>>10795>Exactly my point. Men are disposable, and when they're not disposed of, they create a logger jam.Thats due to chivalry. Men are disposable but so are women. Women who were born infertile were scorned.
The idea that men are expendable is more rooted in romantic prospects which idiots like you wanna uphold to justify your indignation.
>But this is not what's told to me. They're told dating is egalitarian and if they just follow the rules are be a "good person" they'll be partnered. When in reality they need to die in a war so that the next generation of Chad's bastards can be spawned.Methinks you're reading too deep into it. Men aren't trained just for war. Idk what's with this board thinking war is the only male occupation.
Also, most men are not Chads and still manage to have kids
>Women have HIGHER survivor rates and longer lives than men. You have this imaginary cohort of women that died before they conceive either because of illnesses or injury or neglect all, that disproves my theory that women reproduce at the expense of most men, while ignoring men die at higher rates of all those things.Now you're coping.
Women have higher survival rates in war and industrial activities because of leniency not exactly nature.
Also, yes there were alot g women that died from disease or malnutrition or whatever and didn't get to reproduce.