[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1781012089530.jpg ( 54.38 KB , 746x435 , i want her so bad i need t….jpg )

 No.11163[Reply]

>I want her so bad
<I need to become the best version of myself first

Which one should take priority? What is your take on this conundrum dilemma?
1 post and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11324

Tbh, bettering yourself for female attention sounds very dreadful.

It means that you have no resolve or value for yourself
>>

 No.11327

File: 1782682689106.jpeg ( 37.4 KB , 736x504 , IMG_6448.jpeg )

>>11324

do it for yourself then. become who you want to be
>>

 No.11382

"Bettering yourself" just means getting older, because chicks like older guys. Chances are that you will peak physically and mentally in your mid 20's but because you still don't come off as mature enough you won't get laid till your 30s.
>>

 No.11410

>>11382
Not exactly true. Women like older guys because of the assumption of career and stability.
There’s a lot of guys who still aren’t any better in their thirties or forties than they were before then

Age numbers are overused virtue points especially nowadays in an era where people waste their prime years stuck in unskilled labor and college loan debt.

But ok, if what you say is true, why then are the guys who were virgins in their teens and twenties are still virgins in their thirties nowadays?

Women don’t care about how old you are but rather how rich and talented you are.
>>

 No.11413

>>11382
Then what about for women? Is it the same?


File: 1783074013834-0.jpg ( 126.12 KB , 462x729 , white_nat_turned_leftist_h….jpg )

File: 1783074013834-1.jpg ( 334.63 KB , 932x740 , fascist_turned_anti_capita….jpg )

File: 1783074013834-2.jpg ( 280.58 KB , 994x855 , not_sexual_person_humiliat….jpg )

File: 1783074013835-3.jpg ( 98.86 KB , 421x515 , vote_blue_humiliation.jpg )

 No.11373[Reply]

'Fascist turned leftist' humiliation caption porn.


File: 1691706232185.webm ( 1.26 MB , 360x640 , 1691596764415078.webm )

 No.3149[Reply]

Submit your nominations.
I'll start, I present to you:
FUNK-CEL
6 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4865

>>3152
I like to dance. I'm taking break dancing classes right now.
>>

 No.4867

File: 1706980110287.png ( 107.94 KB , 267x360 , Portrait_Enver_Hoxha.png )

>>

 No.9853

File: 1767657324943.mp4 ( 3.48 MB , 576x1024 , cd7347af29e4d56dad12b55ff3….mp4 )

Peggy Weegy for board Queen
>>

 No.9854

>>9853
>Peggy Weggy
>>

 No.11318

Meet MK Ultra-tan


 No.8033[Reply]

2: Raphael!

1: What can I do?

2: Go and jerk off.

1: So it's hopeless?

2: Of course it is.
It always was.
From the start.
You'll never be
a girl's erotic dream.
Get used to it.
It's not for you.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.8034

File: 1740782918311.jpg ( 15.39 KB , 200x200 , Taxi-Driver-3_cropped.jpg )

>>

 No.8545

its over
>>

 No.10198

Brutal scene…
>>

 No.11051

This scene destroyed me…
>>

 No.11310

bump


File: 1693211893246.jpg ( 82.99 KB , 781x1000 , 84485126.jpg )

 No.3351[Reply]

why is she so perfect?
45 posts and 37 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7320

>>6888 (myself)
Anybody know what happened to the CPUSA's momentum since then?
>>

 No.7321

>>7320
Massive FBI infiltration and then taming into Democrat Party lapdogs.
>>

 No.9529

File: 1765912919828.png ( 59.51 KB , 266x272 , Screenshot 2024-04-26 at 1….png )

Would you date the girl who impersonated a Romanov?
>>

 No.10078

File: 1770417586118.jpg ( 49.67 KB , 824x355 , live_twitch_001.jpg )

This shit gonna make me act up
>>

 No.11306

Plus-Size Dating Reality: The Truth Kendra G’s Guest Had To Explain To Her


File: 1781992586219.png ( 1.73 MB , 846x1074 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.11264[Reply]

Why did Marxists choose to side with the young women over young men considering young women are more privileged in society today?
7 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11291

>>11283
>illicit or informal work
>unless it's informal gig workers who I don't personally disregard
This is the problem with trying to define classes based on how you personally feel about them instead of by their relationship with capital. Lumpenproles aren't all in a gang, but do all work irregular, informal, illicit, or taboo work - usually with very low or unreliable pay. Hence the "reserve army of labor" label.
>>

 No.11300

>>11291
But it's not based on how I personally feel, it's based in how they make money.
'Informal Work' has pretty much been subsumed by capitalist enterprises. And there weren't giant pools of illegal immigrants in Marx's time like there are now, they just relied on old fashioned colonialism for free labor or original capital.
Some of Marxism is just outdated. Like the fact that Marx thought of money as a commodity, which fiat currency isn't, but was when there was the gold standard during his time.
>>

 No.11303

>>11300
>But it's not based on how I personally feel, it's based in how they make money.
Then your excluding certain groups based on things other than how they make money is based on how you feel.
>'Informal Work' has pretty much been subsumed by capitalist enterprises.
An increasingly large swathe of first world workers are deliberately lumpenized, yes.
>And there weren't giant pools of illegal immigrants in Marx's time like there are now,
He literally alluded to Bohemians in his original description of lumpenproles lol. The only reason that there weren't large swathes of "illegal immigrants" in the US, specifically, at that time is that the US didn't require any documentation for legal entry until the 20th century. There were massive waves of migration from Europe (Ireland is especially notable, also Germany and Italy) for which no identification or registration was required, and there were also large waves of immigrant laborers from China, which led to the Chinese (specifically) eventually being refused entry and citizenship entirely based on race/nationality, so technically the Chinese (and the Chinese alone) did kind of become the prototypical "illegal immigrants" before "illegal immigration" was properly codified as a more general concept.
>>

 No.11305

>>11303
>Then your excluding certain groups based on things other than how they make money is based on how you feel.
No, it's based on how THEY make money, aka their relationship to the means of production.
>An increasingly large swathe of first world workers are deliberately lumpenized, yes.
No, their status as simply employees is just obfuscated for political and legal reasons. If you have a boss that tells you when, how and at what wage you work, you're a prole or employee. Even libs recognize this and have been trying to change the rules governing gig workers
https://nysba.org/reimagining-workers-rights-in-the-gig-economy-bridging-the-gap-between-independent-contractors-and-employees/
>He literally alluded to Bohemians in his original description of lumpenproles lol.
I'm talking about modern workers now, the type of 'informal work' doesn't exist in modern times. There are no 'ragpickers'. At best I could think of someone like a scalper falling into this 'informal work' category, but they're a negligible part of the work force.
>The only reason that there weren't large swathes of "illegal immigrants" in the US, specifically, at that time is that the US didn't require any documentation for legal entry until the 20th century. There were massive waves of migration from Europe (Ireland is especially notable, also Germany and Italy) for which no identification or registration was required, and there were also large waves of immigrant laborers from China, which led to the Chinese (specifically) eventually being refused entry and citizenship entirely based on race/nationality, so technically the Chinese (and the Chinese alone) did kind of become the prototypical "illegal immigrants" before "illegal immigration" was properly codified as a more general concept.
OMG, the 1800's immigration wave from Europe were not lumpen. They were settler brought on to complete the American settler-colonialist project aka 'Manifest Destiny' and their legal status as settlers (read: white) was established as far back as 1691 after Bacon's rebellion. It's just a honky sePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11307

>>11305
>settlers
here we go again…


File: 1661992631766.jpg ( 962.58 KB , 640x896 , shitposting-x2kxgt.jpg )

 No.633[Reply]

Oh yeah, porn thread.
46 posts and 45 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11007

Thoughts on 'disabled man x abled woman' porn?

I found out it existed
>>

 No.11010

>>10111
The fire rises.
>>

 No.11144

File: 1780930880487.jpg ( 480.94 KB , 800x1067 , Beastpaint-cheetah.jpg )

>>

 No.11177

>>

 No.11218

File: 1781310151152-0.mp4 ( 3.82 MB , 326x576 , Repaoc(1).mp4 )



File: 1781294918910-0.jpg ( 740.28 KB , 2204x1240 , positionen-wo-man-guten-st….jpg )

File: 1781294918910-1.png ( 364.12 KB , 800x800 , 8-2-bricks-png.png )

 No.11214[Reply]

Is dating idealist? You don't know for sure if a relationship is gonna work out, so how do you investigate that materially?
>>

 No.11215

No, there's happy healthy marriages out there were the man and woman love each other. They're just not the rule.


File: 1780820169854.jpg ( 88.63 KB , 796x603 , MV5BNzIxZmIzYjEtZGMyZi00ND….jpg )

 No.11128[Reply]

- Normies: Relationships just happen, stuff just happens, it just happened
- pol chud soyjak: Nothing happens

It's all connected…
>>

 No.11166

I just happened to fuck your mother, but here you are trying to cope with some grand theory.


File: 1714424643464.jpg ( 178.87 KB , 1170x1561 , 0nkfbztmgcv81.jpg )

 No.5800[Reply]

List the petty spiteful ways you mess with the Chosen Gender™. Based pic related. That uygha's my hero right now.

For me:
I don't hold open doors.
I don't stop to give directions.
I search up videos on Youtube, sort by recent and press dislike on the female ones. (I really hope this demotivates them to stop, especially lower view ones.)
I don't lower the bathroom seat wherever I go.
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.8706

File: 1749756155280.jpg ( 95.12 KB , 953x627 , sex worker list things hat….jpg )

>>

 No.9152

File: 1756676676475.jpg ( 86.93 KB , 432x768 , woman crying control laugh….jpg )

>>

 No.11105

>>5801
>implying women aren't labor aristocracy or unproductive labor for the most part

>>5802
>>5806
>>8437
cuck fags
>>

 No.11116

>>11105
>unproductive labor
Dude nurses and doctors are unproductive labor in Marxism, that doesn't mean we don't depend on them. Stop assigning moral shit to economic shit.

>labor aristocracy

Maybe the ones on OF are but that's not the majority of women.
>>

 No.11145

Nice try, but you can't be leftist if you are misogynist.


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home