[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ][Options][ watchlist ]

/assembly_archive/ - Voting archive

Where decisions are made history.
[Clear List] [Clear Ghosts]
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Discord
ReturnCatalogBottom

File (hide): 1612203090311.jpg ( 1.47 MB , 2100x1020 , crm-fd-rsep092016a.jpg )

[–]

▶ No.307[Last 50 Posts][Watch Thread]>>328>>340>>345>>370>>378>>420>>433>>439>>441>>452>>464>>520>>532>>536>>542

Post here and debate proposals.
>>

▶ No.308

Create an /assembly_archive/ to which we would transfer closed vote and bumplocked proposal threads so the /assembly/ board is always showing current votes.
>>

▶ No.309>>310>>311

File (hide): 1612203306933.jpg ( 93.86 KB , 1300x937 , political-map-of-world-sou….jpg )

I propose we adopt the south up map of the world to be the official map standard of leftypol, to be used for all official capacities
>>

▶ No.310>>311>>312

>>30908
I think that maybe we should leave completed votes on this board until they're implemented. That way it will serve as a 'to-do' list.

>>309
Diagree
>>

▶ No.311>>312>>313

>>30908
aye
>>309
nay
>>310
>That way it will serve as a 'to-do' list.

Proposal
To-do list thread
>>

▶ No.312>>313>>314

>>310
>>311
Okay then what about
Create an /assembly_archive/ to which we would transfer closed and implemented vote and bumplocked proposal threads so the /assembly/ board is always showing current votes.

And "Yes" to the '''To-do list" proposal.
>>

▶ No.313

>>312
Aye

>>311
Agree
>>

▶ No.314

>>312
Since caballo and WVoobly gave my proposal the greenlight, I will start the decicated vote thread.
>>

▶ No.315>>316>>317

Preposal: Bump lock haz thread.
>>

▶ No.316

>>315
Non, he's dumb but let people post if they really want.
>>

▶ No.317>>322

>>315
he's giving us traffic for now
>>

▶ No.318>>319

>1
Give Sage the permission to post 1 (one) message in the constitution thread about his chat/posters union/etc.
>>

▶ No.319>>320>>321

>>318
Eeeeeeh nah, I think that'll just lead to shitposting about his stupid chat in the constitution thread.
How about instead we like, let him have a thread in /meta/ about it and he can link it via the constitution thread?
>>

▶ No.320

>>319
I think that's the best compromise.
>>

▶ No.321

>>319
Okay, let's try that instead. I'll make the topic.
>>

▶ No.322>>324

>>317
there's a balance between bringing in attention and alienating the users we have now. Which in some cases is already happening. >>>/leftypol/70800 I think two threads is enough, after this one hits bump limit we should relegate it back to /IG/

It'd be useful to have the stats to see just how much if at all new activity we're getting from this promotion in the first place
>>

▶ No.323

Any proposals for moving/deleting haz threads?

Personally my ideas is either they re-merge to /IG/ or get moved to /b/.
>>

▶ No.324>>325

>>322
same deal as with Sage, except in the case of Sage we know for sure he has exactly zero attention backing him up. Probably just alienates people at this point. Why even compromise with him?
>>

▶ No.325>>326>>327

>>324
kinda hoping sage breaks his end of the agreement so we just have unilateral reason to ban him and never have to pretend to compromise with him again tbh
all he has been doing is grandstanding to form a dumb personality cult
>>

▶ No.326>>327

>>325
>kinda hoping sage breaks his end of the agreement so we just have unilateral reason to ban him
Same for me.
>>

▶ No.327

>>325
>>326
BTW someone linked Sage to this board so it's no longer private.
>>

▶ No.328>>329

>>307 (OP)
I propose the creation of a secret voting board (name TBD in private) where sensitive votes will be carried out. Address will not be shared with non-mods.
>>

▶ No.329

>>328
aye
>>

▶ No.330

>>>/meta/3492
>Btw, am I the only one who is completely turned off by jannies and mods prancing around with usernames identifying themselves that literally serve zero purpose on an imageboard? You just invite others to create rumors, drama and backstories, and give them an attack vector. I have never seen this on any other imageboard before.

I agree with this post and its why we need this board to remain away from public eyes. Its going to lead to cult figures otherwise. You'll all become little caballos
>>

▶ No.331>>332>>333

Haz threads should now be locked and redirected to /ig/
>>

▶ No.332>>334

>>331
I guess you're comatoast because how you spelled "Proposal".
>>

▶ No.333

>>331
I guess the possibility of sending them to /b/ should be also considered.
>>

▶ No.334

>>332
Hey no shit posting on /assembly/
>>

▶ No.335>>336>>338

Proposal: Allow posts about Infra and Haz in the dedicated Infrared thread or in /IG/ ONLY, posts about them elsewhere in /leftypol/ will be removed, repeat offenders may face bans and other actions.
>>

▶ No.336

>>335
aye
>>

▶ No.338

>>335
yes
>this is a sane position
agreed
>>

▶ No.339>>341

Proposal: Add a minimum character requirement for new thread creation (on all boards except /b/) of 250 characters.
>>

▶ No.340>>344

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Due to the rampant acceleration in numbers of topics about the USA and China, all topics relating to those countries should be merged into the relevant general unless they present a significant original subject matter (ie. not 'redpill me on X in China/USA?'.
>>

▶ No.341>>342>>343

>>339
For reference: this is exactly 250 characters:

Proposal: Allow posts about Infra and Haz in the dedicated Infrared thread or in /IG/ ONLY, posts about them elsewhere in /leftypol/ will be removed, repeat offenders may face bans and other actions. Then some filler text for demonstration purposes.
>>

▶ No.342

>>341
Can I add that even if we reject this proposal, that we will reconvene in 14 days to reaffirm or change our rejection?
>>

▶ No.343

>>341
Right. That really isn't very long and I think anyone setting out on creating a new thread can put in that much effort at least.
>>

▶ No.344

>>340
sure
>>

▶ No.345>>346>>347>>348

File (hide): 1614786229481.jpg ( 99.39 KB , 780x760 , banks hate him.jpg )

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: I have tired of the Haz/Infrared thread now, it's time to remove it and direct people back into IG.
>>

▶ No.346

>>345
seconding
>>

▶ No.347

>>345
Thirding
>>

▶ No.348

>>345
As long as we can change our minds about any decision made with regards to this issue.
>>

▶ No.349>>351>>352>>353

Proposal: Move voting back to Matrix
>>

▶ No.350>>351

Proposal: rename /b/ from "Random" to si/b/eria
>>

▶ No.351

>>349
nah, voting here is fine. I think we should start posting voting notices on the matrix though.
>>350
aye, that sounds fine
>>

▶ No.352

>>349
Second
>>

▶ No.353

>>349
Yea I rather we voted in Matrix and put the records here
>>

▶ No.354>>355>>356>>357>>364>>368

File (hide): 1615255382407.jpg ( 17.25 KB , 258x231 , 1614538666983.jpg )

PROPOSAL: New matrix room for user discourse on board admin and management. see convo for details

>we should get a separate room for mod yelling
<Yelling?
>for trying to talk to the mods about something to do with the board
>otherwise [REDACTED] complains that other people are sliding his very important questions. kind of has a point
<I'm afraid unless heavily moderated, a mod complaints room would see people just having random convos like in the old moderation pinned thread.
>it only need be moderated when there are complaints right? no harm if people do use it when it isn't needed but at least there's no controversy to muting people when there is something board related coming through
<Well, we can always try, make a proposal for it in /assembly/
>>

▶ No.355

>>354
I concur.
>>

▶ No.356

>>354
I feel ambivalent about this I guess, I'm not convinced of the need for it so I abstain. I worry about dragging the existing chat even further into the weeds and making it not about site administration at all.
>>

▶ No.357>>358

>>354
Better yet: make a "meeting room" where anyone who contacts mods for mod business gets added to it, when their issue is resolved, they get kicked.
>>

▶ No.358>>360

>>357
that sounds like a lot more extra work for not a lot of extra productivity
>>

▶ No.359>>360>>361

PROPOSAL: Youtube cyclical thread for discussion of youtube content including livestream chat separate from /ig/
>>

▶ No.360>>363

>>358
Fair enough.
>>359
All youtube content?
What about:
funny memes vaguely related to politics
jreg
right wingers (eg making fun of jordan peterson) (also what if it's a tik tok?)
vaush
>>

▶ No.361>>362>>363

>>359
I think overtly rightist youtubers (e.g. Molyneux or Shapiro) should stay on /ig/.
>>

▶ No.362>>363

>>361
How about Thought Slime, Contrapoints, et al? Not to show my ass here or anything.
>>

▶ No.363>>365>>366

File (hide): 1615261883810.jpg ( 76.95 KB , 1080x1075 , c0f7f860a62e75d5b9f1d98230….jpg )

>>360
>>361
>>362
okay lets synthesize this and revise it to be a leftist youtuber cyclical thread, for discussion of leftist youtube content including livestreams. Meme videos hosted on youtube could remain on /ig/ OR the youtube thread.
Speaking of which: leftist is to be defined up to and including vaush(so all those others mentioned by caballo and jreg), as determined by user consensus through their beloved mod representatives.
>>

▶ No.364

>>354
Aye
>>

▶ No.365>>366>>367

>>363
>leftist is to be defined up to and including vaush

This will just be /ITG/ 2, which I'm okay with but I want a more anti-establishment definition of left.

Aren't contra and vaush libs? Are libs really left? I would say bernie up until shilling for Biden to be left wing…
>>

▶ No.366

>>363
Fuck it agreed.

>>365
This is me btw
>>

▶ No.367

File (hide): 1615268984007.jpg ( 4.72 KB , 200x200 , 16044317784650.jpg )

>>365
>I would say bernie up until shilling for Biden to be left wing…
More than one person on leftypol shilled for biden, I'm sorry to say
>>

▶ No.368

>>354
sure, fine by me
>>

▶ No.369>>372

Proposal: for enacting a show trial against our board membership and slandering the name of /leftypol/, we should hereby declare war upon infrared
>>

▶ No.370>>371>>381

File (hide): 1615694814263-0.pdf ( 573.5 KB , 232x300 , Leftypol Constitution 2021….pdf )

File (hide): 1615694814263-1.pdf ( 577.44 KB , 232x300 , Leftypol Manifesto 2021-03….pdf )

>>307 (OP)
I propose that we accept the updated constitution and manifesto (by me and incorporating some text/feedback from Wobbly) for the new site. Attached are the two documents, with the manifesto being the user-focussed document and the constitution the mod-focussed one (though they would both be public).
>>

▶ No.371

>>370
aye
>>

▶ No.372

>>369
no
>>

▶ No.373>>374>>375>>376

File (hide): 1616645022726.png ( 2.3 MB , 3000x2355 , bd1da87a7a0cd8427d4f266a5a….png )

So here's what I've got.
#1 make mod room a public management room.
#2 move voting to meta and have a proposal thread and separate threads for votes. Use /meta/ like /assembly/.
#3 mods authority is to first warn publicly, and then ban(exceptions to this procedure in special cases like spam can be voted on). Additionally deleting or merging posts and threads requires a vote(with exceptions handled by vote again).
>>

▶ No.374>>375

>>373
fine with all but 3 really, a lot of mod actions just don't require voting on and to boot a lot of the time moderators are on in times where there are no other moderators around to vote on anything. it'll just hamstring response times and make us less efficient at our job, which so far our only complaints have tended to be that we aren't fast enough more than anything.
>>

▶ No.375

>>373
>>374
also there are things to consider about such a system like should the votes be proportional to the actual numbers of mods or should it just be a requirement of (x) number of votes to do an action? Because say somewhere in the future we get 30 mods and you need 3 votes to go through with an action, you effectively have as many as 10 possible factions which can all give their own preferred actions the greenlight whenever irrespective of the rest of the moderation. If its proportional, like a flat majority needed, it will effectively always have the problem of speediness and the system will only grow more labyrinthine and slow the larger the moderation team got.
>>

▶ No.376

>>373
1 is possibly ok, though I still worry about public chat being a bit of a drag and a security risk.
2, I don't think moving voting to meta is going to fix the issue of nobody voting, and it will mean users will disrupt the voting by posting (as I understand the proposal)
3, I'm highly against, that puts way too much of a burden on the mod team and will mean it takes exponentially more effort to delete disruptive posters than it does for them to post
>>

▶ No.377

1 - I don't think the current mod should be turned into a public one, mostly for security reasons as there might be things in the chat room history that might be sensitive and while I know there are settings for restricting room history access, I don't trust matrix enough to rely on it. So it would be better to start a new one if we go down that road while keeping the old one in case we have the need to discuss things in a private manners.
2 - Why not just make /assembly/ public then? I really think the board where the modteam vote should be restricted posting-wise to mods to avoid threads getting derailed and for clarity. We could create for each vote a discussion thread on /meta/ that would link the corresponding /assembly/ thread. This seems a better solution to me.
3 - A vote for each of those actions seems too restrictive and might put to big of a burden for proper everyday janitorial tasks moreover it doesn't seem future proof if this site is meant to grow larger and more active with more mods, I don't see how that would scale up. The problem too is that we all have different conception of what "spam" is and unless it is properly and extensively defined (hard task ahead) this "clause" might lead to problems and misunderstandings and heated debates. A better solution in might mind would be to replace the voting with just two seconds like we do in for the proposal stage, seems more flexible.
>>

▶ No.378>>379>>380

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Create a /music/ board for music related discussion and archiving of leftist music.
>>

▶ No.379

>>378
aye
>>

▶ No.380

>>378
Second
>>

▶ No.381

>>370
Seconded by Comatoast (signed with his permission)
>>

▶ No.382>>383

Proposal: limit pages to 20
We have too many pages and its against the aesthetic of an imageboard. We only really need 20 pages and we can encourage people to be more vocal with wanting to archive threads before they die if thats really necessary.
>>

▶ No.383>>384>>385

File (hide): 1617955555729.jpg ( 122.02 KB , 1024x768 , oLDfqdY.jpg )

>>382
Proposal: As an experiment in user involvement/accountability, we will try to run a public mod chat on matrix alongside our normal closed matrix mod chat. We agree to give an honest attempt to use the public chat for administrative matters that do not need to be kept secret for security or privacy reasons. However, if the experiment turns out not to work (as informally agreed by the majority of mods) we will reserve the right to return mod discussion exclusively to our existing closed chat.

Regular users will be allowed to post in the public mod discussion, however their posts must strictly remain on the subject of moderation matters, and the chat should not be used as a 'general purpose' discussion, so that mod matters are not lost in a flood of irrelevant posts. Users who become too disruptive (as defined by the moderators) may be warned or kicked/banned from the chat.

I vote for the proposal.
>>

▶ No.384

>>383
aye
>>

▶ No.385

>>383
yes
>>

▶ No.386>>387>>390>>391>>393>>395

Proposal: Reinstate the following wordfilters for one year:
nigger -> uyghur
tranny -> transhumanist
>>

▶ No.387

>>386
>>

▶ No.388>>389>>390>>392

Proposal: We should recruit new mods as soon as possible.
>>

▶ No.389

>>388
Aye.
>>

▶ No.390

>>386
aye
>>388
aye
>>

▶ No.391

>>386
Nay
>>

▶ No.392

>>388
Aye
>>

▶ No.393>>394

>>386
My issue with this is, I don't think it's a good idea to make a rule that we can't repeal later for whatever reason, why not just add the wordfilters in perpetuity unless we want to change them?
>>

▶ No.394>>396

>>393
it can be repealed anytime, i want it to autoexpire in one year so its not just left on forever. or at least we have to actively reissue it.
>>

▶ No.395>>396

>>386
id like to edit the proposal a little bit to change the time when it expires from one year to the start of the new year 2022. for the reason that i think it'd be harder to forget about revoting on it that way
>>

▶ No.396

>>394
>>395
Ok, I vote in favour if this is clarified in the actual vote.
>>

▶ No.397>>398>>399

Preposal: Removing the youtube thread general.
>>

▶ No.398

>>397
yes
>>

▶ No.399

>>397
>>

▶ No.400>>403>>404

Preposal: Word filter anglo. What the filter will be will be deliberated upon at a later date.
>>

▶ No.401>>403>>404

Proposal: Integrate voting on the matrix for the congress.
>>

▶ No.402>>403>>404

Proposal: Establish a /i/ board.
>>

▶ No.403

>>400
>>401
>>402
All coma btw
>>

▶ No.404

>>400
aye
>>401
dunno how we can do that but aye
>>402
too small for it now imho, maybe test it out as an extension of /edu/?
make it like, an education and organization board
>>

▶ No.405>>406>>407>>408>>409

File (hide): 1618491795614.png ( 27.57 KB , 632x368 , Screenshot_20210415_141130.png )

Proposal:
Seeing that now Brazilians are the fifth demographic in leftypol.org and that their dedicated thread is seeing more and more use with more and more new people coming and that some Brazilians have expressed the desire of having their own imageboard non-filled with rightoids and gusanos; we should publicly and in official capacity ask in the /brg/ >>>/leftypol/112887 what they think about the idea of giving them a board in leftypol.org which would be moderated by their own community and gauge if there is a minimum of demand for it to make it viable, if and only if, of course, they agree to follow the already established constitution.
Moreover, we would be really clear that this is not a near future thing and more a long term goal and that we need further preparations in order to make it concrete.
This proposal doesn't set in stone the creation of such a board but rather set in motion the possibility for this project to come to fruition. Of course, the creation of the board itself, if it comes to it, would be subject of a whole new vote and every major step towards it too, if needed.
>>

▶ No.406>>407

>>405
Yes. Full support for this
>>

▶ No.407

>>405
>>406
>>405
Same, lets go for it
>>

▶ No.408

>>405
aye
>>

▶ No.409

>>405
Support, let's do it.
>>

▶ No.410>>411>>412

Proposal to Recall wvobbly as moderator
wvobbly has:
attempted to cause migrations of explicitly idpol communities into leftypol
constantly suggested to copy the wordfilters of these communities and tone police leftypol
outright stated that his goal was to "get rid of brocialists" in favour of these people
one sidedly enforced the idpol ban, warning and deleting posts insulting liberal idpol while basically never banning the people he drags in
There has been a large shift of idpol into the board and it may be in part due to people going out of their own way to attract it.

Furthermore during the many confrontations, they have never expressed regret in their actions, only bowing down due to pressure by the other mods. This situation in untenable in the long term. Wvobbly wants a leftypol thats totally different than what leftypol currently is.

The latest in the long line of violations being the snarky reddit tier messages left on warnings in an idpol thread, trying to develop an idpol line on the board instead of anchoring the thread. https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/174322.html#175195
>>

▶ No.411

>>410
do I get to say no in this one?
I think I'll say no on this one
>>

▶ No.412>>413

>>410
coma ayes the proposal in the chat
>>

▶ No.413

>>412
(coma did not do this btw)
>>

▶ No.414>>415>>416>>417>>418>>419

Proposal: Organize a meeting in line with the /leftypol/ constitution for this saturday at 10 AM EST or some other agreeable time on the /leftypol/ congress room that will be recorded or open to the public for most of the mod team to work out recent problems.
>>

▶ No.415

>>414
aye
>>

▶ No.416

>>414
I think that a week is too long to wait, and furthermore, wanting to have all the mods in one time and place to somehow 'solve' the issue is idealistic. We should discuss this issue over time in our chats as we always have. The vote on Wobbly will end 72 hours after it began in line with our existing procedures.

So, I vote no.
>>

▶ No.417

>>414
Second
>>

▶ No.418

>>414
I vote aye on my own proposal, needless to say.
>>

▶ No.419

>>414

No.
>>

▶ No.420>>421>>422>>423

File (hide): 1618793828599-0.png ( 104.47 KB , 1647x291 , Krates Chat 01.png )

File (hide): 1618793828599-1.png ( 24.63 KB , 1593x87 , Krates Chat 02.png )

File (hide): 1618793828599-2.png ( 80.73 KB , 1593x266 , Krates Chat 03.png )

File (hide): 1618793828599-3.png ( 47.49 KB , 1600x152 , Krates Chat 04.png )

File (hide): 1618793828599-4.png ( 291.94 KB , 1405x1767 , krates chat 05.png )

>>307 (OP)
I am saddened that it has come to this, but I feel I have no choice but to propose that Zul be removed from the team for wrecking. He has confessed a plan to purge the team of those he disagrees with in order to take total control, he wants to remove the modocracy and revert back to a hierarchical moderation structure, and he has acted alone on multiple occasions in complete disregard of our rules and conventions. Including unbanning obvious problem shitposters like King Lear, Eugenics-Kun, and others in order to create disruption to the board - even when he agreed himself that they deserved to be banned! His conduct has been manipulative, disruptive, and malicious. His actions cannot stand and he cannot be allowed to run roughshod over what we have build with blood sweat and tears over the last two years. If he gets his way, /leftypol/ as it exists today is doomed.
>>

▶ No.421

>>420
for what its worth, aye
>>

▶ No.422

>>420
>>420
NO
>>

▶ No.423

>>420
fuck no
>>

▶ No.424>>425>>426>>427

Proposal:

We have three options to unfuck our shit.

1) Remove Wvobbly

2) Form an elected politburo

3) Do nothing for now.

Please vote
>>

▶ No.425

>>424
And how about removing Zul?
>>

▶ No.426>>427

>>424
"No?"
>>

▶ No.427

>>426
No.

>>424

I am in favor of my own proposal.
>>

▶ No.428>>430>>431>>435

Proposal: Ban all secret chats between moderators and factionalism in general.
>>

▶ No.429>>430>>431>>432

Proposal: limit wvobbly from modding anything related to idpol or reactionary politics
>>

▶ No.430

>>428
second this proposal
>>429
second this proposal
>>

▶ No.431

>>428
aye
>>429
no
>>

▶ No.432

>>429
Yes!
>>

▶ No.433>>434>>446

>>307 (OP)
I propose that we establish a formal system of punishments (lesser than being removed from the team) for moderator mistakes and offenses. Details should be established between the team.
>>

▶ No.434

>>433
second
>>

▶ No.435

>>428
I agree.
>>

▶ No.436>>437>>438>>448>>450

Proposal:
The creation of a constitutional draft room, hosted on the matrix, composed of moderators as well as interested matrix users, for the purposes of communal editing of the constitution and its amendments so to better reflect the community's will in regards to the law.
>>

▶ No.437

>>436
(obviously I vote yes)
>>

▶ No.438

>>436
yes
>>

▶ No.439>>440>>448

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Moderators MUST inform and ask the other users if they wish to undo a ban.
>>

▶ No.440

>>439
aye
>>

▶ No.441>>443>>445>>448

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Votes on changing the constitution must take place over 7 days instead of the usual 3.
>>

▶ No.442>>444>>445>>448

Proposal: Discussion of internal mod drama and governance of the site will be relegated to /meta/ and /assembly/ only. Users (including moderators) may not post about these topics outside these boards, and any topics/posts related to this outside the aforementioned boards will be considered offtopic and locked.
>>

▶ No.443>>444

>>441
second
>>

▶ No.444

>>443
>>442
t. Barbara_Pitt
>>

▶ No.445>>448

>>441
aye
>>442
can we include a caveat where we can vote to make things public with a 75% majority at least, so if there is something the site needs to know the mod team as a whole can authorize it
>>

▶ No.446

>>433
aye
>>

▶ No.447>>448>>451

Proposal: A vote for drafting an amendment to the constitution on the barring the creation of secret chat rooms to hide discussions from other mods on all issues of internal affairs regarding the site, moderation, or other issues of that sort. Likewise, Direct Messages are to be limited in discussion of such internal issues so as to not be conspiratorial or withhold information from fellow moderators. The rule will be in effect without the constitutional amendment but is to be codified in the constitution at a later date.
>>

▶ No.448>>450

>>436
No, we have multiple matrix rooms already. Let's just use the "/leftypol/ congress" room for this.

>>439
No, they should only inform the other mods there is no need for them to have to ask for any of that. As long as people know what's happening it will be fine.

>>441
aye.

>>442
aye but only if what >>445 suggested is included.

>>447
No, but I do think we should make improvements to the constitution.
>>

▶ No.450

>>436
>>448
agree with melon we don't need another room for this, just use the congress
>>

▶ No.451

>>447
Second
>>

▶ No.452>>453>>457>>458

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Approve moderation candidate; "Jannies are lame but having no jannies is even lamer" to join the moderation team.
>>

▶ No.453

>>452
aye
>>

▶ No.454>>455>>456>>458

Proposal

Suspend wvobbly from modding or being in the staff room for 1 month
>>

▶ No.455

>>454
I vote no
>>

▶ No.456

>>454
Aye
>>

▶ No.457

>>452
Voting yes on behalf of Coma (permission given).
>>

▶ No.458

>>452
abstain.

>>454
yes!
>>

▶ No.459>>461>>462>>495>>496

I propose accepting m00dy to the moderation team.

I vote in favour.
>>

▶ No.460>>461>>462

I propose accepting discomrade (Comrade) to the moderation team.

I vote in favour of the proposal.
>>

▶ No.461>>463

>>459
>>460
aye to both
>>

▶ No.462>>463

>>459
>>460
Yes to both. Proposal and vote.
>>

▶ No.463

>>461
>>462
Thank you. Comatoast also approves both so they will go to a vote.
>>

▶ No.464>>465>>466>>468

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Increase the 'automatic acceptance' threshold on votes to 7 affirmative votes due to the influx of new moderators.
>>

▶ No.465

>>464
aye, to proposal and vote
>>

▶ No.466

>>464
yes proposal and vote
>>

▶ No.468>>469

>>464
fair enough, aye.
>>

▶ No.469

>>468
Proposal has already passed, please vote on the actual vote topic. Thank you.
>>

▶ No.470>>471>>473>>483

PROPOSAL: Require spoilers on all porn/gore on all boards until there is a SFW overboard
>>

▶ No.471

>>470
proposal sounds good
>>

▶ No.473

>>470
aye
>>472
aye
>>

▶ No.475

>>474
also aye
>>

▶ No.477>>479>>483>>485

Proposal: Ban pedophilic content and promotion thereof including lolicon and shotacon on all boards
>>

▶ No.478

>>474
yes
>>

▶ No.479>>480

>>477
No, if only because what is and isn't considered shota or loli always ends up instigating endless flamewars
>>

▶ No.480>>481

>>479
Is that the only reason why you'd say no?
Every other rule we have has been controversial/involve subjective opinions
>>

▶ No.481>>482

>>480
Not to the same level usually, people get really weird and anal about what is and isn't loli/shota because they equivocate it to something they see as an absolute moral evil, something stupid like Sakai posting you can walk away from but people aren't so inclined with loli or what have you.
>>

▶ No.482

>>481
I don't think we should diregard voting on something because people care about it. Anyways a short look through the lolicon posters post history shows some predictable threads. I don't get why we can't just refer to pedophilia as pedophilia
>>

▶ No.483

>>477
Yes

>>472
>>470
also yes
>>

▶ No.485

>>477
I will say yes to my own proposal as well
>>

▶ No.487

>>486
I appreciate the changes made to this to make it more palatable, however I am still voting no as I indicated.
>>

▶ No.488

>>486
Agree with the proposal
>>

▶ No.490>>494

2 approved this proposal so far and I'd imagine watermelon will say yes to this one as well when he sees it
>>

▶ No.491

also it seems to have been forgotten at the end but lolicon is illegal in the countries that 2 or more of our moderators reside in
>>

▶ No.493

>>486
nay, for the reasons I've outlined in the discussion room. I appreciate you taking some of the input onboard however.
>>

▶ No.494

>>490
You only have 1 upvote since Discomrade did not vote for the proposal. You still need 2 more.
>>

▶ No.495

>>459
Aye
>>

▶ No.496

>>459
>>459
250 is too high
How about 120? Twitters old character limit
>>

▶ No.497>>498

Proposal: 200 minimum character limit for new topics in /leftypol/ and /edu/, and padding OP character count to reach the limit is a bannable offense and considered spam. (A warning stating this will be displayed when attempting to create a topic under the limit).

I vote in favour.
>>

▶ No.498

>>497
Aye
>>

▶ No.502>>503

>>500
aye
>>

▶ No.503

>>502
it me
>>

▶ No.504>>505>>506>>507

PROPOSAL - in light of the article dropping, I propose we filter "Contrapoints" to "Agent Wynn"
>>

▶ No.505

>>504
spook_milk votes aye with permission
>>

▶ No.506

>>504
Aye
>>

▶ No.507

>>504
looks good
>>

▶ No.509>>511>>517

PROPOSAL: Reduce the charater limit on /leftypol/ and /edu/ down to 150 characters
>>

▶ No.510>>511>>517

PROPOSAL: Suspend character limit implementation
>>

▶ No.511>>514

>>509
aye
>>510
nah
>>

▶ No.512>>513>>514>>515>>517

PROPOSAL: Reduce the character limit on /leftypol/ down to 150 characters, and completely get rid of the character limit on /edu/
>>

▶ No.513

>>512
sounds good
>>

▶ No.514

>>511
rescind this
>>512
aye to this
>>

▶ No.515>>516

>>512
yep
>>

▶ No.516

>>515
it me
>>

▶ No.517

>>512
aye
>>510
nein
>>509
yes
>>

▶ No.519


proposal to remove comatoast for being a whiney self righteous pussy that unilaterally sucks eggs.
>>

▶ No.520>>521>>522>>523>>524>>527>>531

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Wobbly's suspension should be revoked and he should be returned to the status of a full moderator - voiding any previous punishments. We should simply put all this behind us and move on, because I don't see what purpose any of this backbiting serves. It's better to return to a clean slate so we can work together in the future.
>>

▶ No.521

>>520
Aye
>>

▶ No.522

>>520
No cause we just agreed to not revote on recently completed items. Illegal vote.
>>

▶ No.523>>529

>>520
Aye. If the vote is illegal than it should be illegal to delay the punishment this long anyways
>>

▶ No.524

>>520
no lol
>>518
aye
>>

▶ No.525>>526>>527>>528>>530

Proposal: Suspend m00dy from moderating /leftypol/ for a week for deleting posts by IP in an unwarranted way and punching holes through the Intifada thread for no good reason.
>>

▶ No.526

>>525
>>518
there's already a proposal
>>

▶ No.527

>>525
Aye

I would add that this was done twice in one day and they refused to listen to criticism. we can't have people abusing delete by ip

>>518
nay, in favor of watermelon's proposal

>>520
nay
>>

▶ No.528

>>525
aye then
>>

▶ No.529

>>523
Who is this? Please leave your name.
>>

▶ No.530

>>525
Nay
>>518
Nay
>>

▶ No.531

>>520
aye
>>

▶ No.532>>533>>534>>535>>539

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: A new policy to remove posts featuring soyjaks on all boards; unless the post is accompanied by a 'unique point' (IE: a genuine rebuttal of the post replied to which does not just amount to copy&paste). An exception to this rule is this thread where they may be posted freely: https://leftypol.org/b/res/20422.html
.

This also includes 'though' spam and similar iterations. Repeat offenders may face short then longer bans.
>>

▶ No.533

>>532
Comatoast votes no.
>>

▶ No.534

>>532
No
>>

▶ No.535

>>532
>>532
no
>>

▶ No.536>>537>>538

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Wobbly's suspension should be revoked and he should be returned to the status of a full moderator - voiding any previous punishments… Again.
>>

▶ No.537

>>536
Aye
>>

▶ No.538

>>536
aye
>>

▶ No.539

>>532
no
>>

▶ No.540>>541>>547>>549

proposal to remove the character limit. feedback thread can be seen here >>>/meta/6955
>>

▶ No.541

>>540
GET
>>

▶ No.542>>547

>>307 (OP)
Proposal: Due to the continued feud between the Infrared community and /leftypol/, which has escalated to alleged posting of CP and legal threats, all discussion of Infrared and Haz (in any form, in any board) should be banned as a measure to protect the site and to protect the /leftypol/ community. Offenders will be deleted and warned with possible bans for repeat offenders.

I vote Aye. Comatoast votes aye.
>>

▶ No.545>>546>>549

Proposal:

Implement weekly agenda system.

How it works:
Step 1: Thread with OP with the weekly agenda is created.
Step 2: That thread will serve as the place to propose next weeks agenda.
Step 3: A new thread is created for each item in the agenda.
Step 4: Proposal system works the same, two votes besides your own makes it a "valid" vote.
Step 5: On end of Friday UTC, proposal period stops.
Step 6: On Sunday UTC, everything is archived.
Step 7 (Also step 1): On Monday UTC, a new thread is created with the proposals from the thread. This thread is now the agenda of this week.
Step 8 (also step 2): That thread will be where proposals are made. If your proposal gets 2 votes besides your own, it goes to next weeks agenda. (You have until Friday to propose).
Step 9 (also step 3): A thread is created for each item to be discussed in the weekly agenda.
Step 10 (also step 4): All proposals that have a total of 3 votes will go into next week's agenda.
etc.

In other words:
Each week a thread is made with the agenda, where people can propose (until midnight Friday) the agenda for next week. A thread is made for each item on the agenda. The board is completely archived every Sunday.

Extraordinary votes can be made, but a case must be made for their urgency.

Doesn't make sense to make this permanent unless we like it. So, if this passes, we will evaluate its effectiveness and how people feel about it as we go.

Pros:
- Mitigates the tendency to impulsive decisions.
- Gives people time to talk and think about votes.
- Votes aren't pushed out randomly at sporadic times.
- Easier to understand what is being decided on each week.
- There is time to rest (Sat - Sun) no need to think about expiring votes on the weekend.
- Easier communication to community about what is being decided.
>>

▶ No.546

>>545
seems reasonable to me, i vote for it.
>>

▶ No.547

>>540
no, keep the character limit.

>>542
this is too extreme but given the circumstances I will vote for it.
>>

▶ No.548>>549

Proposal: ban lolicon and shotacon on all boards
>>

▶ No.549

>>540
No, I think we ought to keep the character limit
>>545
Aye
>>548
Can you rewrite the proposal to clarify that only sexualised/hentai images of underaged anime characters should be banned. Currently your proposal is a bit too vague imo
>>

▶ No.550>>551>>552>>553

Proposal: Remove /b/ from the overboard
Users on the matrix such as Moo have been complaining about it spamming the overboard. And a user previously made a thread about not wanting to see nsfw stuff from /b/ on the overboard
>>

▶ No.551

>>550
approve
>>

▶ No.552

>>550
Sure, as long as its undone with the implementation with the sfw overboard
>>

▶ No.553

>>550
go for it

Unique IPs: 40
Replies: …Files: Page: …
[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ][ watchlist ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomRefresh: …Home