>>486261>he's on video r-tardYou can say retard here, fed.
Also, I've seen the video, we've all seen the video, the stills, etc. and it doesn't look like the same guy.
>>486262If you think money doesn't help with legal defenses in America
you're delusional.
Of course, you don't actually believe that, it's a ploy to try to discourage people from helping. "Yeah bro, trust me, the feds totally have him dead to rights, it's a super airtight case
which is why you shouldn't help pay for the legal team." Even if the first part about the case being solid was true (which it is not), that would only be
more reason to fund his defense. If you actually believed that it would be a difficult case to beat, that would be
more reason to fund the legal defense, not
less, as the richest people with the best legal teams and most limitless legal & financial resources regularly get away with stuff in America. Unfortunately, neither admitting he is a patsy nor
pretending that the case is difficult to beat will actually provide a good reason for you to shame randos for helping with legal costs, so now you're resulting to petty personal attacks about his "greedy" lawyer and how the patsy is "selfish."
Or perhaps they both have cooties, and that's why no one should help them. You're a joke, buddy.