Bunkerchan containment thread. Keep all tranny posts and things to be noticed in here.

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name	♦2:ifNkUAs6
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:51:08 No.2522

>>2521
It's cope

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:52:20 No.2523

>>2518
Yet, you keep posting here.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 18:54:26 No.2524

>>2518
it takes two to make a split. arguing over who was at fault is of limited value.

>>2519
do they even have that many new mods?

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:06:29 No.2525

>>2524
they apparrently have 8 mods,but it's probably impossible to know even by the other mods,like they can't check post histories,or can't anchor threads.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:41:17 No.2526

>>2517
i like your style

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:42:35 No.2527

>>2497
>reunite with scabs who were proven wrong

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:49:58 No.2528

>>2527
>scabs
Autism. Some of you really think posting online is an extension of the class war huh.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:53:16 No.2529

>>2528
>There are two people in this world those who own and those who do not own.

Facts is facts.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 19:54:21 No.2530

>>2529
larping is larping

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:00:15 No.2531

>>2528
>>2530
Scabs aren't leftists. Everything is part of the class war. What happened on bunkerchan was an coup against a democratic centralist mod team to put in it's place an incompetent mod. The reason this could happen, and what happened afterwards is directly related to our mode of production and our class relations.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:02:23 No.2532

ngl it's very frustrating watching nobody give an answer to "why couldn't space just keep the domain name but redirect it to a server owned by the jannies, rather than asking them to dox themselves to protect himself from illegal activity"
i mean it's a good question.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:03:45 No.2533

I'm having fun being a chaos agent.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:05:17 No.2534

>>2532
>why couldn't space just keep the domain name but redirect it to a server owned by the jannies, rather than asking them to dox themselves to protect himself from illegal activity
I wonder why….

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:05:53 No.2535

>>2533
lol. What are you up to?

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:18:32 No.2536

>>2535
Playing both sides, confusing the hell out of everyone, killing brain cells, the works.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:26:03 No.2537

>>2531
>democratic centralist mod team
That group got nothing to do with what democratic centralism is. The mods weren't elected, meaning it can't be a democratic centralist system. Calling it that shows you either have no idea what democratic centralism is or that you are dishonest. And I'm not proposing that mods should be elected. This doesn't work here because user accounts are not tightly coupled with real-world persons, so the whole democratic centralist idea is not applicable.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:56:14 No.2539

>>2537
You have no idea what democratic centralism is either.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:57:19 No.2540

File: 1610398639706.png ( 5.22 KB , 450x300 , Ancap_flag.png )

business idea: undemocratic decentralism

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 20:59:48 No.2541

>>2536
>le master agent of chaos
you don't fool anyone lol

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:03:57 No.2542

>>2539
You have no basis for that claim.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:10:40 No.2543

File: 1610399440535.jpg ( 51.39 KB , 1053x288 , dumbphoneposter.jpg )

>>2541
>I trust the dumb phoneposter.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:41:16 No.2544

not enough scorn is being poured on d0llars for turning bunkerchan's corpse into his own jonestown rather than just merging and being done with it. .

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:46:16 No.2545

File: 1610401576292.jpg ( 16.07 KB , 255x255 , space zizek.jpg )

>>2490
bunkerbros… we got too cocky!!!

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:46:20 No.2546

File: 1610401580366.png ( 82.61 KB , 662x716 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>2542
>The mods weren't elected, meaning it can't be a democratic centralist system.
>>2544
pic rel

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 21:56:52 No.2547

File: 1610402212472.png ( 88.46 KB , 1320x567 , ClipboardImage.png )

This got a kek out of me (they did, in fact, delete)

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:15:04 No.2548

imagine the kind of person who'd donate to the bunkerchan patreon lmao

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:19:58 No.2549

>>2548
I'd bet good money only one or two of the people saying they'll donate actually will.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:25:13 No.2550

>>2549
>>2548
No one actually would except maybe some glowies

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:27:23 No.2551

>>2550
Nah, some people are definitely dumb enough to do it. I bet they'd even justify it by saying it's for the working class.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 22:29:16 No.2552

File: 1610404156007.jpg ( 451.24 KB , 1242x1119 , 75a4a1ed8049a941dd7082d3ad….jpg )

No fucking way bro, can you imagine the type of degenerate

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-11 (Mon) 23:48:15 No.2553

File: 1610408895876.png ( 75.41 KB , 250x188 , 250px-Thomas_More.png )

>>2543
Suck my diddly ding dong

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 01:08:46 No.2554

>>2551
heh, if someone has not kept up with the drama and doesnt know about here, they might fall for it because having a place to shitpost is important

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 01:59:25 No.2555

SCREAMING at double space guy

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:02:04 No.2556

anyone calling leftypol "democratic centralist" is a LARPing faggot

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:06:35 No.2557

>>2527
>muh scabs
Who fucking cares?? It's not about the jannies, it's about the users, the community, you dumb fucking niggerfaggot.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 02:10:03 No.2558

>>2239
>>2257
please kill yourself.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:26:29 No.2559

okay, i know i specifically advocated against appeals to Stakhanovite attempts to get people to post more, but i'm bored so here's a proposal anyway:
Undertake the commitment to make a specific number of posts per hour under a specific flag. Because of the flag, you will be aware whether or not you are keeping pace with that number of posts, rather than simply making an empty appeal to completely anonymous people to post more, with the result that nobody feels like they own a target. Also, it will hopefully lead to a wider tendency of using flags to indicate your political leanings, which is always an underappreciated bit of context you can provide to any given post. (A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example.)

I suppose this is less of an appeal and more a little thought downstream of the multiplicative effect of such a specific goal when things are moving slowly: 10 people committing to make 5 posts per hour (not a huge ask when that can be as simple as linking a wikipedia article in /ITG/) is +50 PPH, a not-insignificant addition.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:33:56 No.2560

>>2559
How about you create interesting threads and see what happens from there?

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:43:01 No.2561

File: 1610426581092.png ( 209.93 KB , 1350x770 , a8d53ad2df1a9ff3edc67c684c….png )

>>2560
This.
>A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example.
Pic related. Debate the argument, not the user.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:53:01 No.2562

>>2560
Interesting threads require some degree of assurance of getting a response.
Nevertheless I may experiment with making certain types of threads.

>>2561
it's not about "debate", it's about context. lots of posts don't make an argument, but they can prompt development.
i.e. even if the hypothetical trotskyist says "based", by saying he's a trotskyist he increases the odds someone replies asking them to develop on why they agree with the purge, and even if they just say "oh, well because they were guilty" that's still a brief conversation that wouldn't otherwise have occurred.

the accusation of being sect-brained is entertaining considering that i've stated several times that part of why i use the flag i do is to filter people who can't read the argument without being distracted by the flag.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 04:54:28 No.2563

>>2562
I will respond to all of them, I promise. But you have to start them.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:15:51 No.2564

>>2562

>filter people who can't read the argument without being distracted by the flag.

>A Trotskyite saying a Stalinist purge was based is very different to a ML saying it, for example.

???

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:20:59 No.2565

File: 1610428859765.png ( 1.35 MB , 3267x1935 , absolute state of bunkerch….PNG )

so uuuuhhhhh…… is Space not paying the bills or is that spam really this bad?

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:21:18 No.2566

>>2564
There's a world of difference between
"Interesting, you're a Trotskyite but you support this Stalinist purge. How come?"
and
">Trotskyite.
Opinion discarded."

All the flag does is convey additional background information. In many cases, the kind of user who makes the second response will scour your post for similar shibboleths anyway - so instead of getting angry about your flag, he'll pick out a certain unfashionable phrase (such as "problematic" in the very literal sense of "causes practical problems") or other and use that to make the same kind of inane replies.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:22:07 No.2567

>>2565
I think the OP images weren't backed up even though the threads were, so when threads beyond a certain age were restored they were brought back without images.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 05:25:27 No.2568

>>2563
You can help by starting some too.

>>

Anonymous 2021-01-12 (Tue) 06:16:37 No.2569

File: 1610432197678.png ( 1.03 KB , 46x66 , 33 pph.png )