/leftypol_archive/ - Leftypol archive

Jihad will win

>>23042
I'll try to answer each briefly.

>what do you think of the black national question?
Attempt to shoehorn a Germanic understanding where it doesn't belong. Go to black Americans and most consider the black nationalists to be silly hoteps who will make their situation worse. The prevalent strain of black nationalism isn't the Panthers or what these ideologues think. It's the Nation of Islam and Farrakhan, which lifts a lot of Freemason stuff but it's for black people and says that they are the real Israelites.
There isn't a burning desire for "black identity", let alone a "black nation-state" which would be enclosed and segregated. The communists promoting that were doing a lot of damage and promoting their own brand of racism. About the only desire for that from the black people was that they were pushed against so much that they believed they had no choice but to resist. The overriding aim was to simply be able to live, after being left with nothing after emancipation. If that simple thing were granted, there wouldn't be a "Negro Question". That was always an insinuation of eugenics. If you look at America of the past, ideological racism was not what the narrative theory of history insisted it "should" be. You'd probably find that this would have gone away within a couple of generations if the economic basis of the country were at all sane. When that started to happen, it was necessary to "teach the controversy" and restore segregation on explicitly eugenicist grounds. By now, black Americans have no solidarity with each other, and you can go ask them yourself or judge what you would do in their situation, instead of defaulting to pigheaded assumptions.

>What about the national question in general in regards to USA/Canada?
This ties into the above. America/ the US isn't a nation-state in the Germanic sense (which itself was an intentional parody of nationalism as a democratizing force in the late 18th century). It started as 13 colonies in British America, and they understood themselves as British during the Revolutionary War. None of that was about a "national identity". It happened because "well, we've already been at war for a year", and there were expectations that the Empire would not be centered around a racial idea in England. There were people in tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

If someone says "Eugene, you're an American hypocrite" - I don't profit from any further enclosure of Indian land, and what was done was done. America has a lot of questions to ask itself if it is to be a "thing" in the future. But, those questions won't be asked. Eugenics won. This is the world eugenics creates. So, I think only about that, and I will work with anyone who will kill eugenist filth.

Amazing read Eugene, after you finish your work here, I would like you to reconsider seeking a Phd or Masters at Cambridge.

Also publish on demand is a thing, I would very much like to read your work in hard copy.

If you need help typesetting, which tbh fam I reckon you could do yourself; We can help.

>>23046
I know how to format it to look "professional" or something close to it. Just a matter of obtaining materials to make the hard copy.
I have most of Book 3 finished but want to edit it for clarity, to make it clearer what I'm referring to. It looks like "rant at highest volume", which it will be since Books 4 and 5 tone down the "doom is nigh". It comes off as doomer because I'm writing about concepts which are basically trans-historical - that is, what it means to speak of the concept of the political and economic, which are rather grody if they are distilled to their essential characteristics, how we speak of them. I really need to make the point that you won't find answers to the political within the political itself, especially formulations of it written by aristocracy - written traditionally by religion and for the purposes religion serves. Religion itself gives some of the answers of where to look, since no religion is a "total system" in that sense, and I'm opposed to "total systems" as an explanation of anything useful for us. The only total system that is relevant for me is the world itself, and even there, the world is not a "system" in that sense.

I have a supplemental I was writing but it needs to be edited, since I want to avoid "rant mode" and clarify what I wrote in the first book about the concept of systems, and how this concept could be worked with in the future. My main goal there is to demonstrate how a systems thought could be reconstructed from simple components, rather than reliant on pedagogy to assert a fixed system in minds that aren't able to defend themselves against it. My more long-term hope would be to write something accessible to a young reader, so they can do something to guard against the poison of education and we might have far less of this toxicity. I believe this will happen without me doing anything out of necessity, but the fear is very strong now and there is something very real to fear. If there is nothing but "the system" that we're getting - if what they did to us in the 1990s is allowed to continue but worse when the brats around me are the elders - it will be terrible to live through that. That whole thing was set up so that the favored would have their private and special education and everyone else will get nothing but "retard! retard!" shouted at them from cradle to grave. Since it's Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>145829
Crimea was not a part of "Russian territory", it was a part of RSFSR

It was Khrushchev who transferred Crimea under UkrSSR administration as a part of his wider administrative reforms

Khrushchev and Brezhnev were from Ukraine, as well as many many other party functionaries

retarded nazoids being retarded think this is all about Crimea or Donbass, or even Ukraine - if not just for that pesky Khrushchev/Gorbachev/Zelensky/Satan all would've been just dandy in nazoid wonderland kek

suckers for lief

>>145830
The cringe thread really do be having the worst kinds of cringe

bump

>>22661
Technology advances start off as bonus gadgets in high end products and then market forces make them cheaper and more refined until they filter down into everything else. Things like anti lock brakes and lane tracking and voice commands were first introduced in the S Class decades ago to lure millionaires away from Bentley. And now market competition has brought us to the point where they are cheap and reliable enough to be standard in every pleb car.

Whats different about camper vans is there isn't much of a market for super high end models where innovation can happen because anyone who could afford it will just buy a fucking house. Or a yacht.

The other thing to think about is living in a van is cold. So a folding van will probably be even colder.

>>22662
You'd think capitalism would have developed and perfected plop out buildings to completely commodify houses, on their own.

Am i right in the assumption that you are saying that for campers to have technological evolution they need to get better insulation and somebody needs to find a different clientele than wealthy private individuals that can pay for early research and development cost. That leaves the Military upgrading their field tents with fold out buildings or governments who want emergency facilities that they can more or less instantly erect wherever. Who else ?

>>22663
>You'd think capitalism would have developed and perfected plop out buildings to completely commodify houses, on their own.
The problem with housing is that mortgages are provided by banks and banks are artificially propped up by government no matter how badly they act. Banks are not allowed to fail and go out of business because angry citizens who lost all their money will start a revolution. So housing is not really subject to the rules of the free market.

>for campers to have technological evolution
My point is that innovations are typically established in luxury products with high margins and then the market figures out how to make it cheaper over time. Campers don't seem to have a very big luxury market so that could be why innovation is slow. Somehow the new thing needs to be made cheap right away otherwise there is no one to sell to. That's my theory.

>Military
>emergency facilities
The problem with government projects is they are spending other people's money so nobody involved generally cares about the quality of the end result. I guess you're thinking along the right lines though, identify similar products and see what can technology can be moved over.

>better insulation
I don't know what you can do about that because space is so limited. The stuff they insulate brick houses with wouldn't even fit into something drivable. I knew a contractor who lived in a van and he couldn't do it in winter. He just worked 6 months and then lived in a cheap warm country for the other 6 months.

>>22664
>The problem with housing is that mortgages are provided by banks and banks are artificially propped up by government
I get it, it's almost like a feudal arrangement the way power is entrenched, but that would not actually stop people from buying and living in the plop out houses assuming that mass-production with a lot of automation in factories can make it cheap and of good quality.
>My point is that innovations are typically established in luxury products with high margins
Yeah but you said that rich people don't give a shit about this. So forget about the luxury segment.
>The problem with government projects is they are spending other people's money so nobody involved generally cares about the quality of the end result.
That's not a problem that can't be overcome, just create a unconditional return policy for quality control issues. That way even for a bureaucracy that doesn't give a shit, the bar is low enough that eventually it will annoy somebody enough to send it back if it's crap.
Maybe public institution want to have this type of building because it's easier to undo planning errors of previous administrations, if they can just be packed up. And maybe for architecture vanity, so every leader can have their favorite style of building.
>I guess you're thinking along the right lines though, identify similar products and see what can technology can be moved over.
So any suggestions for cross-overs ?
>I don't know what you can do about that because space is so limited.
this stuff http://www.buyaerogel.com/product/spaceloft-5-mm-cut-to-size/ would work but it's kinda expensive, and i'm not sure how healthy it is.

>>22647
This.
Just because it looks nice diesnt make it bourgeois lifestyleism. dammit.

>>22262
>this is basically the one instance in which you can be totally sure what you are getting
Yeah, no trust and i don't want him anywhere near here. not no guessing

>>22259
>I would remove anyone's face pic if they asked me to.

Exactly you retard. That is the problem.

>>22264
No you.

>>434322
new thread for new autism

>>22259
>>22257 is >>434283

>>20294
Cuba has been resisting on the U.S. backyard for 60 years and has not yet fallen. They know how to handle imperialism, have faith.

>>20895
Most people already know this. The people still defending the actions of the USA are retarded inbred gusanos. They don't care.

>>20898
>By the time the government gears are grinding towards intervention, the public is several steps behind on what to be outraged about and disoriented.
So basically China is becoming more coherent and organized while the US is becoming more disorganized and disoriented. If they want to have this great battle for power, why do they shoot them self in the foot ?
Also if you can realize all of this just by casually pondering about what is going on in the media , don't you think that this strategy isn't all that clever ?

>>20902
our human rights organizations are on the case. they are concerned with human rights.

>>20903
>THEY DEPLOY VIOLENCE AND ARREST 20 PEOPLE!!!
In the USA atleast 10 of them would've been killed
>the protests we are seeing in Cuba are massive
Kek, this is a massive cope. They're completely artificial and weak. Counter protests are even larger
>covid and economic conditions
Cuba handled covid extremely well. If that was the case the US government would'be been overthrown by its own people.
Also
<we will definetly improve our economy by sanctioning and couping our country instead of giving up on sanctions
Fucking "human rights watch" faggots are drooling retards and have no clue whatsoever.

Quantum physics accounts for the collapse of the wave function (and thus for the emergence of “ordinary” reality) in terms of the act of perception/registration (a single reality emerges through the act of measurement), but it then explains (or, rather, describes) this measurement in terms of the ordinary reality that only emerges through it (the measuring machine is hit by electrons, etc.), and this obviously involves a vicious circle.

What this means is that the big problem is not how we can pass from the classic universe to the universe of quantum waves, but exactly the opposite one—why and how the quantum universe itself immanently requires the collapse of the wave function, its “de-coherence” into the classic universe, i.e., why and how the collapse is inherent to the quantum universe. Instead of just standing in awe before the wonder of the quantum universe, we should turn around our perspective and perceive as the true wonder the rise of our “ordinary” spatio-temporal reality. It is not only that there is no classic reality which is not sustained by blurred quantum fluctuations; one should add that there is no quantum universe which is not always-already hooked onto a piece of classic reality. The problem of the collapse of the wave function through the act of measurement is that it has to be formulated in classic, not quantum, terms—this is why “the collapse of the wave function occupies an anomalous position within quantum mechanics. It is required by the fact that observations occur, but it is not predicted by quantum theory. It is an additional postulate, which must be made in order that quantum mechanics be consistent.” One should note this precise formulation: a measurement formulated in terms of classic reality is necessary for quantum mechanics itself to be consistent, it is an addition of the classic reality which “sutures” the quantum field. What, then, is the status of “quantum reality,” i.e., of the so-called wave function Fi which renders the panoply of superimposed states?

>Are we to regard Fi as actually representing physical reality? Or is it to be viewed as being merely a calculational tool for working out probabilities of the results of experiments that might be performed, the results of these being “real,” but not the wave function itself? … It was part of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics to take this latter viewpoint, and, according to various other schools of thought alsPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Final bump to kill the thread

>>19074
W-why do you want to kill all this good stuff?

>>19074
I just checked and this thread is 6 months old. A lot of good porn is going to be lost :'(

>>19076
I'll make a new one. Next time i wont post without 5 files per post to maximize post efficiency.

We need a new one until 100.000 lead has been secured at closing

>>18469
Another one for the weeklong recount

Is somebody gonna make a new thread or nah?

>>18471
Ok, give me a sec

I am not sharp enough edition
>>305248
>>305248
>>305248
New one