[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ][Options][ watchlist ]

/assembly_archive/ - Voting archive

Where decisions are made history.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Discord

| Catalog | Home

File (hide): 1621562833642.jpg ( 284.48 KB , 1200x521 , fukoka.jpg )

[–]

 No.813[Reply]>>824>>826

Vote: Wobbly's suspension should be revoked and he should be returned to the status of a full moderator - voiding any previous punishments… Again.

Vote ends 24/05/21 3am UTC
6 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.821

No from me
>>

 No.822

no.
>>

 No.823

>>820
Please leave your name or your vote can't count.
>>

 No.824

>>813
Comatoast says aye.
>>

 No.826

>>813
AUTO-PASSED WITH 7 AYE VOTES


File (hide): 1621038686335.jpg ( 102.27 KB , 1108x800 , C-tEz5GVoAAbNpr.jpg )

[–]

 No.827[Reply]>>834>>838

Vote: Wobbly's suspension should be revoked and he should be returned to the status of a full moderator - voiding any previous punishments.

Vote Ends 18/05/21 2am UTC
3 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.831

aye and cute penguins also
>>

 No.834

>>827
Voting yes on behalf of Antinous.
>>

 No.835>>836

File (hide): 1621099899028.png ( 6.76 KB , 1332x44 , wvobbly.png )

>>833
No the votes were more than legal, they were agreed upon. There was a conference held with almost all the mods and after hours of deliberation there was a consensus around suspending wvobbly and not letting them mod idpol for three months. Terms that they ended up violating anyway.

This is just an attempt to overturn an already made decision. Nothing will ever get finished as long as we're stuck litigating the past over and over.
>>

 No.836

>>835
You need to leave your name.
>>

 No.838

>>827
PASSED AND IMPLEMENTED


File (hide): 1620868115383.gif ( 211.21 KB , 200x150 , jannie beat down.gif )

[–]

 No.283[Reply]>>291>>295>>296

Vote: Suspend m00dy from moderating /leftypol/ for a week for deleting posts by IP in an unwarranted way and punching holes through the Intifada thread for no good reason.

He has done this twice in one day and refused to listen to criticism after each time. Abuse of the delete by IP function is unacceptable.
5 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.291

>>283
No, m00dy already agreed to be less trigger-happy with the Delete by IP button
>>

 No.292

If you have something to say, say it to my face. This conniving backstabbing behaviour is pathetic. I deleted the replies made from the user's vpn after he was banned in the preceding hours entirely consisting of the derail in the antifada general that the users complained so much about, additionally the user was ban evading. The user broke rule 4 and called for graphic genocide of jews and disabled people. The user received a one day ban on his (vpn) IP from /leftypol/. The user then immediately returned to complain about his sentence in that very thread, violating his ip ban and further derailing the thread and violating rule 4. Comatoast then without asking the team unbanned his one IP and made a public apology under his name tag. I deleted that users post history which entirely consisted of derails made in that thread (because he switched to a fresh ip address for it, possibly in anticapation of a ban) I also deleted every offtopic post in the thread pertaining to the one ban, a majority of which was complaing about said user.

The issue I ran into was the complete unwillingness from the two other mods on at the time to delete rule breaking content from that one user that was further derailing the thread. This has been an ongoing issue and I brought it up in congress to get feedback from the users, even the most self proclaimed anti-moderation user in the matrix told us that it makes sense just to delete the post a user is banned for before it can generate (you's) and was OK with us deleting offtopic replies. Additionally we specifically passed a proposal recently to bar moderators from unilaterally lifting bans, which was ignored by comatoast. I have agreed to consult more with the rest of the team before deleting a banned user's post history, however this is still an issue we have to address, and was in response to lifting the ban on a user without consent.
These calls for purging me off the team are childish and pathetic, and you should be ashamed you would refuse analysis of the situation in favour of thugishly lashing out at me over disagreements in moderation when I have made an effort to come to an understanding and to address wider issues with the feedback of the userbase. As they say, don't shoot the messenger.
>>

 No.293

No.
>>

 No.295

>>283
Voting no on behalf of Antinous
>>

 No.296

>>283
VOTE FAILED


File (hide): 1618806684913.jpg ( 890.53 KB , 870x581 , 0d05111ae9fb9bc78c8ba77a73….jpg )

[–]

 No.870[Reply]

vote to suspend wvobbly from modding anything reactionary/idpol for 3 months
7 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.879

this passed
>>

 No.880

>>

 No.881

>>

 No.882>>883

Vote didn't pass! Spooky_milk voted after the 3 day window so their vote doesn't count. So the final vote is 3 for and 3 against.
>>

 No.883

>>882
yes additionally I would change my vote to no after additional consideration


File (hide): 1618806684913.jpg ( 890.53 KB , 870x581 , 0d05111ae9fb9bc78c8ba77a73….jpg )

[–]

 No.272[Reply]>>279

vote to suspend wvobbly from modding anything reactionary/idpol for 3 months
4 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.278

change my vote to Yes (for 3 months)
>>

 No.279

>>272
I vote against.
>>

 No.280

vote yes
>>

 No.281

this passed
>>

 No.282



File (hide): 1618806684913.jpg ( 890.53 KB , 870x581 , 0d05111ae9fb9bc78c8ba77a73….jpg )

[–]

 No.262[Reply]>>269

vote to suspend wvobbly from modding anything reactionary/idpol for 3 months
3 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.267

i vote yes obviously
>>

 No.268

change my vote to Yes (for 3 months)
>>

 No.269

>>262
I vote against.
>>

 No.270

vote yes
>>

 No.271

this passed


File (hide): 1620145362185.jpg ( 447.38 KB , 1500x1073 , soviet-speak.jpg )

[–]

 No.234[Reply]

Vote to reduce the character limit on /leftypol/ down to 150 characters, and completely get rid of the character limit on /edu/

I vote in favour
3 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.238

Voting yes for Wvobbly with permission
>>

 No.239

Voting yes for Antinous with permission
>>

 No.240

Yes.
>>

 No.241

VOTE HAS PASSED
MUST BE IMPLEMENTED
>>

 No.242

implemented


File (hide): 1619911711834.jpg ( 72.14 KB , 1200x675 , contra.jpg )

[–]

 No.884[Reply]>>889

in light of the article dropping, I propose we filter "Contrapoints" to "Agent Wynn"
2 posts omitted. Click to expand.
>>

 No.887>>890

Someone suggested CoIntelpoints and that's much better
>>

 No.888

We let much worse people than Contra go un-word filtered so I don't see why we should pick her out special. Feels a bit sectarian for me. I know she's a socdem not a proper leftist but still.
>>

 No.889

>>884
Voting yes for spook_milk with permission
>>

 No.890

>>887
Yeah I agree with Cointelpoints being the filter instead
>>

 No.891

I would like to change my vote to contrapoints=cointelpoints please. Perhaps Natalie Wynn=Agent Wynn as well


File (hide): 1619898649518.jpg ( 351.64 KB , 1173x1115 , 1619739710669.jpg )

[–]

 No.864[Reply]>>866

Require spoilers on all porn/gore posts across all boards until there is a SFW overboard

I vote in favor
>>

 No.865

File (hide): 1619899113216.jpg ( 167.75 KB , 871x654 , stupidtumblrbullshit.jpg )

also because this might come up in the future, things that just LOOK like they could be porn/gore, should not be spoilered. The standard we should deploy for this is a Naive Realist one

and furthermore don't ban people for not spoiling their images. unless they're *clearly* doing it to be an asshole. just spoiler their shit and tell them to try to remember in the future. the goal is to make the board more accessible for people browsing at work/church
>>

 No.866

>>864
Sure, until SFW overboard or some other like system which solves the problem is implemented
>>

 No.867

sure. i vote aye.
>>

 No.868

I vote aye
>>

 No.869

this passed


File (hide): 1619545462337.jpg ( 685.83 KB , 1280x1828 , spiritual.jpg )

[–]

 No.243[Reply][Watch Thread]>>250>>251

Vote: 200 minimum character limit for new topics in /leftypol/ and /edu/, and padding OP character count to reach the limit is a bannable offense and considered spam. (A warning stating this will be displayed when attempting to create a topic under the limit).

I vote in favour.

Vote ends 30th April 2021 7pm UTC
>>

 No.244

aye
>>

 No.246

voting against
>>

 No.249

Nay
>>

 No.250

>>243
abstain
>>

 No.251

>>243
PASSED, MUST BE IMPLEMENTED


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ][ watchlist ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 ]
| Catalog | Home