>>1940>Are you not aware of how Pinochet rose to power and the resulting "Chilean miracle"?I am aware of it in more depth than you've forgotten. Never forget how much of the so called miracle was propped up by CODELCO, which was nationalised by his predecessor.
In the metaphorical splitting in half of Chile which we're dealing with here (why the fuck did you pick Chile and not the Spanish civil war?) what I am saying to you is that all of your high minded aims and values mean nothing if you do not keep your hands on CODELCO. No copper and you will have no success.
You celebrate the decline in PPH for Bunkerchan, but you have captured little to none of that PPH for this website. It is a deadweight loss. It is copper mines hit by atom bombs. It is an avowal of failure.
>>1941Idealism of the worst sort.
There is no major quality-quantity trade off in the long run when it comes to imageboard posting. Quantity has a quality all of its own, correctly managed.
(That must be the funniest part of this: In terms of a broad philosophy of moderation I almost certainly side with this website more, but it's an utter waste of time when there are only 20 people here to moderate in the first place.)
This board in particular would be most successful had the original plan of the janitors not been uncovered and most of the userbase was transferred over without much apparent shift. In the face of the failure to have done this, there is now a tendency to try and cope and pretend that actually a significantly slower board is a good thing and that actually we'd rather be nothing like bunkerchan, taking as our starting point 60% of bunkerchan's mangled threads, ghost posts left lingering by users who haven't moved over.
This board will be dead by 2022 if it follows the philosophy of "quantity over quality" and lets itself be content with having no posters outside the hours when Bunkerchan has crashed.