No.498463
>How can I go about doing that?
In real life? It's basically impossible.
The Ba'ath Party in Syria was tied to Assad, and there's no appetite for a return of Assad - which may seem stupid (it is), but bringing Assad back wouldn't immediately fix all the things which were ruined when Damascus fell. Syria's arsenal, air defenses, and much of its state infrastructure are gone now, and rebuilding those things would take a lot of time and resources. Syria has lost more land, and, even under Bashar al-Assad's government, Syria wasn't on the verge of retaking land held by "israel" and the United States.
Russia and Iran would have to fully approve of a return to power of the Ba'ath Party (because such an undertaking, especially now that Syria is a failed state, would require the support of powerful states), and in order for them to bother offering major material support, there would have to be a renewed popular mandate among the public in Syria. Even if that were the case, they're not going to go all-in because both of them are fighting wars on their own soil - the war with Ukraine is probably the primary reason why Syria fell when it did, Russia had its hands full and didn't want to bog itself down in a second war far away from its own territory.
Because Ba'ath in Syria has a negative reputation, and because western-aligned propaganda has also been extremely successful there over the decades, any outside state support for a return to Ba'ath rule would be seen as incredibly risky by potential benefactors. My genuine recommendation would be to try to find some other movement which rejects the new zio-takfiri status quo and support that instead.
Otherwise, if you wanted to try a coup to restore the Ba'ath Party… well, a number of things would need to align. You would want to begin with a propaganda movement to argue that things were better under the Ba'ath Party, and the secular Arab nationalism was a better system for a state with multiple diverse religious and cultural groups like Syria. You would want to push this argument hard, although this would likely meet state repression within Syria itself. As conditions worsen in Syria, you would continue to repeat your argument; that Syria needs national unity, that religious/ethnic factionalism is the cause of its collapse and woes, that those who are being displaced and murdered by "israel" are being failed by Jolani's collaborator government. You would want to make sure that, over the years, people associated the decline and partition of Syria with the crimes of the US, zionism, and their successful libeling and destruction of the Ba'ath government. You would want a broad movement which hammered home the point, in the minds of young people, that things were better under the Ba'ath Party; you would need pamphlets, ads, and cultural propaganda, and you would want to emphasize that the previous Ba'ath government was extremely lied about by the US-tied Arab mainstream media. You would also want to emphasize the role of the US in stoking unrest in Syria leading to Syria's collapse.
Of course, you would need to get arms to people who supported a Ba'ath return, but you would want to build sympathy as well, which would take a lot of time. There is no armed undertaking, right now, which would successfully coup the Jolani gov't without outside state support or a great deal (years and years) of preparation.
Also Ba'ath is more like a distinct political concept more closely comparable to social democracy in terms of its economic character. It's still better than having Syria be a failed ISIS-run zionist outpost, though.
polite sage