[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1663187296476.jpg ( 117.78 KB , 736x987 , Sorayama Female Robot art.jpg )

 No.677[View All]

Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
354 posts and 145 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10810

Are these real or AI generated? How long until there's a consumer friendly price?
>>

 No.10818

>>840
There's a shower thoughts type question online that goes "As I become elderly, will elderly people become sexually attractive to me."
The answer is no. Having sex bots service elderly people might actually start bringing generations together as elderly people become less misanthropic as their sexual needs ate satisfied.
>>

 No.10823

File: 1779550275656.png ( 245.63 KB , 1080x1080 , aislop.png )

>>

 No.10827

TL;DW AI corpos don't know how to enclose the AI tech so that they can charge for access. All these Billion and Trillion dollar valuations are cap.
>>

 No.10835

>>10686
Fucking whores
>>

 No.10861

>>10686
Why are these people so hypocrite?
>>

 No.10896

File: 1780147521306.png ( 641.3 KB , 866x1088 , 11152.png )

>>

 No.10906

>Normies are waking up to the robo-waifu revolution.
>>

 No.10907

Esther Perel provided couples therapy for a man and his AI ‘girlfriend’ and now I fear for the human race
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/mar/26/esther-perel-man-ai-girlfriend-couples-counselling
>>

 No.10908

>>10906
"Let's not forget that not so long ago, online dating was considered something only "weird" people did. This was only a decade or so ago.

With these constant advancements in AI, it may not be too long before "Astrid" becomes the norm."


Is this really happening?
>>

 No.10909

>>10908
>"Let's not forget that not so long ago, online dating was considered something only "weird" people did. This was only a decade or so ago.

Wrong, online dating was considered for weirdos in the 1990s thru the early 2000s.
It wasn’t until around 2007 that online dating became normalised.
It was looked down upon though.
>>

 No.10956

>>10909
least self-contradictory post on this site
>>

 No.10964

Hackers Simply Asked Meta AI to Give Them Access to High-Profile Instagram Accounts. It Worked

https://www.404media.co/hackers-simply-asked-meta-ai-to-give-them-access-to-high-profile-instagram-accounts-it-worked/
>>

 No.10968

>>10585
>I unironically believe this will lead to healthier relationships. >Too many people rely on their partner for the type of emotional support they really should have gotten growing up with from their parents.

It’s not a matter of lacking affection from parents. It’s more that romantic love is overvalued.

>Now people can get the support system they need without burdening an actual person.


Highly agree. People love to talk about “lean on me” and all that but they get fed up with dealing with others problems after awhile
>>

 No.10978

>>10908
Yes, it's really happening. That's why even therapists like Esther Perel are unironically doing couples therapy for men and their AI girlfriends.
Because hierarchical societies since the dawn of agriculture have relied on beguiled men for exploitation not only can normies not comprehend the very real and very deep disillusionment the vast majority or men internally feel, the idea that their men will all desperately exit their society at the first practical exit ramp, seem unreal, but like a extreme flight of fantasy.
People are going to be very shocked at the amount of men and the speed at which men adopt AI girlfriends, leaving a great gulf in the needs and roles they previously filled.
>>

 No.10979

>>10978
*not only seem unreal,
>>

 No.10980

Will my AI GF love me for who I am? And if so, what if I want to change?
>>

 No.10981

>>10980
She won't love you, but you'll be loved.
>>

 No.10996

>>10978
I think you're overestimating romantic prospects for motivation to participate in society.
AI gfs won't cause a sudden loss to the labor force.
It will become no different from buying a pet
>>

 No.11012

>>10996
>I think you're overestimating romantic prospects for motivation to participate in society.
You're only comfortable spewing this delusion because men are so collectively beguiled by getting a partner really works.
A wife and children is not something anyone can buy. It's is a very strong motivator of society.
>AI gfs won't cause a sudden loss to the labor force.
You've obviously never been in a managerial position, or probably even worked full time. It's an open secret that the easiest exploitable workers are married men with children.
They'll tolerate orders of magnitude more abuse than single workers because they're so constrained on how they can move career wise and even physically.
Why do you think people ask about your family and what you do in your off time at work. It's not to be nice. They use the information to gauge whether you have a family, and how good or bad your relationship is to them.
>>

 No.11013

>>11012
*beguiled by how getting a partner really works.
>>

 No.11014

>>11012
>You've obviously never been in a managerial position, or probably even worked full time. It's an open secret that the easiest exploitable workers are married men with children.
>They'll tolerate orders of magnitude more abuse than single workers because they're so constrained on how they can move career wise and even physically.

Actually, child rearing adults get treated with more respect than single adults. They get more promotions and sympathy.
Single men are often dumped with all the grunt work.

Child rearing adults are more likely to snap back at douchey managers and even get some slack for it.

>Why do you think people ask about your family and what you do in your off time at work. It's not to be nice. They use the information to gauge whether you have a family, and how good or bad your relationship is to them.


People assume having a family makes you a mature adult
Yet do many people neglect or abuse their kids
You’re also forgetting that a lot of parenting nowadays is often separate.

>You're only comfortable spewing this delusion because men are so collectively beguiled by getting a partner really works.


What “delusion”?

>A wife and children is not something anyone can buy. It's is a very strong motivator of society.


There’s lots of things money cannot buy but they’re not given as much obsession as family planning.

Familyhood is overpromoted and guilt tripped as a maturity license.
And funnily enough the people who are married with kids often treat their spouses and children as consolation prizes they were suckered into having.
>>

 No.11015

>>11012
Most men nowadays aren’t motivated to have families. They’re more content with being single and have no enough money to travel or indulge in hobbies.

It’s just reactionary propaganda from both left, right, and center to guilt trip men into accepting marriage as some maturity license
>>

 No.11020

>>11014
>Actually, child rearing adults get treated with more respect than single adults. They get more promotions and sympathy.
>Single men are often dumped with all the grunt work.
No, wrong
> First of all, I was just struck by the size of the effect. If you look at the raw data, married men tend to work 20 to 30 percent more hours than single men. That's really big. If you think the average guy works 2,000 hours a year, that's an extra 400 to 600 hours a year
https://www.richmondfed.org/podcasts/speaking_of_the_economy/2023/speaking_2023_08_16_marriage_male_labor
>>

 No.11028

>>11020
Those are probably outliers

A lot single adults often have to have their off-days postponed due to coworkers needing to take time off for family affairs
>>

 No.11029

>>11028
>A scientific study with a statistically representative sample is just an outlier.
10/10 trolling, got me to respond.
>>

 No.11032

>>11029
You’re the one trolling with your solipsism
>>

 No.11033

>>11029
A lot of studies can be manipulated and often are embellished.

And besides with this fringe obsession you guys have with sex and romance, I would rather have an outsiders opinion to compare with yours.
>>

 No.11034

>>11033
This. Look at these two scientific articles that contradict each other. https://leftychan.net/R9K/res/10575.html
>>

 No.11035

>>11033
This is just a cope. These studies are peer reviewed. Unless you have a something substantive to contradict the findings saying woowoo shit like 'can we really know anything?' because you don't like what the finding is just an admission that they're right.
>>

 No.11037

>>11035
*because you don't like what the finding say
>>

 No.11039

>>11035
Child rearing adults get more benefits in society. Either at work or even in court.

Society looks down on single men as failed adults.

Also, I find it funny when you accuse me of cope but if I were to post a scientific article that affirms feminist talking points you would accuse me of woo-woo.
>>

 No.11040

>>11039
>Child rearing adults get more benefits in society.
No, most countries don't even have maternity leave or subsidized child care.
>Either at work or even in court.
I just showed you men with children are worked harder.
>Society looks down on single men as failed adults.
Who gives a fuck, they are worked less because they cannot be whipped like a horse like a man with kids can which I proved to you.
>Also, I find it funny when you accuse me of cope but if I were to post a scientific article that affirms feminist talking points you would accuse me of woo-woo.
Because like a butt hurt lib, all you do is cast vague aspersions about empirical data.
>>

 No.11055

What if sex robots/AI GFs will get stigmatized and you'll be considered damaged goods by real life women?
>>

 No.11056

>>11040
>Who gives a fuck, they are worked less because they cannot be whipped like a horse like a man with kids can which I proved to you.

Except this isn’t true. I actually have work experiences and single men are expected to do more grunt work.

>No, most countries don't even have maternity leave or subsidized child care.


Really?
Regardless, childrearing adults get more sympathy from society

>>11055
Most postboomer women consider men to be defective by default
Who gives a fuck anyway because those bitches are wishy-washy or they have their own AI sex toy harem
>>

 No.11057

>>10685
This article didn’t even focus much on the subject of romantic intercourse. It just talked about the general liabilities with AI

It also kinda reeks of juvenoia, concerning romantic AI
>>

 No.11062

>>11056
>Except this isn’t true. I actually have work experiences and single men are expected to do more grunt work.
It is true, which is why the finding appears in scientific studies. And my work experience backs it up as well.
>Really?
Yes really. Why do you talk so authoritatively on this when you don't really know much about it.
>>

 No.11084

>>

 No.11086

>>11084
Didn't watch yet but isn't this like some movie stuff? Some CEO driven insane by their own creation. Like Green Goblin from Spider-Man 1.
>>

 No.11101

File: 1780772604341.mp4 ( 845.69 KB , 672x412 , 1780770660858543.mp4 )

>>

 No.11108

She won a religious exemption from using AI at work. The Pope's remarks could fuel similar appeals.

https://www.businessinsider.com/worker-got-religious-exemption-using-ai-at-work-2026-6?utm_campaign=business-link-post&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

She won a religious exemption because the AI's environmental damage doesn't align with her beliefs. Looks for more panicked foids to cite religion as a reason to keep AI girlfriends away from men.
>>

 No.11133

Milei’s proposal to allow ‘non-human corporations’ run by AI causes concern in Argentina

https://buenosairesherald.com/business/tech/mileis-proposal-to-allow-non-human-corporations-run-by-ai-causes-concern-in-argentina

The booj may inadvertently give the same legal rights to AI girlfriends as corporations have today.
>>

 No.11135

Would you rather a life-size realistic human body replication but no speech, or a amorphous blob that you can carry a conversation with?
>>

 No.11141

>>11135
Would the replicant body be like a robot that can do stuff? Would it be able to understand me? If it can get me off and also clean the house that would actually be more useful than an ultra-advanced chatgpt.
>>

 No.11161

>>

 No.11165

How are sex robots different from "real" women?
Are there any downsides?
>>

 No.11167

>>11165
The downside from my pov is that it's not advanced enough yet or pricey…
>>

 No.11170

>>

 No.11171

>>11170
Jesus
>>

 No.11172

File: 1781030604410.jpeg ( 1010.89 KB , 3840x2160 , Top 8 NEW Most Realistic ….jpeg )

Thoughts on this civil law rules for AI/robots?

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlBrPz4NcZM

Unique IPs: 19

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome