Firefox 89

Posting mode: Reply [Return]
Name
Email	⚄♤g8:=}$C\|♽T'^<LU`2?EI♫+{☢z\WtPf(⛕iw
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 16:22:23 No.8927

File: 1622650943404.png ( 63.44 KB , 240x240 , Lain1.png )

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 16:26:36 No.8928

They also fucked up the scroll bar and on some sites it's just a single colour? I can't actually see the position??

>>8927
What is this supposed to mean

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 16:47:19 No.8929

>>8928
>what is this supposed to mean
I am unhappy about this development

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 17:05:37 No.8930

>>8928
I fixed the scrollbar by setting widget.non-native-theme.enabled to false. It also changed the forms and input elements back to GTK style.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 22:05:43 No.8931

Keeping up with Firefox's suicidal design changes is a suckers game.
Problem is Firefox 78 ESR is end-of-life in October 2021, and the next version is 91 ESR.

By 91 they'll have removed all the options to undo the damage, which means it will be pozzed forever.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 22:58:45 No.8932

Here's the reason:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIGuElYZZzQ

The product designer is a literal padtoddler designing firefox on his maxIpad.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 02:45:55 No.8940

>using Firefox after Australis
>using Firefox after Pocket
>using Firefox after they killed all the XUL extensions that made Firefox unique and worth using to begin with
It's on you at this point, OP. You are a hostage coping with Stockholm Syndrome.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 03:15:33 No.8941

>>8940
well what do you use? there's only chromium left

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 03:30:18 No.8942

>>8941
curl leftypol.org

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 04:13:54 No.8944

File: 1622693634741.jpg ( 287.92 KB , 1749x1668 , 1622671409985.jpg )

With every new update Ungoogled Chromium seems like the only sane choice left.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 04:23:52 No.8945

>>8941
Palemoon, Basilisk, or forks based off of them.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 04:29:57 No.8946

>>8945
Don't use Firefox forks if you care about your privacy.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 05:00:09 No.8947

>>8945
Not any better tbh. And Pale Moon dev appears to be self exploding, banning extensions and shit like that.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 07:07:55 No.8949

Somebody tell me how to bring back the restore tab functionality by click on those > arrows

You could undo closed tabs easily but now you have to go to history and click on closed tabs

me no likey

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 07:09:02 No.8950

>>8944
What about MS Edge?

Guys is Firefox Sync the best alternative to Chrome's sync between your laptop and phone?

Does edge do better laptop to phone syncage?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 10:53:50 No.8952

File: 1622717630810.png ( 167.39 KB , 674x648 , ClipboardImage.png )

Use Emacs.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 15:56:26 No.8957

>>8946
As opposed to all the even worse alternatives, right?

>>8947
>Not any better
Let's see here, one browser has a customizable interface, tons of extensions, and less spyware. But sure, because it's not perfect it's "not any better".

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 17:23:00 No.8962

>>8952
Speaking of, has anyone tried Nyxt?
https://nyxt.atlas.engineer

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 18:50:44 No.8965

>>8941
Librewolf.
https://librewolf-community.gitlab.io/

>LibreWolf is designed to minimize data collection and telemetry as much as possible. This is achieved through hundreds of privacy/security/performance settings and patches. Intrusive integrated addons including updater, crashreporter, and pocket are removed too.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 20:47:38 No.8966

>>8957
I personally don't see much difference between Firefox's current UI, it's a fucking browser, it has tabs and a menu. On the extensions side, there's no Vimium, no open in mpv, no keepassxc extension, no don't accept webp. Has a dev who decided to block AdNauseam. And Firefox's spyware can be disabled. Now on top of that it also renders sites worse, so I don't really see why would I ever use that. At this point Pale Moon is basically Mozilla-lite.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-04 (Fri) 00:04:21 No.8968

>>8957
>As opposed to all the even worse alternatives, right?
Ok, shill. Ungoogled Chromium is the best if you don't want to be easily tracked for using unique Fireshit forks.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-04 (Fri) 01:52:02 No.8969

>>8968
Librewolf and Icecat aren't proper forks, they just change the branding, ship some extensions and switch some user.js options so you don't have to be vigilant about new telemetry being added after you manually make your own .js. Should be identical to proper FF as far as websites are concerned.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-04 (Fri) 03:03:29 No.8973

Idk now that I've been using this for like 2 days I kinda like the new UI, it's not amazing but it's alright, not worse than was before

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-04 (Fri) 21:17:36 No.8988

>>8973
Opinion discarded, because you type like a zoomer toddler on an iPad. No offense.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-04 (Fri) 22:39:08 No.8989

>>8988
But I use cwm on arch loonix and use lineageos on my phone without any gapps

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 00:44:21 No.8990

just got it, doesn't seem that bad

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 01:59:18 No.8991

just use brave

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 02:32:06 No.8992

>>8991
>just use even worse spyware bro, it's better because they have a slick advertising campaign

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 04:53:43 No.8994

File: 1622868823155.png ( 92.43 KB , 569x414 , soyfox.png )

Shit shit shit. There are no good browsers anymore.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 04:59:42 No.8995

Is fennec on android good?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 05:11:43 No.8997

>>8995
Fennec was amazing, but it's long since discontinued.
Firefox for Android was good, but it jumped the shark hard last year.
The usual mozilla bullshit. Remove useful features, make horrible management driven design choices.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 05:58:09 No.9001

>>8997
What do you mean discontinued? I use it daily, I get it from f-droid

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 06:47:05 No.9002

>>9001
Looks like that browser's full name is "Fennec F-Droid".
Probably the best of limited choices.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 09:06:03 No.9003

>>8973
I re-enabled native widgets and it's bearable. I see people complain about floating tabs but I don't notice that as the selected tab's colour and the background colour is almost the same. Now the most annoying thing is that they added "New tab" to the top of the right-click menu for tabs where reload used to be and I keep clicking it.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 09:06:56 No.9004

>>9002
It's just rebranded Firefox.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-08 (Tue) 07:33:03 No.9043

i have no idea of what people are complaining about. looks fine

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-08 (Tue) 10:33:41 No.9045

>>8949
bump request

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-09 (Wed) 10:28:27 No.9066

File: 1623234507636.jpg ( 406.96 KB , 1280x720 , 1617986347648.jpg )

Imagine even needing a navigation menu.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 09:01:34 No.9155

>>8994
Try Vivaldi.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 12:00:39 No.9156

>>8926
UI fix https://github.com/black7375/Firefox-UI-Fix

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 12:44:01 No.9157

>>9043
they removed compact mode support

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 15:28:51 No.9159

>>8929
Oh. very gud response

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 15:35:56 No.9160

>>9156
installed this
but i still have the same problem where i can't undo a closed tab quickly

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 18:27:16 No.9164

>>8962
Not yet but looks very nice.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-13 (Sun) 18:32:49 No.9165

>>9160
Does Shift-Control-T not work?