/dead/ - Post-Left Anarchism

>>1518
on the last point about theory, hmm
this is a fun one
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00697/full
idk i havent read anything that gives these ideas all as one together, i can tell that i base my thinking though on zizek and deluze a bit, deluze mainly for framing things and language i guess, and some freud too i guess. And probably others…. and of course my own experiences

>>1467

By realizing that those spooks were installed in your consciousness by institutions that have economic and political interests in keeping you subservient to them and the mode of production that sustains them, and the people in your life who have negatively sanctioned you for not adhering to said spooks live horrid existences centered around the reproduction of capital and simply bluff to feel less bad about themselves.

>>1467
Get swole

>world would be better off if every trace of my existence was erased

All the more reason to live.

Pills

>>2757
>I probably sound like eric harris rn
… How?

>>2761
I didn't even know who this Eric guy was. Thanks for clearing that up.

>>2762
Always here to help!

Its never been more over

Hello officer,
No we don't give murder advice.

If you are thinking about copying something you have seen in a TV series, always remember that TV is fiction. They do not give instruction-manuals on how to do crime on TV.

My friend, you can only live by turning away from the institutions and recognizing they were never yours. Yes, you'll live while being choked to death while assholes go hog wild plundering everything you would have valued in a better world. Tyring to fix what is unfixable, which aided and abetted the problem, is a Sisyphean task. It's not that the institutions are passively incompetent. They're designed to make the world this shitty, but when you try to better yourself, oh boy, they're on the spot to make sure you fail. It's always like that if you were selected to die. If you're selected to live, you literally can't fail. They'll throw you in a sinecure if you're worthless, and that's where people like Yud and the technophile cultists come from - incompetents given a sinecure where they can tell us how smart and great they are. Many such cases!

Knowing the truth doesn't liberate you, but it is very liberating to no longer lie to yourself about the world or what your eyes see. The hard part is that when you make that decision, you really are cast out of the world, and the institutions REALLY don't like you. That's when it moves from the passive excuses to overt humiliation and contempt if you dare try to work with them on anything. They don't want us to have ANYTHING. They don't want you to have a textbook and will destroy your books if you're "not allowed" to learn - unless those books are full of lies and intended to poison and retard you, while the "smart people" are pulled aside and given the cheat sheet to guarantee success. That's how these fucking Fabians and Germanics roll. Stupid, stupid people who love the smell of their own farts.

>>2682
It's hard to believe that a mentally cogent person is spamming this shit, unless they were trying to make people dislike Christianity…

Most cynicism/depression isnt actual acknowledgemnet of the futility of human endeavors.
Its just frustrated idealists.

Society uses activism as the metric of maturity.

They especially use it to guikt trip young people.

"If youre not a liberal by twenty, you have no heart."

Yet, when young people are involved in activism, elders mock/patronise them.

>>2683
Protestants are the most rabid idealists in the west right now.

>>2597
>the only based lefty state is of nationalist revolution origins
The absolute state of the orthocummies.

>>2597
>They fucking wrecked that site, but they didn't wreck it by not suppressing germ theory hard enough.
feels true

>>2597
>China is nominally communist, but obviously extremely capitalist with some trappings of SocDem-ism remaining.
I wouldn't be so sure, chinese communist theory is not that far off orthodox marxism as it might appear at first. They maintain that it's only possible to make the change to a socialist mode of production irreversible if the capitalist mode of production has exhausted all the material conditions that allowed it to reproduce it self. That's definitly a possible interpretation of what marx wrote.

They're letting capitalists have a longer leesh as long as they devellope the productive forces. But if they threaten to harm social-outcomes or undermine chinese devellopment goals, the cpc acts as decisive as historic communist movements have. In the west most capitlists turned towards neo-liberal parasitic behavior that drains the life out of societies. If that's universally the case for capitalists and the chinese cull them one at a time, at the pace they go bad, then at the end of this process what's left standing, will be the chinese workers, the chinese communist party and a handfull of ethical capitalists. Spending well over a hundred years in socialist transition mode just to make sure it can't ever be undone once it's finished, is probably the most hardass thing anybody has ever done, but at the same time they are spilling very little blood doing it. When they're done with this stage they'll likely have a domminant socialist planning system with a small legacy market, and nobody will contest it because every capitalist that they crushed along the way, will have been caught doing really reprehensible things for maxing wealth and power. Their slow path might also make their system accumulate the features that immunizes against every possible attackvector the bourgoise can come up with.

That said, it obviously it's not a done deal, and the future is not yet written.

>>2598
Did they? Dang. Still not as bad as China.

>>2600
>I wouldn't be so sure, chinese communist theory is not that far off orthodox marxism as it might appear at first. They maintain that it's only possible to make the change to a socialist mode of production irreversible if the capitalist mode of production has exhausted all the material conditions that allowed it to reproduce it self. That's definitly a possible interpretation of what marx wrote.

Yyyyeah, but I mean, why'd they start with Maoism, warm up to the west, distance themselves from the USSR, and switch, then?
4D chess? I just don't believe it. I could be wrong.

>>2603
>why'd they start with Maoism
that's how you clear out imperial overlords with a bunch of peasants.

>warm up to the west distance themselves from the USSR
Hm you seem to be asking whether the Sino-Soviet splitt was a mistake.
It's hard to say what the alternate time-line would have been.

>>2594
Those are revisionist countries. Virology and vaccination are bourgeois ideology. Hope this helps.

Autism is good tho. The negatives are pretty much entirely null if everyone in the room is also autistic.

>>2686
>Autism is a superpower

Im so fucking tired of hearing this.

As someone who has it, I think its the ultinate curse. Even cancer would be better.
Glorification of autism is coping for lack of childhood adventurism.

>>2703
This so much. I would never wish this on anyone.

Of course, "autism" is a political diagnosis. If the diagnosis was brain inflammation or something other people did in the past, that is something that allowed the "retard" agency to change his situation. "Autism" is absolute autism score 0, the creation of living abortions. They don't want you to have anything, ever.

So much of "autism" is nothing more than a description of the most abject slave, a living abortion, a ritual sacrifice, and nothing more. They don't care what actually happens within us, or want us to exist at all. They only want a world of people as Satanic at them, who live for the thrill of torture. That's "normal" under eugenics.

>>2622
>>2623
Testosterone makes you take a lot of risk, which also includes drunkenly riding a motorbike off a cliff thinking you're Evel Knievel. Imperial eunuchs managed to live incredibly long too, because they got their balls STOLEN, ROBBED, NABBED from them.

>>2626
I don't think that you can blame testosterone for a lower life expectancy. It's unclear what you mean but you could be understood to imply castration as a medical measure for increasing life expectancy. That's not acceptable.

The class-divide in life expectancy is a larger factor than most biological factors. (outside of stuff like congenital deseases and so on).

By the way Evel Knievel was an adrenaline junkie, pretty much anybody can get addicted to that rush. I think that if we make realistic enough simulated experiences, this kind of behavior can be channeled into non destructive avenues. Think base jumpig in the holodeck.

>>2627
>but you could be understood to imply castration as a medical measure for increasing life expectancy.
I wouldn't cut a single nut off me if it meant I could live forever without complaints, I love them too much. Look at black and white pictures of Chinese eunuchs post nut-theft and they're crying. But test making you take more risks is the usual explanation I hear for why women live longer
>The class-divide in life expectancy is a larger factor than most biological factors.
That actually does make sense too, men are the ones expected to do the harder work too
>By the way Evel Knievel was an adrenaline junkie, pretty much anybody can get addicted to that rush. I think that if we make realistic enough simulated experiences, this kind of behavior can be channeled into non destructive avenues. Think base jumpig in the holodeck.
To give the man credit, he jumped over busses and fires and sharks and shit, but died in his old age of fucking diabetes of all things.

>>2625
Women live longer vecausw theyre not expected to do heavy lifting.

>>2623
>truly with age comes wishdom

Not automatically. Especially nowadays where the average adult has an artificial shallow perspective of age numbers as personality traits.

>>2626
Nah. Men are just idealists. Men are guilt tripped into Herculean tasks to prove their worth.

Young men are pathologised by society for not being convenient demigod-servants for the community.

>>2693
If I had to guess it originated on leftypol back in the 8chan days.

>>2694
>did it really originate from here?
prepending "post" to words was trendy for a while,
"Post-left" was probably invernted multiple times

They don't even call themselves that any more - they try out new slogans and memes and they all are shit, but by producing more and more shit, they make more shit for the shit god, more puke for the puke throne.

Anyway, there hasn't been a substantive "left" for a long time. What they wound up doing in the Soviet Union diverged from "leftism" and was trying to maintain international relevance without any real idea or goal except survival. You can't blame them - history gave them a shitty deal. They really had a hard time holding it together outside of the core, and they were running on defeating the Nazis for as long as they could. So, "the left" as an oppositional force against the ruling interests or even something that could contest it was pretty well dead by the 1970s. The last embers of it were extinguished during the 1960s and it was pretty quickly papered over with the student movement, because that was the core of the left and they got everything they wanted by promoting their institution above everything else. The last avenues for the working class to conceive of a world where they could be anything but oppressed serfs would be cut, and the institutions became so alien to them that it's like dealing with an alien species - and this is the intended effect of so much that happened in the past century.

That said, the left and right still "exist" - that is still the core contention in the political arena. The right won so hard that it hurts, but the left still exists as the loyal opposition to be kicked around, and there isn't a divergent thought from anything that has been permitted in the global discourse. The replacement of leftism and rightism with ideology and feels > reals warped the historical positions of the right and left, and it has been a deliberate mindfuck to "give" the right populist and anti-institutional positions while saddling the center-left and left proper with the association with eugenics, population control, and these institutions that nearly everyone recognizes as the chief threat in their life. The right in all final decisions will rally behind the institutions - they merely insist on purging them of any "left" elements, and for the vanguard, they thought Eisenhower was a far leftist, to give you an idea of how much the right pushes its agenda. Pretty much everything they call "politics" today has nothing to do with the genuine animal, or the actual positions of the right and left, but the struggle to conPost too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>2696
Take your meds.

>>2697
You're a fag.