[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Password (For file deletion.)


IRC Chat




| Catalog | Home

File: 1679026141039.mp4 ( 25.9 MB , 1066x1080 , TIHI-11t2n9j.mp4 )


Why are millennials and especially zoomers so obsessed with gender?
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.


What do you mean?


People tend to focus on that which they don't have.

It's also part and parcel of the immense faggotry of modern youth generations. In there mad dash to 'normalize' and 'destigmatize' everything, they've turned themselves to lechers of the spoken word and prudes of the deed. Never before has sex been to out in the open and accepted. Meanwhile, never before has a generation been so chaste and unable to perform the most basic function of life.

It's pathetic and one of the reasons why millennials should be stripped of all rights. They're simply not qualified to be trusted to act like functioning adults.


We don't know how much of that was actually organic, or how much is it an artifact of communicative capitalism branding people according to marketing categories.


Gender bullshit and identity politics is actually what we are left with when our political leaders have nothing to give us. It's really a form of pseudo-politics since it's not a serious struggle for political power.
1. Capitalist postmodernity erodes traditional cultural sensibilities
2. New and/or previously suppressed behaviors emerge while social structures collapse
3. The servants of capital attempt to manage this while capital forces market forces upon the social void
Identity politics is a term that refers to a constellation of such management regimes. Every mainstream party in most of the world makes use of some form of identity politics.
For example, the more that civil society break down, the more that we see the violent reassertion of racial, national, and sexual identity. Gender is just another one of these.
This creates a paradox where what seems like the critical destruction of gender norms is also an affirmation of gender, in the form of a bajillion new genders and so on.
TL;DR: millenials and zoomers are living in an aggressively "marketed" gender gold rush


because the cia is gay

File: 1660334174129.jpg ( 22.98 KB , 640x360 , 726328916291.jpg )


>revolutionary defeatism with incel characteristics
It's happening bros
39 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.




bump and also get rid of the faggot e-celeb spam


File: 1679606843139.png ( 402.29 KB , 1180x2087 , A Comprehensive Guide to L….png )

This got posted on .org earlier today. I didn't know there was an entire movement around being a sexless bum tbh


These people should be put into a gulag. Let them rot while doing labor


So the Haz-thot is just the same stalinism. Good to know, I guess.


File: 1675899577676.png ( 1.06 MB , 899x899 , 1675712250463509.png )

 No.1502[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

I don't even think it should be illegal for any moral reason, or, because I think it is degenerate. I think it is bullshit women get to get by only on their looks and their pussies. They should get a job like the rest of us.
130 posts and 19 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


<Nah bro. Capitalism evolved after Marx.

Lenin summarized this development in 'Imperialism, the highest stage of capitalism.'

Since then, it hasn't evolved at all.

Hence, that's the final word on political economy.


The gambling industry isn't selling a commodity faggot wtf are you dumb?
That's the whole point. It's called fictional capital or in modern economics: Speculation. Everything Marx said is still applicable today and you aren't witty or edgy for thinking otherwise.


>Everything Marx said is applicable today, except a huge chunk of the modern economy doesn't fit into his description of capitalism as a system based on the production of commodities
Makes sense


>Gambling is a huge chunk of the modern economy.
You have to go back.


He does gambling not 'fit' into what he said? Lmao.

File: 1678851869846.jpg ( 82.56 KB , 859x813 , IMG_20230314_204321.jpg )


It sure seems like it.


Keep the incel posting in the containment thread, faggot


This is an incel board cock monger.

File: 1669569813170.jpg ( 252.79 KB , 1908x1146 , Balenciaga.jpg )


I would like to know what you think about the Balenciaga case. In my opinion, I think that all these brands conspire to send subliminal messages and unfortunately, they ha

ve been doing this for several years but we have not noticed it because we do not pay attention to the details.

Now, just imagine, if this is the case with Balenciaga and Adidas, do you think there are more brands in other markets that do this kind of thing?

I would like to know opinions and/or thoughts, as this is a topic that is very recent and is of international interest.
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.


> is this probably overblown?
> is this some bourgie pedos winking at each other?
Nah. Prob just an intern trying to mess with anyone that tried to look into it for the lolz
> will I defend a megacorpo for this shit?


Who's defending Balenciaga?


>what do u think?
I think "what an ugly little goblin"

I hate kids.




Spiteful mutants have an intuitive hate for children because deep down they know that they themselves are defunct and could only produce more defunct people. It's an evolutionary adaption that helps inhibit harmful mutations from being rapidly proliferated.

File: 1678402898202.png ( 445.87 KB , 640x960 , 1678313388627340.png )


Is the friendzone really just a social construct. Is it really a simp's fault or do women have some sort of responsibility to let men they know are courting them that they're not interested?
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


>then why shouldn't men fight against that?
Even if we assume that what women are attractive to is somehow objectively wrong, there isn't really a unified collective of men capable of mounting some united effort to change things, especially in the context of contemporary western society [the very notion of divine moral objectivity has been replaced with post modern values faggotry.]

>Like suppose that women find it attractive for men to always be subservient to their bosses. In that context, being a socialist don't think it's unreasonable for men to be upset about it.

This is such on unreal claim (women attracted to subservient men) that is doesn't even warrant a response.

>Generally speaking I think what women find attractive in men and vice versa is partially shaped by bourgeois values but also by the necessities of life and to some extent biology, so it's more often than not plastic to whatever social situation they're in.

Women are generally attracted to 3 things: status, preselection, and genetic fitness/superiority. Those three things are conditioned by society (i.e., what is given status or how genetic fitness presents itself is conditioned according to social context), but the underlying basis for female attraction remains constant. Women don't recognize the underlying thing that they are attracted to. It doesn't register for them. Instead, they tend to register the emotions of fun and security. Hence, they believe that they are attracted to guys they have fun and feel secure with.

>In the perfect ideal world in my head, both sexes would have a shared responsibility to figure out what ought to be to them by engaging the topic together in civil society organizations rather than simply allowing their values to be the result of social conditioning or biology.

You frequently make the mistake of reification. Taking some abstract concept (i.e., the collective of men and the collective of women) and mistakenly assuming it's a real thing that acts in the real world. It's not. People are largely individuals, pursuing individual interests, which in turn are shaped and conditioned by society.

Obviously, society will change over time. But dedicating yourself to changing society is a fool'sPost too long. Click here to view the full text.


In b4 some faggot's gotcha hot take
>This is such on unreal claim (women attracted to subservient men) that is doesn't even warrant a response.
As I said, women are attracted to a few fundamental things (status, pre selection, genetic health/fitness). What they don't particularly care about, aren't aware of, and aren't moistened by is the work and effort that might go into these things.

In fact, it's much more attractive to women when they aren't aware of the work (or subservience) which might go into these things. They want status, pre selection, and fitness that seems to come naturally, as if it's a gift from god, not something which had to be created through discipline and practice.

This is why things like self help, work out pictures posted on social media, or even consciously trying to improve one's social skills and experience with women (i.e., learning game) comes across as cringy. It violates this idealized principal that things should just sort of happen naturally for high quality men.

But, when it comes to women as well, they are acting based on their perception rather than any sort of objective reality. Hence, in many cases, presentation is more important than fact or reality. This can cut both ways. Thus, presenting yourself in the right light is crucial and will help determine which zone you end up in.

<unlike spinning your wheels about muhcommunism online, you are able to test out theories of social interaction with women in real time, gaining direct feedback, and refining your practice into something which has the effective impact you desire. In essence, the art of seduction, relationship management, and virtually anything practical in the real world is more scientific than muhimmortal science of Marxism..


>Even if we assume that what women are attractive to is somehow objectively wrong, there isn't really a unified collective of men capable of mounting some united effort to change things
Yeah that's true, ideally I'd want both men and women tome come together and consciously work this shit out.
>This is such on unreal claim
Don't be autistic just substitute the claim for a more realistic one and address the actual point
>Taking some abstract concept (i.e., the collective of men and the collective of women) and mistakenly assuming it's a real thing that acts in the real world. It's not.
>People are largely individual
I know this, the point is it doesn't have to be this way. What I want is to constitute men and women into a community and develop a form of group consciousness.
>dedicating yourself to changing society is a fool's errand - one which usually makes society worse
Capitalist realism? On MY leftychan?
I can get being skeptical of aocial movements but come on now


File: 1678455260276.jpg ( 68.81 KB , 762x772 , shoulderpain.jpg )

>Is the friendzone really just a social construct.
It depends if you chase after barely socialized women with good looks, nice makeup an flashy attire, than yes. If you go for the plain looking ones with a good brain, then no.

It's a bit like those game character creation screens, you only got so many points and you can't max out all the character traits.


*to let men they know are courting them know that they're not interested?

File: 1677765217362.jpeg ( 180.05 KB , 840x699 , hmm.jpeg )


What's an incel verdict on Sparta?


<Male infanticide was wasteful only of the mother’s nine-month investment. By eliminating unpromising male infants, the community was not obliged to pay the costs of rearing a boy who would not, as Plutarch puts it, be of use to himself or to the state. The decision ostensibly satisfied eugenic considerations. The infant who failed the initial inspection was eliminated before he could produce children who were likely to inherit his undesirable characteristics.

<A question that is often raised is whether at Sparta girls as well as boys,were vulnerable to infanticide. Nowadays few scholars doubt that girls were regularly exposed in Athens.8 The need to furnish a dowry at, or even before, puberty, and the general devaluation of women, were probably among the reasons why a father might choose not to raise a daughter. Was Sparta the antithesis of Athens? Did Sparta expose all boys who did not appear to have the potential for becoming excellent soldiers, but raise all girls — except, one would suspect, those with obvious and debilitating physical abnormalities?9

<We may deduce from Plutarch’s description that at birth girls were simply handed over to the women. This conclusion is ex silentio; on the other hand, it can be argued that Plutarch was unusually scrupulous among Greek authors in remembering to mention women where it was appropriate. It seems that girls were not subjected to official scrutiny as were Spartan boys, nor, apparently, did fathers make a determination about rearing or exposing them, as they did in Athens. The women would test the babies for epilepsy or sickliness by seeing if a bath in undiluted wine would throw them into convulsions. Plutarch does not state whether the immersion ordeal was part of the official evaluation process, nor does he indicate the fate of the infants, presumably both male and female, who failed the wine-immersion test. He does not tell us whether the women took any action in the case of infants who had failed the test, but if they did not, then what was the point? If the decision to expose apparent weaklings was up to the women, they would have exercised a power usually reserved for men in the Greco-Roman world.

<There probably was change over time, with privat
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
44 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.


You roastie feminists are just moving the goalposts. The original pejorative just meant someone that doesn't have sex because that antithetical to women who pretty much universally can have sex with someone at anytime.
Also if it's pathetic to have sex with someone that doesn't desire you, what about all the women who are heartbroken when Chad pumps and dumps them? Are they as pathetic as incels too?


This has been common blackpill knowledge for years. Many incels argue that a white man can never be a true incel, just someone too lazy to improve themselves.
Not sure why you posted this as some kind of clap back. It completely aligns with my beliefs.


>Many incels argue that a white man can never be a true incel, just someone too lazy to improve themselves.
not everyone can afford to move to asia or india to play his white card tho, there is also a language barrier


File: 1677786998981.jpg ( 232.18 KB , 1080x927 , IMG_20230303_015703.jpg )



He thinks the low quality droppings whores offer nowadays is "sex". The joke that is commodification, lol.
The whole thing of whoring is a trap to laugh at those who are not in the club where sex is free and easy. If you're paying money for a pure lie and have the shame and trouble of being a whoremonger on top of it, you're an idiot. Don't pay those bitches a dime. The system will keep them up anyway - if there were no men buying whores, it would be necessary to support them like temple prostitutes, because it's part of the trap we live in. Intel ghouls will never give up prostitution and porn, because it's too useful for their purposes, and that's who proliferates porn as much as it has been. Sane countries know to stamp that shit out rather than let it take over everything.

Ugly truth is that most men are incel, but tell themselves their miserable existence is okay and don't want to be one of those people. No one likes a complainer, after all. There are many strategies for coping with this. The "golden age" where marriage was common was always a lie, and now the lie is being destroyed because it is no longer necessary. They're mandating orgies and artificial insemination and they're very aggressive about pushing it. They do not want us, and they never wanted us. If your only argument for yourself is that no one else will have you, that isn't a really good cause for fucking. Better for everyone to be alone.

Also Sparta got their shit kicked in by anyone who could beat a phalanx. which was eventually everyone. The Spartans were smart enough to know they were going to lose in the long term, but dumbasses like to take the name of the Spartans to justify their faggot versions of it, so they can get young men killed for horseshit. So, they're not a good example.
Bitches have always clamored for war though, and then claim to be the victims. It's all a great game to them, and if they suffer for it, it's just the way of the world and they keep going back to it. Few of them have any sustained principles to stop the war drive, and when they do it is almost always about an economic incentive since war is really fucking expensive. How can they have nice things for me me me if the money is all spent on weapons and paying off generals?
Sparta is not unique in exposing the unwanted children. That has always been the case. That's why abortion is Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

File: 1677097529036.jpg ( 276.02 KB , 2048x1336 , yume.jpg )


In one of his vids Cockshott proposed a tax on childless males because they don't contribute to the reproduction of the labor power of society. There is much wrong with this proposition.

First is an economic argument - the obvious preferred solution should be the corresponding increase in productivity to outset the declining population, and not more surplus extraction out of the subset of the population to stimulate higher birth rates.

Second is a moral argument stemming out of the concept of "justice" - people should not be punished for what they have no control over. To hold that men control the means of reproduction and can voluntary decide when to have kids and when not to is to be ignorant of the evidence to the contrary.
Cockshott brings an example of the Soviet Union right after WW2 when the similar policy was implemented. But he fails to understand the specific conditions at the time - a massive disbalance of the male and female populations and a large number of single mothers. To implement the same policy in the conditions of gender balance is unjustifiable - you don't tax paralyzed cripples for not contributing to the reproduction of labor either, do you? Well, some men are the same even if they can walk.
So if you're still gonna tackle the problem of a declining population with more taxes, then the tax should be levied on the general population as do all other taxes that go to the societal needs, or even a higher income section of the population according to the principle of progressive taxation.
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.


>I think this is about people not having children in order to accumulate capital, and restart an economic cycle that could lead back to capitalism.
By not having children they can't pass on their accumulated capital.


>In one of his vids Cockshott proposed a tax on childless males because they don't contribute to the reproduction of the labor power of society.
Holy shit. Now I want to read this guy
>You don't tax paralyzed cripples for not contributing to the reproduction of labor either
Cels are invalids, confirmed


>Cels are invalids
Yes, sexual invalids.
Incels should get benefits, not be taxed for their disability.

Tax the women who prefer to ride a Chad cock carousel until their eggs shrink - they are the true gatekeepers of the population growth.


Cockshott just took the feminist pill. He doesn't understand that women are no longer a disenfranchised part of the population. They surpass males in higher education degrees and home ownership now.
He should update his theory according to the objective conditions, not keep droning about "muh whomen" like he did when he was still a student.


>By not having children they can't pass on their accumulated capital.
Well they still can have other extended family outside of a household. There are hardcore people who will fully submit to the brutal rationale of capital and task one part of the family to produce heirs while all the rest gets tasked with accumulating capital. These capital "accumulator-men" could theoretically also donate sperm to a cryogenic sperm bank, and have offspring after the family-clan has gained enough capital to become able to extract wealth from society, even if that's after they passed away.

Cockshott lives in the UK where a lot of really old and very ruthless family clans still hold considerable power. He's probably able to analyze those kinds of strategies from real world examples.

At the very least it is worth considering that this kind of stuff could become a stumbling block for socialism. You could try to find another solution if you don't like the one that Cockshott has offered.

File: 1676354044576.jpg ( 72.66 KB , 739x1024 , 1676337694611018m.jpg )


In an unsurprising turn of events, affording women unlimited rights while demanding 0 responsibility (i.e., catering to their demands) hasn't made them happier or improved their well being
Political implications?


File: 1676354466534.png ( 684.65 KB , 877x875 , 1676323097689090.png )



These are high-school students, anon. I wonder what the rate of suicide is for young male teens.

File: 1676408923860-0.png ( 1.48 MB , 1680x1050 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1676408923860-1.png ( 92.32 KB , 460x215 , ClipboardImage.png )


Whatcha doing this val's?
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.


I went the 'be a skittles man' route and got my gf very cheap convenience store candy. She loved it.


>my gf
Why are you here?


dont be like this anon




This isn't r9k the website.

Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 ]
| Catalog | Home