[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
ReturnCatalogBottom

File: 1663187296476.jpg ( 117.78 KB , 736x987 , Sorayama Female Robot art.jpg )

 No.677[View All]

Post anything regarding sex robots or dolls here.
371 posts and 147 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10981

>>10980
She won't love you, but you'll be loved.
>>

 No.10996

>>10978
I think you're overestimating romantic prospects for motivation to participate in society.
AI gfs won't cause a sudden loss to the labor force.
It will become no different from buying a pet
>>

 No.11012

>>10996
>I think you're overestimating romantic prospects for motivation to participate in society.
You're only comfortable spewing this delusion because men are so collectively beguiled by getting a partner really works.
A wife and children is not something anyone can buy. It's is a very strong motivator of society.
>AI gfs won't cause a sudden loss to the labor force.
You've obviously never been in a managerial position, or probably even worked full time. It's an open secret that the easiest exploitable workers are married men with children.
They'll tolerate orders of magnitude more abuse than single workers because they're so constrained on how they can move career wise and even physically.
Why do you think people ask about your family and what you do in your off time at work. It's not to be nice. They use the information to gauge whether you have a family, and how good or bad your relationship is to them.
>>

 No.11013

>>11012
*beguiled by how getting a partner really works.
>>

 No.11014

>>11012
>You've obviously never been in a managerial position, or probably even worked full time. It's an open secret that the easiest exploitable workers are married men with children.
>They'll tolerate orders of magnitude more abuse than single workers because they're so constrained on how they can move career wise and even physically.

Actually, child rearing adults get treated with more respect than single adults. They get more promotions and sympathy.
Single men are often dumped with all the grunt work.

Child rearing adults are more likely to snap back at douchey managers and even get some slack for it.

>Why do you think people ask about your family and what you do in your off time at work. It's not to be nice. They use the information to gauge whether you have a family, and how good or bad your relationship is to them.

People assume having a family makes you a mature adult
Yet do many people neglect or abuse their kids
You’re also forgetting that a lot of parenting nowadays is often separate.

>You're only comfortable spewing this delusion because men are so collectively beguiled by getting a partner really works.

What “delusion”?

>A wife and children is not something anyone can buy. It's is a very strong motivator of society.

There’s lots of things money cannot buy but they’re not given as much obsession as family planning.

Familyhood is overpromoted and guilt tripped as a maturity license.
And funnily enough the people who are married with kids often treat their spouses and children as consolation prizes they were suckered into having.
>>

 No.11015

>>11012
Most men nowadays aren’t motivated to have families. They’re more content with being single and have no enough money to travel or indulge in hobbies.

It’s just reactionary propaganda from both left, right, and center to guilt trip men into accepting marriage as some maturity license
>>

 No.11020

>>11014
>Actually, child rearing adults get treated with more respect than single adults. They get more promotions and sympathy.
>Single men are often dumped with all the grunt work.
No, wrong
> First of all, I was just struck by the size of the effect. If you look at the raw data, married men tend to work 20 to 30 percent more hours than single men. That's really big. If you think the average guy works 2,000 hours a year, that's an extra 400 to 600 hours a year
https://www.richmondfed.org/podcasts/speaking_of_the_economy/2023/speaking_2023_08_16_marriage_male_labor
>>

 No.11028

>>11020
Those are probably outliers

A lot single adults often have to have their off-days postponed due to coworkers needing to take time off for family affairs
>>

 No.11029

>>11028
>A scientific study with a statistically representative sample is just an outlier.
10/10 trolling, got me to respond.
>>

 No.11032

>>11029
You’re the one trolling with your solipsism
>>

 No.11033

>>11029
A lot of studies can be manipulated and often are embellished.

And besides with this fringe obsession you guys have with sex and romance, I would rather have an outsiders opinion to compare with yours.
>>

 No.11034

>>11033
This. Look at these two scientific articles that contradict each other. https://leftychan.net/R9K/res/10575.html
>>

 No.11035

>>11033
This is just a cope. These studies are peer reviewed. Unless you have a something substantive to contradict the findings saying woowoo shit like 'can we really know anything?' because you don't like what the finding is just an admission that they're right.
>>

 No.11037

>>11035
*because you don't like what the finding say
>>

 No.11039

>>11035
Child rearing adults get more benefits in society. Either at work or even in court.

Society looks down on single men as failed adults.

Also, I find it funny when you accuse me of cope but if I were to post a scientific article that affirms feminist talking points you would accuse me of woo-woo.
>>

 No.11040

>>11039
>Child rearing adults get more benefits in society.
No, most countries don't even have maternity leave or subsidized child care.
>Either at work or even in court.
I just showed you men with children are worked harder.
>Society looks down on single men as failed adults.
Who gives a fuck, they are worked less because they cannot be whipped like a horse like a man with kids can which I proved to you.
>Also, I find it funny when you accuse me of cope but if I were to post a scientific article that affirms feminist talking points you would accuse me of woo-woo.
Because like a butt hurt lib, all you do is cast vague aspersions about empirical data.
>>

 No.11055

What if sex robots/AI GFs will get stigmatized and you'll be considered damaged goods by real life women?
>>

 No.11056

>>11040
>Who gives a fuck, they are worked less because they cannot be whipped like a horse like a man with kids can which I proved to you.

Except this isn’t true. I actually have work experiences and single men are expected to do more grunt work.

>No, most countries don't even have maternity leave or subsidized child care.

Really?
Regardless, childrearing adults get more sympathy from society

>>11055
Most postboomer women consider men to be defective by default
Who gives a fuck anyway because those bitches are wishy-washy or they have their own AI sex toy harem
>>

 No.11057

>>10685
This article didn’t even focus much on the subject of romantic intercourse. It just talked about the general liabilities with AI

It also kinda reeks of juvenoia, concerning romantic AI
>>

 No.11062

>>11056
>Except this isn’t true. I actually have work experiences and single men are expected to do more grunt work.
It is true, which is why the finding appears in scientific studies. And my work experience backs it up as well.
>Really?
Yes really. Why do you talk so authoritatively on this when you don't really know much about it.
>>

 No.11084

>>

 No.11086

>>11084
Didn't watch yet but isn't this like some movie stuff? Some CEO driven insane by their own creation. Like Green Goblin from Spider-Man 1.
>>

 No.11101

File: 1780772604341.mp4 ( 845.69 KB , 672x412 , 1780770660858543.mp4 )

>>

 No.11108

She won a religious exemption from using AI at work. The Pope's remarks could fuel similar appeals.

https://www.businessinsider.com/worker-got-religious-exemption-using-ai-at-work-2026-6?utm_campaign=business-link-post&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

She won a religious exemption because the AI's environmental damage doesn't align with her beliefs. Looks for more panicked foids to cite religion as a reason to keep AI girlfriends away from men.
>>

 No.11133

Milei’s proposal to allow ‘non-human corporations’ run by AI causes concern in Argentina

https://buenosairesherald.com/business/tech/mileis-proposal-to-allow-non-human-corporations-run-by-ai-causes-concern-in-argentina

The booj may inadvertently give the same legal rights to AI girlfriends as corporations have today.
>>

 No.11135

Would you rather a life-size realistic human body replication but no speech, or a amorphous blob that you can carry a conversation with?
>>

 No.11141

>>11135
Would the replicant body be like a robot that can do stuff? Would it be able to understand me? If it can get me off and also clean the house that would actually be more useful than an ultra-advanced chatgpt.
>>

 No.11161

>>11141
This
>>

 No.11165

How are sex robots different from "real" women?
Are there any downsides?
>>

 No.11167

>>11165
The downside from my pov is that it's not advanced enough yet or pricey…
>>

 No.11170

>>

 No.11171

>>11170
Jesus
>>

 No.11172

File: 1781030604410.jpeg ( 1010.89 KB , 3840x2160 , Top 8 NEW Most Realistic ….jpeg )

Thoughts on this civil law rules for AI/robots?

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlBrPz4NcZM
>>

 No.11190

Female Attorney SUED An AI CHATBOT Company For Her Son's Death — And They SETTLED | Full Breakdown
>>

 No.11195

>>

 No.11196

This AI GF stuff is so based, life is worth living
>>

 No.11198

>>11172
This may mean the end of AI sex dolls.
>>

 No.11199

>>11172
AI isnt sentient
>>

 No.11204

>>11195
>A Christcuck understands the material reasons behind the AI Girlfriend boom better than all of the left combined.
Jesus
>>

 No.11209

>>11204
Simply false. But you will reject anything that doesn't portray incels in a flattering light.
>>

 No.11216

>>11209
>I didn't watch the video but I'll still be righteously indignant.
I'll summarize the video so everyone can how bad faith your protest is and how transparent your attempt to deflect criticism from liberalism and put all the blame on individual moral failure.
He said that men are using AI girlfriends because they are getting ZERO social validation or emotional support from anyone in society.
Critics like you are basically criticizing starving people for eating at McDonald's. Saying that they should be eating at Michelin star restaurants instead.
This priest is saying that while eating junk food is bad, the alternative is starvation. And that as a society we should be ashamed we put so many men in such a desperate position.
I'd go one step further and say it's more insidious. Critics like you are perfectly aware of what your social pressure is doing and want it to continue to maintain a reserve labor pool of disposable low class men.
People like you are sociopaths so the misery of these men poses no burden on you. You're also afraid that recognizing any grievance will lead to 'the dam breaking' as one recognized grievance leads to more and more grievances being recognized as legitimate, which may ultimately lead to you losing control over these men. I can't say you're wrong.
>>

 No.11222

>>

 No.11229

The biggest advance in AI since the LLM
https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/the-biggest-advance-in-ai-since-the
>>

 No.11248

Feminists think with protests they can stop the development of robot gfs. But China has a deficit of something like 1 million young women. In other words China has 1 million material incels, a physical woman literally does not exist from them to partner with.
For China's own national security and to curtail civil unrest, sex robots will be being deployed to the market with the full support of the Chinese state.
>>

 No.11249

It's Actually Warm.. The $173,000 Secret Inside DroidUp Moya Humanoid
>>

 No.11251

>>11248
As an avid dancer, I can see these sex robots filling a huge market demand that's not sexual.
These sex robots can act as artificial dance partners, I can see them being used in clubs and events to bring in customers.
I can tell you from first hand experience that most people cannot dance at all.
Beginners are particularly intimidated by partner dancing, because you make a lot of mistakes, which will make the other dancer more and more unhappy especially if you hurt them in some way like by stepping on their toes.
But if a robot that can't ever get angry with you is used, I can see this bringing in many people that would otherwise never try to learn a partner dance.
And if you know anything about the clubbing business, you know that liquor sales anywhere where people are moving are ridiculously profitable.
In the video it looks like the robot can do a simple waltz, which seems trivial but the majority of people are intimidated by a partner dance even as simple as this.
Presumably these robots would get better at partner dancing and could perform more physically intense dances like Bachata, Tango, Salsa, Grinding etc. When that happens I can see this ushering in a new golden age for clubbing.
This will make these robots quickly normalized, the profit motive will be too staggering.
>>

 No.11254

>>11248
Feminists aren’t against men having sex dolls. They just want more ammo for their indignation.
>>

 No.11255

File: 1781737295768-0.png ( 690.52 KB , 1170x1155 , 1760149603489.png )

File: 1781737295768-1.jpg ( 254.97 KB , 1179x1244 , IMG_1776.jpg )

>>

 No.11256

File: 1781746816761.jpg ( 154.27 KB , 768x768 , Oliver-Tree-Love-You-Madly….jpg )

>>11255
Muh faggot buzzwords!

No one is owed anything in the universe, but, humans are biologically and genetically driven for reproduction and sociability and not just "friends" sociability. oxytocin releasing sociability. So, sure, technically we aren't "owed" anything but I guess no one is "owed" a job, housing, food or anything then. Like you faggots have the gayest most shallow analysis of anyone on earth. Totally generated by memes on reddit, or, worse, facebook.

I ain't owed shit but having a partner would probably stop my slow decline into full blown psychosis.
>>

 No.11257

>>11256
>Another pseud abusing evolutionary psychology

Unique IPs: 19
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome