[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1782966761940.jpg ( 21.73 KB , 768x512 , anonymity.jpg )

 No.13750

So the US Congress has been busy the last four years or so trying to build a draconian internet surveillance bill under the guise of protecting the children. Britain has been trying to push something similar to this for the past year, and many other countries in the American hegemony have working for several years now to outlaw encryption. The good news at the moment is both chambers Congress seem unable to reconcile the differences between their two bills and combine them into one.

https://reclaimthenet.org/the-house-just-voted-for-kosa

Let's say they finally do pass a bill like this though. Would it be the outright end of anonymous forums based in Western countries? Is it even enforceable? Will people revolt to decentralized/distributed protocols?

What would be the future of online discussion?
>>

 No.13751

>Would it be the outright end of anonymous forums based in Western countries? Is it even enforceable? Will people revolt to decentralized/distributed protocols?
It would be a disaster.

I'm unsure of precisely how enforceable it would be, but I'm certain they'd make a serious attempt which would have a major impact. The reason they do this is practical; they are all murderous criminals of the highest degree, and it frightens them that people know about it and discuss it. With this in mind, their efforts to criminalize speech and enforce mass surveillance will obviously be very serious ones.

You already see very bad effects in the UK. Florida has adopted some fraction of UK-like laws, and now Spacehey (an independent social media site) is de facto banned in both places.

>What would be the future of online discussion?

More of the worst - an even greater push towards centralization on large sites controlled by US MIC contractors, and free reign for their bots/ops.
To this day, the best discussions are on small forums which have been untouched by the algorithms and ops, but the design of this government suppression includes the aim of separating people and alienating them from one another, and it necessarily is ruthlessly antagonistic towards community and coherence.
>>

 No.13752

My guess is this would push server hosting to countries that don't respect American surveillance networks. Which would prompt American governments to do the thing they always criticize other governments for doing: construct national firewalls against the global internet.
>>

 No.13753

All good points. It's been happening since cuomo forced ISPs to shudder their NNTP servers. ICANN existed to keep the internet open so they can't do anything about it. https://www.futurescope.co/can-icann-stop-a-government-from-shutting-down-the-internet/
I'm guessing all bandwidth will eventually be reserved exclusively for commerce and streaming services. AI will likely replace search engines entirely, and the old Internet will simply disappear.
>>

 No.13754

>>13753
>shudder
I knew it. Friggin' autocorrect
*Shutter, as in shut it down.
>>

 No.13755

>>13753
This is one of the reasons I've been using OpenNIC servers as my DNS resolvers for many years now.
>>

 No.13756

>>13755
Excellent. Guess I'll finally give it a try.

Unique IPs: 4

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome