[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Password (For file deletion.)


IRC Chat




| Catalog | Home

File: 1659827652248.jpg ( 70.2 KB , 1280x640 , Andrew_Tate.jpg )


What's the deal with this guy and why am I seeing his name everywhere?

I've noticed normies are talking about how much of an evil misogynist he is and keep giving him free publicity, hell even my sister was asking me what I think of him. Is he just another clout chasing grifter taking advantage of desperate incels or does he make some good points?
21 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


>some sleazy grifter in a 5000$ jacket wearing 7000$ watch says "you're a cog in a matrix"
such revelation






This is like reading a 2000's livejournal blog.



File: 1662075320383-0.webm ( 3.99 MB , 1024x576 , White_Fever.webm )

File: 1662075320383-1.mp4 ( 3.57 MB , 576x1024 , 1a1bbf8f524d34e76612c08898….mp4 )

File: 1662075320383-2.webm ( 4 MB , 1280x720 , Cant_Stay_Mad.webm )

File: 1662075320383-3.webm ( 2.94 MB , 900x506 , 1661925619112461.webm )


What do you think leftychan, is it based or cringe?

The way I see it both sides seem to be benefitting, but at what point is one partner taking advantage of the other? Some would argue that this the next stage of economic imperialism from racially european men, as poor asian women are pressured into relationships for a chance to get a visa and a new life in the richer west. But if that's the case why does the trend continue for the richer asian diaspora living in the west? Or is the whole thing is based upon outdated racial stereotypes, which can be very damaging to the psyche of asian men (looking at you /r/aznidentity).
Or maybe white men and asian women just made for each other, and it's all harmless.

7 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1662445150534.jpg ( 83.52 KB , 630x315 , charisma-man-31e5869d-35d1….jpg )

I'm not sure why they haven't, especially in Japan where their population is crashing. I suspect it's because the booj can move capital so easily internationally now that they really aren't concerned with nationality anymore. Or that to enforce a brutal child support system like the US you need a sprawling police apparatus which isn't possible with states with smaller governments.


File: 1662445914412.jpg ( 83.52 KB , 630x315 , charisma-man-31e5869d-35d1….jpg )

Asian women are better partners because their native country governments have banned single mothers, so they date with intention.

In Asian countries women cannot turn men into their personal debt slaves via child support so they are forced to date men that will actually stick around and raise any child they give birth to, so their standards are way way lower because no one is stupid enough to think Chad will raise any of his bastards.

If Asian countries ever adopted the similar child support laws, Asian women would go right back to being as scornful of low status men as Western women are now.

The spectacle of attractive Asian women jumping into relationships with loser Western men lays this misandrist scam bare. Which is why feminists try to make it out to be about racism or Orientalism which it's not.

Slim, young women with clear skin and symmetrical features will always be desired by men.

What's funny is that Asian women are not even particularly feminine. It's just that Western women have gotten drunk off the tremendous power they have over men and long ago stopped trying to take care of their appearance and instead started demanding men find them attractive no matter how sloven they let themselves be. See the "fat acceptance movement" for an example, acceptance that is never extended to men.

The brutal child support and anti-male family court system keeps western women pumping out babies, but at the expense of ugly poor men who lose the chance to have their own children without at least raising one of Chad's children.

Asian countries could boost their population numbers by copying the US and EU misandrist system. I'm not sure why they haven't, especially in Japan where their population is crashing. I suspect it's because the booj can move capital so easily internationally now that they really aren't concerned with their own nations issues anymore. Or that to enforce a brutal child support system like the US you need a sprawling police apparatus which isn't possible with states with smaller governments.


No one going to comment on my bomb ass thesis.


File: 1662836266446.png ( 826.71 KB , 960x572 , 1644320028251.png )

Anon there's no need to respond when you have those numbers… but yeah you're correct.
Foids demand abortion rights to "give women a choice" but then support turning men into their serfs with child support payments. The state should cover all costs of raising a child, but in absence of this women should take more things than just looks into account when looking for a partner to have a family with.



File: 1669151642239.png ( 141.22 KB , 753x541 , 1662988055705.png )


Wtf bros women have feelings too, why has nobody told me this?


WTF bros


File: 1669157730627.png ( Spoiler Image, 147.73 KB , 348x480 , 1663279080023101.png )

This bitch could literally go find any dick to fuck her. Men die alone and clod fuck her feelings.


File: 1669175044369.png ( 394.72 KB , 958x438 , Blackpilleggy.png )

>he's friendly and handsome
say no more
another case of the so-called """femcel""" thirsting for chad

"waaah! why doesn't chad notice me!!"
because he's a chad, and you're beccy, you stupid bitch

File: 1651213402521.jpg ( 306.69 KB , 1200x1200 , a0155906282_10.jpg )


Our concept of romance revolves around the monogamous ownership of another individual. This conception of Monogamy os seated in the same ideological framework of The capitalist system at large.
Namely that women and love are commodities that must be purchased on the open market for its correct price evaluation. Human interaction under capitalism is reduced to a market relationship and the idea of a monogamous relationship between a man and a woman play into the exploitative nature of capitalism ideally as well as the need for people, namely men, not to feel lonely is an easy target for control by the capitalist system.

We need to change our conception of romance and of love. Love shouldn't be some magical fetishized ideal to be obtained on the market. Love is an objective and active force moving through us. Love should be appreciated for what it is and was. I feel like a lot of us could benefit from this reexamination.
6 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


Capitalism has two factions:

The first faction (that has existed for longer) wants men to buy women as property.
The second faction (that is more recent) wants men to rent women as commodity from a capitalist service provider.

OP strikes me to have aligned with the second faction. And might be trying to manufacture consent by rebranding capitalist development as socialists. This is mildly irritating. Saying this is about monogamy vs polygamy is missing the point, because it lacks class analysis.

Socialist will not pick one of these capitalist factions, they are both very reactionary forces. Commodification of social relations isn't any better. The propertarian faction wants to reduce women to a household appliance and a baby maker for the owner. The commoditarian faction wants to reduce women to a whoring service and surrogate womb provider for the customers. There is no progress here, it's just variation in the method of subjugation. Both methods of subjugation are instruments for the reproduction of class society, and a way for the ruling class to control access to sex and reproduction.

Socialism is going to put the interests of the working class above other interests. If i had to make a guess, a lot of workers, both man and women, will continue to form something similar to traditional families, because that's what they prefer. Other workers will chose to live in different social arrangements. We will try to build appropriate structures regardless. Socialism will have fewer constraining factors because it only needs to reproduce it self at the level of society. The additional hurdles that have to be put in place for reproducing a ruling class will fall away. Without the extra burden of a ruling class social relations will improve somewhat.


File: 1651413911264.gif ( 96.48 KB , 310x263 , 2cb8c758f1f60c7118e5f068b7….gif )

I don't get how you could get that from what I was saying at all considering that several times I explained that its not monogamy that's fucked up bit the expectation that one is owed a monogamous relationship that is fucked up and our society through the inclination of profits drives us to treat eachother (namely women) as commodities where our loves is only valuable to the investments we put into it through our purchases on the market and through mass media that has played a role in sculpting out expectations and enforcing the nuclear family along with the general development of capitalism as a whole.

I don't get how you interpreted what I said as this false dichotomy of "monogamy vs polyamory"." You're missing the point of what I am saying whole still, more or less, getting to the conclusion.

As I said, people should be free to enter into relationships with one another voluntarily and autonomously as they see fit, but, you have to do some level of development on yourself to be able to participate. Or, get a robot wafui.




>Tfw never read about deep conversion


>Tfw can't make a girl orgasm

File: 1668036686993.png ( 115.21 KB , 840x574 , ClipboardImage.png )




Holy shit those poor desi


Very bad bob to benus ratio


brittons wtf


If I was a currycel I would probably just rope tbh

File: 1656004721204.jpg ( 45.97 KB , 600x600 , infographic.jpg )


reminder that if your penis isn't 6 inches (15 cm) long at the absolute least you're a waste of meat in the eyes of a woman. don't even bother
24 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


File: 1667513489355.png ( 388.53 KB , 1800x1296 , 1665910768911778.png )

I legit don't undertanx what you are saying.

I would have segg with you now qween.
Do you like anime perhaps?


also regular deep penetration by large cocks makes childbirth easier


Big dicks are uncomfortable to some women though.


People are getting taller each generation, pussy depth is related to torso/hip size so soon it won't be a much of a problem


Evolution takes millions of years and there's actually no data that says that is happening anyway

File: 1652030981455.jpg ( 339.69 KB , 852x723 , [email protected] )


>bodycount of 40 at 18 yo
Do zoomer women really?
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


I mean look at their idols.


I really doubt that's most women, considering both young men and young women are staying virgins longer basically everywhere in the industrialized world. Also, if a bodycount bothers you, let it be known. You aren't obligated to sleep with someone no matter how "ridiculous" your reason may seem to them.


Also, please do get tested regularly if you're sexually active. It's really irresponsible not to do so.


lol std aren't real, so yes you're a faggot, your problem is not STDs



File: 1649441578434.png ( 83.38 KB , 824x487 , ClipboardImage.png )




Same thing is happening with Chinese men in Africa I bet.


currycels just can't catch a break


File: 1649450073914.png ( 74.8 KB , 567x460 , ClipboardImage.png )



Absolutely brutal

File: 1664711215220.png ( 24.85 KB , 1014x829 , ClipboardImage.png )


Is it kill for good or just temporarily?
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


Why? What happened?


So we seriously lost another imageboard? Dark days are up on us


9chan.tw was originally setup by Joshua Connor Moon of Kiwifarms fame as a successor to 8chan.
He sperged out one day and said 9chan was too hateful (as of 8chan wasn't) and was giving ownership of the board to endchan leadership.
Endchan said they weren't seeing the numbers needed to make it worthwhile and shut the board down. To be fair to them it was a very slow board.
Many of the leftcel threads are backed up on archive.is and archive.org.


I don't get why everyone is so obsessed with extremely high post numbers these days. That's capitalistic idealism being hyper concerned with with productivity/


Shame. It was an interesting, albeit slow, board. Hopefully enough of the anons who frequented there know about this board so the community doesn't die completely.

File: 1662249197575.jpg ( 515.05 KB , 750x933 , arizona-x2htoq.jpg )


Research highlights experiences of general and mental ill-health in sexual and ethnic minority individuals
>LGBTQ+ individuals continue to experience high rates of general- and mental ill-health, and report greater rates of adverse health-related behaviours.
This was obvious to anyone that's had to deal with LGBTQ people that don't have any social capital.
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


No but gay people having higher mental illness isn't because of their sexuality you obtuse dick head. It's because they have to hide it usually.


LMAO, LGBTQ supporters always trot out this meme that homos and transgender people are dysfunctional because they face so much persecution.
There are legions of minorities that endure more hardship and don't have these mental illnesses.
Gay men have get the most AIDS, gay women have the highest domestic violence rates, and transgender people are victims of violence at the exact same rate as mentally ill people.
LGBTQ activism got so big because it obstensively anti low status CIS male. A form of misandry that's been cultivated by feminism for 60 years.
But anyone with two eyeballs could see how destructive the LGBTQ lifestyle is and now science is finally willing backing this up.
I'm not anti-LGBTQ, I don't think any harm should come to these people, but the idea that it's just another form of sexuality is wrong.


>There are legions of minorities that endure more hardship and don't have these mental illnesses.
Most minorities don't experience the same degree of social atomization as LGBT people unless they are actively being ethnically cleansed (like palestinians)


>Most minorities don't experience the same degree of social atomization as LGBT
History, Psychology, statistics all prove this otherwise. LGBTQ people are not the most oppressed minority, they're not even close.


This is retarded any n. I'm gay too

Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 ]
| Catalog | Home