>>464955>Lol yes western officials do indeed say a lot of things, but realistically they are not arming Ukraine to win
Well, they're certainly not losing. The new hardware can only help. >I too have read the US military startegic papers about fighting 2 countries at the same time, but you are utterly delusional if you think the US can fight China and Russia at the same time
I mean, the Ukrainians are fighting China with underequipped troops and no air cover. I think the US would stomp Russia in a month if it came to that. >I don't think you understand how economics works, you cannot borrow growth
You're right, which is why after the pandemic and the tightening on lending, the US and other western economies went into slowed growth. This is the same thing that will happen to Russia. You're the one that doesn't understand this. >If Russia was cooking the books they wouldn't have admitted that it had a little bit of net growth.
That's not cooking the books. You're stupid and don't know how things work. >The Russians have been fielding more T-90 tanks
Yeah, where? Because all I see are upgraded T-62s and T-72Bs with B2 parts grafted on. >The Russians are the only ones fielding a really brand-new tank (T-14) tho only in small numbers.
T-14 isn't in Ukraine, and the reason it's a small number is because they can't build more. >As far as their missile barrages go i can't find any data that corroborates your claims.
You could just look at the fact that there hasn't been a big one in weeks. You could count them based on headlines, or you could even look at MoD numbers. >Hypothetically if they have indeed reduced their attack rates they may just be running out of targets to destroy
Then, I guess they only have to march forward and take the rest of Ukraine, then. Or, they might not do that, since you're full of shit. >or they might be holding out for a large knock-out blow to support a bigger offensive.
There won't be an offensive. Russia is spent with most of her trained soldiers lying in a ditch somewhere in the Ukraine. >In any case the Russians have fired more missiles than the US has production capacity.
And yet when the US invaded somewhere like Iraq, the missiles actually hit their targets. It's almost like Russian stuff is junk. >About 80% of the world did not participate in the Sanctions against Russia.
No, just the richest, most influential countries did. You know, the ones that matter and might actually damage Russia's economy. >The Sanctions war is the imperial bourgeoisie causing the west to become more internationally isolated.
Hey dipshit, here's a hint: Russia is not the Soviet Union. They are also ruled by national bourgeoisie and are engaging in imperialism. You're simping for rich authoritarians. >Russian losses are estimate between 12.000 and 20.000
Hey, if we're just making shit up, just say nobody has died so far and that the Moscva returned to port under her own power. In fact, just declare victory. >Ukrainian losses are estimate between 140.000 and 300.000.>nearly 50% losses
Again, the Russian troops have only to march forward now, if up to 300k are combat ineffective. That's a destroyed military right there.