[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1701275633156.jpg ( 49.03 KB , 640x590 , 1701275055345131.jpg )

 No.4421[View All]

In most countries it's 16 which I think is good. I'd say there needs to be some "Romeo and Juliet" exceptions added. No reason to have a 17 year old go to jail for dating a 15 year old.
15 is a just a little too young for the age of consent. What is hilarious is that burgers think just big age gaps are pedophilia while the average roastie in America becomes sexually active at 13, and often even younger.
236 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10518

>>10498
>Pedo allegations literally ended Drake's career, the highest selling pop star alive right now.
<just shows how much the US doesn't care about the safety of children
I don't really understand your logic.
>cunny
The fact that channers use a shortened version of "cute and funny" as a euphemism for "child porn" is especially gross.
>>

 No.10522

>>10476
Die.

>>10489
>Find someone your own age, incel perv.
No. Mind your own goddamn business you worthless cunt. You're not qualified to assess anyone else's maturity level. Kill yourself.

>>10491
Uhh, maybe because equating pedos and ephebophiles is retarded midwit reddit shit?

>>10494
Shut the fuck up, roastie. Back to .ogre with this feminist faggotry.
>>

 No.10523

>>10518
<just shows how much the US doesn't care about the safety of children
>I don't really understand your logic.
By the fact that he is in fact not a pedo. All the underage girls he was accused of touching came out and said he never touched them. Americans love virtue signalling about pedophilia but how many people that went to Epstein island have gone to jail?
>The fact that channers use a shortened version of "cute and funny" as a euphemism for "child porn" is especially gross.
Libs like you will do more to cancel people that use offensive words than anything to materially protect children.
>>

 No.10524

>>10506
Looks incredibly fake.
>>

 No.10525

>>10489
Would that count elderly and disabled?
Also again, “hebephilia is a meme” is like saying “anti Zionism is a meme”
>>

 No.10526

>>10523
This.
Most hysteria over pedophikia often rarely involves actual children
>>

 No.10527

>>10522
> Uhh, maybe because equating pedos and ephebophiles is retarded midwit reddit shit?

This.
These are the same people who stress to differentiate “anti semitism” from “anti Zionism”
>>

 No.10528

People freak about youth sexuality but are ok with youth violence
>>

 No.10529

>>10526
Of course, it involves sexually viable females that roasties feel threatened by.

>>10527
They're also the same people who get super salty about the difference between liberalism and socialism. But when socialism has been infected by pedohysterical libfem trash it's indistinguishable from liberalism in practice.
>>

 No.10530

>>10529
What’s really fucked up about all this is that the notion that 13 to 25 being helpless children is a modern concept.
Purely from the eighteenth century idealists.

And we have seen now that it’s been normalized to spend your teens and twenties with no prospects, no skills, no nuances.
People say that thirty is the start of true adulthood nowadays yet or in their thirties are barely able to keep up
>>

 No.10537

>>10527
>These are the same people who stress to differentiate “anti semitism” from “anti Zionism”
<Being against Israel's genocide of the Palestinians is just like how Hitler hated Jews.
Back to .orge NOW
>>

 No.10538

>>10537
Nobody said this, what are you even reading
>>

 No.10539

>>10538
Yes he was, he was comparing people who say anti-Zionism isn't antisemitic to pedos that that say fucking 12 year olds isn't the same as fucking 7 year olds.
>>

 No.10540

>>10539
That's being generous lol - his comparison clearly favored the latter while suggesting the former was ridiculous. Really heinous shit.
>>

 No.10541

>>10539
>12 year olds
Nobody said this either, most guys want 15-16
>>

 No.10542

>>10539
He didnt say that.
youre just twisting his words
>>

 No.10544

>>10541
No, most guys want women. Only creeps want pubescent girls.
>>

 No.10556

>>10544
>hurr durr creeps
Back to CrystalCafe, roastie. A 16-year-old is a fucking woman and more of a woman than you ever will be again.
>>

 No.10557

>>9358
>So you had everything figured out at 18?

Ironically an extremely immature view to have because believing anyone has it "figured out" is something only children would think anyone has.
>>

 No.10558

>>9358
>So you had everything figured out at 18?
No, but how do Americans reconcile the face that girls in the US start having sex around 14 and sometimes as young as 12.
I'm not for a low age of consent but why do people like you see sex with older people more dangerous than sex with peers.
As a materialist I'd be most concerned about unplanned pregnancies, STD and sexual assault. None of these risks are mitigated if an underage girl only has sex with a peer.
>>

 No.10559

>>10558
*but how do Americans reconcile the fact
>>

 No.10560

>>10556
Disgusting. I hope you get doxxed, pedo.
I work in schools. 16 year olds are CHILDREN.
You are lower than filth.
>>

 No.10563

>>10560
So you don't think any of your students are sexual active?
>>

 No.10564

>>10560
Why don't you answer the question. How is sex among underage peers safer than sex with of age people?
It's not am endorsement of the activity,
It just really seems like you aren't concerned about this issue because you want to protect children but out of some warped jealously you have of them.
>>

 No.10565

>>10564
Power dynamics.
I'm not jealous of a bunch of pedo incels kek
>>

 No.10566

>>10565
I said you're jealous of children not me an "incel".
I agree there's some power dynamics, but underage kids are more than capable of being manipulative. I don't see this mitigating much danger.
Conversely an older person is capable of being more nurturing as well.
Like I said, it really seems like you're just jealous of young women who you feel are more desired than you. Your rationalizations for being this militant are pretty flimsy.
I wouldn't want my child in a relationship with someone of age but I wouldn't think it was an existential treat to them either.
You obviously don't have children because making something this taboo that you can't justify as being as dangerous as you make it just makes teens want to experiment with it more.
Ironically your hysteria has driven more underage girls into the arms of adult men than anyone salivating about teen sex here.
What do you have to say for yourself?
>>

 No.10567

>>10566
*existential threat
>>

 No.10568

>>10565
Elaborate on 'power dynamics' and how peer to peer sex is safer without them? Also how there's no 'power dynamics' in peer to peer sexual relationships.
>>

 No.10569

Didn't realize that Jeffrey Epstein used .neet
>>

 No.10570

>>10569
Statically your pastor or uncle is diddling one of your nieces while you're making jokes on here.
>>

 No.10572

>>10560
>super ultra mega seethe that she will never again be as hot as a 16-year-old
Lel, retarded cunt. 16 is actually legal in most places including most of the US, mald and cope about it.

>>10565
>muh power dynamics
Only midwits believe in this shit, it's fucking Soviet-tier pseudoscience.
>>

 No.10573

File: 1777058948670.jpg ( 83.82 KB , 900x357 , marx lysenko china.jpg )

>>10572
>shitting on Soviet science
Actually, some of Lysenko's work had a certain scientific merit, which was recognized internationally.
>>

 No.10574

>>10560
Shut the fuck up, you self-righteous, patronizing assclown. 16-year-olds are adults. They're tried as adults in court if they commit a crime, therefore they're adults, simple as that.

>I work in schools.

You're unqualified to teach.

>You are lower than filth.

You're also unqualified to judge the moral status of people who don't subscribe to your agecuck idiocy. And above all else, you're unqualified to police other people's relationships. Get fucked.
>>

 No.10586

>>10560
In most pf the world amd hisyory, 16 was an adult. Its only now that theyre considered children.

Also, moderm.schools.habe this subtle way of infamtilizing young people
>>

 No.10587

>>10566
this.
people always assume that youth means automatic weakness.
Alot of underage girls in relationships with adult males werent coerced
>>

 No.10588

>>10574
>They're tried as adults in court if they commit a crime, therefore they're adults, simple as that.


this.
teens are treated like infants when it comes to sex but theyre classified as adults when it comes to violence

we train teenage boys to assault each other in ballsports
>>

 No.10589

>>10565
ppwer dynamics more exists in platonic affairs between childrem and adults
>>

 No.10590

>>10588
The roasties seem to have vacated the thread, as they usually do when they get BTFO super fucking hard. But sadly they won't stop their bullshit, they'll just take it elsewhere and spew the same old lies. Feminist women have to have their hold on power removed.
>>

 No.10593

>>

 No.10605

>>10593
Reminder that Macaulay Culkin said he didn't get touched.

"“Look,” Culkin said. “I’m gonna begin with the line—it’s not a line, it’s the truth: He never did anything to me. I never saw him do anything. And especially at this flash point in time, I’d have no reason to hold anything back."
https://www.esquire.com/entertainment/a30782546/macaulay-culkin-michael-jackson-relationship-friendship-details/



Furthermore the material reason is because parents being greedy and Michael Jackson owning the Beatles catalogue, which is worth a lot of money. Flash forward to now, and conveniently the Jackson estate no longer owns the Beatles catalogue.

Furthermore, why did accusing parents try to pay other parents to join in on the accusations? If the truth is on your side, why pay others to fabricate an accusation?



Michael Jackson takes control of the Beatles’ publishing rights | August 14, 1985 https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/august-14/michael-jackson-takes-control-of-the-beatles-publishing-rights

Akon: Michael Jackson Accusations Started when He Refused to Sell Beatles Catalog (Part 12) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEuEzKGe6FY

Ron Newt on Getting Offered $200K To Say Michael Jackson Touched His Kids (Flashback) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viyD1G_WuX8

Aaron Carter on His Mom Attempting a Money Grab Against Michael Jackson (Part 8) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtSSeOcZxok

Scott Ross Investigated Mom of Michael Jackson Accuser: She's a Scammer & Liar (Part 4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5tl6Oa6514

Lord Jamar on Russia Hiding Michael Jackson: MJ Became a Target After That (Part 10) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtJfpZ2FXME



Michael Jackson singing about how the elite oppresses the common man. (Agit prop, redpill)
Michael Jackson - They Don’t Care About Us (Brazil Version) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNJL6nfu__Q
Michael Jackson - They Don't Care About Us (Prison Version) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1pqi8vjTLY

Michael Jackson portraying Egyptians as black.
Michael Jackson - Remember the Time (Official Video - Upscaled) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeiFF0gvqcc
>>

 No.10645

>>10590
Idk man, this isn’t mere “roasties”, it looks more like adults projecting their past immaturity or rather post boomer adults whom have adapted a more infantilized view of youth as way to save face for maturational deficits
>>

 No.10646

RFK Jr. clears path for minors’ use of tanning beds, much to the dismay of dermatologists
https://www.latimes.com/science/story/2026-05-06/rfk-hands-major-win-to-indoor-tanning-industry-to-dermatologists-dismay
Mmmmmm tan cunny
>>

 No.10647

>>10646
Agitating = harassing the public
>>

 No.10649

>>10646
I thought white teens were already allowed to use tanning beds
>>

 No.10712

>>10645
Christ. Imagine being this much of a cuck. Worldly? You mean whores? That have no self respect? That goes for both genders. You wanna wife up a broad who took sausages adding up to 1000 miles, which would be like the distance between New York and Florida? You want other men to do that stuff? Look at you, man. You're a freaking perverted nihilistic hedonistic low-value scumbag. That's what you are. These no-good hooligcan sloozies running around opening their legs for any no-good Joe Schmoe and a good honest hard-working man is supposed to put a ring on that type of stuff? Get outta here, you disgusting pig. You disgust me. Whores disgust me. Some people in the world got more values than that. Just because you can doesn't mean you should. You ever seen what these loose women do? You think I'mma go down on that? Freaking disgusting. You make me sick. Some people don't wanna eat food that was touched with bare hands by someone else. You might as well sprinkle ballsack hair on the wedding cake. You make me sick. And the baggage that comes with it? And them aging badly? Have some self respect. These sloozies got no self respect. Unreal, man. Unbelievable. Low-life.
>>

 No.10714

>>10590
Christ, imagine being this much of a retarded pedophile. Newsflash, dumbass, we don't want your kind around here! The age of consent is that way for a reason. You're just a creepazoid weirdo who can't get women his age so he has to resort to preying on young girls who you can manipulate and control because you're a loser. Just because you have a problem doesn't mean you have to saddle others with it. Jesus, get a life. You're pathetic. Useless scum. For Christ's sake, eat a salad for once. You probably got Cheetos stains on your fingers and drink Mountain Dew like it's water. Like goddamn, your parents must be really disappointed. What do you have going for you? "Oh man, look at my edgelord pedo-posting!" Fuck off. In the real world, you'd be ostracized, that's why you hide behind a screen. You're the reason for Amber Alerts. Straight up trying to groom, exploit, and abuse vulnerable girls. Imagine being such a weirdo. You probably got no social life. You probably don't accomplish anything. Embarrassing. You probably set calendar alarms to celebrate when Natalie Portman turned 18. You're disgusting, dude. Scum of the Earth. Shame. Sick, selfish adults like you can ruin the lives of children. When you die, you won't die with honor.
>>

 No.10715

>>10714
NTA but that’s a false dichotomy.
A lot of young girls with older guys were not all innocent nor vulnerable.

In fact the main reason why men go for younger women is for their libido and looks not for their docility

Most men would be turned off by any young women displaying the old fashioned behavioral stereotypes of youthful innocence
>>

 No.10716

>>10714
> You probably set calendar alarms to celebrate when Natalie Portman turned 18.

Isn’t that the right thing to do?
Why is it considered wrong to wait until the younger part turns eighteen?
>>

 No.10738

>>10714
>Newsflash, dumbass, we don't want your kind around here!
Who the fuck is we, bitch? The entire rest of the thread is telling you to shut your retarded cunt mouth.

>The age of consent is that way for a reason.

Yes, and that reason is because roasties are jealous cunts who know teenage girls are better than them in every way and any man who has the option to choose a teen would rather do that than accept some psychotic used-goods twitter whore.

>You're just a creepazoid weirdo who can't get women his age

Why the fuck would I want women my age? What do they have to offer me that a teenage girl doesn't? Oh right, STDs and debt. No thanks.

>>10716
>Isn’t that the right thing to do?
No, 18 is cuck shit. 16 is legal in most states and countries anyway. Stop letting self-involved, self-interested spinsters determine your moral worldview.
>>

 No.10753

American Pedopolitics: 250 Years of Child Abuse and Exploitation - An Academic Review

Unique IPs: 23

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome