>>13992>My anecdotes are proof. If you don't want to believe them that's fine. But you're not even presenting that, you're just making sweeping statements about how dating works then folding your arms with smug self satisfaction because your assertions align with the dominant liberal consensus. >Not just mere words but photos and names?I could but I'm not going to. I'm not going to dox my friends like that. I take it you've never attended a major state university, or even one at all. Go outside and see for yourself, observe how attractive women behave and get back to me.
So you wanna act like a bitch toward me accusing me of bias yet you refuse to provide evidence to back up your claims?
>>13994>You must be a kid because you dare to disagree with meAnon, being over eighteen doesn't make you mature by virtue of age.
Your rebuttal is just showing how much of a failed adult you are.
"My anecdotes are true and I don't have to explain myself to you" is not the language of mature adults.
You're just hiding behind a computer screen on an anonymous forum where nine out of ten threads always preach about "chads always women from betas"
Your petty episodes are especially telling.
>Calling you wrong and stating why is not a strawman. Try to separate your feelings from your arguments.Anon, you're the one making rebuttals. You're accusing women of being willfully mean to "subpar men", classifying people as "chads" and "incels".
That doesn't sound like separating facts from feelings.
If anything, that sounds like hijacking facts with feelings.
>What makes you say that? I'm a passport bro, I don't have any trouble dating, I just don't date in the US.You know that lookism in dating isn't exclusively an American thing. And you proudly self-proclaim as a passport bro based on this rationale.
Tell me more about how "factually correct" you are.