[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1754651312902.jpeg ( 45.35 KB , 627x418 , euthanasia-b.jpeg )

 No.9037[Reply]

Should people be allowed to get voluntary euthanasia?

Some vets recommend for blind cats to get euthanized. Why not the same for humans?
10 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.9083

>>9078
>>9076
>>9075

>Death by euthanasia is cruel

>Jumping off of roofs is honorable

You know that roofs and other high places are closed off for this reason?
Not only that, instant death isn't guaranteed. You most likely die slowly and painfully.
And you're forgetting about passerby or cars that you could accidentally land upon
>>

 No.9084

I find it funny that people think euthanasia is eugenics yet they have no problem with wanting to sustain vegetables
>>

 No.9088

>>9078
The same size in higher tiers is kinda small tbh.
>>

 No.9090

>>9083
The US is littered with parking garages 14+ stories high with little to no barrier for jumping

If i were to do it, I'd just do it when there's no traffic to the place or, if I'm super concerned just wall off the area i'd land with some caution tape.

A 12 story fall would be hitting solid concrete at 60 miles per hour.

That death would be instantaneous with no suffering. The severe traumatic brain injury, particularly the diffuse axonal shearing and brainstem damage, would cause an immediate loss of consciousness at the moment of impact. Simultaneously, the aortic transection would lead to an immediate cessation of blood flow to the brain, ensuring an irreversible loss of brain function within moments. Forensic pathology classifies such events as 'immediate death.' There is no credible scientific evidence to suggest that consciousness or pain perception could be maintained in a fall of this magnitude onto solid concrete without obstacles.
>>

 No.9091

The term "instantaneous" in the context of death must be defined with scientific precision. It does not refer to the cessation of all cellular metabolism, but to the immediate and irreversible termination of integrated organismal function.

The impact from a 45+ meter fall delivers over 35,000 Joules of kinetic energy, which, upon contact with a non-deformable surface, generates forces that cause simultaneous, catastrophic failure of the body's most critical systems. The key event is the complete destruction of the central nervous system, particularly the brainstem, which controls all vital functions. This injury, whether from direct impact, shear forces, or axial loading, results in immediate brain death. This is compounded by the simultaneous traumatic transection of the aorta, which causes an immediate cessation of cerebral perfusion. The convergence of these independent, unsurvivable injuries means that the moment of impact and the onset of medico-legal death are, for all practical and scientific purposes, the same. The classic trimodal distribution of trauma deaths, immediate, early, and late, is rendered moot; this event falls squarely and entirely within the "immediate" category, occurring within seconds of the traumatic event.

The question of suffering is answered by the same mechanism. Suffering requires consciousness, and consciousness requires a functioning brain. The distinction between nociception (the signal) and pain (the perception) is paramount. The pathological evidence shows that the very structures required to perceive pain: the thalamus, the cortex, the entire integrated network of the brain are obliterated by the impact forces on a timescale that is faster than the speed of neural transmission and processing. The brain is destroyed before it can register that the body has been injured.

While the fall itself from this height is a conscious event, the impact is not.


File: 1691460639287.gif ( 14.58 KB , 700x500 , 1665208925460928.gif )

 No.3121[Reply]

I just realized I haven't had sex since 2020. Does that make me an incel if the reason I don't have sex is because I'm interested in other shit? Or am I some sort of asexual weirdo? I know at least one person interested in getting married with me, but I'm not interested, even though I think I should get married, since I want to have a family. I just like other things more, and I had all the sex I wanted during my previous marriage. In fact, in the end, that was all there was to it. I want to be in love, but I don't know how to do that. I'm not young anymore, and I don't think I've ever actually experience that, even during the time I was married. I do love my friends, but I'm obviously not in love with any of them, since I'm straight, so I really don't feel alone. I just feel like there's something I should be doing, but I'm failing to grasp the details. Does anyone get like this?
25 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.3174

Not since 2020 huh? wow that must be so hard. Kill yourself
>>

 No.3175

>>3132
Kill yourself retard
>>

 No.3248

>>3134
Well, I'm trying to do that. This is one reason why I haven't gotten into a relationship or even considered it. I'm quite happy as I am, but I feel like I'm missing something that's obvious to everyone else.
>>

 No.9054

>>3124
>That and you just sound older and thus less horny than most of us.


Bruh, most of the whiny ass inxels here are late twenties/early thirties.
>>

 No.9055

>>3121
>>3248
No offense but this is a non problem


File: 1678326363930-0.png ( 1008.38 KB , 1208x912 , 1678261930176750.png )

File: 1678326363930-1.webm ( 1.83 MB , 720x1280 , 1678263631940761.webm )

 No.1762[Reply]

Why are women aging so fast suddenly?
14 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.1819

>>1817
Puff puff pass
>>

 No.2586

COVID reduced everyones socializing so everyone became more fat and lazy.

That's it really

All the women I see on Tinder in the USA are ugly af now lmao
>>

 No.2592

>>2586
its been that way since the mid 2010s atleast. you referring to femoids 17+ now?
>>

 No.9034

>>2592
Wrong. It's been that way since the 1990s
>>

 No.9048

How do you know that? You only see the highlights of earlier years or models/actors and not average people who look average


File: 1715505459474.jpg ( 176.63 KB , 1200x501 , Viewfinder-Yamane-Ayano-1.jpg )

 No.6159[Reply]

Yaoi and non-straight shipping - women would rather think about two handsome men being gay than anything to do with an *ncel
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6898

I hate the word cishet, it makes "leftists" look retarded
>>

 No.6936

>>6898
Now you know how I feel about people using the term "cringe" for anything slightly awkward.
>>

 No.9004

File: 1754080541663.png ( 74.51 KB , 556x549 , just have gay sex bro Scre….png )

just have gay sex bro
>>

 No.9020

Don't men do this with lesbians?
>>

 No.9032

>>9020
This
There's a lot of Yuri posted in inageboards.


File: 1752951129760.jpg ( 197.82 KB , 937x388 , Brave men fighting against….jpg )

 No.8916[Reply]

Who was in the right?
>>

 No.8920

Both idiots.
>>

 No.9003

It's funny how society says beating women is wrong but are less forward about beating kids being wrong


 No.8482[Reply]

Please step on me.
4 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8487

>>8486
Yeah, but, it didn't really have to do with anything about size. Those chick's just clearly don't know how to actually fight. I mean the Small guy looks like he can fight a little, but, clearly those chick's have no idea how to fight.
>>

 No.8488

>no audio
What is this cuckchan faggotry?
>>

 No.8491

>>8487
If it had been three tall dudes, he would have been cooked. It wouldn't have mattered if those guys knew how to fight or not.
>>

 No.8915

File: 1752939672315.mp4 ( 1.06 MB , 540x480 , RDT_20250719_083948.mp4 )

Mao Zedong gets shocked by the height of Henry Kissinger's wife.
>>

 No.8968

>>8491
Not really.
What if those three tall girls were UFC fighters?


File: 1723018740650-0.jpg ( 168.44 KB , 720x844 , ugly bastard (3).jpg )

File: 1723018740650-1.jpg ( 145.92 KB , 960x946 , ugly bastard (2).jpg )

File: 1723018740650-2.jpg ( 59.59 KB , 500x535 , ugly bastard (4).jpg )

File: 1723018740650-3.jpg ( 111.42 KB , 700x695 , ugly bastard (1).jpg )

File: 1723018740650-4.jpg ( 76.47 KB , 700x1197 , ugly bastard (5).jpg )

 No.7237[Reply]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_K5ONweYd4
I Like Ugly B*d Hentai And I'm Not Sorry
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiymBmCJ3hg
Lily likes ugly bastards?

There's females that like the ugly bastard genre. What's your excuse now?



Discuss the ugly bastard question.

Does it disprove the mainstream/orthodox something-pill?
9 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8277

>>8276
this could be you
>>

 No.8289

>>8277
Kevin James isn't an ugly bastard. He's a cute chubby teddy bear
>>

 No.8290

>>8271
Shota and loli are pathologised. Ugly bastards are too but they're treated as comical relief.
They're not looked down upon as much.
>>

 No.8291

>>8274
You haven't been on image boards or mainstream internet much have you
>>

 No.8933

File: 1753207328609.webm ( 1.42 MB , 852x480 , YgmZewCuVQk 02 06 02 09.webm )

>fav porn category
You won't believe her answer…


File: 1655854016805.jpg ( 119.76 KB , 1280x720 , bimbotiktok.jpg )

 No.240[Reply]

Is the bottom finally starting to fall out from 3rd and 4th wave feminism? Right now bimbos are trending on tik tok and the fully embracing the male gaze growing popular among zoomer women. Along with divine feminism, which is almost an anti-feminism ideology that encourages women to become stay-at-home moms and obedient housewives if they wish to, and assuages their fears about it being demeaning to themselves and women as 3rd and 4th wave feminists are so keen on proselytizing.

One prominent bimbo tiktoker describes the bimbo lifestyle as an "ego death". Where women stop trying to foster masculine traits in themselves and instead cultivate their natural vulnerability, gentleness, and hunger for the sexual desire of men. Bimbos claim these innate traits of most straight women have wrongly been maligned by feminist as naivete, weakness, and subjugation by the patriarchy.

I think women gravitating to the antithesis of feminism is primarily due to the deteriorating economy, having a committed husband or boyfriend is quickly becoming a necessity as it has been throughout most of captialism. And bimbos encapsulate in a extreme manner, the things women have always known men want. I think there's also other converging trends at work.

Millennial women are now hitting middle age in earnest, and zoomer generations are seeing the poisoned harvest of feminism. Many millennial women are alone and miserable as either single mothers, divorcees, or spinsters that were never wed and face a future devoid of companionship.

Women have also gotten to experience capitalist alienation first hand for 60 years and are realizing that as much as a eunuch a housewife can be, it's still far better than being a prole. Zoomer women are realizing what men have always known, that only a small percentage of workers ever find a fulfilling career, everyone else just works to make money until they die.

I think this bimbo trend is the beginning of a wider revolt among zoomer women against feminism. Feminism can no longer hide its failures, and zoomer women cannot be spooked by horror stories of past female oppression like not being able to open checking accounts, since they have no living memory of it. And even if rights like abortion are taken away, modern technology, like the nearly dozen birth control methods that are available now, will mitigate much of the harm and keep zoomer women from reradicalizing. What do you guys think?
59 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7524

>>7513
Case in point: >>7509
>>

 No.7525

>>7514
Explain how bimboification is antithetical/novelty to feminism.
Because I dont see how its any idfferent.
>>

 No.7526

>>7525
Feminism posits male sexuality is oppressive to women. Bimbos cater to male sexuality at the expense of social norms.
Bimbos are differential to men, which again feminism says is patriarchal oppression.
Bimbos celebrate male sexuality for it's own sake and do not require any prerequisites like looks, money or status before having intercourse with men which feminism says is debasing since men subjugate women.
The supporting arguments are in the OP
>>

 No.7532

>>7526
Again, bimbos were a thing in the bourgeois feminist denomination.


Yes its objectifying women, but bourgeois feminism used it as andrological bait.
Alot of the bimbos were either portrayed as doms or power bottoms.

The submission was a lie.
>>

 No.8913

Bump


File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.


File: 1751371931276.png ( 759.39 KB , 664x571 , never kill yourself ninten….png )

 No.8816[Reply]

ITT: Reasons to NOT kill yourself.
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8827

To kill Christians instead
>>

 No.8846

>>8822
>>8823
Thanks for the input.

>>8824
>>8826
Why are people not allowed to simply enjoy things?
>>

 No.8855

>>8846
>Why are people not allowed to simply enjoy things?
Because you aren't creating anything. Better to meditate than to consoom capitalist slop. That shit is stopping you from self-actualizing.
>>

 No.8867

>Because you aren't creating anything. Better to meditate than to consoom capitalist slop. That shit is stopping you from self-actualizing.

This sentiment you have is ironically what stops self actualisation.
This moral obsession with wanting to "change the world" to punish others for having their own personal treats because it's "not productive" is just self righteousness.
And the people who hold views like yours are often the least productive.
>>

 No.8893

File: 1752172512620.jpeg ( 966.65 KB , 4032x3024 , z27d2ktdi1cf1.jpeg )



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 ]
| Catalog | Home