[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1693590623252.jpg ( 58.07 KB , 931x706 , f19dc1dd1e527d1c44640252e4….jpg )

 No.3464[Reply]

Are fictional women still based (as in positive opinion) if they are based off of real life women?

If we assume real life women existed before imaginary women did, then don't traces of real life women exist within the concepts of fictional women? Thoughts?
34 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11963

>>11961
Just the same way you don’t like women being fat and ugly
>>

 No.11964

>>11961
It’s fiction and I don’t like how they disregard beauty for male characters always maxing out aesthetic points for female characters.
I know you don’t really care and just wanna yank my chain but how would you like it if 2d fetishization always had women being fat or tattooed up?
>>

 No.11965

>>3649
What if that’s not true? What if said male character was a chad but not the typical kind of chad?
>>

 No.11966

>>3647
Wrong. Even in fiction,”pathetic losers” have some stats going for them. In fact, “pathetic loser” is a vague term.
>>

 No.12014

>>11964
I don't care about fat women unless they carry that weight well. I only care about me, myself, and I.


File: 1715526974011.jpg ( 48.69 KB , 520x600 , Lipo-in-Colombia-Dr.-David….jpg )

 No.6175[Reply]

is lip surgery worth it?
24 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10973

>>10961
>ngmi/not gonna make it
<triggered?
>problem?
<u mad?
>epic trolled
<owned/pwned
We live in a loop.
>>

 No.11042

>>10960
Did he actually have sex with a minor?
>>

 No.11043

>>

 No.11978

Why's so much stuff fake? Makeup, BBL, roids/juicing, Ozempic, etc..
>>

 No.12011

Nothing is really worth doing.


 No.7528[Reply]

betabux male feminist training general
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7537

>>

 No.7614

File: 1728340733400.jpg ( 60.12 KB , 1024x683 , depositphotos_109542570-st….jpg )

just go on dating apps bro, there's plenty fish in the sea
>>

 No.9223

bump for Newgene
>>

 No.9227

File: 1759462184606.jpeg ( 60.45 KB , 735x881 , Lee x neji.jpeg )

Bromance for life
>>

 No.12008

File: 1786458259602.jpg ( 73.37 KB , 800x533 , dramatic-portrait-attracti….jpg )

What's the matter? You not willing to give this a chance?


File: 1693822695687.png ( 201.93 KB , 900x930 , 84-841225_porky-capitalist….png )

 No.3492[Reply]

We need to create bourgeois culture. How about we shame commoners and call them involuntary poors or inpoors? Let me know what you think, fellow Persons of Wealth.
4 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.3501

This is actually brilliant.
>>

 No.4570

Americas Founding Fathers did that already
>>

 No.4578

We could also call them class cucks.
>>

 No.11802

>>4578
This is the way
>>

 No.12002

Anybody else a wealthy NEET? My struggles and hardships are exactly the same as poor NEETS.


File: 1779981489719-0.jpg ( 153.46 KB , 818x620 , 3amtlw.jpg )

File: 1779981489719-1.jpg ( 180.66 KB , 1080x1080 , leftists vs incels.jpg )

File: 1779981489719-2.png ( 399.76 KB , 1180x2076 , A Comprehensive Guide to L….png )

File: 1779981489719-3.png ( 101.1 KB , 1180x416 , DarkStarDowns' LDAR Guide.png )

 No.10858[Reply]

Laying Down And Rotting thread (LDAR)

Discuss doing nothing… Or don't post at all.
8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11294

none of you seem to get it
there is no movement and there is no left and there is no theory
all of it is LDAR in disguise and even pure LDAR itself is ultimately cope at its core
all just ways to override the fundamental anxiety that the future has been erased and history has ended
and we will continue to be trapped in this mourning for a lost future until a genuine utopian impulse is recovered from the failures of the past
>>

 No.11609

it's over…
>>

 No.11788

>>11287
>At least read theory.
Lol he doesn't know that it's over. NGMI
>>

 No.11990

Anybody else get bored?
>>

 No.11997

File: 1786436539500.jpg ( 29.02 KB , 485x534 , 51faaf02fffe1d18e1b9ff6fa6….jpg )

>no reply in a few minutes


File: 1750535122176-0.jpg ( 143.39 KB , 712x978 , state-issued girlfriends.jpg )

File: 1750535122177-1.png ( 292.31 KB , 816x846 , 67ggpbiuk1591.png )

File: 1750535122177-3.jpg ( 194.89 KB , 1080x977 , State issued rule_-_4eFJA0….jpg )

File: 1750535122177-4.jpg ( 405.84 KB , 2048x1534 , 2021-11-09_mulch_tv_145792….jpg )

 No.8759[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

State-issued girlfriend program thread


Alternate titles for this program/policy/initiative/plan:
state-assigned
state-issued
state-mandated
state-appointed
state-ordered
state-mediated
state-arranged

government-assigned
government-issued
government-mandated
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
127 posts and 23 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11919

File: 1786257018448.png ( 387.49 KB , 408x743 , SAGP_ statematch_sedated.png )

>>9214
>>8809
Open to requests; I enjoy pushing propaganda.
>>

 No.11926

>>11919
is this sites active?
>>

 No.11956

>>11926
LOL, looks like the propaganda's doing its job.
>>

 No.11972

>>11926
It will be once the commies take over
>>

 No.11988

>>11917
I'll take this one. I don't like thicc girls. They blow up like balloons once they're married.


File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
73 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11954

>>11952
More often or not, it’s the man that cheats.
Dead bedrooms are often due to decaying libido and stress of adult life.
Men will be married to the most beautiful intelligent docile of women, have the most intelligent beautiful obedient of children, and these family men will still feel bored. They still will feel they’re “missing out”. They still go out seeking new thrills.

I mean seriously, not everything is about sex.
>>

 No.11968

>>11908
>Women want you at exactly the time they've run out of options.
>It's because they've changed anon! They really want you now, no this won't blow up in your face in seven years when her contempt for you has reached a boiling point, honest!
OMG STFU you white knight.
>>

 No.11971

>>11908
People often change “for the better” when they don’t have any prospects anymore
>>

 No.11986

>>11954
>it’s the man that cheats
[citation needed]
>>

 No.11987

>>11908
If you believe that shit I have a bridge to sell you.


File: 1782689407746.jpeg ( 111.29 KB , 1200x1200 , IMG_6452.jpeg )

 No.11329[Reply]

I have looked through some posts about incels here. How do you even come up with such ideas? Does the world really looks like this to you? All hostile and greedy evil women who want to manage sex market? They don't give us sex so they shut our mouths?

How many layers of irony I'm losing here? Is it what not having sex does to a man?

I would be happy to listen your thoughts on this.
32 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11561

>>11556

Feminist liberal cucks consider sex for women as something worse than death for men
>>

 No.11562

>>11370
>Celibacy is a choice, not a sexual orientation

It's neither of those. If it was a choice, incels wouldn't be complaining about not having sex.
>>

 No.11565

>>11562
Funny how incels get told "just turn gay bro" by libcucks when these same fucking cunts say that being gay isn't a choice.
>>

 No.11566

>>11565
I'm legit gaycel anon.
>>

 No.11980

broken homes and abusive parents can really mess up people.


 No.7428[Reply]

A thread for all of your politically incorrect whining and complaining that wouldn't be allowed in leftypol-ORG or left-wing/progressive organizations irl.
32 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11960

>>11950

> Cosmetic surgery


It might be a solution for a one incel, but it's not a systematic solution. In South Korea lots of men do it, but there's still huge amount of incels there. It's like, let's say, everyone would get 200k salary a year. Would everyone become rich then? No, because the standards for being rich would just rise up, as well as prices for everything. Same with mass look-maxing. Women would still choose a small percentage of men.

> selective service for sex work


So prostitution? How do you imagine a socialist/communist society with prostitution? It's nonsense. But nevertheless, even it would be ethically appropriate in a socialist state, let's do some math. I hope you meant state-sponsored prostitution for incels? Because otherwise it just makes no sense.

First of all, the majority of men are incels. Sex is required once a day. Let's suppose that a state-sponsored prostitute can "work" with 5 men a day. So, we have 50% of population (men) * 50% incels / 5 = 5% of total population or 10% of female population are required as prostitutes. Also we must exclude non-adolescent girls and old women. If we take, let's say, 14-30yo females, that's less that 20% of female population, so we multiply 10% by 5, which gives up 50% of 14-30yo females who are required to be such state-sponsored prostitutes. It will be impossible to voluntarily hire a half of young females to be prostitutes, especially in a socialist society when women have guaranteed job, free medicine, education etc.

So this idea is mathematically impossible. And that's not even saying that those men who would get sex only from state prostitutes, will not feel themselves well about it, as they will compare themselves to other men, who get sex for free. And this will lead to yet another wave of social envy and hate from incels to other men. That's why I state that there must be equal distribution of sex between men. State-sponsored prostitution doesn't provide it.

> You’re forgetting about personal choice. And that not all men are gonna be up to par in hygiene, looks, manners, talent for female preference

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11967

>>11960
> It might be a solution for a one incel, but it's not a systematic solution. In South Korea lots of men do it, but there's still huge amount of incels there. It's like, let's say, everyone would get 200k salary a year. Would everyone become rich then? No, because the standards for being rich would just rise up, as well as prices for everything. Same with mass look-maxing. Women would still choose a small percentage of men.

You sure? I think cosmetic surgery would do wonders to increase mens chances of getting laid. Women as well. You’re also mistaking looksmaxxing for wealthmaxxing.

>Agree, all ideas like teenagers don't need or don't want sex must be abolished.


I find it peculiar that our culture permits and even encourages bullying because it “toughens up people “. This same culture even says “cringe phases are necessary for adolescence otherwise you become a horrible person”. But they draw the line at romantic/sexual experiences.

> So prostitution? How do you imagine a socialist/communist society with prostitution? It's nonsense. But nevertheless, even it would be ethically appropriate in a socialist state, let's do some math. I hope you meant state-sponsored prostitution for incels? Because otherwise it just makes no sense.


>First of all, the majority of men are incels. Sex is required once a day. Let's suppose that a state-sponsored prostitute can "work" with 5 men a day. So, we have 50% of population (men) * 50% incels / 5 = 5% of total population or 10% of female population are required as prostitutes.


I think you mean to say the majority of incels are men.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11969

>>11967

> You sure? I think cosmetic surgery would do wonders to increase mens chances of getting laid. Women as well. You’re also mistaking looksmaxxing for wealthmaxxing.


If everyone is rich, no one is rich, if everyone is handsome, no one is handsome, I mean that. By the way, good looking is not the only female filter that men have to pass. There are others, and in case of mass looks-maxing, they will play the decisive role.

> I find it peculiar that our culture permits and even encourages bullying because it “toughens up people “. This same culture even says “cringe phases are necessary for adolescence otherwise you become a horrible person”. But they draw the line at romantic/sexual experiences.


The elites don't want people to have sex, and especially young people. It's insane how there are already discussions that the age of consent should be 21, while the age of military draft is 18.

> I think you mean to say the majority of incels are men.


No, I said it correctly. Majority of men are incels, and all or almost all incels are men.

> thirties and early forties aren’t old.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11970

>>11969
>If everyone is rich, no one is rich, if everyone is handsome, no one is handsome, I mean that.

Now this is bullshit. This logic is what sore losers say. I’d rather have a society where the average person is handsome and sexy.
It may not result in excessive sex overnight, because libido isn’t infinite, but it will make life a lot easier in the dating realm.

>By the way, good looking is not the only female filter that men have to pass. There are others, and in case of mass looks-maxing, they will play the decisive role.


Of course looks aren’t the factor. There’s wit and talents.

>Who would want to be a volcel if he can fuck any young beautiful female for free? Highly unlikely. About women - it's a question of current women mentality. If we allow them to be volcels now, when they hate incels and do not want to have sex with them, there will be no difference with the current situation. Incels will remain incels. If women would become different, understand that every man needs sex and give it voluntarily, there will be no need to point them out to this.



Women want men to paneled them but women don’t get that all the time. Feminists want society to have men act as butlers for every non-essential whim of women. Your proposition is like that but for men. It’s coercive.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11974

>>11970

> I’d rather have a society where the average person is handsome and sexy


Who minds that? I'm just saying that it won't enough by itself to provide sex to all men, if we don't change the system.

> Your proposition is like that but for men. It’s coercive.


Why? If women understand the importance of sex and provide it voluntarily to men, there is no coercion.

> There’s people who have sex without all the sentiments that come with it.


Maybe. But does that mean that other don't need them?

> Friendships are more sincere than sexual intimacy in the hear of the moment.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1700584286950.jpg ( 95.47 KB , 761x1024 , nopussy.jpg )

 No.4391[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

474 posts and 309 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11813

https://www.independentliving.org/docs5/sterilization.html
Eradication of "deviants": the dark side of the Swedish Model." | Independent Living Institute

The world was shocked by the recent news of a skeleton in Sweden’s closet, the country’s forced sterilization policy of disabled people and others who were not found to be worthy to have children. The facts are clear, there is no reason to question the authencity of the sterilization records. Sources other than Dagens Nyheter, the nation’s largest daily newspaper that recently started the sterilization discussion, as well as researchers are confirming the facts. Also, Sweden is famous for its comprehensive statistics. Thus, all sterilizations records and "patient" journals are archived and available to researcchers and journalists. Persons who were sterilized against their will have come out of their silence and appeared in the media. The sterilizations were fully legal according to the laws of the time. There were well-developed and state-regulated routines with medical experts at the local and national level, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, with a panel of highly placed representatives of political parties (mainly female Social Democrats including an ambassador to the United Nations) who signed the decisions that would deprive tens of thousands of persons of one of the most basic human rights, the right to have children.



https://muse.jhu.edu/book/40871
Project MUSE - Eugenics and the Welfare State
https://www.euronews.com/2023/06/08/how-did-sweden-sterilise-up-to-30000-people-against-their-will-in-the-cause-of-eugenics
Why did Sweden sterilise up to 30,000 people against their will in the cause of eugenics? | Euronews

Sweden set up a eugenics plan, grounded in the science of racial biology, between 1934 and 1976. “They wanted to get rid of a certain type of people: The weaker ones”.

Kjell Sundstedt’s family had never talked about the darkest moment in their history.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11816

File: 1785962554553.jpg ( 118.92 KB , 950x1199 , c83f0845-e242-44b9-ab83-c7….jpg )

>>

 No.11831

File: 1785975262135.mp4 ( 5.48 MB , 576x1024 , 97e77f72567259d38618ec5ace….mp4 )

>>

 No.11849

File: 1786113317458.jpg ( 46.98 KB , 467x765 , d600255b-5a06-416d-959f-98….jpg )

>>

 No.11959

File: 1786335644927.png ( 337.98 KB , 566x782 , 170060219.png )



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home