>>23034This was at the heart of the euthanasia push. It was in the discourse during the 1990s, then as a "hypothetical" - but they were making us public humiliation targets and attacking the family for "genetic sin". Behind the curtain, where "real society" happened, they bragged they would kill us, and there was nothing we would do to stop it. Cue "euthanasia" and the push-back when it was rammed through, against law and reason and all sentiment. Everything about so-called "euthanasia" is illegal on multiple grounds, violates any possibility that there can be law, and is a declaration of open season on anyone not granted explicit license to live. It is an extension of "papers please" in every institution - so you could see this happen from the moment it became obligatory for human beings to be tracked from cradle to grave. In principle, states always did this as is their right - there's nothing preventing the state from knowing what happens within its domain, and record-keeping regarding the people is basic to any concept of the state. But, the new innovation was occulting the state and denying any basis for law as such - and eugenism and euthanasia are deliberate assaults on any law that is anything other than a procedure for glorifying eugenics. That was what was always at stake, rather than the moral sentiment regarding the death of any one person or genocide. It would be horrifying if very few people were actually killed, and one way they "mollified" people is to assure that this would be a rare, edge case "for those that needed it". Then you get MAiD gone haywire.
What gets me about the autism thing isn't that they're being killed and a good person is put to death because of the label. Most of us have long been ready to die, knowing that this world will never be different and humans will always hate us. The point is that they wish to control how we live and how we die. We don't get "clean death", and this is exemplified throughout the "euthanasia" discourse. They do not believe in "clean death", yet that is sometimes sold to the damned as a way to impose unlimited torture and the thrill of torture for the valid. Such are the values of eugenism.
Like I say, this is the worst thing humanity has ever done. Much worse than the Nazis.
>>23035To answer your question,
>>23037is pretty much on the money. I don't see pederasty as a uniquely eugenist thing, as if this were a new idea. Aristocratic pederasty goes back a long way, and rarely does it link directly to the eugenic creed. Eugenics is a thorough and total aristocratic religion, and so pederasty is weaponized and glorified for their class, and anything that will promote rot and death is rewarded by its logic.
Pedophilia and pederasty are different things. Philia implies a sentiment, pederasty is a practice. The pederast is not a "pedophile" - they do what they do because they believe they are ordained by God to "teach these savages a lesson" and conduct a ritual sacrifice. The pederasty that is most dangerous, that is never going to be punished and has been tacitly accepted, has nothing to do with "philia" or love. The men doing it are "good men" and not men with pathologies of any sort. They're given the signal that they have sanction to do it. You see this stuff in military elite cults a lot.
The pedophilia/ephebophilia "discourse" is aware of this and intentionally re-directs. It exists to make this large-scale ritual abuse inadmissible and unstoppable. So, they show escaped young boys and girls on those posters, to brag "this is what we can do to you, and there are millions of us party to this, you can't escape". I have very good authority on this matter, but I won't say exactly how, except that I didn't go through it personally and want to keep myself away from all forms of child rape… really I don't like childhood at all and hated being a child.
Another aim of the pedophilia discourse is infantilization and internalization - to teach failed men that they are intellectually children, and then intellectually "pure retarded", autism score 0. So, it relates to autism and the wank about it. They would accuse me of such things, but some lines are too far for society, even in this degraded state.
One thing I have found is that, outside of the socially approved discourse, there are a lot more men and women who understand what this really is, and there is more sympathy or understanding with pedophiles than you'd think. There are pedophiles with the pathology who will speak of why they turned out this way and publicize that, so this isn't exactly a secret.
There is another angle with the insinuation game, PUA types (who are introduced as "change agents" with intel and Tavistock ties), who want rot by any vector they can push it. I am very familiar with the incel mentality, having done my time before getting over it and seeing "hey, these assholes are just grooming for Nazi faggotry". When it started though, "incel" did not have the meaning it acquired, and it was a lot of men and women who were forced alone. The main incel board was libtarded and so much of the incel mentality exists as a direct response to that forum and its culture. Somehow, the lib forum was worse than what exists now, but the discourse has been completely Nazified. What I've seen since then is that mainstream society has largely stopped pretending that anything about the dominant sexual mores worked, and the people who pushed that are guilty as sin for enabling the rise of eugenism and the thrill of torture. Natural slaves will never be different.