[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble


File: 1737719939860.gif ( 82.37 KB , 768x576 , LesMaitres_1299754253 uno ….gif )

 No.487075[View All]

Big massive thread for American politics.
406 posts and 91 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.491346

>>491338
ZOINKS MY WAGE-BROS, guess the revolution has to be post-poned!
>>

 No.491347

>>491346
Marx bless the commonality between slavers in the Earthrealm and people all the day down in Hell, for God has abandoned them for their sins! But remember, there is no such thing as a pure true Virgin™! Oy vey!!!
>>

 No.491351

>>491346
>>491347
What is this gobbledygook?
>>

 No.491355

>>491351
terminal irony poisoning
>>

 No.491362

From the newly released "Epstein Birthday Book."
Left: Jeffrey Epstein holds a large novelty check from current US president Donald Trump.

"A young blonde girl's face is redacted, it says she has "early people skills", but that she is "fully depreciated"

And notes that "even though I handled the deal I didn't get any of the money or the girl""
>>

 No.491367

>>491362
Holy fuck are both of these from the epstine list?
>>

 No.491370

>>491367
Not the list, a single piece of evidence from the Epstein estate - a signed book given to Epstein on his birthday by Ghislaine and his associates.
>>

 No.491371

File: 1757468815763-0.jpg ( 639.25 KB , 1170x1498 , Ghislaine Maxwell account ….jpg )

File: 1757468815763-1.png ( 135.84 KB , 1050x1322 , Trump Epstein doodle.png )

>>491370
Interesting thread on Twitter, too:
https://x.com/adamscochran/status/1965232933880692831
https://x.com/adamscochran/status/1965219194565525961

Also the Trump doodle is in there. See pic on the right. Descriptions of it as a doodle of a "woman" may have been a bit misleading.
>>

 No.491391

Why do libs say they would take the day off and celebrate if Putin died but then in the same chat say that they're anti-Trump but violence isn't the answer and that it will only lead to more violence?
>>

 No.491392

Why are people saying it's US' Years of Lead? Feels more like a recency bias.
>>

 No.491393

Apparently Israel's favorite anti-communist water baby Charlie Kirk was just shot and killed on a college campus in Utah.
>>

 No.491533

File: 1758286922294.jpg ( 216.13 KB , 1062x2048 , G06gZNAWMAAPILd.jpg )

https://x.com/DropSiteNews/status/1967686446493360379
Breaking: @jason_paladino
reports the DOJ has quietly scrubbed a study showing far-right extremists have committed far more deadly attacks than far-left or Islamist extremists — 227 incidents taking 520+ lives since 1990.

The paper, “What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism,” was removed from the National Institute of Justice site within the last day but remains archived. Its disappearance comes as MAGA leaders stoke fear of left-wing violence (see below).
>>

 No.491592

File: 1758632104463.jpg ( 147.8 KB , 1284x1364 , US offers financial lifeli….jpg )

Propertarianism is so fucking fake lmao
>>

 No.491610

File: 1758679457698.jpg ( 738.19 KB , 3000x2000 , milei-chainsaw.jpg )

>>491592
The chainsaw didn't work?
>>

 No.491611

>>491533
> he DOJ has quietly scrubbed a study
Don't let your confirmation bias stop you. Keep following links until you find the actual "study" and tell me it's not drivel. All they did was cherry pick conclusions from other studies which are no doubt equally biased.

>227 incidents taking 520+ lives since 1990

1990 is already a convoluted starting point, they obviously needed to include Waco and OKC in the stats to get the results they want. It would be more convincing if they just listed the 227 incidents so people can verify for themselves what is being counted as "far-right" but of course they don't.

This is study they removed
>What NIJ Research Tells Us About Domestic Terrorism
https://web.archive.org/web/20250911012550/https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/what-nij-research-tells-us-about-domestic-terrorism

This is where the 227 incidences since 1990 figure comes from
>Far-left versus Far-right Fatal Violence: An Empirical Assessment of the Prevalence of Ideologically Motivated Homicides in the United States
https://web.archive.org/web/20250913012306/https://ccjls.scholasticahq.com/article/26973-far-left-versus-far-right-fatal-violence-an-empirical-assessment-of-the-prevalence-of-ideologically-motivated-homicides-in-the-united-states

Which is also not a study they just pulled data out of a pre-made database
>This article uses ECDB data
>to examine ideologically motivated homicides in the
>United States between 1990 to 2020 committed by far-
>left and far-right extremists

Antifa, BLM, Occupy, Palestine Action etc. are not counted in the data
>Outside of environmental and animal rights
>extremism, the ECDB does not collect information on
>far-left violent extremism

Basically any Trump supporter is counted as "far-right"
>The definition of far-right extremism refers
>to groups and/or individuals that (1) support violence
>and/or criminal activity explicitly, or implicitly, to (2)
>further aspects of one or more of the following ideals:
>fiercely nationalistic, anti-global, xenophobic, and
>anti-immigration

And that's how you lie with statistics.
>>

 No.491615

>>491611
>Keep following links until you find the actual "study" and tell me it's not drivel.
I looked at it years ago and it wasn't drivel.


>Antifa, BLM, Occupy, Palestine Action etc. are not counted in the data

uygha, Eric Robert Rudolph blew up the Olympics and gay bars in my city. You want me to equate that with Occupy putting drum circles on Wall Street?
Fuck off.

You accuse something of cherrypicking and your real complaint is that they don't include every instance of Antifa knocking over a trashcan as "terrorism."

>1990 is already a convoluted starting point

Left-wing terrorism fell off hard after the '70s and even harder after the '80s. There was a lot more of it in the '70s, and that's using the same metrics which were used in this.

>Basically any Trump supporter is counted as "far-right"

And that's largely accurate, and it's certainly accurate if we're only talking about perpetrators of violence - IE homicide, maiming, etc. Jim David Adkisson was a Bush supporter, and he shot up a fucking church because he thought they didn't like the Iraq war enough. Neoconservatism is a far-right ideology, what separates the US and its metrics is the game of pretending that DNC-flavor neoliberalism isn't economically or militarily far-right. It's the same ideology, they just shoot up abortion clinics, gay bars, synagogues, mosques, and churches less often.

Your entire argument is predicated on the insistence that other people should take the outrage porn you get off Facebook of spraypaint and vandalism and sit-ins to be terrorism in the same right as the Charleston church shooting, Olympic Park bombing, Buffalo supermarket shooting, Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting, the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting, the Pulse massacre, etc. The reason that things which are not violent pre-meditated attacks with lethal intent are not counted as violent pre-meditated attacks with lethal intent is completely obvious to anyone who isn't more worried about actual terrorism than they are about artificially increasing the paper amount of "leftist terrorism" in the US since 1990 by including instances where teenagers sprayed "FUCK TRUMP" on the walls of an underpass. I'm sure that your argument looks very convincing to you.
>>

 No.491616

>>491610
I was sure it would work!!!
>>

 No.491617

>>491615
>You want me to equate that with Occupy putting drum circles on Wall Street?
No I want you to respond to what I actually said. The paper includes 2 paragraphs of text explaining all the words that get somebody branded "far-right". And only 2 specific groups are counted as "far-left", environmentalists and animal rights. Of course one number of going to be bigger than the other. It has no bearing on reality though.

>You accuse something of cherrypicking and your real complaint is that they don't include every instance of Antifa knocking over a trashcan as "terrorism."

If you're being honest I think you know that antifa do a little more than that.

>There was a lot more of it in the '70s, and that's using the same metrics which were used in this.

That's wrong. The weathermen who planted dozens of bombs in the 1970s would not fall into the narrow category of "environmental and animal rights extremism". That's how pathetically dishonest this paper is.

>And that's largely accurate

If you actually think that 80m americans are "far-right" because they voted for a 90s Democrat then your brain is completely fried by propaganda.

>Your entire argument is predicated on the insistence that other people should take the outrage porn you get off Facebook of spraypaint and vandalism

Wrong. My argument is that the database the studies got their data from has severely overcounted "far-right" and severely undercounted "far-left" and the resulting discrepancy is meaningless. Both these papers are an affront to anybody who values science and the pursuit of truth.

>the Pulse massacre

That was islamic terrorism. The whole time he was on the phone with police negotiators he was talking about syria and israel.

>artificially increasing the paper amount of "leftist terrorism" in the US since 1990 by including instances where teenagers sprayed "FUCK TRUMP" on the walls of an underpass

You really derailed yourself with this strawman didn't you. Do you actually think there is no such thing as leftist terrorism? Off the top of my head we've had the CK assassination, 3 attempts on Trump, several transhumanist mass shooters, weeks of sustained rioting which resulted in a few dozen murders, the congressional baseball game shooter, the guy who attacked thomass massie outside his house. There's a reason they had to stretch the time window all the way back to 1990 to get the conclusion they wanted.

>I'm sure that your argument looks very convincing to you.

Stop deepthroating your own strawman and respond to the actual words on screen.
>>

 No.491618

File: 1758738985231.png ( 1.17 MB , 2057x1400 , joe biden taken to court f….png )

>>491617
>No I want you to respond to what I actually said.
What you actually said wrt Occupy was:
>Antifa, BLM, Occupy, Palestine Action etc. are not counted in the data
You want me to equate Occupy's tents & drum circles & Palestine Action's elite spraypaint operations with the mass shootings, bombings, and murders by the far-right. The implication here is that you're as frightened by those things, or by flag burnings, as you are by actual terrorism - it's just that you don't want to admit that.

>And only 2 specific groups are counted as "far-left", environmentalists and animal rights.

Except you actually left out the bit right after that:
>The sample of far-left ideologically motivated homicides was independently
identified using the same procedures listed above. Crimes committed by far-left extremists were identified from various sources to create a list similar
to that of the far-right homicides. Once homicides were identified, multiple coders collected information on the situational characteristics of interest for the current analysis. To ensure inter-rater reliability, far-left homicides in this sample were coded simultaneously to address any inconsistencies.

>If you're being honest I think you know that antifa do a little more than that.

Yeah, they do riots and brawls also.
Weird how they never walk into a supermarket or a church and just start shooting people. Crazy how they never bomb clinics or crowded sporting events. They're like the ornery hockey fans of """terrorism."""

>That's wrong. The weathermen who planted dozens of bombs in the 1970s would not fall into the narrow category of "environmental and animal rights extremism". That's how pathetically dishonest this paper is.

Most after the '90s did, and you were dishonest, by omission, about the contents of the article.

>If you actually think that 80m americans are "far-right" because they voted for a 90s Democrat then your brain is completely fried by propaganda.

If you actually think Americans vote for a president based on whether or not they totally agree with everything about them, you don't understand the US electoral system. That's not how it works.

It's a system of workers being duped into largely voting for "lesser evil" candidates; in Trump's case, Biden was being sued for genocide complicity and he only got off because a federal judge said that, although the case was plausible, the president probably was too big to sue over foreign policy. Trump's campaigned regularly positioned him as the peace candidate compared to Harris, who had promised to continue all of Biden's policies and "make America's military the most lethal in the world." Do you think 75 million Harris voters were all devoted K-Hive morons?
No, most of those were people who were duped because they were afraid of Trump & bought the "lesser evil" propaganda, and most Trump voters are operating on exactly the same logic. By the end of 2024, the "lesser evil" Dems were so ashamed that they wouldn't even get mad if I told them I wasn't going for it. None of the IRL ones would, anyway.

PS, it was 77,302,580.

>That was islamic terrorism.

I didn't say it wasn't.
I said that you want me to equate spray painting walls and knocking over trashcans with stuff like that, an actual terror attack. Next you'll tell me 9/11 or San Bernadino were Islamic terrorism; what a smart boy you are. A little lacking in reading comprehension, though!

>Do you actually think there is no such thing as leftist terrorism?

No. I think it is extremely rare, which it is.

>Off the top of my head we've had the CK assassination,

Israel did it. Even if Israel didn't do it, there has been zilch to indicate a "leftist" political motive for the patsy; even the incredibly fake script the FBI put out to supposedly provide motive suggests he did it for his girl/boyfriend out of personal vendetta. Buy that or don't, there's nothing "leftist" about it either way.

>3 attempts on Trump,

One attempt on Trump by a guy who shifted between ActBlue and the GOP, and whose most notable action before that was appearing in an ad for BlackRock, who left behind zero political affiliation evidence besides his apparently participating in both duopoly parties, and who allegedly had an online account which made comments which "appear to reflect antisemitic and anti-immigration themes." Weird how the Secret Service sniper just had this guy in their line of sight and let him fire off a few rounds before killing him. If Thomas Crooks was a leftist, I'd be glad to claim him; even though he was a failure and appears to have been set up.

A second supposed attempt was a neocon former Trump supporter who was obsessed with waging war on Ukraine and China.

A "third" was some guy named "Pop" from NYC who the FBI entrapped into a fake """Iranian""" assassination hiring sting.

Literally none of these were "leftist," and you'd know that if you bothered to look into it.

>several transhumanist mass shooters

There've been some black mass shooters, too, you should count them. Every day a minority does a mass shooting that's "leftist terrorism," that's the rule!

>weeks of sustained rioting which resulted in a few dozen murders

The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina was also """leftist terrorism"""!

>the congressional baseball game shooter

Yeah, this counts.

>the guy who attacked thomass massie outside his house.

Maybe. Who did it?

>There's a reason they had to stretch the time window all the way back to 1990 to get the conclusion they wanted.

That's not a stretch, it was literally just assessing a 30 year window. How dare they.

>respond to the actual words on screen.

I did, and those words were dishonest and weren't convincing. You think you're owed more respect than you actually are for offering these false equivalences based on assumptions you haven't bothered to check or challenge, but I won't appeal to this unearned sense of victimhood by pretending like it holds water that it doesn't.
>>

 No.491619

>>491618
>Israel did it.
See also vidrel. The official narrative is that an angry boyfriend shot Charlie Kirk from the front because he was angry for his partner, and there was no blood splatter behind Charlie Kirk because "Charlie Kirk's miraculous man of steel neck blocked a bullet which would normally go through everything, so there was no exit wound." Even if you don't find it weird that, without much prompting beyond initially fringe online chatter, Netanyahu has made multiple videos denying that Israel did it, there is no way you can believe the official narrative. Even if you were born yesterday and trust the FBI over your own eyes, even the FBI narrative frames the alleged shooter as doing it for personal reasons.
>>

 No.491629

>>491619
What I'm interested in is why his shirt poofed upwards from the front. I still can't explain that.
>>

 No.491630

>>491629
Maybe he ate way too many beans beforehand.
>>

 No.491631

>>491629
inertia maybe?
like his body went backwards with the shock but his shirt resisted the movement so it looks like it poofed up.
i dunno tho seems a very weird explanation.
>>

 No.491633

>>491631
Reviewing footage from multiple angles, Charlie doesn't really move at all before his shirt jumps upwards. So it can't be that. There's also no indication of any kind of violent muscle spasm.
>>

 No.491642

File: 1758829429706.webm ( 4.88 MB , 576x1024 , Download(13).webm )

>Rare and urgent meeting of every senior military official
It's probably nothing but I wonder what this is about
>>

 No.491644

>>491642
99% it's war with Iran. Netanyahu is in the US this week and will meet with Trump on Monday. Escalation with Russia or China (or Venezuela) is also not necessarily off the table. We're essentially in WWIII.

Meant to post a summary earlier:
Hegseth orders rare, urgent meeting of hundreds of generals, admirals–The Pentagon has summoned military officials from around the world for a gathering in Virginia. Even top generals and their staffs don’t know the reason for the meeting.

Hegseth has ordered hundreds of the U.S. military’s generals and admirals to gather on short notice — and without a stated reason — at a Marine Corps base in Virginia next week, sowing confusion and alarm after the Trump admin’s firing of numerous senior leaders this year.

None of the people who spoke with The Post could recall a secdef ever ordering so many of the military’s generals and admirals to assemble like this. Several said it raised security concerns. “People are very concerned. They have no idea what it means,” one person said.

-WAPO
>>

 No.491645

>>491644
>We're essentially in WWIII.
awe fuck dude
>>

 No.491647

>>491642
>>491644
>>491645
Am I going to die?
>>

 No.491650

>>491644
Greg Stoker via Twitter:
This compulsory meeting of General and Flag Officers in Virginia isn’t “rare,” it’s unheard of.

Possible reasons:

A) Launching a new military campaign
B) Total overhaul of command structure
C) Squid Games: demand complete obedience to Trump administration
D) All of the above

>>491647
Short answer: Yes.

Long answer: It depends on what "you" is. If by "you" you mean your person as defined separately from your surroundings, then yes. If you mean the stuff that you're made of, then no; there is no permanent death. Things die all the time, yet life goes on. Matter cannot be created or destroyed. The dust from which you have been made will be recycled endlessly, and from it consciousness will re-emerge time and time again as it did so many times leading to your birth. Whatever forces destroy your subjective reality will continue to wreak havoc upon the world that your matter is recycled into in various forms. Death is no escape.
>>

 No.491694

File: 1759088039844.jpg ( 103.01 KB , 770x513 , Mormon.jpg )

One dead, nine injured in shooting at Mormon church in Michigan: Police
Police in Grand Blanc Township warn that more victims are likely to be found after a fire at the building.

One person has been killed and nine injured in a shooting at a church belonging to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Michigan in the United States, according to police.

The suspect, a 40-year-old man from a nearby town whose motives remain unknown, is also dead after being shot on Sunday by responding police officers, Grand Blanc Township Police Chief William Renye said.

A fire engulfed the building. Firefighters sprayed the blaze with water while fire trucks and emergency vehicles were parked nearby, footage on social media showed. It was later extinguished.

The suspect ran a vehicle into the front door of the church, exited and opened fire with an assault rifle at people inside, Renye told reporters, adding that “hundreds of people” had been in the church attending a service at the time.

The local police chief also confirmed that 10 gunshot victims had been taken to a hospital, including one person who later died.

Renye said the authorities believed the gunman deliberately set the church on fire before he was killed by police. He added that it was likely additional victims would be found once the scene was secure.

Speaking to the AFP news agency, a woman who lives near the church said: “My husband heard people screaming, one lady yelling for help.”

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer condemned Sunday’s shooting in a statement, adding that her heart was breaking for the Grand Blanc community. “Violence anywhere, especially in a place of worship, is unacceptable,” she said.



The shooting came the day after the death of the 101-year-old Mormon leader Russell Nelson.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/9/28/multiple-people-injured-in-shooting-at-a-mormon-church-in-michigan-police
>>

 No.491738

>>491694
Hasan on the culprit
>>

 No.491757

Trump memorandum brands anti-fascism and opposition to capitalism as “domestic terrorism”

On September 25, President Donald Trump issued National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7): “Countering Domestic Terrorism and Organized Political Violence.” NSPM-7 is a fascist blueprint for mobilizing the entire repressive apparatus of the American state—the FBI, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), State Department, Treasury, and the military—against all political opposition on the left.

The memorandum begins with the killing of Charlie Kirk and asserts that “individuals who adhered to the alleged shooter’s ideology embraced and cheered this evil murder while actively encouraging more political violence.”

More than two weeks after Kirk’s killing, no evidence has emerged that the shooter had a definite political ideology, or that he was part of an organized group, left or right-wing. There is no evidence he planned the assassination with anyone else and there have been no other arrests connected to the shooting.

In order to manufacture the image of a unified, centrally directed left-wing terror network, NSPM-7 strings together entirely unrelated incidents—protests against police, opposition to ICE, the killing of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson and assassination attempts on Trump and Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh—and presents them as parts of a single conspiracy. This deliberate conflation creates the mirage of a vast, organized movement of “domestic terrorism” on the left, even though no evidence has emerged connecting these events.



This selective accounting is not an oversight. The greatest purveyor of political violence in the world and the greatest threat to the democratic rights of everyone, inside and outside the United States, is the US government itself, led by Trump, but supported by both the Democrats and Republicans.

Yet NSPM-7 presents “anti-fascism” and left-wing opposition to genocide, forced disappearances and police violence as the terrorist menace.

Terrified of growing support for socialism in the US and internationally, NSPM-7 frets that “anti-fascism” movements, “portray foundational American principles (e.g., support for law enforcement and border control) as ‘fascist’ to justify and encourage acts of violent revolution.”

The claim in NSPM-7 that “foundational American principles” include “support for law enforcement and border control” is historically absurd. Americans did not take up arms in the Revolution of 1776 because of their love of police or their defense of border guards. Modern policing in the United States did not even exist at the time of the revolution. The earliest municipal police departments emerged only in the 1830s and 1840s, and they were designed above all to discipline the working class and enforce slavery. Border enforcement, likewise, only became institutionalized with the creation of the Border Patrol in 1924—in the midst of a wave of xenophobic and racist immigration restrictions.

By retroactively treating the coercive apparatus of the capitalist state—the police, ICE, border control—as “foundational,” Trump’s memorandum rewrites history to equate “America” with its modern machinery of repression. In Trump’s fascist framework, opposing police brutality or the persecution of immigrants is equated with terrorism.

The memorandum continues:

Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.

This sweeping definition paints a target on anyone who rejects the official ideology of Trump and the Republican right. Those who oppose capitalism, challenge nationalism, defend immigrants, expose racism or fight for gender equality are to be placed in the same category as terrorism.

By treating political beliefs as the “animating threads” of terrorism, NSPM-7 provides a pseudo-legal justification for the persecution of individuals and organizations on the basis of their political convictions. It is a direct attack on the First Amendment.

The memo orders all 56 Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs) to “develop and implement a comprehensive national strategy” to investigate, prosecute, and disrupt individuals and organizations allegedly engaged in “political violence.” Its scope is expansive: it explicitly includes “funders, officers, employees of organizations, US citizens abroad, and NGOs with close ties to foreign governments.”

The Treasury is directed to track and disrupt financial networks, while the attorney general is ordered to prosecute all cases “to the maximum extent permissible by law,” and to classify activities like “doxing campaigns, swatting, rioting, looting, civil disorder” as forms of terrorism.

ICE, which is presently kidnapping and deporting immigrants—including US citizens—is positioned in the memorandum as a primary victim of supposed left-wing violence. As of this writing, not a single ICE officer has been killed on the job, period. This sleight of hand turns reality on its head: the same agency terrorizing working class immigrants is presented as under siege, justifying more repression.

The White House released an accompanying “Fact Sheet” elevating “attacks on ICE officers” and the harassment of billionaires as existential threats, while erasing the January 6 coup and decades of fascist terror. The omissions are deliberate. As with the Reichstag Fire Decree of 1933, the aim is to transform isolated incidents into a pretext for the destruction of democratic rights and the persecution of left-wing opposition.

NSPM-7 follows directly from Trump’s September 23 Executive Order designating “Antifa” as a “domestic terrorist organization.” As the World Socialist Web Site explained:

The Trump White House has now taken the unprecedented step of branding “Antifa”… as a domestic terrorist organization. The order has no basis in law, but it provides the pseudo-legal framework for targeting left-wing political opposition.

read more: https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2025/09/27/npou-s27.html
>>

 No.491758

>>491757
>the January 6 coup
wooswoos really embarrasses themselves when they peddle crap like this.
>>

 No.491761

>>491758
I mean, are they wrong?
AFAIK the military put out internal memos not to participate prior to it occurring. Trump tried to get GA to change the results after the fact. There was an attempt at a coup which was abandoned & failed at the last minute, which left only the rioters at congress and Trump's phone calls.
>>

 No.491763

>>491761
Yes, they're wrong. If you want to call it a coup it was the most limp-wristed ineffectual coup attempt in history. No military was involved, no armed groups (keep in mind a sizable demographic of the capital protestors were gun rights advocates), no lines of communication or travel hubs were seized, 99% of the protestors were non-violent and in fact the biggest advocates of violence were the sizable number of FBI provocateurs in the crowd. Finally the leaders of Congress at the time told the DC police to stand down, inviting protestors into the capital building so they could use it for political theater for the next four years. It's utterly moronic to call it a coup attempt and you're just giving ammo to politicians by legitimizing it as such.
>>

 No.491764

>>491761
>Trump tried to get GA to change the results after the fact.
Also America has a long rich history of election theft in presidential elections but we don't usually call them coups. The one exception might be when the US supreme court violated their impartiality as a check on the other branches of government and halted the Florida recount that would have declared Gore winner in the 2000 presidential race. People sometimes refer to this as a "judicial coup". But again that's really quite a stretch of the definition since it didn't involve any force or violence.
>>

 No.491767

File: 1759444806351.jpg ( 101.15 KB , 382x261 , Brooks_Brothers_riot.jpg )

>>491763
>No military was involved
Yeah, but that's because they got caught planning it.
>>491764
>But again that's really quite a stretch of the definition since it didn't involve any force or violence.
It actually did involve force, see picrel.
Bush staffers quite literally went into a polling place in Florida and rioted and started beating people up to delay the recount, and the judge who was on board then came out after and said "this is taking too long, Bush is president."

It's not weird that people see January 6 as a failed coup (in my personal view it was deliberately bungled - it was more like a play meant to establish a precedent that the president can't be held accountable for stuff like that even when everybody sees it and admits it isn't legal), it's weird that Americans memory hole the successful one.
>>

 No.491769

>>491767
Fair point about the Florida riot. There was so much manipulation going on in that election that it's hard to remember all of it.
>>

 No.491775

File: 1759477562486.jpg ( 1.44 MB , 4096x3554 , G2T2REpbMAQPfqH.jpg )

Huge explosion at El Segundo refinery in southern California.
>>

 No.491776

>>491775
anarchist propaganda by the deed?
>>

 No.491778

>>491776
In other words, nothing.
>>

 No.491779

Do any modern anarchists actually believe in the propaganda of the deed tactic anymore? I kind of think the history of it presents a useful cover for false-flag operations these days.
>>

 No.491780

>>491779
No. all anarchists care about now is opening up cafe co-ops and putting "Agitprop" stickers up on lightpoles
>>

 No.491781

>>491779
Except for the earth-firsters who turned off electricity in aspen in 2020. But not sure if Earth-Firsters count as anarchist, really
>>

 No.491782

Leftypol.org mods actively defend questionable behaviour
>>

 No.491783

>>491776
Doubt it.
>>

 No.491788

>>491781
You can't even be sure that they're the ones who did that. All we have is that someone wrote their name on a sabotaged pipeline segment. Reminder the FBI or some Pinkerton detonated a bomb in Judi Bari's car and then tried to prosecute them for transporting a bomb.
>>

 No.491841

Commentary on the recent Chicago ICE apartment raid around 43 minutes.
>>

 No.491850

MAGA T*RROR ATTACK HITS SOUTH CAROLINA | The Kyle Kulinski Show
>>

 No.491854

Jimmy Dore on Larry Ellison/Oracle and Marco Rubio.

Unique IPs: 11

[Return][Catalog][Top][Home][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
ReturnCatalogTopBottomHome