No.498336
If you subtract the retarded addition of 'benefits' to the guy on the left (in the original he's a "foreigner" and wouldn't necessarily be eligible for benefits in the US anyway), which is clearly overcompensation on the part of the person who edited it (also, as the least relevant nitpick, the original was clearly set, if loosely, in the UK or Australia, so adding an EBT card and Section 8 voucher is incoherent in addition to the fact that this stuff wouldn't be applicable to many migrant workers), then they're the same image. The individual who edited it, an idpol-brained retard, had to add in extra, irrelevant, allusions to American right-wing talking points because otherwise it would be obvious that they hadn't actually changed much of anything about the message. The original is arguing on class, but the person who edited it clearly did not even understand the message of the original and seems to have thought that it was about race rather than the futility and fraud of racism and xenophobic idpol; and, unsurprisingly, the editor also doesn't understand how meager and drained the American welfare system has been since the '90s for anyone who isn't already rich, and also, equally unsurprisingly, doesn't understand how the meager remaining assistance programs work at all (the single largest racial group that receives government assistance is still poor and unemployed white people, the only connection to race at all is that black people in the US are disproportionately poor and unemployed, which makes sense when you consider that they were targeted with systematic economic discrimination for centuries right up into living memory, even long after the end of the civil war when they were emancipated with zero property or wealth of their own - IE it's about poverty and unemployment, not skin color).