington’s domestic law across the globe.

The law firm Mayer Brown described the order as “intended to internationalize pressure on the Cuban government by deterring foreign commercial engagement with certain targeted sectors or actors linked to the Cuban government.” Under the order, any non-U.S. person operating in Cuba’s energy, metals and mining, financial services, defense, or security sectors can face asset-blocking sanctions.

On May 7, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the first designations under the new authority, targeting GAESA—the Cuban military conglomerate said to control at least 40% of the island’s economy—as well as Moa Nickel SA (MNSA), the joint venture in which Sherritt holds a 50% stake alongside Cuba’s publicly-owned General Nickel Company.

Three decades of partnership with Cuba

Sherritt is widely considered to be Cuba’s largest foreign investor, with a history in the country spanning more than 35 years. The company began purchasing Cuban nickel concentrate for its Fort Saskatchewan, Alberta, refinery in 1991, and in December 1994 formalized a 50/50 joint venture with Cuba’s General Nickel Company to integrate mining at Moa, in Holguín province, with refining in Alberta.

It was also hit by the U.S.’ blockade on Cuba in that era, long before Trump. The company was the first to be targeted by the 1996 Helms-Burton Act, the law which sought to strangle Cuba while its economy was in freefall in the post-Soviet period. Sherritt executives were banned from entering the United States because the industrial sites on which it operated in Cuba had been expropriated from private ownership by the socialist government decades earlier.

Canadian law, however, does not forbid trade with Cuba, and the company was undeterred by U.S. actions. In 1998, Sherritt further expanded into Cuba’s energy sector, establishing Energas S.A., which operates 506 megawatts of independent power capacity—making it the island’s largest independent power producer.

During the commodity boom of the late 2000s, Sherritt’s market value approached $5 billion CAD. In 2025, the Moa joint venture produced 25,240 tons of nickel and 2,728 tons of cobalt, while Energas generated 799 GWh of electricity.

Sherritt had already been battered before the latest executive order arrived, though. It is reported that Cuba owes the company at least $344 million USD, and nickel production has declined from 34,876 tons in 2021 to 25,240 in 2025. In February 2026, Sherritt suspended nickel and cobalt production at Moa due to fuel shortages stemming from the U.S.’ energy blockade of the island.

Still, the May 7 executive order designations appear to be a fatal blow for not only the company’s business with Cuba but perhaps its very existence. Three board members—Chairman Brian Imrie, Richard Moat, and Brett Richards—resigned with immediate effect the same day Sherritt announced the suspension of Cuban operations.

The company has since filed an application with the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to allow its reduced board to continue functioning. Its Fort Saskatchewan refinery continues to operate on existing feed material inventory, but that supply is expected to run out by mid-June 2026, by which point Sherritt must make permanent decisions about its future.

Direct assault on Canada’s sovereignty

The Canadian Network on Cuba (CNC), a solidarity organization, issued a forceful statement calling Trump’s executive order “yet another illegal attempt to extend U.S. domestic law beyond its borders and impose Washington’s unilateral sanctions regime on the entire world.”

“This represents not merely an attack on Cuba, but a direct assault on Canada’s sovereignty, on international trade law, and on the principle that no state has the right to dictate the economic relations of other nations,” the CNC’s Executive Committee wrote.

The statement calls on Prime Minister Mark Carney’s government to invoke and enforce Canada’s Foreign Extraterritorial Measures Act (FEMA), legislation originally amended in the 1990s in direct response to the U.S. Helms-Burton Act, which was itself designed to penalize foreign companies doing business with Cuba. The CNC warns that failure to act now would render FEMA “little more than a hollow gesture.”

“If Canada accepts Washington’s ability to punish Canadian enterprises for engaging in lawful commerce with a third country, then Canada ceases to exercise meaningful economic sovereignty,” the network wrote. “Today it is Cuba. Tomorrow it could be any country or sector that falls afoul of U.S. geopolitical objectives.”

Fred Wilson, writing for the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said on the eve of Trump’s order: “For most of the 67 years since the Cuban revolution, successive Canadian governments played the ‘Cuba card’ to assert independence from U.S. hegemony—that is, they have refused to align themselves with the United States’ hostile approach to Cuba, and used that lack of alignment to differentiate themselves from the U.S. on the world stage.”

The situation has changed, however. “Today,” Wilson argued, “Canada’s failure to play the Cuba card stands out as a confounding failure of Canadian policy and resolve.” Carney has been mostly silent on the latest U.S. aggressions against Cuba, ignoring pressure from below.

The Canadian Labour Congress—the largest federation of Canadian unions—has condemned Trump’s attacks on Cuba and urged Ottawa to break ranks. It called on the Carney government to “stand with Cuba and defend the Cuban people’s rights to sovereignty and self-determination.” The CLC demanded that the Government of Canada “vigorously denounce U.S. aggression and defend the principles of international law,” while rushing aid to the people of Cuba.

Going beyond humanitarian concerns, the CNC also highlights a particular irony in targeting Sherritt: The company operates nickel and cobalt refining capacity in Alberta that is crucial to the North American battery supply chain and energy transition. “While Washington speaks endlessly about securing critical mineral independence,” the statement reads, “its policies are actively undermining one of North America’s key refining operations because of its relationship with Cuba.”

Broader fallout

The Trump administration has enacted over 240 new sanctions against Cuba since January 2026, which have been piled on top of the already 64-year-old blockade. These latest measures have slashed the island’s energy imports by 80 to 90%. Cuba’s economy is projected to contract by 7.2% in 2026, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit. The United Nations Human Rights Office has warned that the blockade and ensuing fuel shortage have threatened Cuba’s food supply and disrupted water systems and hospitals.

The extraterritorial reach of E.O. 14404 has alarmed governments and businesses far beyond Canada. Legal analysts at Bird & Bird note that European financial institutions processing transactions traceable to designated Cuban entities risk losing their access to U.S. dollar correspondent accounts, effectively cutting them off from global dollar-clearing systems.

The Morrison Foerster law firm warns that all non-U.S. companies across sectors from energy to financial services will have to review their “Cuba-related exposure” or risk being targeted by the Trump administration.

Sherritt’s departure strips Cuba of its largest foreign mining partner and could reduce the island’s independent power generation capacity by an estimated 10 to 15%. Paolo Spadoni, a Cuba scholar at Augusta University, told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, “With ⁠Sherritt suspending operations, the U.S. has now effectively targeted all of Cuba’s main sources of hard currency.”

The CNC’s statement demands that Ottawa publicly denounce the executive order, invoke FEMA, provide legal and financial protections to affected Canadian firms, and coordinate with Mexico, the European Union, and CARICOM nations in resisting Trump’s extraterritorial reach.

“Silence and inaction are not neutrality,” the network concluded. “They amount to acquiescence.”

https://peoplesworld.org/article/u-s-bullies-canadas-sherritt-corporation-out-of-cuba/
>>

 No.496496

Apparently the CIA director just visited Cuba to deliver them an ultimatum. Is the big pig invasion finally going to happen this time? Can Cuba actually defend itself this time?
>>

 No.496498

>>496496
Maybe.
I'd say the US is going to have its hands full going back into a heavier stage of warfare with Iran, but maybe they'll try to do Cuba first. They might succeed, they might not.
>>

 No.496533

>>496531
Why did you delete your previous post?
>>

 No.496535

>>496533
He didn't. I gulag'd it because that anon keeps trying to turn every single thread, regardless of topic, into an argument about age of consent and ageism against young people.
>>

 No.496554

>>496535
What’s wrong with that? At least his post was relevant to Cuba.
>>

 No.496560

>>486890
I am surprised they would do this since they are designating antifa a terror group
>>

 No.496561

>>496560
They did this in the last few days of Biden, and then Trump brought it back iirc.
>>

 No.496579

File: 1779310870500-0.jpg ( 255.5 KB , 960x1280 , IMG_20260520_165853_829.jpg )

File: 1779310870500-1.jpg ( 281.48 KB , 960x1280 , IMG_20260520_165854_110.jpg )

File: 1779310870500-2.jpg ( 306.06 KB , 960x1280 , IMG_20260520_165854_060.jpg )

File: 1779310870500-3.jpg ( 322.46 KB , 960x1280 , IMG_20260520_165854_074.jpg )

🚨PSL Statement: The announced indictment of Raúl Castro Ruz, historic leader of the Cuban Revolution and former President of the Republic of Cuba, by the United States Department of Justice is a brazen act of injustice and a transparent pretext for escalating aggression against a sovereign nation.

This indictment is not an act of justice; it is another provocation designed to manufacture consent for another war by the Trump administration.

Read the full article on Liberation News ➡️ https://liberationnews.org/psl-statement-baseless-indictment-of-raul-castro-a-pretext-for-another-war/
>>

 No.496580

File: 1779312408074-0.jpg ( 285.1 KB , 960x1280 , IMG_20260520_165853_808.jpg )

File: 1779312408074-1.jpg ( 299.55 KB , 960x1280 , IMG_20260520_165853_803.jpg )

>>

 No.496598

BreakThrough News | Why is the US going after Raul Castro NOW?
>>

 No.496602

Strategic Military Movement:

The USS Nimitz Carrier Strike Group arrived in the Caribbean Sea sometime two days ago and has taken up station off the coast of Cuba. If that past is any indication for what is going to happen, the US parked a carrier strike group off the coast of Venezuela for months before finally striking, and if diplomacy breaks down Cubans may be looking at getting their butts fucked all the same.
>>

 No.496609

>>496602
>if diplomacy breaks down
>implying there's diplomacy
>>

 No.496805

🔴 Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine:

The Popular Front condemns the American sanctions imposed on Cuba and affirms that it is paying the price for its revolutionariness in the face of the imperialist offensive.

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine condemns in the strongest terms the new package of American sanctions that targeted Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel, and a number of family members of the historical leader Raúl Castro, in addition to Cuban sovereign and military entities.

We consider this aggressive step a new link in the series of the ongoing imperialist offensive led by the American administration against countries that refuse to submit to its dictates and cling to their independent national decision-making.

These sanctions, which come in the context of the American administration's attempts to replace international law with the law of the jungle, reflect a state of moral and political degradation; Washington installs itself as judge and executioner at the same time, and allows war criminals and violators of the rights of peoples to prosecute a sovereign state, simply because it defends its country and has chosen the path of political and principled resistance to colonial policies.

The language of threat and intimidation used by the American President against Cuba, and his arrogant statements about "managing files" and changing regimes, are direct additional evidence of the colonial mentality that rules Washington, which imagines that it can tame countries and subjugate the will of peoples through tools of siege, starvation, and political blackmail.

We express our complete and unconditional standing with Cuba, leadership and people, in the face of this rabid offensive, confirming that it is paying today the tax of its revolutionariness, and its moral and principled commitment to defending human dignity, protecting the sovereignty of nations, and its solid stance against colonial and zionist projects in the region and the world.

We call on all living forces, liberation movements, and free people in the world to raise their voices loudly in the face of this American piracy, and to intensify solidarity campaigns with Cuba, as it is a symbol of hope and resistance in the face of global imperialism.

06/06/2026
>>

 No.497056

So what's up with these economic reforms I heard about? Is Cuba going the way of the USSR where liberalization led to dissolution, or like China where allowing a managed form of capitalism lead to prosperity (at some cost of self-exploitation)?
>>

 No.497058

>>497056
My impression is the former.
From what I understand, Cuba is adopting these reforms purely as appeasement directed towards the US.
>>

 No.497060

>>497058
America is truly the devil. I hope they follow China's model and keep a tight control over private capital (have members of their party on the board of directors, have the government own a stake in major companies, force them to adhere to the five year plan etc) but I'm afraid what will happen is if the US still doesn't like it they can blockade them.

The US won't be happy until they have homelessness and a drug epidemic.
>>

 No.497083

File: 1782259825609-0.png ( 306.29 KB , 514x385 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1782259825609-1.png ( 979.39 KB , 1188x1539 , ClipboardImage.png )

US Supreme Court Clears Exxon to Sue Cuba Over Property It Nationalized 65 Years Ago

The US Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Exxon Mobil can sue Cuban state-owned companies in American courts for more than $1 billion over an oil refinery, terminals, and hundreds of service stations that Cuba nationalized after its 1959 revolution, handing Washington a fresh weapon against the island it has blockaded for decades.

The 6-3 decision, written by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, held that the 1996 Helms-Burton Act strips Cuban state enterprises of the sovereign immunity that normally shields foreign governments from US lawsuits. The court’s three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Elena Kagan writing that the law contains no such provision.

Helms-Burton is the 1996 law that codified the decades-old US embargo of Cuba into statute, stripping any president of the power to lift it alone. Its Title III provision lets US nationals sue over property the Cuban government reclaimed from foreign corporations after the revolution, and sue all companies that later do business using those assets. The provision was considered so aggressive, and so likely to anger allies whose firms invest in Cuba and to poison any future US-Cuba settlement, that every president continued to suspend it in six-month incremental waivers for over two decades, until Trump let the suspension lapse in 2019. Exxon sued the same day.

The ruling lands as Trump tightens the screws on Havana, which is already reeling under a renewed US oil blockade that has caused brutal shortages and hardship across the island. Together with a similar decision last month (Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises), it opens the door to thousands of pending claims, nearly 6,000 certified ones worth almost $2 billion before interest, seeking to extract wealth from a nation the US has worked to isolate since Cubans first took control of their own resources in 1960.

(Based on information from the Supreme Court ruling and reporting by the AP, CNN, and Bloomberg Law.)

📸 Photo: March 12, 1996, President Clinton signs the bill into law.

-
Drop Site News
https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/2069521576781828290

Unique IPs: 18

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome