[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1700584286950.jpg ( 95.47 KB , 761x1024 , nopussy.jpg )

 No.4391[View All]

Archive of first Incel Humor Thread:
https://web.archive.org/web/20231121161437/https://leftychan.net/R9K/res/131.html
500 posts and 328 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12412

>>12345
>foids
>think
>>

 No.12413

>>12342
The only sexy Asians are Japanese, Korean, and Chinese.
>>

 No.12447

File: 1787101429311.jpg ( 89.37 KB , 1179x963 , 63aa22d8-fc0e-4944-b259-b2….jpg )

>>

 No.12456

>>12342
>>12345
>>12412
Women can dress however they want. It's their body, their choice.
>>

 No.12457

>>12456
>Intentionally missing the point
Shut up zoomer boomer
>>

 No.12458

>>12457
You have no right to judge women. No right. This isn't the 18th century.
>>

 No.12459

>>12457
>zoomer boomer

Millennials with their idpol smh
>>

 No.12463

>>12459
>Different generations all have the same material conditions.
Yes, I remember it well. The day the Challenger Shuttle exploded I was gooning to goth tiddy streamer, sad day.
>>

 No.12477

>>12456
Yeah, sure, and I can judge them however I want for it and film them if they're in public.

>>12458
>it is the current year
Lol, shut the fuck up retard.
>>

 No.12478

>>12477
>material conditions are actually the same right now as 300 years ago
Wow, you're very smart.
>>

 No.12480

>>12478
Material conditions have absolutely no fucking relevance to this situation. This bitch is a fucking cunt, simple as.
>>

 No.12481

>>12342
Moids will applaud this clip while raging and malding and crashing out over women filming and catching creeps at the gym.
>>

 No.12484

>>12481
>Falsely accusing someone of something is the same as passively filming them with their bottom out where any passerby can see.
>>

 No.12485

>>12484
How would you feel if you were out and about and got filmed without your permission?
>>

 No.12486

>>12485
Fine, you know other people can see you when you're out in public too right?
>>

 No.12487

>>12486
There's a difference between seeing people and filming people without their permission.
>>

 No.12488

>>12487
You have no expectation to privacy outside. It's why you don't have to ask everyone's permission to film anything if it's outside.
>>

 No.12489

>>12487
People will see your ass if you wear a sting bikini outside. Just put on a pair of pants if you don't want that.
>>

 No.12490

>>12488
>>12489
The perpetrator broke at least these rules:
- taking and publishing those images
- targeting specific individuals
- taking upskirt photos
- explicitly not having her consent
This is not okay. We live in a society with laws and ethics.
>>

 No.12494

>>12490
Bro should learn how to be more discrete and keep any media to himself for his personal use.
>>

 No.12495

>>12490
>- taking and publishing those images
Of a public space
>- targeting specific individuals
Who were in public and drawing attention to themselves. Yes, if you wear next to nothing you are drawing attention to yourself. Not everything that makes women feel uncomfortable is rape.
>- taking upskirt photos
She wasn't wear a skirt, or anything but a piece of string over her vagina. He filmed what anyone else present could see clearly.
>- explicitly not having her consent
Public areas are shared and don't become your personal safe space because you've decided you want to be exhibitionist.
>>

 No.12497

>>

 No.12531

File: 1787411262941.jpg ( 97.39 KB , 680x681 , 1767955553331.jpg )

>>

 No.12536

>>12531
Why is the nuclear family looked down upon while gay threesome are praised and revered?
>>

 No.12538

Ok, so its pretty much an established statistical fact that women ON AVERAGE are more attracted to men with bigger wallets (more status, more money, more resources to support their future family etc). And by a simple supply-demand law women have unfair advantage in dating market as there are more men competing for each woman than there are women competing for each man. But then why don't incels see the issue in the fact that most men are attracted to a very specific certain kind of women: the conventionally attractive type (hourglass figure, pretty face, small nose, big proportional eyes, smooth skin, nice makeup, good hair etc)? Don't you see the hypocrisy in being annoyed/mad at the fact that women are seeking men with bigger wallets while either not mentioning at all or downplaying the fact that men are seeking women with better looks and sexual appeal?

I've been to some places where wealthy people live and what I've noticed is that most of the average or even below average looking guys there have hot as soykaf wives/gfs. Because guys with options won't settle for less when they can get whatever they prefer and it turns out that they are as picky as women when they get to choose.
Which kinda brings us to my next point: men ON AVERAGE WOULD BE just as picky if they got to choose, if they had an option.
>>

 No.12567

File: 1787526117272.jpg ( 153.21 KB , 1000x1000 , IMG_2421.jpg )

>>

 No.12569

File: 1787529662401.png ( 98.22 KB , 641x389 , IMG_2707.png )

>>

 No.12578

File: 1787583326018.png ( 580.69 KB , 1960x1218 , IMG_7545.png )

>>

 No.12674

File: 1787858472695.jpg ( 135.81 KB , 1424x780 , 6404d289-b9f5-4a72-a608-9e….jpg )

>>

 No.12697

File: 1787925334425.jpg ( 257.34 KB , 1080x990 , 1774448687784.jpg )

>>

 No.12722

File: 1787980816340.png ( 497.71 KB , 1305x960 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.12724

File: 1787981117169-0.png ( 135.87 KB , 712x615 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1787981117169-1.png ( 1.3 MB , 800x2250 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.12859

File: 1788359106128-0.png ( 1005.04 KB , 1000x728 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1788359106128-1.png ( 280.44 KB , 480x561 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1788359106128-2.png ( 387.14 KB , 1440x1877 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.12909

File: 1788559490085.jpg ( 338.82 KB , 1600x2000 , fb27f9cd-bf4f-47f8-a0bd-ea….jpg )

>>

 No.12930

>>12909
Cats are already based
>>

 No.12943

File: 1788686277489.png ( 2.89 MB , 1133x1388 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.12947

File: 1788687241598-0.png ( 610.57 KB , 680x680 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1788687241598-1.png ( 323.66 KB , 500x737 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1788687241598-2.png ( 970.31 KB , 1064x1100 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1788687241598-3.png ( 1.44 MB , 1131x652 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.12950

>>12947
Second pic is so true, feminist aversion to porn, sex work, and now sex robots is really just a ploy to strengthen chads monopoly on sex
>>

 No.12960

File: 1788708842912.png ( 95.73 KB , 250x238 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.13009

File: 1788827990102.png ( 665.26 KB , 676x850 , Screenshot_20260907200039.png )

>>

 No.13010

File: 1788828465634-0.jpg ( 182.75 KB , 902x1024 , 1788742703112650.jpg )

File: 1788828465634-1.jpg ( 434.33 KB , 724x911 , Screenshot_4-9-2026_102255….jpg )

>>

 No.13026

>>12947
What's so bad about the the first pic?
Why are people so against young people having any natural freedom and prospects?

Not everyone needs a family or partner to feel completion. I find it funny that pro-natalism is especially aimed at young adults as a gatekeeping license of maturity

Meanwhile, older adults are getting the opposite ideologue with their pro-hedonism to relieve midlife crisis

You know that having ample free time for yourself is the biggest blessing that anyone can ask for?

A lot of family-rearing adults often lament loss of personal time.
>>

 No.13027

>>12950
Feminists aren't averse to sex or porn.
They're just hostile to cishet male sexuality.
>>

 No.13043

File: 1789094889982.jpg ( 37.99 KB , 700x631 , 49d980ba-6820-4684-ba8f-09….jpg )

>>

 No.13045

>>13026
It, really, wouldn't be an issue, but, when it becomes the majority things start to break. I understand the POV of anti-natalists, but, I can't help it. I am who I am, I want a family, kids and a nuclear life, or, like, the real old old days when families lived under one roof for multiple generations.
>>

 No.13060

File: 1789253145802-0.jpg ( 48.77 KB , 370x346 , IMG_3687.jpg )

File: 1789253145802-1.jpg ( 348.46 KB , 1030x1333 , 1000046677.jpg )

File: 1789253145802-2.jpg ( 102.24 KB , 960x768 , IMG_3690.jpg )

File: 1789253145802-3.jpg ( 54 KB , 750x620 , 643eee085c1ca.jpg )

>>

 No.13062

>>13060
Horseshoe theory or something.
>>

 No.13064

>>13045
Fair point. I think the family structure should go back to clans and people live on manors with individualiised suites
>>

 No.13069

>your entire identity revolves around bitches
that shit is gay
>>

 No.13070

>>13069
>Grievances are only legitimate when they're novel, even if they're never reconciled. The fact that this materially preserves liberalism from change is just a cowinky dinky.
BASED LIBTARD

Unique IPs: 24
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome