[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/ent/ - Entertainment

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord

| Catalog | Home

File: 1664738606692.jpg ( 126.15 KB , 725x575 , 1664679352873-0.jpg )

 No.8762[Reply]

Have depictions of LGBTQ sexuality finally hit a limit with audiences. I always believed that the popularity of homosexuality in media was actually malicious especially from women. For straight women gay males are very often the perfect man. A male, often effeminate, that they can emotionally bond with that will never ever put demands on them sexually. Basically a man that friend zones himself that will never grow bitter. This is actually the template for boy band and their popularity but that's and of understandable because preteen girls are attracted to boys but find their sexuality intimidating. You're supposed to grow past this kek
Much like straight males' mythologization of lesbians, CIS women's interest in gay males is only in so far as it serves their own egos. They're not actually interested in these men as people, and the failure of this movie proves it.
I've only seen the previews but it stuck me as a very unapologetic depiction of an idealized gay romance from and for homosexual men. I didn't know about the explicit sex scenes but I find it interesting that for over a decade on social media women pilloried men that chaffed at homosexual characters and now that they have an opportunity to see a gay love scene they balk.
This has got to be the umpteenth movie that's tried to serve the woke market and crashed on the rocks. Maybe movie makers in the future can include some kind of social media cache for watching their movie like a badge that appears next to their Twitter handle, because social capital is what really motivated the meteoric rise of LGBTQ support in the mainstream.
7 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8771

>>8762
Haven't seen this movie, so this is more a general observation.
You have to understand the business model of this type of entertainment, they make lower quality stuff and try to offset that by adding cultural pandering.

I don't know if it's really ego-exploitation, I think women like stories where the protagonist has to resolve relationship conflict. It's a very limiting framework from a narrative standpoint because it's either a man-v-himself or man-v-opponent type of story. For reference the least limited type of story is man-v-environment.
>>

 No.8772

>>8762
damn, i need to see this.
>>

 No.8773

The main character is a neurotic nerd that's dating a chad. Essentially he's all the qualities that women associate with incels. Women HATE seeing beta men, especially depicted in a humanizing light (because it lays bare their own rabid bigotry against them)
Ironically his character is a copy and paste template of most Cinderella style female romance movies.
>>

 No.8781

>>8762
Hollywood still hasn't learned that having all the characters in a film be queer/women/POC is not by itself a reason for people to see it regardless of what their political views are. We watch movies to engage in a narrative for a couple hours. Tell us a story! We'll sniff our own farts and feel smug about how right our politics are on Facebook later.

Also, who the fuck did the producers think would watch a film like that? Only certain women like rom-coms, and they just project themselves into the leading lady's role. Can't do that without a leading lady! Were they thinking that gay men would watch it? While gay men may be gay, they're still men. That rom-com bullshit ain't gonna play with them.
>>

 No.8782

>>8762
You vill vatch zee homo erotic rom-com and be happy


File: 1634740868527.png ( 274.12 KB , 600x315 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.7808[Reply]

Is it the usual radlib absue of the word?

I hear people saying this in comments and I can't be arsed to deduce from the 40+ minute documentaries people make on this cartoon or watch the show

Some comrade tell me pls
>>

 No.7809

There's a bread fam >>6131 yes it's lib


>not watching hours long videoessays materially analyzing the political economy of the world of Shrek 3 and its subsequent echoes on western anime's themes to bring about the revolution

Yikes
>>

 No.7813

File: 1635337923894.png ( 426.73 KB , 1369x667 , Shrek 2 A Maoist Review.png )

>>7809
Apologies, famrade
>>

 No.8777

Steven Universe isn't fascist, it's pretty liberal. Although the main character is literally the stone if a dead revolutionary who's held in high esteem by most of the protagonists. It's mostly just about family trauma though.
>>

 No.8778

>>7808
Is a TV cartoon the open dictatorship of the imperial finance bourgeoisie in decaying capitalism ?
probably not

Does the ideology off that tv cartoon propagate fascist ideology ?
Maybe, i can't say, i haven't watched it.
>>

 No.8779

On top of being a hilariously awful show with a litany of technical problems and dumb as fuck writing, the overall message is liberal to the core and culminates with the show's big space nazis being given a slap on the wrist.


File: 1608526718424.jpg ( 142.77 KB , 1280x720 , LordOfTheRings.jpg )

 No.7636[Reply]

Noticed a lot people talking about Tolkien’s works and philosophy. So, I created a thread specifically dedicated for that and other things related to it, like the movies and games.
60 posts and 18 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7697

>>7696
>it just looks like every generic anime
Wait, have they released concept art/trailers?
>a 2D animated movie that looks like a smoother version of the old Rankin-Bass movies
Yeah that's not happening. I knew a dude on DA who was part of a reboot for Flight of Dragons but it got cancelled with only some refurbished concept art he had posted on his account left.
>>

 No.7698

>>7697
Nothing released yet, it's just what I'm worried about
>>

 No.7816

>>

 No.8677

Tolkien was a Steinerite
>>

 No.8776



File: 1608525629678.jpg ( 50.79 KB , 1260x600 , films we just watched.jpg )

 No.5801[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Hello, the most recent movie threads have seemed a bit unfocused, this thread is for the discussion of movies we just watched and other anon's takes on them. So, without further ado I'll begin.

I just watched Parasite last night, it was pretty good I think, but not as cutting edge or witty as I was expecting. I thought it was a bit unfocused and threw a lot at the wall to see what stuck, but on the other hand, it was fun and more interesting than most. A solid 8/10.

I do an IMDB rating for each film I watch, for my own reference mostly, but you can see each film I watched lately and my rating if you're curious or want to ask about them. If other anons have something similar feel free to post.

https://www.imdb.com/user/ur46013471/ratings
329 posts and 84 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8707

bump
>>

 No.8709

Watched enough of "Ghostbusters: Afterlife" to say that I saw it.

How much you like the movie depends on how much you liked the GB franchise / early-mid 80s cinema in general.

Seeing the original gang back, albeit briefly, was nice. Ghost Egon was nice and very sentimental. I'm an old person so it would've been nice to have seen a bit more of the OG cast. Kids always act like snarky adults in the movies and, no offense, but I never remember any of my friends or myself acting like that.

The mid-credits scene w Murray & Weaver was a bit stupid, though. Mid- & Post-credits scenes ought to add something / hint at what could be.
>>

 No.8727

I watched the latest dune movie and it was okay, that's the only mainstream shit I've watched since 2016
>>

 No.8728

Can any one recommend me some old japanese live action monster movies? Like with the monster of the week like godzilla or where dudes in spandex fight monsters and shit.
>>

 No.8731

File: 1661685309978.jpeg ( 22.85 KB , 328x154 , images (6).jpeg )

>>8728
Look up super Sentai on wiki.
Thank me later.

There's thousands of episodes and series after series. I like em all so far. I love the giant robot battles of the guys in rubber suits kek Also Zyurangers was what the used to build power rangers in top of and it's hundreds of times better and more captivating.


 No.5680[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Seeing how there’s multiple /co/ related threads on the board. I think we should just put all of them into one general just for clarity’s sake.

Discuss anything related to comics and animations from comic recs, leftist animations to comic writers’ attempts to larp as leftists.

Seriously is there a worse anarchist in the UK than Alan Moore?
116 posts and 64 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5797

>>13369
>ur doamine burned
&ltused by the "muh /v/" fag
Ironic
>>

 No.5798

>>13366
You sure use that boogeyman a lot.
>>

 No.5799

>>13366
>implying /v/ even know who bendis is
Dumb.
>>

 No.5800

>>

 No.8708

bump


File: 1652628997436.png ( 988.65 KB , 920x613 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.8699[Reply]

Alhambulillah. Is the populace finally awakening to the superiority of piracy?
https://www.theverge.com/2022/4/19/23032399/netflix-lost-subscribers-q1-2022-earnings
>>

 No.8701

>>8699
Streaming companies are making the exact same mistakes major cable companies made: To much saturation in the market with to many options and all behind a massive expensive walled garden of price.

So yeah, people are turning to piracy.
>>

 No.8702

>>8701
kek sometimes i forget how retarded porkies can be
>>

 No.8703

File: 1652701097703.gif ( 1.43 MB , 400x292 , 1652401863344.gif )

>>8702
Well, its not entirely that. Its note so that in their myopic race for profits they fail to realize the bigger picture and thus you end up with everyone of them competition with one another and that's how you get to the point where its thousands of dollars just to watch the things you want lol
>>

 No.8704

>>8703
Wow, I haven’t seen E-Rotic referenced in years.


File: 1608517706941.jpg ( 64.94 KB , 1280x720 , cake mom.jpg )

 No.8583[Reply]

>No doom thread
Pathetic.
67 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8651

I still can't find anyone to play doom with :(
>>

 No.8690

File: 1651428136271.png ( 235.01 KB , 1351x1014 , Screenshot (1990).png )

bumping my map from last summer but whatever, it's had a couple of minor updates
geoddo.itch.io/outerlogistics
>>

 No.8694

>>8690
i'll try it out, i hope it works with the brutaldoom mod
>>

 No.8697

>>8609
I remember when they would have demos of games that you could play on computers at stores. This was one of them. The 6 degrees of freedom was so nauseating that I had to turn away from the screen for a moment.
>>

 No.8698

Doom 3 never got the respect that it deserved. Awesome engine and they tried to put an actual story into the Doom IP other than "Run around and shoot shit." Got toasted by the Half-Life 2 fanbois and the "OMG! Gravity gun! Gravity gun! Did you just see that?! Gravity gun!!!" hysteria.

Kind of ironic that the Doom IP is now more popular with the kiddies these days than Half-Life (although Alyx closed the gap slightly for a bit). Of course, when you find out that you've cornered the market on digital distribution for over a decade before the first credible competitors show up, who gives a crap when HL2 : Episode 3 comes out, amirite?


File: 1642568967810.png ( 211.17 KB , 763x271 , 53t545t45.png )

 No.7828[Reply]

Let's go. I'm reading the one piece manga. I'm also reading berserk. Just made it to chapter 100. Manga is superior to anime, tbh.
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8665

>>8664
I will… eventually
>>

 No.8669

the reason you say manga are better than anime is because they can hit you with a powerful sensory-emotional overload, and anime don't do that, they are traditional media in the relation to the audience. It's bad for your health and intellect. You become easily addicted and it's also a more solipsistic activity that also can lead to the development of an ill fetishist relation to the physical book object.
>>

 No.8671

>>8669
Every one has something they use to cope with this shitty world under capitalism. Some people do heroin "I like to read high fantasy manga. I think it';s a bit cynical to simply discount these works as "Addictive" as if there is nothing to learn, no information to garner of value, nothing of worth.

I find that far to cynical of an outlook.
>>

 No.8672

>>8671
>as if there is nothing to learn, no information to garner of value, nothing of worth.
I didn't say that.
>>

 No.8673

>>8672
That 2as the implication I was kind of drawing from what you said. If you didn't mean that sorry, but, Still anon.


File: 1635947162998.png ( 2.4 MB , 1200x690 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.7817[Reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLxYklZAnBs

How much power do you think entertainment has?

This video kinda got me thinking about Socialist Realism, Like sure the vid is teensy bit radlibby and silly in its conclusions in some places but whatever
I just am puzzled by how could socialist realism be a successful campaign in any aspect, I mean sure the projects under it, even those critiquing it are incredibly influential as opposed to the stuff made under capitalist realism

But I propose that is a matter of time, The earlier in time you exist, the more stuff you do is noteworthy
Anyways, I think even with socialist realism, The soviet union fell, Clearly it doesn't help prop up the system as the dangers to socialism exists in the real world in the form of opportunists and imperialists

My question is what level of censorship helps and what level doesn't?
Are all these anti-capitalist movies made under capitalism actually amount to any actual change?

If not,
Should a socialist society operate the same way?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.7818

>>7817
>Like sure the vid is teensy bit radlibby and silly in its conclusions
thanks for the warning and sparing me that.

Socialist realism was just what most proles and peasants in the Soviet Union wanted to see during that time. Since the proletariat and the peasantry was the patron of the arts, that's what artists produced. In capitalism artists have to produce what people with money want. If you want creative freedom as an artist you have to do it as a hobby. We'll make sure people have enough leisure time to do that.

For entertainment we'll do healthy mental states vs unhealthy mental states. We stick people in a machine that looks at their brain while they consoom entertainment. And then try to support what ever entertainment correlates with the mental states that correlates with good brain health. Basically we are going with neurology over psychology because that has more objective data. Ideologically socialist media is what ever doesn't melt your brain. Because i think that ruling classes try to cause brain damage to the population as a way to make people cognitively impaired enough to be lorded over and screwed out of the wealth they produce.

Censorship was not very effective. I think the most effective tool for shaping the entertainment information sphere was just making sure that there is much more of the stuff you want people to see, so that statistically, people see more of the "correct information". The Soviets banned certain entertainment and in a weird turn of events that was like a stamp of approval that made that media very desirable and also politically credible.

I think we have to make sure that people who create the information that goes in the brain of people have similar life experiences than their audiences. The reason mainstream media has become so unbearably cringe is because people in that system live in a completely different world, and they have nothing in common with the masses.

In order to produce ideological stability i think socialism has to do something that allows people to track where economic surplus and resources are spend, and it has to be very accessible for normal people, basically the complete opposite of the incomprehensible stuff what wall-street does, that even baffles many so called expert economists. I think Socialism does transparent economy anPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.7819

>>7818
That's a good idea you said about a more transparent economy under socialism

>The Soviets banned certain entertainment and in a weird turn of events that was like a stamp of approval that made that media very desirable and also politically credible.


Very true, Like a troll, Ignoring is the first and best way to curb it, If something anti-socialist does get popular than idk what to do after that tho

>Socialist realism was just what most proles and peasants in the Soviet Union wanted to see during that time

Do you think the popular support of it ever fell out? Was it co-related with people's faith in the direction the government was going in?

>thanks for the warning and sparing me that.

It's not really that bad, It's mostly just talking about Tarkovsky's Stalker and film theory along with socialist and capitalist realism, one of the moments she kind of paints Stalin as an authoritarian who only wanted power kinda thing which is why I called it little radlib-y

I don't know who this Tarkovsky's guy really is but he came off kinda anti-communist in this vid
>>

 No.7820

The insistence on prioritizing Socialist Realism at the expense of based prolekult is what caused Mayakovsky (based OP of the porky meme) to an hero. Terrible mistake. USSR could have dominated the art world as the home of the avantgarde but they chose to bet on promoting themselves as boring and lame instead. This is ur brain on demcent.
>>

 No.7821

>>7820
what's demcent

>Mayakovsky

This guy sounds interesting, Russian Futurist and whatnot and the rocky relationship with the government
>>

 No.7822

>>7821
>what's demcent
it might mean democratic centralism, not sure tho


File: 1632233169600.png ( 2.36 MB , 1280x720 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.2814[Reply]

How do I watch the halloween franchise?
Should I just watch this latest one
I know there's time travel, non canon and robots and shit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUwVHX3242M
14 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7772

>>7769
OH MY GOD MRS BROWN GET AWAY QUICK
>>

 No.7775

>>7769
gulp!
>>

 No.7800

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DVzbsNR-pJU

What kinda class do they teach abou urban legends and talk about folklore?

Humanities? Society? Would love to take a class like this
>>

 No.7801

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWB3VhIPWrU

I FINALLY FUCKING FOUND THE VIDEO that talks all about the halloween franchise

and goddamn it was actually a GT video on how to kill M*ke meyers and not a series retrospective
>>

 No.7815

So the politics of the purge movie
I've never watched it but I hear the in-universe explination is that they let it happen because "it boosts the economy and brings down unemployment"

I don't think the creator intended that to be commentary on how ghoulish the practices of capitalist countries are but it's funny
I'm pretty sure it was intended to be some boomer anarchism bad type of movie


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 ]
| Catalog | Home