[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/gulag/ - gulag

trash can / purgatory for deleted threads
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

File: 1780306239796.png ( 28.62 KB , 900x963 , IMG_3721.png )

 No.1377[Reply]

The following is a grammatically corrected and slightly edited copy of a response I made to a woman who had two bad experiences with adult men when she was underage, and then asked questions to the MAA [Minor Attracted Adult] community, specifically Girl Lovers [GLers] on the GirlChat [GC] forum. The questions from the woman are in greentext, with my comments and responses made in standard text. It begins with my response to her initial respectful but guarded query to the forum.

Welcome, and thank you for your questions. Strictly speaking, I'm not a pedophile, but a hebephile…that is, an adult with a romantic preference for adolescent girls. Since this includes some girls who are 12, and you had a bad experience at that age, I will step in here and give you some answers in addition to all of the great responses you have received here from genuine pedophiles.

>When I was about eight, an unknown man tried to make me go into his car so he could "take me to the beach" *I was on my way to the public pool* and insisted about it until I run away in tears and scared out of my mind. I never talked to a stranger again during the rest of my childhood and my early teenage years. Then another man, this one known by my family, tried to touch me *and I'm not talking about my arm* and even offered me money to go with him, saying that he was being generous because I was "fresh" and that he could find a hooker for way less but he liked me better. I was twelve then and could confront him. He left me alone when I threatened him to call the police if he ever dared to even look at me or any of my friends again.

>This man doesn't sound like a typical pedophile to me. He sounds more like some creep with a purely sexual fetish for little girls. Most pedophiles are not like this. It's possible the man was a pedophile, but 90% of all adults who commit these crimes are not real pedos. Pedos CAN be bad people, just like people from any group can be bad, but MOST pedos are decent people, just like most blacks, most Jews, and most homosexuals are decent people. To be honest, I had a bad experience with a homosexual man when I was a few months shy of my 18th birthday, and this occurred soon before I graduated high school; he unsuccessfully tried to pick me up in his car as I walked home from school on two separate occasions. As a result, I had negative opinions of gay men for a while, but that changed in tiPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1780304463636.jpeg ( 33.35 KB , 474x316 , IMG_3718.jpeg )

 No.1378[Reply]

Below is my analysis of this article (https://web.archive.org/web/20100822150940/http://www.ctv.ca/CTVNews/World/20070623/peru_consent_070623/) detailing something rather amazing and extremely refreshing amidst today's global sex abuse hysteria and the continuing Orwellian encroachments on youth sexual rights as a result: the government of Peru actually lowered its AoC back in 2007. Hence, its then-in-power political party Aprista proved itself to be composed of progressives that are truly worthy of the term, unlike most of their cowardly counterparts in North America, Europe, and Australia. Without further ado, let's begin my analysis of the various excerpts from the article that are greentexted below, followed by my response in standard text.

>"Peru's Congress has voted overwhelmingly to lower the age to 14 for participating in consensual sex, a move some activists said could expose children to sexual abuse."

And who, exactly, would these "activists" be? They certainly aren't activists for youth rights, that much is clear. My guess is that they are the Peruvian equivalent of "child advocates" [CAs], who claim to fight for the "rights" of minors but in actuality fight for increased state and parental control over every aspect of young people's lives "for their own good." They are the main people in this world who have created an entire industry around the sex abuse panic, and they benefit and gain political power and oftentimes a large degree of state funds and lucrative media careers as a result of this dubious industry. So it's no wonder that so many of them push this "concern" past all degrees of reason and protest any type of progress that may weaken the stranglehold the sex abuse hysteria currently has over public discourse in the Western nations.

>"Lawmakers voted 70-10 on Thursday to approve the measure lowering the age at which criminal law recognizes the legal capacity of a person to consent to sexual activity. It was previously 17."

70-10??!! Holy shit! Peruvian politicians who consider themselves to be progressives are truly and sincerely progressive, and take the principles connected to the moniker very seriously, in contrast to the bulk of the progressives in America, England, and Austrialia who are tPost too long. Click here to view the full text.(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
>>

 No.1379

>>1378
For one thing, such claims carry the implication that young people, including those who are empowered with their rights, are easier to coerce and intimidate into lying on behalf of adult rapists than other adults are, which is an ageist attitude against young people. Such claims are also invoking negative stereotypes and unreasonable distrust of adults by making the strong implication that adults who have a romantic/sexual interest in younger teens are very likely to be unscrupulous. This is a similar sentiment to what I often hear from anti-choice MAAs when they argue in favor of retaining AoC laws: an extreme, paranoia-laced mistrust for adults, with an accompanying belief that society is filled to the brim with adult rapists and potential rapists who are just sitting back and waiting for the AoC laws to be lowered, and will then emerge in mass numbers to pounce on unsuspecting minors, threaten and coerce them into having sexual relations, and then taking advantage of the AoC laws being lowered to intimidate these minors into saying that the rape was actually consensual. I wish people who make such claims would seriously think clearly about what they say before saying it, because they would look far less foolish and totally out of their minds with paranoia if they did so.
In a democratic nation, misanthropic attitudes that presume the world is filled with evil people, and passing laws based on this assumption, are frowned upon with good reason. We cannot pass laws based on what are clearly assumptions about what people might do based on a cynical dislike for the human race and still remain even a nominally democratic nation that is based upon socially progressive values. Yes, there are some evil adults out there who would indeed try to take advantage of young people, but I challenge anyone to prove that these adults exist in such great numbers that they justify oppressive laws that are based upon totally arbitrary assumptions, and which necessitate throwing large amounts of innocent people in prison to make sure that every single truly evil or guilty person gets punished right away. Yes, evil adults doing such things can happen and indeed have happened before, but I think it's nothing less than totally hysterical and even ageist to suggest that huge numbers of younger people lack the fortitude and strength of will to report to friends, family, and the auPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1779948854104-0.png ( 676.46 KB , 808x638 , Home Brew Nerve Gas page 1.png )

File: 1779948854105-1.png ( 659.06 KB , 808x638 , Home Brew Nerve Gas page 2.png )

File: 1779948854105-2.pdf ( 760.34 KB , 67x118 , 3e7577cee051cb0334d1dadbf9….pdf )

File: 1779948854105-3.pdf ( 143.83 KB , 67x118 , 3-Quinuclidinyl benzilate ….pdf )

File: 1779948854105-4.pdf ( 1.11 MB , 67x118 , Phosgene page 1.pdf )

 No.1376[Reply]

Interesting how just 5 miligrams of scopalamine or so is lethal, Perhaps you could convert it into some nerve gas like agent? It could be a good military chemical incapactating agent at least, but at least somewhat treatable,

File: 1779577964517.jpeg ( 90.84 KB , 960x952 , 1779369624335.jpeg )

 No.1370[Reply]

In 2024, American Communist Party (ACP) top figure Haz Al-Din made the point that a man was being raped by a trans woman if the latter didn’t disclose their gender transition status beforehand, which some leftists found to be controversial: https://xcancel.com/secondbyfarce/status/1852772181073445357

Some here may find Haz’s position to be disconcerting and triggering, but within the context of consent in sexual intimacy, he is right since he is merely applying the logic of rape-as-lack-of-consent to its logical conclusion.

Because let’s face it: Consent, as pointed out by figures such as Harry Hay and Michel Foucault, is just liberal contract theory as applied to sex, and a contract is made void if you enter under it under false pretenses, and let’s not pretend that contracts are made in a vacuum, as whether a contract is or isn’t valid isn’t a neutral judgement made by an impartial figure, as much as being done by the powers that be (e.g., the state) under dominant or bourgeois cultural diktats.

So unless you think consent shouldn’t be absolute when it comes to sexual relations, then a trans woman having sex with a cishet man without disclosing “her” pre-transition gender is rape as much as sex by deception is rape, and neither are criminalised even in the most feminist countries like Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK, and France. So what does it say about consent theory if not even the most feminist countries on Earth criminalised sex by deception as rape?

Then of course, there’s the issue of the AoC, a draconian and absolutist bourgeois piece of legislation used by the capitalist bourgeoisie to morally discipline the working class into anti-proletarian bourgeois morality since the days of William T Stead’s infamous yellow press journalism. In this case, a person under the magic age line cannot (legally) consent to sex with someone above the magic age line. Common idealist talking points often allude to an inconsistent and arbitrary notion of “mental maturity” that is heavily subjective depending on who uses it, whilst obfuscating the meat of the issue: It’s not that people below the magic age line are incapable of being willing sexual and/or romantic partners, it’s just that the state decided that the magic age line makes the willingness of the person below the magic age line (Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.1371

Yeah I think you're onto something
>>

 No.1372

>>1370
I kind of agree but only because I think there is an obvious difference between a trans woman and a woman, but what do you say to the people that will scream "trans women are women"? Because in the future the physical differences will probably go away.
>>

 No.1373

File: 1779681786700.png ( 1.45 MB , 1000x1500 , TheLifeandPhilosophyofMich….png )

>>1370 (OP)
>consent is the same as ideological disagreement
Well, then a woman is raped by a man if he voted for Donald Irump, I guess.
>Michel Foucault
Why won't the anti-woke crowd leave Foucault alone for fuck's sake? He wasn't a liberal, neither did he support identity politics. Other than Foucault feminists also read Davis and Crenshaw whose methodology is a complete 180.

Why not deconstruct idpol through Foucault himself? Show how idpol is an essentialist expression of the Panopticon or something.
>>

 No.1374

>>1373
>Why won't the anti-woke crowd leave Foucault alone for fuck's sake? He wasn't a liberal,
He was an idealist "Pretend superhero movies are THE REAL reason we capitalism." so he might as well have been.
>>

 No.1375

>>1374
>idealist
It's such a common insult that it doesn't even make any sense anymore. One can accuse even Stirner of idealism, which is such an absurd strawman. Also, Foucault was a friend of Deleuze who was explicitly a materialist.
>"Pretend superhero movies are THE REAL reason we capitalism."
He lived in the 60s…

File: 1779378421693.png ( 153.13 KB , 610x563 , IMG_3636.png )

 No.1368[Reply]

In 2024, American Communist Party (ACP) top figure Haz Al-Din made the point that a man was being raped by a trans woman if the latter didn’t disclose their gender transition status beforehand, which some leftists found to be controversial: https://xcancel.com/secondbyfarce/status/1852772181073445357

Some here may find Haz’s position to be disconcerting and triggering, but within the context of consent in sexual intimacy, he is right since he is merely applying the logic of rape-as-lack-of-consent to its logical conclusion.

Because let’s face it: Consent, as pointed out by figures such as Harry Hay and Michel Foucault, is just liberal contract theory as applied to sex, and a contract is made void if you enter under it under false pretenses, and let’s not pretend that contracts are made in a vacuum, as whether a contract is or isn’t valid isn’t a neutral judgement made by an impartial figure, as much as being done by the powers that be (e.g., the state) under dominant or bourgeois cultural diktats.

So unless you think consent shouldn’t be absolute when it comes to sexual relations, then a trans woman having sex with a cishet man without disclosing “her” pre-transition gender is rape as much as sex by deception is rape, and neither are criminalised even in the most feminist countries like Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK, and France. So what does it say about consent theory if not even the most feminist countries on Earth criminalised sex by deception as rape?

Then of course, there’s the issue of the AoC, a draconian and absolutist bourgeois piece of legislation used by the capitalist bourgeoisie to morally discipline the working class into anti-proletarian bourgeois morality since the days of William T Stead’s infamous yellow press journalism. In this case, a person under the magic age line cannot (legally) consent to sex with someone above the magic age line. Common idealist talking points often allude to an inconsistent and arbitrary notion of “mental maturity” that is heavily subjective depending on who uses it, whilst obfuscating the meat of the issue: It’s not that people below the magic age line are incapable of being willing sexual and/or romantic partners, it’s just that the state decided that the magic age line makes the willingness of the person below the magic age line (Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1779370506173.jpeg ( 90.84 KB , 960x952 , IMG_3627.jpeg )

 No.1367[Reply]

In 2024, American Communist Party (ACP) top figure Haz Al-Din made the point that a man was being raped by a trans woman if the latter didn’t disclose their gender transition status beforehand, which some leftists found to be controversial: https://xcancel.com/secondbyfarce/status/1852772181073445357

Some here may find Haz’s position to be disconcerting and triggering, but within the context of consent in sexual intimacy, he is right since he is merely applying the logic of rape-as-lack-of-consent to its logical conclusion.

Because let’s face it: Consent, as pointed out by figures such as Harry Hay and Michel Foucault, is just liberal contract theory as applied to sex, and a contract is made void if you enter under it under false pretenses, and let’s not pretend that contracts are made in a vacuum, as whether a contract is or isn’t valid isn’t a neutral judgement made by an impartial figure, as much as being done by the powers that be (e.g., the state) under dominant or bourgeois cultural diktats.

So unless you think consent shouldn’t be absolute when it comes to sexual relations, then a trans woman having sex with a cishet man without disclosing “her” pre-transition gender is rape as much as sex by deception is rape, and neither are criminalised even in the most feminist countries like Norway, Sweden, Iceland, Denmark, the USA, Canada, Australia, the UK, and France. So what does it say about consent theory if not even the most feminist countries on Earth criminalised sex by deception as rape?

Then of course, there’s the issue of the AoC, a draconian and absolutist bourgeois piece of legislation used by the capitalist bourgeoisie to morally discipline the working class into anti-proletarian bourgeois morality since the days of William T Stead’s infamous yellow press journalism. In this case, a person under the magic age line cannot (legally) consent to sex with someone above the magic age line. Common idealist talking points often allude to an inconsistent and arbitrary notion of “mental maturity” that is heavily subjective depending on who uses it, whilst obfuscating the meat of the issue: It’s not that people below the magic age line are incapable of being willing sexual and/or romantic partners, it’s just that the state decided that the magic age line makes the willingness of the person below the magic age line (Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1778679481024-0.png ( 221.69 KB , 1600x892 , IMG_3571.png )

File: 1778679481024-1.jpeg ( 194.69 KB , 1080x1268 , IMG_3570.jpeg )

File: 1778679481024-2.jpeg ( 123.66 KB , 1125x1125 , IMG_3569.jpeg )

File: 1778679481024-3.jpeg ( 364.76 KB , 750x809 , IMG_3568.jpeg )

 No.1355[Reply]

White child cohabitation should be legalised, otherwise how will white girls learn to respect white men at an early age? Heterosexual relationships are inherently unequal regardless of age. And that's ok as it conforms with the natural world. The importance is to seek harmony in the different natures between males and females. Females, regardless of age, are naturally submissive and cater to men, while men need to show strength, providance and dominance over their females to have the relationship be complementary. Thus, to foster respect for men, child cohabitation between pubescent white women and older white men has to be legalised so that white girls can later on foster their docility and submission for their white husbands.

This monoracial and heterosexual harmony between child and adult, female and male, promotes a good deal of spiritual peace that is currently under threat by modern secularism. One example would be Germanic countries like the Netherlands and Germany, where equality and greater freedom for youth has resulted in higher birth rates. So legalising white child cohabitation between pubescent white women and adult white men will prove societal ties further, especially if it's the parents that make up the arrangement, thus white child cohabitation will benefit white society. It should also be noted that zero evidence exists to support the notion that intergenerational intimacy is inherently harmful, so the idea that legalising child cohabitation will result in another holocaust is very immoral and unfounded, as it goes against the harmonisation of the white race and its spirituality, rooted in nature.

Matter of fact, evidence suggests that the trauma is more from the societal stigma attached to it thanks to radfems that hate men and don't want girls to respect men. After all, Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome had intergenerational relationships legal (see average age of senators' wives in Rome, and pederasty in Greece and average age of marriage there) and both the Rind report of 1998 and the Finnish victimisation survey have put the CSA dogma into question.

White child cohabitation will not only foster respect for men among white girls, but also nurture their natural tendencies to submit and remain docile to older white men as the latter loves and supports them, causing harmonisation in the white race. It will also boost white birth rates against the tide of colour against white supremacy, which will benefit thePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1358

White make elders need to lean to respect women and young people, especially those of ethnic descent
>>

 No.1359

>>1355
>Rambling AI slop
You have to go back.
>>

 No.1360

>>1359
This is a cooypasta from LeftyPol, not AI slop
>>

 No.1361

>>1360
Let me guess, it had hundreds of relies from .ogres
>>

 No.1362

>>1361
No. It only had one reply.
Irony is, LeftyPol accuses LeftyChan of being pro pedo and being racist

File: 1778581338895.jpg ( 299.82 KB , 1920x1080 , End Card 32.jpg )

 No.1354[Reply]

How fucking funny that the marxist lingo for 'goy' is 'philistine'?

File: 1777277592721.png ( 18.54 KB , 800x800 , avatar1.png )

 No.1352[Reply]

hello world
>>

 No.1353

hey :)

File: 1777021944454-0.png ( 2.98 MB , 1510x1042 , amy robot.png )

File: 1777021944454-1.mp3 ( 8.99 MB , audit_20260423_215547 (par….mp3 )

 No.1321[Reply]

gas chambers are technology
>>

 No.1322

File: 1776960549602-0.jpg ( 64.88 KB , 1280x720 , raiden.jpg )

File: 1776960549602-1.mp3 ( 8.95 MB , raiden bitching and compla….mp3 )

the /n/azis on 4chan always ban me and delete my threads when it's very obvious that those are gas chambers.

Are the nazi moderators fucking blind?

/n/ should be FULL of herding bodies in to gas chambers threads by now…

it makes me want to rip white people in half like a fucking phone book.

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home