No.494482
Serious question. Capitalists hate it, the bourgeois hate it, idpol cucks hate it, the reactionaries hate it. Just because they want to carve their own niche within this pedophobic zeitgeist doesn’t make them consistent.
It should also be noted that all the current nominally communist countries have magic age lines below the Hollywood one of 18, as well as Stalin, Mao, Evo Morales, etc… got laid with JB (with Evo still being persecuted for having sex with someone below the bourgeois magic age line), as well as that the USSR didn’t have a formal age of consent even under Stalin.
I should also point out that being against bourgeois norms isn’t some trendy Tumblr fad, as the Spartacist League opposes the magic age line (a.k.a., the age of consent, which was literally invented by feudal nobility because they found extramarital sex among peasants too icky) and the communist party of Britain (CPB) used to oppose it as well.
On the top of that, since there’s no evidence that intergenerational intimacy is inherently harmful, therefore this isn’t a materialist question of harm as much as a bourgeois dialectics of moralisms after moralisms that only serve to attack working class men.
So again…
Why is youth-love bad?
>>
No.494483
thx for reminding me why gulags existed…
Only because you were FREE to do smth in a "left" state, doesnt mean you SHOULD. Simple as that.
You are confusing Age of Consent with the age you are liable in bourgeois juristiction.
The age of consent is (typically 14) set because of the growth of the human brain and the dev. of sexual relations AMONGS peers.
It is NOT normal for a adult to fuck kids/teen. But why am I bothering, you will just read what you want.
Sex between Adults and kids is in 99.9% due to a power gap and hierarchy. And if you were a left, you would see that. But you are just in the search of a explanation for your disorder. Get help or smth