[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1698622873576.jpg ( 107.24 KB , 1080x1350 , 1698611404875127.jpg )

 No.4183[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Should women be drafted?
102 posts and 26 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11693

File: 1785637874555-0.mp4 ( 1.82 MB , 580x476 , good point 1.mp4 )

File: 1785637874555-1.mp4 ( 40.08 MB , 1080x1080 , good point 2.mp4 )

>>11659
good point
>>

 No.11694

File: 1785646018702-0.png ( 216.71 KB , 892x2319 , number_of_US_military_casu….png )

File: 1785646018702-1.jpg ( 104.25 KB , 792x813 , IMG_20260801_102953_826.jpg )

File: 1785646018702-2.webm ( 614.54 KB , 960x1706 , 1772728910657142.webm )

>>

 No.11696

All anons on here saying there’s no need for female soldiers are delusional simps
>>

 No.11701

File: 1785670620895.png ( 3.06 MB , 2876x1522 , rape.png )

>>11696
??????
>>

 No.11846



File: 1780776475998.png ( 264.96 KB , 600x439 , how your gf looks at you w….png )

 No.11104[Reply]

Thoughts on 'refusing to block your rapist' discourse going on right now?

Btw X is actually alive unlike this dead fucking site
9 posts and 12 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11749

>>11746
>incels don't rape because they can't powertrip
>True or noth?

Not, of course. Incel only means that a man needs sex, but cannot get it for some period of time. He may become a rapist, and may not. Just like a poor person. May become a thief and may not.
>>

 No.11750

I don't date any woman that's been raped. It's a red flag. Their fucked up head space will destroy the relationship, ask me how I know.
>>

 No.11771

>a rapist has more social clout than you
It's over…
>>

 No.11772

>>11771
It's because he reminds her of her father.
>>

 No.11843

>>11749
What about the saying that rape is not about sex, but about power?


File: 1714908611391-0.jpg ( 116.09 KB , 800x2000 , love-1.jpg )

File: 1714908611391-1.png ( 41.35 KB , 350x876 , lvrkjhthuou91.png )

File: 1714908611391-2.jpg ( 221.41 KB , 1928x1243 , 654ab33f33a0dbd731846116_l….jpg )

File: 1714908611391-3.jpg ( 46.54 KB , 750x458 , EzauAy1X0AA5iiz.jpg )

 No.5961[Reply]

Love vs Limerence

Do you recognize yourself in these graphs? Discuss.
21 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10914

How is love not simply reduced to material things such as your income and status and looks, thus making limerence the superior option?
>>

 No.11082

i can't stop thinking about her
>>

 No.11836

I don't know wha romantic love is, so I turn to limerence. It is what it is.
>>

 No.11837

>>5961
who else be in a constant state of limerence
>>

 No.11842

>>11837
I do, I follow a celebrity and save her pictures and short videos. I listen to her music and I read fanfics about her with self-inserts as wish fulfillment fantasy.


File: 1766880991220.jpg ( 213.66 KB , 3500x2322 , 7.jpg )

 No.9730[Reply]

Is it because they're the least fat, least smelly and most feminine looking ethnicity of women? Is the fat in western society really is the problem?
>>

 No.9741

>>9730
Did you just discover that korean girls are cute af? Welcome to the party.

Also I reject that they're objectively the best, see >>>/b/159381
>>

 No.9746

Are East Asians, especially South Koreans, morphing into White people? Sexual selection and preferences for the lightest skin tones mean that they are becoming almost as White as Europeans. There is also high preference for wider eyes with double lids, high nose bridges, blonde and brunette hair, and less-flat faces.

With sexual selection and upcoming genetic modification, will East Asians become the new Whites as we go extinct?
>>

 No.11832

I kinda think east Asian women are unattractive. Now central east Asian women like from Uzbekistan are hot!


File: 1746734067915.jpg ( 46.09 KB , 398x577 , if she hit me it's for my ….jpg )

 No.8412[Reply]

Would you date an abusive female?
11 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11825

any even remotely attractive white woman in the usa is abusive. don't ask me why, but it's likely because they have 4 billion options and once they decide to move on its like throwing away a candy wrapper for them, the don't see men like human beings anymore
>>

 No.11826

>>11825
>random white women hate
Lol found you https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/2108700.html
>>

 No.11827

>>11826
why would a nazi be casually posting here.

also that's a super gross forum
>>

 No.11829

>>11827
Because some autistic no-lifer with an unhealthy manner of spending their convenient amount of free time, has an agenda and specifically wants to push white women hate.
>>

 No.11830

>>11826
i said i don't date attractive white women

not that i love azns

cut off the lolcow stuff it's not even productive unless they have some kind of power or influence


File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
53 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11782

>>11778
>I thought you are a specialist at homosexuality

You’re the one acting like a sexuality expert in general.

All the paragraphs you posted on here reeks of persecution complex

>Of course it's not. Just accidentally the percentage of people who identify themselves as LGBT raised from 5 something percent to 20-30 something percent for a few decades. No promotions, no propaganda, no prides, no faggots in cinema, no cancel culture for those who dislike all this crap. If you are not a bot, which I doubt very much, you REALLY stupid.


I really think you’re schizo or something. Have you considered that less reported being gay in the past due to the culture being less accepting back then?

If you’re not a bot you must be really stupid.

Also cancel culture is mainly an indignatory response used by contrarian figures for being told that their ploy isn’t cool.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11783

>>11778
>So what's the point of this?

Non penetrative sex has become more popular
>>

 No.11798

>>11782

> Have you considered that less reported being gay in the past due to the culture being less accepting back then?


Yes, I have. And I've also considered another fact - that sex and getting a young wife were much more available back then. So we have the first option - men in the past desperately wanted to fuck other men in the ass, but couldn't do it due to the culture or law reasons and the real percentage of gay was roughly the same as now. And the second option - today sex and relationship with young women are so unavailable for men and the gay propaganda is so ruthless, that some of men give up and start to date other men, which leads to higher gay percentage. The principle of Okkam's razor states that you should choose the more likely option between two. Which is clearly the second one.

> You know that incels are lower number than you realize?


I know that you have no clue about the statistics and this makes your question senseless. You didn't even know about the U.S. survey and asked me for the link that there are 63% of incels among young men in the U.S., lol.

> The number of reported incels has increased a lot in the past two decades In tandem to reactionary politics. Totally just a coincidence huh?


No coincidence of course. The politics of cancelling sex which is being executed with huge help of feminists, is an important part of the reactionary politics you are talking about. And it's the ruling class of capitalists who is doing this and benefits from it. So when you're defending feminism and talking bullshit against incels, you are helping them.

> Secondly, it’s wrong to flirt with women at work unless they’re okay with it.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11814

>>11798
> C-U-C-K-O-L-D

I guess not being an obnoxious horndog means I’m a cuck. Women aren’t gonna like flirting unless you’re suave and gorgeous

> Yes, why not?


I mean ALL kinds of women, not merely the young slender docile beauties. That means it includes the grannies and boisterous butch ones as well.

>No, sex is needed no matter leads it to a birth or not. And not only with your wife, actually the more females you fuck the better for you.


Then why do you call homosexuality a mental illness? If heterosexual intercourse shouldn’t have to be procreation, there is no moral mandate for anal sex to be pathologized.

>Yes, I have. And I've also considered another fact - that sex and getting a young wife were much more available back then. So we have the first option - men in the past desperately wanted to fuck other men in the ass, but couldn't do it due to the culture or law reasons and the real percentage of gay was roughly the same as now. And the second option - today sex and relationship with young women are so unavailable for men and the gay propaganda is so ruthless, that some of men give up and start to date other men, which leads to higher gay percentage. The principle of Okkam's razor states that you should choose the more likely option between two. Which is clearly the second one.


Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11821

>>11814

> Women aren’t gonna like flirting unless you’re suave and gorgeous


In you previous posts you denied that women want chads. Now you are confirming that they don't like flirting with a man who is not a chad (suave and gorgeous). You are so bad at debating that you don't even remember what you have said, lol.

> I guess not being an obnoxious horndog means I’m a cuck.


You care more about what women like than what about men need. That's why you are a cuck.

> I mean ALL kinds of women, not merely the young slender docile beauties. That means it includes the grannies and boisterous butch ones as well.


I don't get erection to grannies, lol. But still don't mind their right to flirt with me, if it's required to get sex with the young ones.

> Then why do you call homosexuality a mental illness? If heterosexual intercourse shouldn’t have to be procreation, there is no moral mandate for anal sex to be pathologized.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1775938701898.jpeg ( 48.97 KB , 640x480 , images.jpeg )

 No.10358[Reply]

Post eugenic and or genetic stories here.
73 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11781

>>11779
Why is it bad to have less kids?
>>

 No.11786

>>11781
The real reason: it hurts capitalism.
The reason they say is it's because pension systems will collapse.
>>

 No.11805

Eli Lilly is treating nearly 10% of US obesity population with GLP-1s: CFO
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/eli-lilly-treating-nearly-10-150223508.html
>>

 No.11810

https://www.independentliving.org/docs5/sterilization.html
Eradication of "deviants": the dark side of the Swedish Model." | Independent Living Institute

The world was shocked by the recent news of a skeleton in Sweden’s closet, the country’s forced sterilization policy of disabled people and others who were not found to be worthy to have children. The facts are clear, there is no reason to question the authencity of the sterilization records. Sources other than Dagens Nyheter, the nation’s largest daily newspaper that recently started the sterilization discussion, as well as researchers are confirming the facts. Also, Sweden is famous for its comprehensive statistics. Thus, all sterilizations records and "patient" journals are archived and available to researcchers and journalists. Persons who were sterilized against their will have come out of their silence and appeared in the media. The sterilizations were fully legal according to the laws of the time. There were well-developed and state-regulated routines with medical experts at the local and national level, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, with a panel of highly placed representatives of political parties (mainly female Social Democrats including an ambassador to the United Nations) who signed the decisions that would deprive tens of thousands of persons of one of the most basic human rights, the right to have children.



https://muse.jhu.edu/book/40871
Project MUSE - Eugenics and the Welfare State
https://www.euronews.com/2023/06/08/how-did-sweden-sterilise-up-to-30000-people-against-their-will-in-the-cause-of-eugenics
Why did Sweden sterilise up to 30,000 people against their will in the cause of eugenics? | Euronews

Sweden set up a eugenics plan, grounded in the science of racial biology, between 1934 and 1976. “They wanted to get rid of a certain type of people: The weaker ones”.

Kjell Sundstedt’s family had never talked about the darkest moment in their history.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11812

>>11810
Wow, Sweden's eugenics program ran all the way until 1976!?


File: 1688537424106.jpg ( 103.8 KB , 1239x293 , DJ Akademiks details his c….jpg )

 No.2897[Reply]

>normalize dating sex workers
49 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11806

Would you a doctor? Depends on her personality, right? So why is it not the same for dating sex workers?
>>

 No.11807

why would we normalize this?
>>

 No.11808

>>11807
Because sex workers are human too.

And see:
>>3634
>>

 No.11809

>>11808
Haha now not dating someone is dehumanizing?! You sound like a goddamn incel. What is even happening to women?
>>

 No.11811

>>3634
These are the same women who will complain about men consuming porn while in a relationship


File: 1710603807032-0.jpg ( 229.8 KB , 1459x785 , imaginary gf waifu It work….jpg )

File: 1710603807032-1.jpg ( 107.72 KB , 716x472 , live meticulously crafted ….jpg )

File: 1710603807032-2.png ( 130.92 KB , 2034x310 , lit gf imaginary delusion ….png )

File: 1710603807032-3.jpg ( 119.02 KB , 690x727 , lonely just talk to myself.jpg )

File: 1710603807032-4.jpg ( 93.33 KB , 909x481 , Me on the left.jpg )

 No.5239[Reply]

Post and discuss using your imagination/delusion/fantasy.
43 posts and 32 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.10727

>>10516
Why are there no true communist countries nowadays then?
>>

 No.10857

>be unproductive
<just imagine myself being productive
>>

 No.10886

File: 1780085642327.jpg ( 16.12 KB , 636x151 , Fanfiction is better censo….jpg )

>>

 No.10890

>>

 No.11804

>☀️ ⛱️ 🌊 Intimate & Relaxing Eye Gazing on the Beach

using this video for imagination fantasy


File: 1693822695687.png ( 201.93 KB , 900x930 , 84-841225_porky-capitalist….png )

 No.3492[Reply]

We need to create bourgeois culture. How about we shame commoners and call them involuntary poors or inpoors? Let me know what you think, fellow Persons of Wealth.
3 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.3497

>tfw i have to go board meeting or else my dad'll fire me
>tfw golfing in the hot sun to nail this business deal
inpoors don't know how much struggle comes with being a person of means
>>

 No.3501

This is actually brilliant.
>>

 No.4570

Americas Founding Fathers did that already
>>

 No.4578

We could also call them class cucks.
>>

 No.11802

>>4578
This is the way


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home