>>688> wasn't there a separateI never heard anything specific about this. But it's unlikely that any of this shit went unnoticed. The 9/11 attackers were hardly subtle, many of them were under investigation before shit went down.
The thing with anti-terror organizations is that they don't have a strong incentive to prevent this stuff. If attacks occur they get an excuse to get more funding. If you combine that with neo-cons needing a pretext to start wars in the middle east, you get a recipe for letting the 9/11 attacks happen.
The hole concept of creating an organization to solve a problem is absurd, no organization will do something that would jeopardize its reason to exist, because this stuff represent lucrative careers, and hence it will do everything to preserve the problem it's supposed to solve.
If you wanted to make sure airplanes can't be abused like in 9/11 you'd design planes that make it impossible for anybody in the passenger cabin to get access to the cockpit. Like make it holey separate compartments without any go-in-between.
If you wanted to stop other types of attacks like when happened in the London tube, you need chemical detectors that can sniff out explosives.
This is physical hardening of civilization, but there also is psychological hardening. Acts of terror are about exploiting fear to make civilization behave foolishly. You need to have a media culture that doesn't relay the message of fear. And you need a political culture that would consider anybody trying to exploit fear as terrorist collaborators.
>decades of cooperation between bin ladens & bushes shouldn't be 4gottenPost too long. Click here to view the full text.