/gulag/ - gulag

The process of class consciousness is tough cause you'll realize how slop and bourgeoisified the proletariat really is.

The programming and ideologies of people are based on relations, distorted material conditions, and false concepts and commodities. You strip away capital and state we are nothing more than a cooperative animal with potential for collective capacities.
What I find so strange is that for some reason all the "vanguard" people all seem to agree that the non-vanguard people are utterly exploited and without a society that attempts to seize its means will instead end up sharing existence with reactionaries. Even as far back as Marx there was the idea of needing some kind of class education to ensure most people have their minds so filled with fetishes that they're too confused to act revolutionary but also so confused they don't even fight against the capital. The reason you get to the conclusion that without these systems we're just alienated is because for some reason a fuck ton of people really do seem to be almost commodified. As though life is really just the few real historical agents out their trying to argue with one another on how the hell we should dialectically wrangle the rest of society.

And honestly I really do think that this analysis is true. Just look at history. I hate using them but I asked AI to try and get me a ratio of "classes important enough to be in a history compared to workers" and it said around 0.02%, or about 1 in 5000. Of coarse not all history is recorded and not every real revolutionary changes history but lets' say we multiplied that by 1000 times just to be generous. That'd still mean only 1 in 50 people would be considered class conscious and interesting enough to be able to not be just a dumb laborer. Statistically that means 49 in 50 people in all history are just surplus masses that serve no purpose then to hopefully produce surplus and aid in the upbringings of that 1 in 50. And even then this number is off people with a wiki, there are bourgeoisie so stupid throughout history they got mentioned.

So really I think looking at society is just statically going to make you feel sad because evidence shows that most people are alienated at worst and utterly forgettable at best. All you can do is organize or delude yourself to become or think you are that 1 in 50 that does class struggle and isn't like the rest.

im really excited for the post-collapse cheap prostitutes

This is what real leftism looks like, critical support for the US courts.

https://oecd.ai/en/incidents/2026-08-28-2b57

cause you'll realize how slop and hiveminded the species really is.

The programming and philosophies of people are based on assumptions, distorted instincts, and imaginary concepts and conditions. You strip away civilization and culture we are nothing more than a highly adaptive animal with potential for physic abilities


What I find so strange is that for some reason all the "wisest" people all seem to agree that the non wise people are utterly garbage and without a society that attempts to program its people will instead end up sharing existence with savages. Even as far back as Plato there was the idea of needing some kind of controlled education to ensure most people have their heads so filled with garbage that they're too confused to act savage but also so confused they don't even fight against the control. The reason you get to the conclusion that without these systems we're just animals is because for some reason a fuck ton of people really do seem to be almost animals. As though life is really just the few real individuals out their trying to argue with one another on how the hell we should tard wrangle the rest of society.

And honestly I really do think that this mentality is true. Just look at history. I hate using them but I asked AI to try and get me a ratio of "people important enough to be in an encyclopedia compared to normal people" and it said around 0.02%, or about 1 in 5000. Of coarse not all history is recorded and not every real smart person changes history but lets' say we multiplied that by 1000 times just to be generous. That'd still mean only 1 in 50 people would be considered smart and interesting enough to be able to not be just a dumb savage. Statistically that means 49 in 50 people in all history are just useless nothings that serve no purpose then to hopefully give birth and aid in the upbringings of that 1 in 50. And even then this number is off people with a wiki, there are retards so stupid throughout history they got mentioned.

So really I think looking at society is just statically going to make you feel sad because evidence shows that most people are savages at worst and utterly forgettable at best. All you can do is improve or delude yourself to become or think you are that 1 in 50 that does cool shit and isn't like the rest.

I AM IN A VERY NEED OF A TRUSTED MIDDLEMAN URGENTLY

you'll realize how slop and hiveminded the species really is.

The programming and philosophies of people are based on assumptions, distorted instincts, and imaginary concepts and conditions. You strip away civilization and culture we are nothing more than a highly adaptive animal with potential for physic abilities

What I find so strange is that for some reason all the "wisest" people all seem to agree that the non wise people are utterly garbage and without a society that attempts to program its people will instead end up sharing existence with savages. Even as far back as Plato there was the idea of needing some kind of controlled education to ensure most people have their heads so filled with garbage that they're too confused to act savage but also so confused they don't even fight against the control. The reason you get to the conclusion that without these systems we're just animals is because for some reason a fuck ton of people really do seem to be almost animals. As though life is really just the few real individuals out their trying to argue with one another on how the hell we should tard wrangle the rest of society.

And honestly I really do think that this mentality is true. Just look at history. I hate using them but I asked AI to try and get me a ratio of "people important enough to be in an encyclopedia compared to normal people" and it said around 0.02%, or about 1 in 5000. Of coarse not all history is recorded and not every real smart person changes history but lets' say we multiplied that by 1000 times just to be generous. That'd still mean only 1 in 50 people would be considered smart and interesting enough to be able to not be just a dumb savage. Statistically that means 49 in 50 people in all history are just useless nothings that serve no purpose then to hopefully give birth and aid in the upbringings of that 1 in 50. And even then this number is off people with a wiki, there are retards so stupid throughout history they got mentioned.

So really I think looking at society is just statically going to make you feel sad because evidence shows that most people are savages at worst and utterly forgettable at best. All you can do is improve or delude yourself to become or think you are that 1 in 50 that does cool shit and isn't like the rest.

If you take a look at cats,they do behave, with slight variations, 1:1 across all individuals.
They even groom themselves the same way.

I think thPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

Let me lay out my evidence because when you just step back and look at it, it's obvious.

- In every city in the world, you will find a shady old asian lady who barely speaks English that will jerk you off for $50, and gets lots of business doing it. BUT, the inverse of this exists NOWHERE in the world. NO where will will you find an old asian man that doesn't speak english being paid to schlick women off in shady stores.

- If you take any woman and ask her what her perfect day with an attractive celebrity of the opposing sex includes. Women will almost always say something like, we start out with a date, he is well dressed and treating me well, and all the people I know can see me with him, and see that he likes me, and then maybe we have sex later.
A man would say; we are at cozy/comfy million dollar cabin in the woods, naked, we spend the day fucking and watching movies / cuddling between refractory periods.
This isn't an accident. It betrays what each gender is really looking for.

- Women hate random dick picks. Men tend to love random nudity pics. Why the asymmetry? Women are supremely concerned with WHO'S dick. How did that dick get there. and ultimately they are squirming their way to the question: "Okay beside the dick what else do I get?".

Put all of this together, and ask yourself. Do they really have a 'sex' drive? A DRIVE for sex? No. They do not. At best they have what can be described as a 'sex-trading drive'. A drive to exchange sex for other non-sexual quantities: Peer jealousy, protection, food, money, clout, marking ownership… but in all of these cases the sex is a 'cost' that's paid for something non-sexual in return.

For men, sex IS the return. This is why men are happy to 'pay' for sex, whereas to a woman 'paying' for sex doesn't make sense. Because sex IS the payment.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

If such a scenario came to pass it would be a multi faction brawl like Myanmar or Yugoslavia. Even if such demographics become majorities in the nation I have no intentions of falling in with partisans that claim to be the good guys. I'd much prefer they destroy each other and I'll just neet.

the destruction of the nation and suggesting people should push for a conflict on the side of a regime that had a clean sweep of the government, all three branches went to that retard and he could have done anything he wanted and chose this bullshit. No more wars, no culture wars as distractions, make life better for Americans, fight COL rising and rein in government spending; thats what he ran on and we got none of that shit. He sucks as an elected politician, he would suck as a despot and the anti thesis of his government also sucks.

There is a giant gulf in the middle of national dialog that can and will be exploited and its for the best. War is a complete waste especially when its being pushed by the dregs of our society be they polar opposites it makes no difference to me.

So does the right, but, the left has many that create extreme weaknesses. I say this is the best way possible but genetic differences are a reality among different races of people. Cultural identity as well is insular and tightly woven through societies. Many times these societies clash in variuous ways. The left needs to actually accept white ppl. The left and minorities as well don't need to get over it, per se; They need to stop antagonizing whites and accept whites for who we are. If you desire a world built by the unification of class then cultural identity must be respected, for everyone.

name these moderate crimes and no like many teens still work shithead its seen as "irrelevant" for other issues like parents shifting to prioritizing academic preparation