>>494911I'm gonna say something a lil' controversial - I like most of the US Constitution, and think we could keep the letter of most it as long as we pay it actual heed. The EC should be reformed within it to definitively reflect '1 person = 1 vote' in national elections instead of doing it by state, land/property rights and taxation should be reformed, and otherwise I think a
lot of the necessary stuff would have to be done actively rather than just, like, written down. A revolution needs to start as a broad workers' movement, the constitution should be a popular constitution foremost, and we should aim to push the existing, capitalist/rentier oligarchs out while preserving much of the existing state bureaucracy so that we have infrastructure to build on top of and alter actively. And then, if that fails, we have another revolution which starts with a more specific constitution. My feeling is that most reforms (outside of land/property reform, although
even those can be done at least part way) could be done with legal reforms not reliant on major Constitutional rewriting.