A lot of "social media celebrities" are pushing for this shit and their followers are following suit

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1626311702154.jpg ( 207.5 KB , 1076x1422 , E6G8v6AXsAUhGk6.jpg )

A lot of "social media celebrities" are pushing for this shit and their followers are following suit Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:15:02 No.10176

I try to tell myself the "normalfag"/internet loser divide is a false dichotomy made up by people trying to cope with being outliers and then this shit happens. Literal cattle, holy shit.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:18:38 No.10177

lol this is murica not that authoritarian shithole south korea

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:19:02 No.10178

File: 1626311941951.jpg ( 44.54 KB , 300x446 , 1984.jpg )

Of course it's fucking England.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:19:31 No.10179

Also it's nearing 700k now.
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/575833

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:25:32 No.10180

why do English people love mass surveillance so much

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:29:26 No.10181

>you need a license for social media in the UK

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:31:55 No.10182

>SJWs don't exist and are a /pol/ bogeyman

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:35:52 No.10184

>>10176
much like the porn ban the UK gov is way too incompetent to actually impliment this. kek.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:49:17 No.10185

>>10182
Yes, /pol/, everything you don't like is le SJW.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 01:49:49 No.10186

Attack of the blue check

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 05:30:34 No.10190

>>10180
middle class urban english are the teachers pets of the world. Tell them theyre smarter than america and typical urban elitist nonsense and you can get people to do anything if its for safety and rationality

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 06:01:17 No.10191

>>10182
this has far more to do with boomers than with SJWs.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 06:17:18 No.10193

>>10179
And the government actually told them to fuck off, lol.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 06:19:30 No.10194

how about critically back this request to do the sonic acceleration shit

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 06:38:24 No.10196

If you need to show ID to drink alcohol why not for using social media? Social media is just as addicting and harmful.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 06:47:46 No.10197

>Furthermore, users without ID, or users who are reliant on ID from family members, would experience a serious restriction of their online experience, freedom of expression and rights. Research from the Electoral Commission suggests that there are 3.5 million people in the UK who do not currently have access to a valid photo ID.
this is a pretty fucking hilarious justification for not doing it considering that the government wants to bring in photo ID for voting.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 11:31:17 No.10204

>>10196
At least getting ID'd to buy alcohol doesn't get logged permanently in a database.

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 11:34:39 No.10205

Think about the children, please! (actually I'm just mad someone said mean things to me online)

Anonymous 2021-07-15 (Thu) 11:58:06 No.10207

>>10176
Would this also affect smaller websites or only the big sites ?
If the smaller websites are spared from the ID requirements it could bring about a renaissance of sites with the scale of forums and boards that had user counts in the hundreds or thousands. And that could bring back quality online discourse.

Anonymous 2021-07-16 (Fri) 04:55:33 No.10221

Holy shit I hate anglos.

Anonymous 2021-07-16 (Fri) 08:30:49 No.10223

File: 1626424249185.png ( Spoiler Image, 149.25 KB , 420x348 , anglo.png )

>>10176
>why yes, I do want everyone to use their real ID

Anonymous 2021-07-16 (Fri) 10:27:54 No.10224

I'm be ok with this if it was referring to the correct narrow definition of "social media".
Obvious it isn't, it's the normalfag definition of "everything on the internet".

Anonymous 2021-07-16 (Fri) 21:02:31 No.10229

Wouldn't this be bad for the social media? Imagine the drop in users. It will become even more of a walled garden, at that point it's bound to get too boring for some remaining users and even more of them will leave…

During the big "crisis" of social media (Trump, Brexit, Cambridge Analytica, Russian trolls, etc.) there was an idea that these giants should switch from an ad-based to a subscription-based business model. This was discussed internally as well. My guess is they decided against it because that wouldn't pay off for them, and I doubt this would as well.

And don't forget it's not only in Silicon Valley's interest for US Internet to colonize the whole world, the US state also wants everybody on Facebook and Twitter for propaganda / regime change reasons.

So if you ask me, I fully support more such limitations, let them shoot themselves in the foot. I don't have an account on any of these anyway.

Anonymous 2021-07-17 (Sat) 03:52:43 No.10235

With the advent of GPT-3 this is going to become inevitable.

Anonymous 2021-07-19 (Mon) 09:11:49 No.10293

>>10235
Why? Is anonymity worth giving up just because you fear that you may be talking to an AI instead of a person?

Anonymous 2021-07-19 (Mon) 09:29:34 No.10294

>>10235
Mandatory ID is not going to prevent bots, fake IDs are a thing, and governments bots could become a thing too.
If you want to defend against bots you have to create chains of trust, where people validate cryptographic keys in meat space.
>>10293
It would be nice if we could train a theory bot, as long as it's not pretending to be a human.

Anonymous 2021-07-20 (Tue) 20:53:39 No.10342

imagine what the internet will look like in 2030

Anonymous 2021-07-20 (Tue) 20:59:05 No.10343

>>10342
IPv6 adoption will reach like 50%

Unique IPs: 12