>>754>It's a terrible justification for why unskilled service jobs became the common job type of the average personWe can talk about why they became the dominant sector, and I believe we can fully figure that out with facts, by looking at the history. I'd like to put a pin in that because…
What I'm actually trying to justify is service workers having a place amongst the proletariat. If we think that service workers, the predominant kind of worker today, are inherently not revolutionary because of their relation to production or whatever, or simply put if they aren't really contributing anything to society, then the consequences of that kind of freak me out.
Hear me out, that would mean that we as revolutionaries don't give a shit about them, that would mean that if there was any kind of revolutionary working class movement then it would be a minority of the population who would be the dictatorship over the rest of the urban, city dwelling, service working population, which might have a problem with what the conservative blue-collar "true" working class want to exert on them.
So how I see this is a contradiction potentially, and I'm not sure how that would be resolved. How could it be a popular movement without actually needing the majority of workers?