[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1701275633156.jpg ( 49.03 KB , 640x590 , 1701275055345131.jpg )

 No.4421[View All]

In most countries it's 16 which I think is good. I'd say there needs to be some "Romeo and Juliet" exceptions added. No reason to have a 17 year old go to jail for dating a 15 year old.
15 is a just a little too young for the age of consent. What is hilarious is that burgers think just big age gaps are pedophilia while the average roastie in America becomes sexually active at 13, and often even younger.
453 posts and 33 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12253

>>12242
> why does your every argument rely on the majority who are retarded,

Isn’t that what your argumentative logic is? Justifying your indignation by using the retarded majority?

>people should be able to read at a past seventh grade level in the us and yes people go to trade schools or just get apprenticeships for that what is your argument?

Trade schools are never discussed much in American schools. Colleges are talked about endlessly.
The only people who end up in trade schools mainly are down-on-their-luck people nowadays.

> what are you waffling about

Sex is only promoted as a way to gatekeep people, especially young people. In meatspace, sex is actively discouraged for young people. It’s only allowed in advertising. And even then, a lot of ads about erectile performance drugs are aimed at older men looking to get their mojo on.

>”same with these categories on porn sites" im sure more people are practicing kinks

Those people are a minority. Most people are beating off to roleplay videos or cartoon porn.

>>12248
And these same people complain about discrimination against older people
>>

 No.12271

>>12253
>Isn’t that what your argumentative logic is? Justifying your indignation by using the retarded majority?

no argumentative logic is not when you use the retarded majority to justify your indignation

>Trade schools are never discussed much in American schools. Colleges are talked about endlessly.

this is just a lie vocational schools are talked about especially cause blue collar does pay "well" and not really many people go cause its ""easy"" money

>Sex is only promoted as a way to gatekeep people

how does it do this and again what are you talking about

>Most people are beating off to roleplay videos or cartoon porn.

and you think these are more vanilla why?

>And these same people complain about discrimination against older people

no we want more discrimination against older people
>>

 No.12274

>>12271
>this is just a lie vocational schools are talked about especially cause blue collar does pay "well" and not really many people go cause its ""easy"" money

Where?
Sounds like an outliers. Colleges are promoted all the time

>and you think these are more vanilla why?

What’s not vanilla about it?
>>

 No.12277

>>12220

> do you even know what the word means? attraction to and sexualization of i quote "young beautiful adolescents females" is a clear decline of societal standards.

No it is not. Men have been attracted, marrying and having sex with "young beautiful adolescents females" for the whole history of humanity. And even today they are doing so in some countries. Pedohysteria is a very new and modern (1990's+) politics, promoted by feminists and globalists. Promoted in order to suppress and control proletariat men. So, you basically work for feminists and globalists and against the male part of the proletariat.

Repeating my question again - how male attraction to young adolescent females can be degenerate? Giving the fact that most of men have this attraction?

> and why cant those men just date women their age? show me this deficit of women on some type of stat

Because young females are objectively much more valuable both as sex and romantic partners, than women 25+, not even talking about 30+. And if a 30yo man, that has been an incel for his whole life, is told to marry a 30yo woman, that has been fucking with chads for her whole life, he will consider it as injustice and he will not be happy with her. And even if she is virgin, he will say "well, other men (chads) have fucked a bunch of girls since their middle school, why should I fuck only one and old woman?".

> no dating women your own age won't turn you into an incel

It's like saying "eating from a trashcan doesn't make you hungry". Sex, as well as any other resource, should be distributed equally. Why should one fuck females of his age, let's say, 30yo, if he hasn't had sex with females of his age when he was 15? Who is gonna compensate the lost years?

> why should we not believe zalkind

I made a large reply to his 12 commandments, but you didn't manage to write any arguments against it.

> where is the pedohysteria bureaucrats get exposed for fucking and eating kids and nothing happens

Nothing happens because the bourgeois elites from the Epstein island are exactly those who have been promoting pedohysteria, but they don't promote it against themselves, they promote it against regular men, you idiot. You are showing completely no skills for class analysis.

> I was talking about you retards actually

What's the problem? I suggest you to prove that you don't really need sex. Or are you just a hypocrite?
>>

 No.12280

>>12274
>Sounds like an outliers. Colleges are promoted all the time

this doesn't mean that that trade schools aren't promoted they have always been treated as a viable second option especially by the media

>What’s not vanilla about it?

were not just talking about any porn its still the porn revolving those kinks

>>12277
>Men have been attracted

you're still using the past and third world as your justification just kys brownoid

"how male attraction" majority means nothing when the majority is retarded and brown and i already said the reason as to why its degenerate like two days ago?

>that has been an incel for his whole life

men who are incels at 30 aren't getting with older women you fucking loser you're so obviously a brown pedophile who wants to fuck young girls so i'll leave it at your perception of value is bourgeois and based off of abstract "values" only upheld by volkerabfalle

>Who is gonna compensate the lost years?

we aren't here to compensate anyone for anything retard and if women your age sounds like a trashcan you might actually be a pedophile


>I made a large reply to his 12 commandments

i still dont see it but its probably brownoid cope about shit he doesnt understand

>Nothing happens because the bourgeois elites from the Epstein island are exactly those who have been promoting pedohysteria, but they don't promote it against themselves, they promote it against regular men, you idiot. You are showing completely no skills for class analysis.

congressmen and cops are not bourgeois elites and nothing happened to them retard i meant anyone involved in it

>I suggest you to prove that you don't really need sex.

go back to esl retard i already proved that i don't need it
>>

 No.12285

>>12280

> you're still using the past and third world as your justification

I am, so what's the problem? You are using nothing but pathetic angry shouting.

> "how male attraction" majority means nothing when the majority is retarded

Why is the majority retarded? Maybe, it's you who is retarded? If you apply that attraction to young females is degenerate, you first must prove it. But it seems you are not able to it, lol.

> i already said the reason as to why its degenerate like two days ago

No, you haven't. You said some illogical bullshit, that proves nothing, but the fact that pedohysterical people have no arguments except their emotions.

> we aren't here to compensate anyone for anything

That's why you are a class enemy for incels and your bullshit posting is not needed here. Incels won't support those who say that they don't care about incels' needs.

> you might actually be a pedophile

Learn what the term "pedophile" means, at first.

> i still dont see it

Not only you're stupid, but also blind?

> congressmen and cops are not bourgeois elites and nothing happened to them retard i meant anyone involved in it

Who are congressmen and cops working for?

> go back to esl retard i already proved that i don't need it

Saying that you don't need it is not a proof. A worker can call himself a capitalists, but he will not stop being a worker after that. You are just a so-called incel in denial. It's very painful for you to admit that you are an incel and young females reject you, so you are sublimating it into hating sex.
>>

 No.12288

>>12285
>I am, so what's the problem?

they aren't civilized of course they aren't following what should be the societal standards and i haven't shouted once and i've been using logic to correct your claims

>Why is the majority retarded?

you couldn't even stay coherent in the rest of this "sentence", the global average autism score is like 90 and i already told you how that shows a decline from societal standards retard

>You said some illogical bullshit

in response to "liking adolescent girls shows a decline in societal standards" to which you justify by saying "see people in the past and in the third world today don''t do it that way"

>That's why you are a class enemy for incels

do soyim really?

"Learn what the term "pedophile" means, at first. "

"at first" and sorry i meant predator

>Not only you're stupid, but also blind?

copy and paste it here so i can debunk it

>Who are congressmen and cops working for

le people (public jobs and whatnot)

>Saying that you don't need it is not a proof.

that just wasn't my reason dickhead, my reason is that I have not reached full biological or social maturity as per the twelve sexual commandments of the revolutionary proletariat
>>

 No.12293

>>12288

> they aren't civilized of course

Who sets the standards for being civilized? You?

This nazi calls himself a marxist, lol.

> they aren't following what should be the societal standards

Again, who sets the standards? Why should people follow the standards of globalists, feminists and random puritanical dickheads like you?

> i've been using logic to correct your claims

Never knew that behaving yourself like a hysterical old hag with PMS is "using logic", lol. And you still haven't even explained why male attraction to young females is degenerate. Still waiting for it.

> i already told you how that shows a decline from societal standards retard

This social "standard" is relatively new and created artificially by the ruling class of capitalists and supported by feminists. It's made against men, the true aim of it is to cancel sex, atomize the society (so men would fear to talk with teens), demonize men and create new "witches" to hunt. So pedohysteria is just a capitalists' weapon in the current class war. Most men are attracted by young females, so this cannot be a perversion.

> do soyim really?

What?

> sorry i meant predator

Define predator. I would propose this - "the one who doesn't want to fuck old hags".

> copy and paste it here so i can debunk it

>>12153

> le people (public jobs and whatnot)

So, capitalists' servants work for people, not for the capitalists? You are definitely not a Marxist. Or a very stupid one.

> my reason is that I have not reached full biological or social maturity as per the twelve sexual commandments of the revolutionary proletariat

LOL. Have you ever seen such a cope, incel comrades? He's not an incel in denial, which can't get laid and doesn't even have balls to admit that. He's just following twelve sexual commandments, written by some Jew 100 years ago xD. Oh, funny motherfucker you are. By the way, what do you think Zalking would say about the fact that you masturbate your poor dickey every day? Is this okay for revolutionary proletariat? Or it's just a waste of time you could spend on fighting against capitalists (or, more likely, against incels)?
>>

 No.12319

>>12293
>This nazi calls himself a marxist, lol.

if you ever go back in time make sure to never ask marx and engels what their opinions on how civilized the third world and people of the past were. lol

> Why should people follow the standards of globalists, feminists and random puritanical dickheads like you?

read a book the standards i propose hae nothing to do with liberalism retard, nobody sets the standards and thats why they have fallen so low

>And you still haven't even explained why male attraction to young females is degenerate.

it shows a clear decline from societal standards. I mean only 100 years ago under the ussr did they endorse zalkinds twelve commandments.

>This social "standard" is relatively new and created artificially by the ruling class of capitalists

how did the capitalists make these standards exactly? and why would they make themselves look like pedophiles by upping the limit if they were just going to have sex with teens aswell (no this pedophilia stuff in the government and bourgeoisie didn't start at epstein) jfl "to cancel sex" "so men would fear talk to teens" "demonize men" you're so redpilled and christpilled bro do us all a favor and kys brownoid.

>Define predator.

someone who looks for vulnerable people for things (in this context sex)

im gonna respond to that under that thread but i already know its gonna be unfiltered cope about your brown culture

>capitalists' servants work for people

not what i said brown

you are so brown so i'll leave it at marx was a jew too
>>

 No.12320

>>12319
<This nazi calls himself a marxist, lol.
>if you ever go back in time make sure to never ask marx and engels what their opinions on how civilized the third world and people of the past were. lol
That's because today's radical leftism in America is not Karl Marx, but Karl Popper.
>>

 No.12322

>>12320
and here i was thinking they knew of how marx and engels used to talk about asiatic socities lol
>>

 No.12324

>>12319
>>12322
But Marx also said:
"Men make their own history, but they do not make it as they please; they do not make it under self-selected circumstances, but under circumstances existing already, given and transmitted from the past. The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living."
>>

 No.12325

File: 1786921917878.png ( 74.97 KB , 1550x372 , marx and engels americans ….png )

>>12319
>>12322
But what about Marx and Engels thinking this about Americans and other English speakers?
>>

 No.12327

>>12319
>>12322
But Marx also said:
"What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but, on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society; which is thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges."

(Critique of the Gotha Programme)
>>

 No.12328

>>12324
>but they do not make it as they please

im not the one arguing to go back to pre 1980 societal standards and "The tradition of all dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the brains of the living." aligns with y views

>>12325

>But what about Marx and Engels thinking this about Americans and other English speakers?

they were germans trying to undo anglo dominance, but im sure many germans also struggled with their writings

>>12327
>"What we have to deal with here is a communist society, not as it has developed on its own foundations, but, on the contrary, just as it emerges from capitalist society; which is thus in every respect, economically, morally, and intellectually, still stamped with the birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges."

so what? does this disprove what im saying?
>>

 No.12329

>>12328
>so what? does this disprove what im saying?
Well, you're implying Marx and Engels are like racist chuds
>>

 No.12332

>>12329
you're a jewish nigger
>>

 No.12335

>>12332
Back to /pol/ pig skin
>>

 No.12336

>>12332 i actually put uygur here idk why it put that
>>

 No.12340


Acceptable in my culture: Indian real estate agent gives bizarre reason for luring 9-year-old into his car in Canada
https://www.msn.com/en-in/crime/general/acceptable-in-my-culture-indian-real-estate-agent-gives-bizarre-reason-for-luring-9-year-old-into-his-car-in-canada/ar-AA22aE31
Why are so many religions like this?
>>

 No.12358

>>12288
>they aren't civilized of course they aren't following what should be the societal standards and i haven't shouted once and i've been using logic to correct your claims

You know that white people follow those same “uncivilized codes” of the “brown skins” you complain about? The whites just hide behind excessive liability laws.

Also funny that’s you’re racist assuming non whites aren’t civilized when white civilization was built on rape as pillaging of brown peopls
>>

 No.12370

>>12319

> if you ever go back in time make sure to never ask marx and engels what their opinions on how civilized the third world and people of the past were. lol

It would be useful for you to know, that Marx end Engels supposed that socialist revolutions would first start in developed industrial countries, but in fact the first socialist revolution came up in Russia. And a bit later some guys from one very progressive and civilized nation murdered tens of millions of people just because they considered them as lower beings. Would these social standards be appropriate for you, if you lived 90 years ago? Seems like they would.

> nobody sets the standards and thats why they have fallen so low
> it shows a clear decline from societal standards

If no one sets them, how do they exist?

> how did the capitalists make these standards exactly

Just like everything other - via media, laws, propaganda. The society's morale is defined by the ruling class.

> and why would they make themselves look like pedophiles by upping the limit if they were just going to have sex with teens aswell

I repeat it again, if you didn't get it for the first time - they're banning and cancelling sex for regular men, not for themselves.

> no this pedophilia stuff in the government and bourgeoisie didn't start at epstein

Attraction to teens is not pedophilia, but this stuff didn't start at Epstein indeed. The elites have been fucking young females since the ancient times, and there's nothing strange in that. Everyone would do so if he could. And the problem is not that some men have sex with young females. The problem is that other men don't.

> someone who looks for vulnerable people for things (in this context sex)

So? What's bad about this? And why are young females "vulnerable"? Some of them have higher bodycounts that most of grown men do.
>>

 No.12377

>>12288
>that just wasn't my reason dickhead, my reason is that I have not reached full biological or social maturity as per the twelve sexual commandments of the revolutionary proletariat

People reach biological maturity by fifteen.
We extended the childhood stage by ten years

>it shows a clear decline from societal standards. I mean only 100 years ago under the ussr did they endorse zalkinds twelve commandments.

If anything society has INCLINED by your standards. People nowadays think young adults dating anyone a few years their senior is “pedophilia”

A lot of people in their thirties say they find anyone younger than them is unattractive
>>

 No.12378

>>12288
>they aren't civilized of course they aren't following what should be the societal standards and i haven't shouted once and i've been using logic to correct your claims

You’ve been throwing around slurs and death threats and most of your “facts” are merely opinions without much evidence
>>

 No.12379

>>12358
>The whites just hide behind excessive liability laws.

i know i think all non marxists are this degernarated im simply only speaking to a brown so im not gonna call him a crakkka (and i never said brownskins)

and rape against your enemies is based
> but in fact the first socialist revolution came up in Russia.

wrong it was in paris russia was the 3rd revolution but the only one to win and the ussr itself killed millions and germany was not more progressive then them (maybe civilized but thats because of the headstart)

>If no one sets them, how do they exist?

no individual* i messed up

>The society's morale is defined by the ruling class.

jargon there is more than several historical examples of the modern moral contradicting with the bourgeoisies and peoples ethics are usually taught at home

>they're banning and cancelling sex for regular men, not for themselves.

this still doesn't make sense why make yourself the outlier? just because le supply will be bigger?

>Attraction to teens is not pedophilia

maybe some other philia but it will never be right and you're just outing yourself as a predator who can't get any JFL

>So? What's bad about this?

im going to rape your mother while she is on her death bed

>People reach biological maturity by fifteen.

source?

>If anything society has INCLINED by your standards. People nowadays think young adults dating anyone a few years their senior is “pedophilia”

this sentence isn't coherent try again retard and yes attraction isn't based on primal urges and that is good

>You’ve been throwing around slurs and death threats and most of your “facts” are merely opinions without much evidence

ask me for a source then subhuman
>>

 No.12380

>>12377
>People reach biological maturity by fifteen
my penor was ready since 11
>>

 No.12391

>>12379
>and rape against your enemies is based

You this while complaining about “liberal socialization”?

>source

Read any basic medical biology article.
Human puberty goes from around age nine thru fifteen

>maybe some other philia but it will never be right and you're just outing yourself as a predator who can't get any JFL

Soon, sexual attraction to vicenarians will be considered “pedophilia”

>this sentence isn't coherent try again retard and yes attraction isn't based on primal urges and that is good

You sure? There’s a lot of antisocial/homocidal forms of attraction that aren’t based on primal urges.

Also my sentence isn’t incoherent. The average postboomer adult thinks vicenarians dating anyone outside their age group is “grooming”
>>

 No.12392

>>12379

> there is more than several historical examples of the modern moral contradicting with the bourgeoisies

So what? No one says that 100% of the modern moral is created to serve the bourgeois.

> peoples ethics are usually taught at home

Today parents don't teach their children much, it's the Internet that's doing it instead.

> this still doesn't make sense why make yourself the outlier?

They are not doing it to make themselves "the outlier", they are doing it in order to deprive men of sex, to cancel sex, to make men incels. Because without sex men become weak, egoist, atomized, authoritarian and easy to rule and oppress. They want most men to be sexless slaves that only work for the corporations, but do not fight against the system.

> maybe some other philia but it will never be right

It has been right for the whole history of humanity.

> im going to rape your mother while she is on her death bed

Good luck. Probably, it's your only way to lose your virginity xD
>>

 No.12393

>>12377

> People reach biological maturity by fifteen

I started masturbating when I was 12. And when I was 13 I wanted to fuck all of my female classmates. But never mind, the reason of that is not human biology and physiology, the true reason is LIBERAL DEGENERATES xD
>>

 No.12395

>>12393
>I started masturbating when I was 12. And when I was 13 I wanted to fuck all of my female classmates.
Same. I would've started doing it at 5 or 6 if I had known how. Actually I was already fantasizing sex with classmates at that age. This sounds bad but I jumped on girl at around 5 because I was horny for her. She screamed and I was at home so I jumped off. I must've learned the concept of consent after that. In fact maybe too well since I never had sex.
>>

 No.12397

>>12391
>You this while complaining about “liberal socialization”?

this was an obvious joke

>ead any basic medical biology article.

id like to know which one you're reading because puberty ends at 16-17 (not that it marks biological maturity anyways)

>sexual attraction to vicenarians will be considered “pedophilia”

slippery slope fallacy people don't even know what that mean scrub

>The average postboomer adult thinks vicenarians dating anyone outside their age group is “grooming”

you can't just keep saying shit that doesn't happen as fact and like which ones?

>No one says that 100% of the modern moral is created to serve the bourgeois.

so prove that that part is

>it's the Internet that's doing it instead.

even worse the internet is largely decentralized

>they are doing it in order to deprive men of sex, to cancel sex, to make men incels.

bourgeoisie international plot to make men incels JFL just shut up

>for the whole history of humanity.

you can't keep relying on the past for justification lmao

>it's your only way to lose your virginity

i can rape you too

> I was 13 I wanted to fuck all of my female classmates.

you're a degenerate who grew up this way because f liberalization the neo-bolsheviks will save you soon.

>Actually I was already fantasizing sex with classmates at that age. This sounds bad but I jumped on girl at around 5 because I was horny for her.

you people should've been castrated.
>>

 No.12398

>>12395
>since I never had sex.
According to some psychoanalysts and philosophers, masturbating yourself is the same as a having sex with another person. Both count as sex according to some psychoanalysts and philosophers.

Thoughts on this?
>>

 No.12400

>>12398
If it was accepted by most people that masturbation counts as sex then I would brag that I've had sex thousands of times. But alas I don't think most people accept masturbation as sex and I'm not weird or brave enough to argue otherwise.
>>

 No.12401

>>12400
Darn…
>>

 No.12406

>>12397
>id like to know which one you're reading because puberty ends at 16-17 (not that it marks biological maturity anyway)

Then what is the mark of biological maturity then? Menopause?

>slippery slope fallacy people don't even know what that mean scrub

“Slippery slope fallacy” is what you’re doing, denying young people as full fledged adults

Also, vicenarian means “twenty-something”

>you can't just keep saying shit that doesn't happen as fact and like which ones?

A lot of tricenarian a say they don’t find vicenarians are attractive because “muh brain development”

>even worse the internet is largely decentralized

Wrong. The Internet is centralized. Also it’s wrong to blame the Internet

>>12398
This is a retarded rationalization. Do you count suicide as homicide?


>you're a degenerate who grew up this way because f liberalization the neo-bolsheviks will save you soon.

I take it you’ve never hung out with old men before? It’s common to have sexual desire for schoolmates of the opposite sex. This was a thing even before “liberal socialisation”

>you people should've been castrated.

Why? For having a sex drive?

No offense but you come off to me as someone who is way too in denial about the human world.
>>

 No.12407

>>12397
>slippery slope fallacy

That’s what you’re doing, treating youth sexuality as degeneracy. Thinking that young people having sex or relationships will lead to absolute whoredom
>>

 No.12408

>>12407
>>12397
>>slippery slope fallacy

That’s your logic towards young people entering the workforce. You act like young people doing any industrial activity is gonna dumb then down/abuse them
>>

 No.12410

>>12406
>what is the mark of biological maturity then? Menopause?

its a multifaceted thing if not obvious mostly revolving around the brains development (though obviously including the rest of the mature markers) and in this context societal maturity

>denying young people as full fledged adults

this isn't the slippery slop fallacy nor is it wrong? you're trying to label 14-15 year olds as adults

> The Internet is centralized. Also it’s wrong to blame the Internet

no it isn't and i wasn't you made that point

>I take it you’ve never hung out with old men before?

i forgot to include 'conservative socialization', quite frankly any type of socialization under a class society does that to people

>No offense but you come off to me as someone who is way too in denial about the human world.

wheres the giga but in all seriousness that guy was telling a story about how he was so horny he jumped on a girl and borderline assaulted her, in any real society that little uygha would've been punished

>>12407
>Thinking that young people having sex or relationships will lead to absolute whoredom

this just hasn't been my point against "youth sexuality" brainlet

>That’s your logic towards young people entering the workforce. You act like young people doing any industrial activity is gonna dumb then down/abuse them

where did i imply this?
>>

 No.12419

>>12410
>you're trying to label 14-15 year olds as adults
What's wrong with that? If you shot up your school at 15 you'd be tried as an adult.
>>

 No.12420

>>12410
>its a multifaceted thing if not obvious mostly revolving around the brains development (though obviously including the rest of the mature markers) and in this context societal maturity
I’m talking specifically BIOLOGICAL maturity you ignoramus.


Besides, you know that neuroscientists now say brain development finishes around 35-40?

May as well extend adolescence until 35

Regardless concerning your “multifaceted” theory, kids were socialised alongside adults an were trained in worldly affairs such as work, customs, etc

So by your metric, we have delayed maturity. People were considered adults in their teens in the old days both biologically and socially.


>this isn't the slippery slop fallacy nor is it wrong? you're trying to label 14-15 year olds as adults

Maybe because they are? They’re tried as adults for crime and are expected to work.
Your philosophy is divorced from reality

>no it isn't and i wasn't you made that point


Explain how the current Internet isn’t centralized.
>>

 No.12421

>>12419
This HatefulGramscian guy is an ignoramus. Don’t argue with him.
>>

 No.12424

>>12419
> If you shot up your school at 15 you'd be tried as an adult.

well yeah thats an extreme case

>>12420
>I’m talking specifically BIOLOGICAL maturity you ignoramus.

yes uygha thats why i said its a multifaceted thing

>you know that neuroscientists now say brain development finishes around 35-40?

"which averages to 20" just reread what i wrote retard by my metric people are considered mature too early (biologically) and socially to late "in the old days" JFL

>They’re tried as adults for crime and are expected to work.

they aren't expected to work and they're only tried as adults if they do some real fucked up shit and the reality under a liberal society? sure

>how the current Internet isn’t centralized.

I think you think im talking about the internets infrastructure and not the people on it but if you don't then because of how many different people (in variety) are on here?
>>

 No.12425

>>12421
You just learned this word
>>

 No.12426

>>12420
>neuroscientists now say brain development finishes around 35-40
Neuroscientists say a lot of things, many of which have been found to not be replicable. Also:

>roasties work in psychology
>keep getting older
>guys keep not wanting them
>oh shit, better increase the age at which the brain supposedly matures again
>a couple years ago they said it was 25
I'M NOTICING
>>

 No.12519

>>12424
>they aren't expected to work and they're only tried as adults if they do some real fucked up shit and the reality under a liberal society? sure

Wrong. Even for more moderate crimes, teens are treated as adults and are still seen as old enough to work although it’s becoming seen as irrelevant due to increased workload in homework.
>>

 No.12523

>>12519
>Even for more moderate crimes, teens are treated as adults

name these moderate crimes and no like many teens still work shithead its seen as "irrelevant" for other issues like parents shifting to prioritizing academic preparation
>>

 No.12526

>>12426
>roasties work in psychology
>I'M NOTICING
What about the patriarchy?
>>

 No.12556

>>12526
>what about the Easter Bunny
>>

 No.12558

>>12556
Are you denying there is a patriarchy that would actually tip the scales the other way instead, meaning it's more likely to generally espouse male-biased views?
>>

 No.12568

File: 1787526472714-0.png ( 683.18 KB , 1090x882 , Screenshot 2026-08-23 at 6….png )

File: 1787526472714-1.jpg ( 104.21 KB , 1047x719 , media_HQWxgTKbkAAK1-P.jpg )

>>9501
I TOLD YOU THIS WOULD HAPPEN

Unique IPs: 24
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome