[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1610807894986.jpg ( 65.77 KB , 475x320 , nkvdshooting.jpg )

 No.6536

Is it possible to get access to some form of VPN if you can't afford a monthly subscription? I tried openvpn with some open servers but I'm a techlet and I don't think I've set it up properly, it barely seems to hide anything.
>>

 No.6538

File: 1610810597936.jpeg ( 12.76 KB , 474x448 , 886866987.jpeg )

VPN's are dead.
Use lokinet: https://docs.loki.network/Lokinet/Guides/lokinet-linux-guide/

After you get it installed run lokinet-vpn –exit exit.loki –up

Lokinet is like tor but it exists a layer deeper than tor. Tor runs on layer 3 where HTTP requests are handled and lokinet runs on layer 2 where VPN's usually sit, but, it, again, like TOR uses multiple levels of encryption and anonymize your packets. I use it in conjunction with tor and end up with like 8 hops.
>>

 No.6539

>>6538
>VPN's are dead.

Techlet here, why are they dead?

Did Loki kill them or?
>>

 No.6540

>>6538
This dude is pushing some shit nobody's heard about. Be cautious.
Also VPNs aren't "dead".
>>

 No.6548

File: 1610860609540.gif ( 879.37 KB , 400x258 , 22fa78a54e086151fee7e945fa….gif )

>>6540
Glow

Everyone who isn't a skiddy has heard of lokinet. It's an upcoming network. Only retards and shills advocate insecure bullshit like VPNs. Be gone glow cuck.

>>6539
VPN's are dead because they cannot be trusted. Why would you trust a single point of failure with all of your data? Loki is still young and, yes, new, but, it is worth investigating as, like I said, it works on a layer lower than tor. I highly advocate using them in conjunction. Don't listen to retards like >>6540 who don't even bother to read their man pages.
>>

 No.6550

>>6536
There is riseup.net. I think you don't even need an invite to use their vpn these days.
>>

 No.6551

File: 1610876046882.jpg ( 7.24 KB , 228x221 , 0daa8877ba67d2b2863822e21e….jpg )

>>6550
>Riseup.net
>>

 No.6552

>>6551
It depends on what you use it for. I don't think it glows more than any other commercial vpn.
>>

 No.6553

>>6552
See>>6548
>VPN's are dead because they cannot be trusted. Why would you trust a single point of failure with all of your data? Loki is still young and, yes, new, but, it is worth investigating as, like I said, it works on a layer lower than tor. I highly advocate using them in conjunction.
Anything commercial does deals with feds, better safe than sorry.
>>

 No.6554

Use Tor or I2P before risking anything with this fucking lokinet high school project that doesn't even have a Wikipedia page (no, if it doesn't have a wiki page then it's not a very 1. popular network or 2. reliable/reputable network).
Hell even use RetroShare over this shit.
>>

 No.6555

>>6550
allready mentioned that I'm a techlet, I tried setting it up a while back buck all I did was put some files on my harddrive and get them to do anything.
All I want to do is torrent some video games with my isp messing arround with the quallity of my connection like my last provider did.
>>

 No.6556

File: 1610894150053.webm ( 974.75 KB , 720x480 , glowinginthedarkagain.webm )

>>6554
>>

 No.6557

>>6552
Riseup has literally been caught dealing with feds who then forced them to remove their warrant canary. They are compromised.
>>

 No.6558

>>6554
>Tor
NSA trash.
>I2P
CIA Techno-larp shit
>>

 No.6559

>>6557
It is good enough for OP's torrents.

>>6555
If you can't make riseup work, which is just literally pressing a button and it works, you don't have much hope of using any vpn…
>>

 No.6560

>>6558
Trash that the NSA itself has just happened to admit they have difficulty de-anonymizing people from.
>>

 No.6561

>>6559
No it ins't you retard. Torrents are still illegal. So many glowies, holy fuck.
>>

 No.6562

>>6558
You have no idea how these things work do you? Windows users get the wall.
>>

 No.6570

>>6559
>you don't have much hope of using any vpn…
I've still used free trials before so fuck off
>>

 No.6571

tor
>>

 No.6572

>>6538
>cloudflared website
>>

 No.6573

>>6556
404 argument not found
>>

 No.6579

mullvad VPN has you generate an account and also lets you pay by mailing in money and a generated token
>>

 No.6652

riseup provides a free VPN service. they say they keep no logs.
>>

 No.6654

>>6652
they've been hit by the feds before
>>

 No.6745

>>6536
it’s called The Onion Router, or TOR as I’ve taken to calling it.
>>

 No.6746

File: 1612206697413.jpg ( 122.59 KB , 1200x1200 , IMG_2727.JPG )

>>6558
>a fucking leaf
>>

 No.6751

File: 1612263659974.jpg ( 51.75 KB , 1233x853 , 20201217_024935.jpg )

>>6538
>blockchain
>>

 No.6754

>>6751
>thinking blockchain is exclusively about ancapistan and not just an easy way to securely decentralize a server.
>>

 No.6779

>>6754
How tf does blockchain even work?
>>

 No.6780

>>6573
Your argument was…what exactly? That a decentralized toy network that uses the exact same protocol standards as tor while also being based on blockchain technology and working at a fundamentally lower level is bad because….reasons? It's always fags who lack an actual substantive argument who say "muh not an argument" bullshit.
>>

 No.6846

>>6779
you keep public ledger where every new transaction record requires consensus
>>

 No.6911

>>6571
tor has and can be broken
>>

 No.8365

>>6911
aren't those examples just poor opsec by users?
>>

 No.8623

Windscribe
I get 10 gigs a month just for giving them my email and their locations are pretty good

You can get more if you make a tweet too but I don't need 15 gigs
>>

 No.8646

look for free socks5 proxies, i know there are some free ones out there

you dont need a full vpn just to hide from your isp
you dont need tor or any good network like these retards say
(if you're just downloading torrents over it)
>>

 No.8653

>>8623
doesnt that literally just steal your data
>>

 No.8655

>>6911
Not a rebuttal.
Tor, like literally every usable computer and software, gas weaknesses. Furthermore, Tor users almost always get caught by deanonymizing themselves or downloading and running things they shouldn't. Either that, or being worth spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on.
Do you have any specific example you want to discuss, or are you just parroting FUD shit you don't understand?
>>

 No.8656

I will say that Tor Browser (not Tor), as a long-life Firefox build, is somewhat insecure if you are being personally targeted, but the best option for anonymity.
>>

 No.8659

>>8653
really? i didn't know
i was using it to pirate music
>>

 No.8673

>>8653
nothing wrong with stealing data, if you give them useless data or dont care
like what, they're gonna intercept and copy your download of mama mia 2?
>>8655
(not really a reply to you but about what you said) btw for good practice with tor, of course no javascript, dont go to any websites you use on the clearnet on tor, for the same reasons stay away from anything with cloudflare or recaptcha, and dont open anything from tor on the client you run tor on
lesser known good practice is also use a bridge so your tor traffic is less easy to automatically effect, and explicitly set a few guard nodes that you trust, you can set up your own if you really want to
and qubes is really great for this, you virtualize your tor environment every time, so it doesnt match the environment you use for other browsing, and you can open shit in a sandboxed way
safe cybertravels
>>

 No.8745

>>8673
MAMMA MIA 2: HERE WE GO AGAIN

Unique IPs: 19
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome