[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord

| Catalog | Home

File: 1697737018609-0.jpg ( 128.02 KB , 579x909 , fired-rick-and-morty-co-cr….jpg )

File: 1697737018609-1.jpg ( 253.83 KB , 946x2048 , Fh_NombWAAAlXz4.jpg )

File: 1697737018609-2.jpg ( 244.64 KB , 946x2048 , Fh_NZhqWQAIgYNt.jpg )

 No.4105[Reply]

What is R9K's take on Justin Roiland (creator and voice actor of Rick and Morty) being accused of beating and imprisoning a woman, and also grooming underage girls and showing them violent porn of his ex-girlfriend turned pornstar?

>he ended up bringing two other young women to his airbnb with us, even though that was not our plan. He tried pressuring me to get drunker, but I was sobering up in case I needed to drive home.

>He randomly showed us VERY violent porn of his ex girlfriend getting rammed by a huge pornstar Imfao he pulled it up on the tv and everything. Odd choice but ok.

Is he a cuck turned predator or a predator turned cuck?
Is it worse to be a predator or a cuck?
Does it count as cucking if your ex does it after you break up with them?
Was Stanley Kubrick revealing the truth when he made Eyes Wide Shut?
11 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4136

>>4133
"From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs."

>>4135
>The only reason strikes work is because the government forces the employer to keep paying you and prevents them hiring someone else.
They sure as shit don't in my country, and they don't in most countries either. All workers get while striking are meagre government subsidies, and historically during prolonged strikes have to resort to food collections from the public as not to go hungry.
Oh and the government always takes the side of the employer too. Who do you think the government represents? The average person? Lmao.
>Which if you flip the chessboard around would be the equivalent of you not being paid and not being allowed to find another job until you agreed to work more hours.
Sounds like the current economy if you replace 'not being allowed to find a job' with 'there are no other jobs'.
>>

 No.4137

>>4136
>the government always takes the side of the employer too.
If government was on the side of the employer they would be allowed to fire all strikers with no severance and hire replacement workers with no minimum wage. You are not as oppressed as you think you are.

>Who do you think the government represents? The average person? Lmao.

Depends what you mean by "represents" but basically yes, democratic governments need to bribe average voters to stay in power. I accept your underlying point that government don't really care about the people. Government doesn't care about industry either though.
>>

 No.4138

>>4137
>If government was on the side of the employer they would be allowed to fire all strikers with no severance and hire replacement workers with no minimum wage.
why do you think those laws are there in the first place? Maybe because they were a result of general strikes that fucked up the whole national economy?

>You are not as oppressed as you think you are.

I've never seen the state using an army to suppress capitalists kek.

>basically yes, democratic governments need to bribe average voters to stay in power.

well, they are doing a pretty shit job at it kek

the """bribe""" can't even fucking keep up with inflation
>>

 No.4139

File: 1697931333471.jpg ( 121.55 KB , 443x360 , The_hand_that_will_rule_th….jpg )

>>4137
>If government was on the side of the employer they would be allowed to fire all strikers with no severance and hire replacement workers with no minimum wage
And this was the case for a long time until capital was forced to concede basic rights to workers in the face of massive unrest. Those in power would love a complete dictatorship of the bourgeoisie like there was during much of the 19th century. However due to the collective power of workers channelled through organised labour, it is impossible to strip workers of their basic rights.
>I accept your underlying point that government don't really care about the people. Government doesn't care about industry either though.
Well who do they represent in your mind?

>>4138
This is a different anon to who you were replying to but I agree with all his points.
>>

 No.4143

>>4138
>why do you think those laws are there in the first place?
Because government is not 100% on the side of industry as you claim.

>the """bribe""" can't even fucking keep up with inflation

Inflation is how they pay for the brides. Keynesian economics is not a perpetual motion machine it is a snake eating its own tail.

>>4139
>And this was the case for a long time until capital was forced to concede basic rights to workers in the face of massive unrest.
What specific timeline are you implying exists here?

>However due to the collective power of workers channelled through organised labour, it is impossible to strip workers of their basic rights.

Except it's the government that gave you these "rights" and many things happened to restructure the nature of government in the 20th century including universal suffrage, bretton woods and the cold war.

Or if you want to look at it another way, tell me what happens when workers go on strike in china or russia? Does the economy grind to a halt until the porkies concede "basic rights" or does something else happen?
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1697722944108.mp4 ( 673.92 KB , 368x360 , hniClsE1O1LQJFXC.mp4 )

 No.4101[Reply]

Incels of Left,
You guys don't have to be lonely or waste money on prostitute. Get yourself a valid girl like her
>>

 No.4102

Or I could just go overseas
>>

 No.4104

you gotta 'mire the 'elusion


File: 1697473679498-0.jpg ( 12.55 KB , 480x360 , wig.jpg )

File: 1697473679498-1.jpeg ( 7.67 KB , 235x132 , its-always-sunny.jpeg )

 No.4086[Reply]

I'm a balding incel, and while looking today in the mirror I caught myself pondering how it would be great to go back to the 18th century when it was hip for men to wear wigs, make up, powder, boots on high heels and dog knows what else.

What THE FUCK happened in the 19th century that deprived men of such a vast arsenal to enhance their SMV? Was it the rise of feminism?
>>

 No.4087

File: 1697476589723.jpeg ( 382.56 KB , 630x436 , powdered-wig.jpeg )

Tho I prefer to shave my hair because it's more comfortable to me, but having a wig option that you could just put on like baseball cap would be very nice too.

Imagine having a special set of wigs just for the Tinder lol. One for this girl that likes straight blond, one for that girl that likes curvy ginger..
>>

 No.4088

File: 1697477416183.jpg ( 224.77 KB , 1280x720 , marie-antoinette-original.jpg )

But problem is obviously that a wig was a status thing in a feudal society, that's why w*men were okay with them, that's why men were openly allowed to wear them.

So fucking eugenic w*men won't allow any wigs to men in any classless soyciety.
>>

 No.4089

>>4086
>What THE FUCK happened in the 19th century that deprived men of such a vast arsenal to enhance their SMV? Was it the rise of feminism?
The newfound supremacy of capital over the aristocracy would be my guess. Tribal dresses fell out of fashion in favour of boring suits and top hats. And I guess Victorian w*men preferred banging fat factory owners rather than flamboyant incel nobles.
>>

 No.4090

File: 1697480474623-0.jpg ( 198.69 KB , 1784x1075 , A-Clockwork-Orange.jpg )

File: 1697480474623-1.jpg ( 37.11 KB , 479x685 , 1.jpg )

File: 1697480474623-2.jpg ( 36.27 KB , 640x360 , 2.jpg )

>>4089
>Tribal dresses fell out of fashion in favour of boring suits and top hats.
This shit is depressing. I feel like Alex from the Clockwork Orange sometimes - the last Aristocratic Rebel in a boring gay post-modern dystopia.

Laughed my ass off when he murdered that cunt with her own post-modern fart-piece lol. Kubrick was always spot on with his symbolism.


File: 1696826744343.jpg ( 457.71 KB , 1080x1304 , Screenshot_2023-10-09-11-4….jpg )

 No.4037[Reply]

Do you think she needs a man now?
11 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4067

>>4066
Do you need any help. Can I call someone for you?
>>

 No.4068

>>4067
You can help by not defending bloodthirsty settler because they have boobs
>>

 No.4069

File: 1697222001574.png ( 274.98 KB , 605x735 , ClipboardImage.png )

>>

 No.4070

>>4069
Jewesses can't resist the BAC (Big Arab Cock)
>>

 No.4083

>>4069
brownchads stay winning


File: 1694270728870.png ( Spoiler Image, 2.03 MB , 2566x1787 , Screenshot_2023-05-13_1331….png )

 No.3559[Reply]

Why is chad's cock so large and girthy while mine is like a shrimp?
3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.3573

>>3563
Yet I still can't find a fucking hot azn cutie.
>>

 No.3591

>>3563
That's just online. At best Asian women are ambivalent to black men. If anything Asian women have the worst white fever and care for little else.
>>

 No.3592

is that Hillary?
>>

 No.3600

File: 1694346894781.jpg ( 536.83 KB , 1536x2048 , C10FE97D-2487-4DED-A640-9A….jpg )

>>3573
Have you tried the Philippines?

>>3591
I think you misread. I said BWC, not BBC.
>>

 No.4076

File: 1697305321591.jpeg ( 89.47 KB , 512x513 , download (10).jpeg )

tfw chad's cock is literally thicker than my arm


File: 1697134610804.jpg ( 68.96 KB , 750x1094 , 20231013_011335.jpg )

 No.4049[Reply]

Women:
>Fall hopelessly in love with men in prison for life for murder
>Also have the right to vote


File: 1697091326574.jpg ( 76.26 KB , 1280x720 , 1701120545.jpg )

 No.4045[Reply]

i was gonna rope but then an internet stranger told me "don't do it"


File: 1696562017065.png ( 37.09 KB , 354x353 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.4015[Reply]

Does one differentiate between one's personal attitude and adopting a scientific attitude about women?
>>

 No.4017

Simple OP
>kys
>>

 No.4018

Yes, but since science supports everything incels say there's not much need to.
>>

 No.4019

>>4018
Not much hope for runts


File: 1696095794914.png ( 1.42 MB , 900x680 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.3874[Reply]

Does anyone else like watching old war movies because they have no women in them?

Picrel is my favorite and the best example of this:
-3 hour+ runtime and not a single female character with a speaking role.
-The only women in the movie are a handful of arab civilian background extras wearing burkas.
-T. E. Lawrence IRL was a celibate who disliked women and the movie stays true to this by not forcing a romance arc or making him gay.

Overall kino film which I highly recommend. Please share more examples of female-free cinema ITT.
21 posts and 17 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.3991

>>3874
i watched the catalina collection on youtube for the meme factor, since its on utube it has all the gay sex edited out.
>>

 No.3992

File: 1696433993484.jpeg ( 65.4 KB , 1024x479 , flowers.jpeg )

>>3984
>>3987
>>3990
don't forget to buy your flowers betabux
>>

 No.3997

>>3992
u have to impregnate them and leave them with the child to truly be a alpha
>>

 No.3998

File: 1696438235976.webm ( 5.4 MB , 720x1280 , no.webm )

>>3997
Chad doesn't have to do anything. He simply needs to exist.
>>

 No.4507

File: 1702083339960.png ( 501 KB , 1000x1450 , f481841c444d69221ca470b815….png )

>>3892
feminazis, being one of the dirtiest (& frighteningly efficient in their socially collaborative efforts) get the bullet the moment shit's getting blazin'. It is so unbelievable to witness how there's an international sex-racist vocal movement consisted of fucks who propagandize the pricelessness of one kind of humans, & violently portraying themselves as the most progressive ones (churchill moment) while conveniently forgetting about any problems that ail all the other unworthy untermenschen who do not have genitalia in the form of a cunt.
It's plain, & economically racist too, lmao. Shitty uyghurs Uneducated afroamericans get shafted by them time after time, & don't even try to guess what feminazionistas think of proles with pussy characteristics & their problems.

they are so fucking audacious that they claim some marxists as feminists, LMAO. I still remember how one cunt @ some local ML organisation started a witchhunt against me when I pointed this faschizoidic hipocrisy of theirs about Klara Zetkin out. There's not even any place for a question about what side did the other cummie marxtardic normalfucks take in that situation.


File: 1696218954593.jpeg ( 10.62 KB , 201x251 , images (5).jpeg )

 No.3935[Reply]

Are women's mate preferences responsible for the perpetuation of capitalism

According David Buss and most evolutionary psychologists, the most notable distinction between the biological sexes are mate preferences. Whereas males are more likely to choose mates based on physical appearance (signs of youth, health, and beauty), women are more likely to choose a partner based on relative resource acquisition ability. This desire by women for men who can acquire the most stuff leads to intense competition for status and acclaim by men, which is often channeled into competing within (and thus tacit support for) capitalism. Especially when men can't simply forcibly take young attractive women like in the old days, they basically have to become multi millionaires to secure a steady stream of young women. Most attractive women, for their part, won't tolerate for long a guy who substitutes fighting the system for getting ahead within it.

Thus, we have to ask the question, to what degree are women's preferences and unfettered ability to pursue them responsible for the perpetuation of late stage capitalism?

As a correlated question, since this mate preference distinction applies to biological sexes, should we reject the normative position of ciswomen as 'real women' and instead insist that, politically speaking, transwomen are the only women who serve any use to the anti-capitalist revolution. That is, we ought to not simp for biological females and only associate, on a political and romantic level, with transwomen?

Thoughts?
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.3971

>Thus, we have to ask the question, to what degree are women's preferences and unfettered ability to pursue them responsible for the perpetuation of late stage capitalism?

OP what concretely do you think happens for that to be the case? Wouldn't that mean that men "do capitalism" because women want them to or reward them for doing so?
>>

 No.3972

>>3942
For sure socialism would be better for women. They wouldn't have to be whores. And men could compete for mates based on more meritable traits other than richest daddy.
>>

 No.3973

>>3972
What makes you think women want that. Revealed preference states otherwise
>>

 No.3974

>>3972
>And men could compete for mates based on more meritable traits other than richest daddy.
yeah, compete based on bones lol

This is a major problem for communist theory. And I'm not joking.
>>

 No.4506

>>3935
>evilutionary psychos
👉🧱.
Eternal end of history fags' existence is a crime against the universe.
>so women or trans-women
Any person who have an aspiration for pursuing actual knowledge of this world gets our support, whatever body these consciousness-carrying eyes-infused neurojellies found themselves in. This is why we end all discrimination which is based on appearance.


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 ]
| Catalog | Home