[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/posad/ - Paranormal

Skitzo round table.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1629823457892.png ( 1.02 MB , 1328x1340 , 87h87h.png )

 No.1[Reply]

Welcome to /posad/, our version of /x/.
Try not to get too skitzo and keep things some what based in material reality here. Obviously the board is an ode the late and great J Posadas. Ayyy's are acceptable as well as other forms of conspiracy and general skitzo tom foolery. Just try to keep it from devolving to the point of trying to peddle obviously clear and fallacious conspiracies and retarded CGI cooming.


File: 1779671140968.jpeg ( 150.66 KB , 1000x1499 , IMG_3659.jpeg )

 No.1067[Reply]

Good book on Jesus’ historicity, analysing not just every argument on the historical Christ but also giving a holistic assessment on how Christianity likely came to be, with a vigorous reference section. If you don’t want to buy it on Amazon, it’s available at z-library (link not given to avoid piracy charges).

Inb4:
>Muh Adam Green
>Muh Bart Ehrman
>Muh consensus
>Muh Christophobia

Yadda yadda, I know who Adam Green is, about the Ehrman talking point, and how this subject can be touchy to both Christcuck and e-crusader secularised midwits here, so I’ll be blunt here:

Adam Green’s background doesn’t invalidate his broader points on Christianity, the Bible, and Jesus Christ’s existence

The “consensus” doesn’t mean much since it’s mostly made up of Christians and Christian-sympathisers who engage in confirmation bias and gatekeeping to discourage any critical opinion on the historical Christ theory. Given that Ehrman himself relies on this very unreliable consensus for his book on Jesus’ historicity

Not believing in Jesus’ existence as a historical figure isn’t anti-Christian as many non-mainstream Christian sects like the early Church-era marcionites and gnostics assert the notion of a mythical non-physical Christ. On the top of that, much of Judaism (and by extension Zionism) rests on the notion of the Old Testament as being 100% true and historically accurate text, whilst Islamic doctrine holds the existence of a historical Christ. So by negating the existence of a historical Christ, and by extension undermining the value of the Old Testament as a historical text, Christianity and Islam and Judaism are effectively undermined
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.1068

If you like podcasts, there's a phenomenal one called Born in the Second Century, which as its names suggests, dates all the New Testament texts and the development of Christianity in the second century. It might be up your alley.

One of the best books in this genre is Earl Doherty's "Jesus: Neither God nor Man."

Since you mentioned Bart Ehrman, his book on this was almost unbelievably bad. A genuine travesty of scholarship. "Bart Ehrman and the Quest for the Historical Jesus of Nazareth" by Richard Carrier et al goes through a lot of the problems of it.
>>

 No.1069

File: 1779824607180.jpg ( 897.85 KB , 3000x3500 , 548c883f95e5ef0b2186754a83….jpg )

Anyone who actually knows history and understands history from that time knows that the existence of Christ has never been verified. No records of the existence of Christ exist and not only that, but, anything that does is most likely a forgery, or, embellishment.


File: 1751507354413.jpg ( 36.97 KB , 253x400 , 191198.jpg )

 No.894[Reply]

https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/191198.Mankind_Child_of_the_Stars
Mankind Child of the Stars by Max H. Flindt

Is Earth a colony established by creatures from Outerspace?

Scientific evidence to prove that mankind could not possibly evolved naturally. Step by step clues that explore the very real possibility that we are direct descendants of ancient starmen who came from other planets to Earth millions of years ago. Some of the fascinating discoveries revealed in this book:* Earth has been visited more than 5,000 times by creatures from other planets! * There's evidence that starmen deliberately hid any "Missing Link" human fossils in order to keep mankind from knowing it was a colony! * There is a reason to believe that the starmen were the "Angels" of the Bible, carrying on a "Divine" mission to bring human life to Earth! Max H. Flindt was the first to scientifically document from biological evidence the possibility that mankind may be a hybrid from a prehistoric union of terrestrial humanoids and starmen. With a 180,000 copies previously sold, this new Edition of "Mankind" offers a whole new generation a look at these mind-expanding theories.
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.897

>>896
I agree with your general argument but, to be fair we haven't actually explored nearby planets except with a few probes here and there. So we can't really rule that they do not contain any "ET evidence"
>>

 No.900

>>897
If there was extraterrestrial intelligence on nearby planets within our solar system, we would've seen them by now.
We sent probes to Venus and Mars for five decades now.

We mapped the surface of Venus with radar, infrared, and ultraviolet.

On Mars, we have rovers that test the soil for any microbes.

We still haven't gotten any results back where there are any sentient beings on the surface.

If there is extraterrestrial life within our solar system, chances are they could be microbial.
>>

 No.901

>>900
Jupiter has icemoons with liquid oceans underneath. Afaik we have not checked those out.

Op meant aliens with spaceships, rather than microbes. We have not checked the entire solar system for parked spaceships. If aeons ago an Alien had parked one on earth, it could be covered by dirt and hiding right under our collective noses.
>>

 No.902

>>901
If mankind's origins are from aliens, who created the aliens?
>>

 No.1066

File: 1779300208366.png ( 484.38 KB , 692x987 , bizarre fossil.png )



File: 1705344211628.png ( 276.8 KB , 1320x874 , meds-forever-pills-feature….png )

 No.576[Reply]

>post on leftist imageboards
>get told to take meds multiple times
>later on, get put in actual psychiatric hospital and forced to take meds
Is dialectical materialism actually occult?
40 posts and 14 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.683

File: 1716479019165-1.jpg ( 64.28 KB , 1170x901 , 0xkmiemx10881.jpg )

I made a mistake and told my psychiatrist about being a suicidal leftcel who fantasizes about committing murder and assassinating politicians. They're acting as if I've already done it. It's over.
>>

 No.684

>>683
>I made a mistake and told my psychiatrist about being a suicidal leftcel who fantasizes about committing murder and assassinating politicians
You're getting sent to Klaus Schwab's rape basement now anon
>>

 No.685

File: 1716480643559.jpg ( 70.45 KB , 960x720 , w64m6lrkldz11.jpg )

>>683
better come clean about being a fag too so they can start your transition
>>

 No.686

they just searched my room for objects i could use to harm myself or others with. they didnt find anything

>>684
i did joke about getting put on a list, but it might actually become real.

>>685
that's not funny, i told them about this website (not the name but the content) and they said it's unhealthy and i should stop visiting. fuck u
>>

 No.1065

File: 1779297928262.jpg ( 40.32 KB , 500x366 , fed50e467775f8634dc1dc3176….jpg )

>>576
>Is dialectical materialism actually occult?


File: 1742935171194.jpg ( 532.11 KB , 2859x1128 , l.jpg )

 No.797[Reply]

there are some spiritualities (Indigenous matriarchal ones for example) that believe women possess intuition like a 6th sense that men aren't able to tap into. And that it can be honed with practice.

I have pretty powerful intuition, always have since I was a kid. I started doing tarot readings when I was little for fun, and they ended up really scarily accurate. It's all intuition based, the way I read them. I freaked out several family members- aunts uncles, mom, grandma with my readings to the point where they were made uncomfortable. I've predicted severe illness, infidelity, and minor issues too with my card readings. I get told a lot that my tarot readings aren't any fun because I don't sugarcoat bad things. In fact I think I have more of an ability to predict bad things than good.

I am also really good at reading people, which I usually pass off as being a perk of being a wallflower, but I can even guess people's first names when I've never seen them before sometimes. Sometimes I even get such a powerful feeling that a person or animal's name is 'wrong' somehow to the point where I have a hard time using the name they give me. Like, one time I was riding a trail horse with a name like Red or something, but I could not stop calling her Daisy- in my mind, when I was petting her or riding her. It was really weird. Probably sounds retarded but I wonder if it's some kind of weird intuition or something.

At this point I always listen to my intuition. If I get a bad feeling about something. My husband believes I have very strong intuition as well, and always listens to me if I decide to cancel a plan or leave something early because it's never steered us wrong. I think it's the closest thing to a religious belief I practice- if I get a gut feeling about something I don't do it, or if someone gives me bad vibes I gtfo.

few examples off the top of my head:
- when i was 16 I crashed my car going 80 into a telephone pole and the tree line in a ditch, with my mom in the passenger seat. she only came out with cuts from the glass, I didn’t have a scratch.
- some dumb friend of mine was getting catfished and subsequently extorted, and basically made a deal to “sell me” to them since he knew i was well off in exchange for being left alone. instantly knew something was up with the girl that hmu. few days later he attempts suicide and she’s arrested for something completely unrelated.
- i was in a bad place in high scPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.802

>>797
>matriarchal societies
>believe men aren't able to tap into intuition
YA DON'T SAY!
>I have pretty powerful intuition, always have since I was a kid.
I don't have an intuition but I do get whatever I'm reading or thinking about "echoed" in my surroundings sometimes, like TV or music. Dunno if the aliens are trying to contact me or I have finally gone insane. It still bothers me to this day.
>>

 No.808

>there are some spiritualities (Indigenous matriarchal ones for example) that believe women possess intuition like a 6th sense that men aren't able to tap into. And that it can be honed with practice.

Intuition isn't gendered. It's overassigned to women like how intellect is overassigned to men.

>>799
>I'm a bit puzzled about your car crash, how is that a win for your intuition ? I don't want to be rude but if you had a mechanical brain and looked up some car accident statistics you'd have figured out that driving slower prevents most accidents. And lets be real you didn't get harmed in the car accident because of all the engineering that went into making cars safer. If you'd crashed a car from 50 years ago into a pole at that speed you'd have been mangled or dead. I'm not trying to be mean, if i was in your place i would not assume that my intuition is granting me a walk-away-unharmed-from-car-crash power. Consider that 60mph is probably fast enough.

Most intuition may be based off of plain old natural selection. It's not that people can read life without any prior data.
>>

 No.810

>>808
>It's overassigned to women like how intellect is overassigned to men.
Same ol' patriarchal gender stereotypes.
>>

 No.821

>>810
Yep. The same people who whine about patriarchy will then spin gender stores in a positive light
>>

 No.1064

File: 1779297339136.jpg ( 143.78 KB , 1920x1080 , bp6vhf.jpg )

>>797
You know what, OP? There ARE things we are able to grasp intuitively. Like consciousness. How much we can grasp intuitively is an entirely different question however. People tend to be overconfident in their intuition… and then lose money to a slot machine.


File: 1753713960745.webm ( 2.61 MB , 714x1000 , gondola.webm )

 No.903[Reply]

capitalism itself will bring about its own downfall not some messiah complex and their disciples cult.

https://www.marxists.org/subject/left-wing/icc/1934/11/permanent-crisis.htm

https://www.marxists.org/archive/mattick-paul/1934/fascism-revolution.htm
3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.913

File: 1755845848340.jpg ( 377.71 KB , 1024x578 , Utukku.jpg )

"the utukku, were an ambiguous class of demons from ancient Mesopotamian mythology"
Utukku - otaku
it's all connected…
>>

 No.1034

What if they are inside?
>>

 No.1041

fucking nonsense
>>

 No.1058

File: 1779169033388.png ( 114.62 KB , 517x778 , yfd68f6.png )

>>913 animal metaphors & animal shaman disguises are at the centre of mystery & re-legion (cohort/centurian666) … pine cones are a glirls best friend ;)
>>

 No.1063

File: 1779296459141.jpg ( 57.37 KB , 620x368 , 4ab77i.jpg )

>>903
>parties are Aragorn's Sauron trap run by the arch-angels
Anon, wtf are you talking about?


File: 1722189424942.jpg ( 21.27 KB , 229x239 , Theosophical_Society_Seal.jpg )

 No.699[Reply]

>do magic rituals for fun/out of boredom
>actually start to believe they are real and affect reality
What is the explanation for this? Idk if pic is related cus i didnt read
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.782

>>701
It would've been cool if the enlightenment made us develop evidentiality
>>

 No.783

>>701
>Opinions just come to us, we don't think about it in terms of collecting opinions
This is painfully true. Most self-professed rationalists just make their favorite opinions their personality and cast everything else as frivolous.
>>

 No.784

>>783
this, these are the kind of uyghurs that got that fedora meme popular. fuvk those uyghurs.
>>

 No.785

>>784
>that fedora meme
You mean the hat, not the Linux distribution, right ?
Also would you mind explaining the hat meme, i know of it but i never really understood what it means.
>>

 No.1062

>>701
>linguistics
Boring logical positivist analysis that doesn't understand how people think. To me the answer is much simpler:
>people are confused
>people are controlled by deterministic forces they cannot explain
>people search for easy explanations and ways to influence their fate
>they find refuge in mysticism
>this mysticism is vague enough that it has a high likelihood of success
>they start actively seeking confirmations of their magick rituals' effectiveness
>they rationalize and reinterpret inconvenient outcomes
Psychologists, egoists, and Marxists have a way better understanding of human behavior than linguists ever did.


File: 1719261095021.jpeg ( 65.09 KB , 720x560 , 1000k354t.jpeg )

 No.691[Reply]

Did Oswald act alone?
Or do you believe he really was the patsy?
Which do you think is the more likely scenario?
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.705

>>693
Based. in reality.
>>

 No.1048

File: 1778307754833-0.jpg ( 937.42 KB , 1456x1088 , James Jesus Angleton stone….jpg )

File: 1778307754833-1.jpg ( 1.11 MB , 2366x1473 , James Jesus Angleton allow….jpg )

I've been thinking of starting a thread on this to give my thoughts - thankfully one already exists!

Here goes:

JFK was killed by the CIA working directly with the Mossad (including through Jewish mobsters connected to Meyer Lansky, who was a major zionist in addition to being a wildly successful career criminal with interests in Cuba), in a successful internal coup which had several goals:

1. Remove the U.S. official (but not-really-enforced) arms embargo on "Israel."
2. Stop the repeated efforts of the executive branch (under both Kennedy and his successor Eisenhower) to get the American Zionist Committee for Public Affairs (the predecessor to AIPAC) to register as a foreign agent under FARA.
3. End U.S. demands (by Kennedy, in 1963, shortly before he was assassinated) for "Israel's" nuclear weapons stockpile (partly stolen from the U.S.) at Dimona to be inspected by the IAEA. This demand from JFK greatly angered the "Israelis" and led to "Israeli" PM David Ben-Gurion's resignation under pressure from Kennedy to allow inspections.
4. Retaliate against Kennedy for (rightly) getting pissed off at the CIA for its disastrous Bay of Pigs operation, curb what the CIA saw (rightly or wrongly) as Kennedy's increased hostility towards U.S. imperialism, and ensure that the U.S. continued its deranged (and failed) mafioso crusade against Cuba for decades to come.
5. Derail what was seen by the CIA & Mossad as excessive friendliness towards the USSR.
6. Prevent any potential reverse (real or imagined) on U.S. imperial war in Vietnam.

James Jesus Angleton, head of the CIA at the time of the assassination (when the CIA was not forbidden from openly doing ops in the continental U.S.), had established the "Israel" desk at the CIA, and was responsible for greatly increasing U.S. espionage ties with the Mossad. He had major ties to "Israel," which hated Kennedy, and also he hated Kennedy himself due to Kennedy's criticism of the CIA. He had been surveilling Lee Harvey Oswald since 1959 (unless I'm misremembering and it was 1958), keeping close tabs on him for at least four years right up to Kennedy's killing. On the morning of the day of the killing, future CIA director (and future president) George H. W. Bush had been in Dallas, Texas - though he would always claim, when asked in future interviews, not to have remembered where he was on that day.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.1049

>>1048
>(under both Kennedy and his successor Eisenhower)
*predecessor lol
>>

 No.1057

File: 1779168472175.gif ( 158.69 KB , 444x444 , southworld.gif )

thee koob giveth … the quub taketh away
>>

 No.1061

File: 1779238730470.jpg ( 66.88 KB , 444x300 , secretshootsect.jpg )

OK think about this … the secret service agents around the car accidently shot a round into Prez Ken… was this the agent on the back of the car or follow car? Does this explain final fatal shot & angle/ricochet?


 No.1040[Reply]

Discuss making pacts with deities or demons



Linked video: 'How to make a Pact with a Deity or Demon'
>>

 No.1055

I have done this, although it wasn't a deity or demon, but a real person of power status.

I was in a bad way and felt i couldn't redeem myself from an action i believed happened (but it didn't) and i was told to get on my knees and pledge. So i obliged, and did so.
>>

 No.1056

File: 1779168284263.jpg ( 50.66 KB , 332x534 , ed5f17295046614fc8e5b29f27….jpg )

"no promises in combat"
>>

 No.1060

>>1056
What?


 No.920[Reply]

world war 3 & ww2 occurred at same time
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.981

>>980
I'll be your friend.
>>

 No.982

>>981
no you'll leave me, and i can't ever have a true one, everything feels made up
>>

 No.983

why dont you have friends?
>>

 No.984

>>983

yeah be my friend … they will just use that against us? … but seriously be my fren (seriously)
>>

 No.1059

File: 1779169429941.png ( 11.82 KB , 263x175 , nolefty.png )

any friends left(ychan)


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 ]
| Catalog | Home