[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble
| Catalog | Home

File: 1747587586535.png ( 913.72 KB , 864x1920 , Screenshot_20250518-093640.png )

 No.8492[Reply]

==Former pop star Cassie, has husband storm out of court once evidence in P. Diddy's trial revealed that she willing participated in urination play with R. Kelly and in "freak off" orgies and trains.

What is too high of a body count for a woman before you will not consider her for marriage?

Many feminists online will say that any body count is irrelevant. While more conservative and red pill men will say anything above a very low number ranging from 2 to maybe 10 will say is too much, and that that one is for the street.

Is any woman with a high Body count, like let's say close to 100, just guaranteed to have extreme and bizarre sexcapades like Cassie, things like trains or scat play.

And any one who marries them is just doomed to be eventually cucked when it is revealed to them all while only getting the most vanilla sex throughout their own marriage with them?

Or is that just in in cell cope and most women with high body counts simply explored their options and their high-body count is not indicative of them settling for their ultimate life partner, or hiding their true sexuality from their husbands.

For men, is a safer and better to seek a partner with a low body count to prevent what has happened with Cassie from happening to them?

Or are situations like Cassie Rare and there's no danger in being humiliated when marrying a woman with a high body count.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
49 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12201

>>8554
They say this, this infantilization of young people sexually, but what of the military enlistment age and wage age?
>>

 No.12209

>>8600
>That really isn't indicative of how socially those societies function. LGBT acceptance is very wide in Europe, as well as very low marriage rates and high rate of pre-marital intercourse.
All hallmarks of nonconservative progressive society

Even in conservative societies, premarital sex was common.

Also LBGT acceptance is more virtue signaling than true acceptance

LBGT people are only accepted as glamor figures

>>8575
Youth is not automatic innocence. Also, many people older than her have done the same thing in those instances yet they’re not called retarded for it

Lastly, “Brain development” doesn’t finish at 25

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.12212

>>8556
>the patriarchal gender norms. And it's only considered bad because of the obsession with the ideal of "purity" which is a remnant of Christianity, nothing more. I ain't a Christian. I'm an atheist. I do not concern myself with such superstitions.

Christianity is relatively lenient about female infidelity compared to other religions


>>8557
Psych wards are no more lenient than prisons. If anything they’re worse in some ways. Juvenile correctional facilities often get away with more abuse due to minors not having any rights
>>

 No.12213

>>8556
>NTA
<You do realize a lot of other women think high bodies counts are disgusting too.
>Yes. Because they're conservatives. And conservatives are dumb.
<If women wanted virginal men, I would respect that.
>That's 'cause you're cucked by conservative social norms.
<I also don't understand why Western women live in alternative lifestyle for decades and then suddenly turn around and want a traditional family.
>Marrying very early for the sake of marrying doesn't lead to a satisfying relationship. It's not just "le women," men also act like that: fuck around in their youth but then settle down when they're older. It's only when women do it is it considered bad because of the patriarchal gender norms. And it's only considered bad because of the obsession with the ideal of "purity" which is a remnant of Christianity, nothing more. I ain't a Christian. I'm an atheist. I do not concern myself with such superstitions.

No offense but your argument is weak here.

Virgin shaming is accepted and promoted even in conservative societies.

Wanting a virginal person for marriage doesn’t make conservatives dumb. It makes them smart. You’re the dumbass for dismissing it.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.12241

File: 1786839941780.png ( 199.7 KB , 625x1215 , SKEETED.png )


File: 1786755214908.jpg ( 4.84 KB , 138x140 , images.jpg )

 No.12173[Reply]

mine is the symbionese though they didn't do much and I disagree with them on some things they were cool and were californians

File: 1694033687514.jpg ( 660 KB , 1825x1902 , 1252703471000.jpg )

 No.3522[Reply]

>your type
>describe your favorite way to explain cognition; stacks, circles, etc
>explain where you discovered this way of thinking and why it stuck with you
>what do you seek to gain by discussing typology
>do you actually gain that in these threads

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) is an introspective self-report questionnaire indicating differing psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions. The test attempts to assign four categories: introversion or extraversion, sensing or intuition, thinking or feeling, judging or perceiving.

Learn the Basics
https://watchwordtest.com/types

Don't know your type? Take a test here:
https://sakinorva.net/functions

An introductory article:
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7353

>>3527
>individualistic,
>Open minded,
>and willing to change with new data and contradictory information.


🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Imageboards are anything but wilking to change acvording to intellectual accuracy let alone open minded or individualistic.

Most of ypu are whiny indignant incels whom all screech out the same buzzwords amd mentalities.

You all dismiss scientific articles that contrafict your opinions as bourgeoise.
>>

 No.7425

>>3522
>Hey goys, we've noticed th@ you're applying 2 little labels on your cattle horns so we made up sum moo'. Enjoy your enhanced personality!

>>3526
You're a certified leftist then.
>>

 No.12068

Anybody else wish they were a Dark Triad?
>>

 No.12078

>>7353
Damn, bro, facebook is over there –→


>>12068
Hell no, prison sucks.


INTJ
>>

 No.12084

>>12068
what does it mean if i score high on machiavellianism but low on psychopathy

File: 1696038982215.png ( 20.48 KB , 960x720 , Asexual_Reproduction.PNG )

 No.3823[Reply]

What would life be like if humans reproduced asexually? What would the modes of production look like?
>>

 No.3839

>>3823
Well for a start I think we wouldn't have women at all. What practical use do women have other than their role in sexual reproduction?
>>

 No.12034

Bump for this question.

Would this solve some problems? But maybe create new ones?

What if it was always like this?
But also:
What if it happened to supersede pre-existing sexual reproduction?
>>

 No.12083

File: 1786589585498.jpg ( 25.85 KB , 288x445 , 41a6C-VmmNL._SY445_SX342_M….jpg )

first couple chapters are relevant
(sorry but i dont have the pdf)

File: 1693822695687.png ( 201.93 KB , 900x930 , 84-841225_porky-capitalist….png )

 No.3492[Reply]

We need to create bourgeois culture. How about we shame commoners and call them involuntary poors or inpoors? Let me know what you think, fellow Persons of Wealth.
6 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4578

We could also call them class cucks.
>>

 No.11802

>>4578
This is the way
>>

 No.12002

Anybody else a wealthy NEET? My struggles and hardships are exactly the same as poor NEETS.
>>

 No.12082

all culture in capitalism is bourgeois culture
>>

 No.12085

>>12002
>My struggles and hardships are exactly the same as poor NEETS.
If this is true then you're not wealthy.

File: 1786477441092.jpg ( 184.74 KB , 1584x810 , politsturm suicide.jpg )

 No.12030[Reply]

Discuss suicide.

https://us.politsturm.com/uk-construction-workers-suicide
British Construction Workers Four Times Likelier Than Average to Commit Suicide

https://us.politsturm.com/minimum-wage-raises-could-lower-suicide-rates
Minimum Wage Raises Could Lower Suicide Rates

https://us.politsturm.com/17-american-veterans-commit-suicide-every-day
17 American veterans commit suicide every day

https://us.politsturm.com/american-suicide-rate-up-33
American Suicide Rate Up 33%
>>

 No.12031

We have a eugenics general thread where suicide is discussed.
>>

 No.12032

>>12031
Is it the same thing?
>>

 No.12040

Animator and YouTube personality Hot Diggity Demon announced he will travel to Switzerland to euthanize himself.

https://nypost.com/2026/08/02/us-news/youtuber-max-gilardi-weighs-euthanasia-in-switzerland/
>>

 No.12077

I feel like the natural state of a person is to want to live and not even consider reasons to die. But society has turned living into something so painful that for many people the default is wanting to die and having to find reasons to live.

How do we reverse this?

File: 1693590623252.jpg ( 58.07 KB , 931x706 , f19dc1dd1e527d1c44640252e4….jpg )

 No.3464[Reply]

Are fictional women still based (as in positive opinion) if they are based off of real life women?

If we assume real life women existed before imaginary women did, then don't traces of real life women exist within the concepts of fictional women? Thoughts?
34 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11963

>>11961
Just the same way you don’t like women being fat and ugly
>>

 No.11964

>>11961
It’s fiction and I don’t like how they disregard beauty for male characters always maxing out aesthetic points for female characters.
I know you don’t really care and just wanna yank my chain but how would you like it if 2d fetishization always had women being fat or tattooed up?
>>

 No.11965

>>3649
What if that’s not true? What if said male character was a chad but not the typical kind of chad?
>>

 No.11966

>>3647
Wrong. Even in fiction,”pathetic losers” have some stats going for them. In fact, “pathetic loser” is a vague term.
>>

 No.12014

>>11964
I don't care about fat women unless they carry that weight well. I only care about me, myself, and I.

File: 1779981489719-0.jpg ( 153.46 KB , 818x620 , 3amtlw.jpg )

File: 1779981489719-1.jpg ( 180.66 KB , 1080x1080 , leftists vs incels.jpg )

File: 1779981489719-2.png ( 399.76 KB , 1180x2076 , A Comprehensive Guide to L….png )

File: 1779981489719-3.png ( 101.1 KB , 1180x416 , DarkStarDowns' LDAR Guide.png )

 No.10858[Reply]

Laying Down And Rotting thread (LDAR)

Discuss doing nothing… Or don't post at all.
8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11294

none of you seem to get it
there is no movement and there is no left and there is no theory
all of it is LDAR in disguise and even pure LDAR itself is ultimately cope at its core
all just ways to override the fundamental anxiety that the future has been erased and history has ended
and we will continue to be trapped in this mourning for a lost future until a genuine utopian impulse is recovered from the failures of the past
>>

 No.11609

it's over…
>>

 No.11788

>>11287
>At least read theory.
Lol he doesn't know that it's over. NGMI
>>

 No.11990

Anybody else get bored?
>>

 No.11997

File: 1786436539500.jpg ( 29.02 KB , 485x534 , 51faaf02fffe1d18e1b9ff6fa6….jpg )

>no reply in a few minutes

File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
73 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11954

>>11952
More often or not, it’s the man that cheats.
Dead bedrooms are often due to decaying libido and stress of adult life.
Men will be married to the most beautiful intelligent docile of women, have the most intelligent beautiful obedient of children, and these family men will still feel bored. They still will feel they’re “missing out”. They still go out seeking new thrills.

I mean seriously, not everything is about sex.
>>

 No.11968

>>11908
>Women want you at exactly the time they've run out of options.
>It's because they've changed anon! They really want you now, no this won't blow up in your face in seven years when her contempt for you has reached a boiling point, honest!
OMG STFU you white knight.
>>

 No.11971

>>11908
People often change “for the better” when they don’t have any prospects anymore
>>

 No.11986

>>11954
>it’s the man that cheats
[citation needed]
>>

 No.11987

>>11908
If you believe that shit I have a bridge to sell you.

File: 1725540635959.jpg ( 7.05 KB , 250x186 , 39a7a9ae228ef74a241374c1e9….jpg )

 No.7428[Reply]

A thread for all of your politically incorrect whining and complaining that wouldn't be allowed in leftypol-ORG or left-wing/progressive organizations irl.
32 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11960

>>11950

> Cosmetic surgery

It might be a solution for a one incel, but it's not a systematic solution. In South Korea lots of men do it, but there's still huge amount of incels there. It's like, let's say, everyone would get 200k salary a year. Would everyone become rich then? No, because the standards for being rich would just rise up, as well as prices for everything. Same with mass look-maxing. Women would still choose a small percentage of men.

> selective service for sex work

So prostitution? How do you imagine a socialist/communist society with prostitution? It's nonsense. But nevertheless, even it would be ethically appropriate in a socialist state, let's do some math. I hope you meant state-sponsored prostitution for incels? Because otherwise it just makes no sense.

First of all, the majority of men are incels. Sex is required once a day. Let's suppose that a state-sponsored prostitute can "work" with 5 men a day. So, we have 50% of population (men) * 50% incels / 5 = 5% of total population or 10% of female population are required as prostitutes. Also we must exclude non-adolescent girls and old women. If we take, let's say, 14-30yo females, that's less that 20% of female population, so we multiply 10% by 5, which gives up 50% of 14-30yo females who are required to be such state-sponsored prostitutes. It will be impossible to voluntarily hire a half of young females to be prostitutes, especially in a socialist society when women have guaranteed job, free medicine, education etc.

So this idea is mathematically impossible. And that's not even saying that those men who would get sex only from state prostitutes, will not feel themselves well about it, as they will compare themselves to other men, who get sex for free. And this will lead to yet another wave of social envy and hate from incels to other men. That's why I state that there must be equal distribution of sex between men. State-sponsored prostitution doesn't provide it.

> You’re forgetting about personal choice. And that not all men are gonna be up to par in hygiene, looks, manners, talent for female preference
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11967

>>11960
> It might be a solution for a one incel, but it's not a systematic solution. In South Korea lots of men do it, but there's still huge amount of incels there. It's like, let's say, everyone would get 200k salary a year. Would everyone become rich then? No, because the standards for being rich would just rise up, as well as prices for everything. Same with mass look-maxing. Women would still choose a small percentage of men.

You sure? I think cosmetic surgery would do wonders to increase mens chances of getting laid. Women as well. You’re also mistaking looksmaxxing for wealthmaxxing.

>Agree, all ideas like teenagers don't need or don't want sex must be abolished.

I find it peculiar that our culture permits and even encourages bullying because it “toughens up people “. This same culture even says “cringe phases are necessary for adolescence otherwise you become a horrible person”. But they draw the line at romantic/sexual experiences.

> So prostitution? How do you imagine a socialist/communist society with prostitution? It's nonsense. But nevertheless, even it would be ethically appropriate in a socialist state, let's do some math. I hope you meant state-sponsored prostitution for incels? Because otherwise it just makes no sense.

>First of all, the majority of men are incels. Sex is required once a day. Let's suppose that a state-sponsored prostitute can "work" with 5 men a day. So, we have 50% of population (men) * 50% incels / 5 = 5% of total population or 10% of female population are required as prostitutes.

I think you mean to say the majority of incels are men.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11969

>>11967

> You sure? I think cosmetic surgery would do wonders to increase mens chances of getting laid. Women as well. You’re also mistaking looksmaxxing for wealthmaxxing.

If everyone is rich, no one is rich, if everyone is handsome, no one is handsome, I mean that. By the way, good looking is not the only female filter that men have to pass. There are others, and in case of mass looks-maxing, they will play the decisive role.

> I find it peculiar that our culture permits and even encourages bullying because it “toughens up people “. This same culture even says “cringe phases are necessary for adolescence otherwise you become a horrible person”. But they draw the line at romantic/sexual experiences.

The elites don't want people to have sex, and especially young people. It's insane how there are already discussions that the age of consent should be 21, while the age of military draft is 18.

> I think you mean to say the majority of incels are men.

No, I said it correctly. Majority of men are incels, and all or almost all incels are men.

> thirties and early forties aren’t old.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11970

>>11969
>If everyone is rich, no one is rich, if everyone is handsome, no one is handsome, I mean that.

Now this is bullshit. This logic is what sore losers say. I’d rather have a society where the average person is handsome and sexy.
It may not result in excessive sex overnight, because libido isn’t infinite, but it will make life a lot easier in the dating realm.

>By the way, good looking is not the only female filter that men have to pass. There are others, and in case of mass looks-maxing, they will play the decisive role.

Of course looks aren’t the factor. There’s wit and talents.

>Who would want to be a volcel if he can fuck any young beautiful female for free? Highly unlikely. About women - it's a question of current women mentality. If we allow them to be volcels now, when they hate incels and do not want to have sex with them, there will be no difference with the current situation. Incels will remain incels. If women would become different, understand that every man needs sex and give it voluntarily, there will be no need to point them out to this.


Women want men to paneled them but women don’t get that all the time. Feminists want society to have men act as butlers for every non-essential whim of women. Your proposition is like that but for men. It’s coercive.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11974

>>11970

> I’d rather have a society where the average person is handsome and sexy

Who minds that? I'm just saying that it won't enough by itself to provide sex to all men, if we don't change the system.

> Your proposition is like that but for men. It’s coercive.

Why? If women understand the importance of sex and provide it voluntarily to men, there is no coercion.

> There’s people who have sex without all the sentiments that come with it.

Maybe. But does that mean that other don't need them?

> Friendships are more sincere than sexual intimacy in the hear of the moment.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home