[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/gulag/ - gulag

trash can / purgatory for deleted threads
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1767400600208.jpeg ( 2.04 MB , 4032x3024 , IMG_0898.jpeg )

 No.1227[Reply]

I am a white German Patagonia Nazi and I am going to run the gas chambers on your family so that I can go skiing.


File: 1767283975197.mp4 ( 6.2 MB , 1280x720 , snca.mp4 )

 No.1225[Reply]

>Of Course There Will Be Rape In The Revolution


File: 1767149622322.jpeg ( 1.13 MB , 2448x2448 , IMG_4867.jpeg )

 No.1220[Reply]

The Heritage Foundation.


 No.1221[Reply]

1. ADHD is one of the only examples of this, since most issues aren't considered to be innate in the same way. It's still debatable to what degree ADHD is innate
2. every thought, memory, and emotion is brain wiring. People who have certain patterns of thinking and feeling have certain patterns of brain function or physiology. Your claim is that all of these deviations from average are innate and organic in origin, but there isn't proof of that. In fact there is correlation between certain conditions and childhood environmental factors, giving credibility to the opposite, that many conditions are environmental/developmental.
3. we live in a particular society that contains unique and particular conditions. For any given innate neurotype, they might happen to either thrive or have difficulties under a given society. There is no guarantee of a society in which all neurotypes are equally adaptive. What's wrong with noticing deficits in functioning or well being and happiness and attempting to administer fixes at the only currently possible level - individual - while we still work to change society? And what if we actually need these fixes in order to be adaptive enough (have the energy, emotional stability, time, etc.) to change society? Even just to survive most people have chemical crutches, e.g. caffeine to wake up, nicotine for work, alcohol to relax.

So my question is: what advantage is it to frame things in this way? I think it's juvenile ultra-left critique of society that doesn't care about how we achieve liberation or even day to day survival, and only concerns itself with the purity of its critique. But also it's just flawed, the brain wiring is a correlation, it's not a one way causative factor, the brain is plastic especially developmentally but even as an adult.
>>

 No.1222

OP are you a bot? This post reeks of AI slop
>>

 No.1223

>>1222
It only seems that way due to having a wall of text disagreeing with the current cultural over-sympathy for neurocognitive disorders


 No.1219[Reply]

you say women are retarded, useless, annoying, overrated and that you hate simps

and yet, you say your life is miserable because you don't have a wife out of high school to have a loving family with and daily sex


which one is it?


do you need women or not?

and if they're so bad as you claim, why are you "lonely"? are you retarded?


 No.1217[Reply]

atleast are aware what women are like now, a genuinely nice dude has a much lower chance of being stuck with a verbally abusive post-wall roastie that leaks nothing but hate from every single orifice.


 No.1218[Reply]

If you are a christcuck or jew, you by definition believe that the Torah or the Torah fanfic that is the bible is the infallible word of God. These books say that when you take a town, you should kill every single person in them besides the young girls which you take as sex slaves. Why do we let these lunatics in left-wing spaces? Sure, you can make a "progressive" interpretation of these books if you erase enough words, but you can do the same with Mein Kampf. There's a reason why Marx and Lenin were so anti-religion, which modern postmodernist "communists" seem to have forgotten.


 No.1216[Reply]

>That's rApE
naw, we can artificially inseminate women with top tier sperm.
>i WoN't RaIsE a ChIlD i DoN't LoVe!
That's fine, all families looking to adopt will get all adoption fees waived completely.
>MY BODY MY CHOICE
This is a matter of national security. The government that gave you the rights to choose if you have a child needs children and you failed to meet your duty to the country. Men get drafted for war, women get drafted for breeding.
>I'LL ABORT IT!
Then go to jail for murder where you will be a breeding mare as your prison labor job
>I'LL INDUCE MISCARAIGE
The government will keep you in a cell and allow you to have optimal nutrition to ensure a healthy baby.
>I MIGHT DIE IN CHILD BIRTH!
Well, men might die in war. That's a risk we are willing to take.


 No.1215[Reply]

A song being used on TikTok is blasphemy in my eyes. I find it disgusting that art is being bastardized into fail compilation background music.
It is also subhuman to base your identity on your "media" "consumption" habits. These people should not be taken seriously.
People who consider Netflix Shows to be anything other than garbage are not to be considered when it comes to their opinions on anyone's artistic output.
People who come up with excuses for any of this are to be ignored. You are the majority. I'm just one online freak, close the tab and you probably never have to hear this opinion again.
No, you should not "just let people just enjoy stuff". It is important to """gatekeep""" garbage consumers so they are inspired to do some reading and actually engage with art instead of making their retarded surface level video essays.
The obvious exception is people who are occupied with other matters like feeding their families.


 No.1209[Reply]

the fact that many kids living in nuclear families are increasingly being raised by Ipad is a sign that the nuclear family as an institution has become irrelevant. Even from the start the nuclear family idealized the view of dads as someone who spent 99% of his time at job instead of being with his family and moms as stay at home serfs which is not only sexist but also retardedly dystopic.

However, i do not vibe with most marriage abolitionists because most of them criticized it from a liberal, promethean individualist perspective. They want to abolish marriage because they want to replace it with a libertarian world where free individuals hook up with everyone but never truly attach themselves to anyone that they don't envision through their Will. I actively abhorr that vision. I want a more communitarian, more communal relationships that carried real stakes like the clans of old.


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home