[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1715974221104.png ( 400.15 KB , 800x922 , Gigachad.png )

 No.6412[Reply]

Sorry for the trans people reading this, but what if I identified as GigaChad? Can I then get model tier grills?
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7025

>>7023
Your post is a logical fallacy.
>>

 No.7026

>>6412
Confidence gets you chicks but it helps to be fit and have a good personality too.
>>

 No.11444

Will Chad dysphoria ever be taken seriously?
>>

 No.11451

>>11444
It already is, but it’s defined by a different name
>>

 No.11517

>>11451
What name is that?


File: 1712845428902-0.jpeg ( 200.86 KB , 750x996 , dx2gvhvkgi1c1.jpeg )

File: 1712845428902-1.jpg ( 272.23 KB , 720x1280 , f498343e9589b128f8c8974dfa….jpg )

File: 1712845428902-2.jpg ( 408.77 KB , 1080x1230 , CtV-nW_tn11.jpg )

File: 1712845428902-3.jpg ( 404.06 KB , 1152x2048 , 1427183354667933696.jpg )

File: 1712845428902-4.jpg ( 565.02 KB , 1496x2048 , 1649887196655017985.jpg )

 No.5585[Reply]

Leftcels do participate in self flagellation. And their obsession with relationships and sex?

Leftcel humiliation fetish captions.
Tags: femdom, findom, domination, humiliation, beta, beta male, maybe joi, chastity
44 posts and 67 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11490

You just know a .ogre is behind all these.
>>

 No.11493

>>11490
Even if it were the case, what difference does it make?
>>

 No.11511

File: 1784826608466-0.jpg ( 103.82 KB , 610x900 , denial_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826608466-1.jpg ( 135.8 KB , 1090x799 , no_power_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826608466-2.jpg ( 171 KB , 935x864 , powerless_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826608466-3.jpg ( 227.65 KB , 900x900 , not_entitled_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826608466-4.jpg ( 184.47 KB , 900x800 , nightmare_cel.jpg )

It's over
>>

 No.11512

File: 1784826724127-0.jpg ( 169.94 KB , 900x790 , nightmare_difference_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826724127-1.jpg ( 108.16 KB , 802x648 , blit_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826724127-2.jpg ( 164.89 KB , 750x700 , why_try_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826724127-3.jpg ( 115.48 KB , 650x700 , like_that_cel.jpg )

File: 1784826724127-4.jpg ( 101.33 KB , 650x520 , no_cel.jpg )

>>

 No.11516

File: 1784827740620.jpg ( 175.86 KB , 612x530 , any_women_reject_you_cel.jpg )



File: 1735236122513.png ( 679.1 KB , 750x1000 , image.png )

 No.7864[Reply]

>You are walking on a breaking bridge
>You are stepping into a pothole
>You are buying a rental
>You are drinking expired milk
>You are stepping on a rusty nail
>You are eating melted ice cream
>You are reusing an old tampon

For much of human history and in many cultures, the institution of marriage was a transfer of a man's daughter to his age-peer in exchange for a dowry. The daughter was treated as little better than livestock. She was expected to bear children for a man her father's age. A young man did not have sex with a woman his age unless she was a prostitute. He instead worked at agriculture, artisanship, or war until he was middle aged and owned his own homestead, at which point he would pay a dowry to his age peer in exchange for his daughter, to bed, and produce children.

Since this kind of age gap between men and women was normalized until industrial times, it is not uncommon for young men to lust after young women, but to find that the young woman is already with an older man, who has money. "hggmaxxing" is the late capitalist inversion of this. Women have been politically free under liberal capitalism for the first time in history. Not truly free from class society and exploitation, but free to become exploiters and members of the ruling class, and to accumulate property in their own names. Men have been downwardly mobile, have lost their monopolies on warfare, on education, on politics, and are now, for the first time, seeking older women with property for stability. To become an objectified himbo boy toy for some old "hag" is the inversion of the way women were treated for most of history.

Those ITT who object on the grounds that it is a "psy op" are missing that it is a natural byproduct of class society at this stage of development.

Those ITT who object on the grounds that older women are "disgusting used goods" etc. etc. are going to feel rather frustrated when they find this rhetoric turned against old men as well eventually. Promiscuous men will no longer be regarded "players" sticking their "key" in as many "locks" as possible, but as serial sexual harassers, and lecherous old syphilitic creeps.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
8 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7904

>>7899
Disgusting. Not for his age preference but the way he said it.

>>7896
Theyre not really wrong though.

>>7892
Youre wrong about the twenties and thirties.
Women only start to "rot" by thirty five to forty.
>>

 No.7905

>>7900
wrong.
Zoomers pickrd up the same faux pas as ther Millennial elders but with a few differences.
>>

 No.7930

This OP is semi true.
While it's true that age gap relationships were common, most were ten to fifteen years at best.

And it's actually was more common for young men to marry their female age-peers that weren't prostitutes.
>>

 No.11501

>>7864
>For much of human history and in many cultures, the institution of marriage was a transfer of a man's daughter to his age-peer in exchange for a dowry. The daughter was treated as little better than livestock. She was expected to bear children for a man her father's age. A young man did not have sex with a woman his age unless she was a prostitute. He instead worked at agriculture, artisanship, or war until he was middle aged and owned his own homestead, at which point he would pay a dowry to his age peer in exchange for his daughter, to bed, and produce children

If this age gap marriage you mention was true, then most of humanity would’ve suffered a lot of developmental disorders

Sperm from older men are less genetically viable.
Especially with their lifestyle of drinking and smoking, any babies born to men over forty are more likely to have premature health problems.

Young women were given to men fifteens years their senior at the max.

In fact, that’s why we had arranged marriages for same age peers.

Also, if men couldn’t have a wife until middle age, how was he gonna find a peer with an already pre existing daughter?
>>

 No.11502

>>7864
>thats been my experiences with the 40 crowd compared to the 20 crowd. the 40 crowd has a list of expectations you have to meet for her and the 20 year old is content with some weed and a large pizza and drinks and a shitty horror movie. I dont date often as im fairly bitter and jaded in my 40yrs but yeah my experiences with older females have been far more demanding of me than a 22yr old looking to get high and watch a cheesey 80s horror movie in her underwear

Those young women that are agreeing to date you are gauging you. They’re looking to see if you’re a good catch. If you’re not it, they will drop you like a hot potato

Young women only go for older men who they feel are loaded.
If you’re a loser incel with no money, no hobbies, etc they’re not gonna even spit in your direction


 No.9520[Reply]

In reality, it’s not because all women unanimously refuse to touch them. Rather, it’s actually because incels universally have an absolutely ridiculous idea of the perfect woman that they think that they’re entitled to. They won’t settle for any woman who isn’t a blonde-haired, blue-eyed supermodel with extremely bigoted far-right political views, porcelain white skin, at least 6 feet tall, at least DD cup breasts, under the age of 18, no tattoos, no piercings, no makeup, no vaccinations, no male friends, has never even kissed another man before, and has absolutely no thoughts of her own that don’t involve being a perfectly obsequious slave to her husband’s every single whim and desire. Well, guess what, neckbeards? You will never find such a woman, because such a woman does not even exist - and, even if she did, you can rest that she would absolutely never go anywhere near you. Incels don’t want to work for anything in their lives and are violently angry that they can’t get a ridiculously perfect underage girl who will clean their shitted underwear and blow them while they play Overwatch 2.
>>

 No.9521

Who asked?
>>

 No.11487

Most incels aren’t perfectionists like that and they don’t want underage females.

Also what’s so bad about not wanting women/men with tattoos?


Incels are more diverse in their physiognomic preferences than you think

Also, “incel” as a term has been hijacked to mean sex-haters suffering from a dry spell


File: 1781012089530.jpg ( 54.38 KB , 746x435 , i want her so bad i need t….jpg )

 No.11163[Reply]

>I want her so bad
<I need to become the best version of myself first

Which one should take priority? What is your take on this conundrum dilemma?
1 post and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11324

Tbh, bettering yourself for female attention sounds very dreadful.

It means that you have no resolve or value for yourself
>>

 No.11327

File: 1782682689106.jpeg ( 37.4 KB , 736x504 , IMG_6448.jpeg )

>>11324

do it for yourself then. become who you want to be
>>

 No.11382

"Bettering yourself" just means getting older, because chicks like older guys. Chances are that you will peak physically and mentally in your mid 20's but because you still don't come off as mature enough you won't get laid till your 30s.
>>

 No.11410

>>11382
Not exactly true. Women like older guys because of the assumption of career and stability.
There’s a lot of guys who still aren’t any better in their thirties or forties than they were before then

Age numbers are overused virtue points especially nowadays in an era where people waste their prime years stuck in unskilled labor and college loan debt.

But ok, if what you say is true, why then are the guys who were virgins in their teens and twenties are still virgins in their thirties nowadays?

Women don’t care about how old you are but rather how rich and talented you are.
>>

 No.11413

>>11382
Then what about for women? Is it the same?


File: 1783074013834-0.jpg ( 126.12 KB , 462x729 , white_nat_turned_leftist_h….jpg )

File: 1783074013834-1.jpg ( 334.63 KB , 932x740 , fascist_turned_anti_capita….jpg )

File: 1783074013834-2.jpg ( 280.58 KB , 994x855 , not_sexual_person_humiliat….jpg )

File: 1783074013835-3.jpg ( 98.86 KB , 421x515 , vote_blue_humiliation.jpg )

 No.11373[Reply]

'Fascist turned leftist' humiliation caption porn.


File: 1691706232185.webm ( 1.26 MB , 360x640 , 1691596764415078.webm )

 No.3149[Reply]

Submit your nominations.
I'll start, I present to you:
FUNK-CEL
6 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4865

>>3152
I like to dance. I'm taking break dancing classes right now.
>>

 No.4867

File: 1706980110287.png ( 107.94 KB , 267x360 , Portrait_Enver_Hoxha.png )

>>

 No.9853

File: 1767657324943.mp4 ( 3.48 MB , 576x1024 , cd7347af29e4d56dad12b55ff3….mp4 )

Peggy Weegy for board Queen
>>

 No.9854

>>9853
>Peggy Weggy
>>

 No.11318

Meet MK Ultra-tan


 No.8033[Reply]

2: Raphael!

1: What can I do?

2: Go and jerk off.

1: So it's hopeless?

2: Of course it is.
It always was.
From the start.
You'll never be
a girl's erotic dream.
Get used to it.
It's not for you.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.8034

File: 1740782918311.jpg ( 15.39 KB , 200x200 , Taxi-Driver-3_cropped.jpg )

>>

 No.8545

its over
>>

 No.10198

Brutal scene…
>>

 No.11051

This scene destroyed me…
>>

 No.11310

bump


File: 1693211893246.jpg ( 82.99 KB , 781x1000 , 84485126.jpg )

 No.3351[Reply]

why is she so perfect?
45 posts and 37 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.7320

>>6888 (myself)
Anybody know what happened to the CPUSA's momentum since then?
>>

 No.7321

>>7320
Massive FBI infiltration and then taming into Democrat Party lapdogs.
>>

 No.9529

File: 1765912919828.png ( 59.51 KB , 266x272 , Screenshot 2024-04-26 at 1….png )

Would you date the girl who impersonated a Romanov?
>>

 No.10078

File: 1770417586118.jpg ( 49.67 KB , 824x355 , live_twitch_001.jpg )

This shit gonna make me act up
>>

 No.11306

Plus-Size Dating Reality: The Truth Kendra G’s Guest Had To Explain To Her


File: 1781992586219.png ( 1.73 MB , 846x1074 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.11264[Reply]

Why did Marxists choose to side with the young women over young men considering young women are more privileged in society today?
7 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11291

>>11283
>illicit or informal work
>unless it's informal gig workers who I don't personally disregard
This is the problem with trying to define classes based on how you personally feel about them instead of by their relationship with capital. Lumpenproles aren't all in a gang, but do all work irregular, informal, illicit, or taboo work - usually with very low or unreliable pay. Hence the "reserve army of labor" label.
>>

 No.11300

>>11291
But it's not based on how I personally feel, it's based in how they make money.
'Informal Work' has pretty much been subsumed by capitalist enterprises. And there weren't giant pools of illegal immigrants in Marx's time like there are now, they just relied on old fashioned colonialism for free labor or original capital.
Some of Marxism is just outdated. Like the fact that Marx thought of money as a commodity, which fiat currency isn't, but was when there was the gold standard during his time.
>>

 No.11303

>>11300
>But it's not based on how I personally feel, it's based in how they make money.
Then your excluding certain groups based on things other than how they make money is based on how you feel.
>'Informal Work' has pretty much been subsumed by capitalist enterprises.
An increasingly large swathe of first world workers are deliberately lumpenized, yes.
>And there weren't giant pools of illegal immigrants in Marx's time like there are now,
He literally alluded to Bohemians in his original description of lumpenproles lol. The only reason that there weren't large swathes of "illegal immigrants" in the US, specifically, at that time is that the US didn't require any documentation for legal entry until the 20th century. There were massive waves of migration from Europe (Ireland is especially notable, also Germany and Italy) for which no identification or registration was required, and there were also large waves of immigrant laborers from China, which led to the Chinese (specifically) eventually being refused entry and citizenship entirely based on race/nationality, so technically the Chinese (and the Chinese alone) did kind of become the prototypical "illegal immigrants" before "illegal immigration" was properly codified as a more general concept.
>>

 No.11305

>>11303
>Then your excluding certain groups based on things other than how they make money is based on how you feel.
No, it's based on how THEY make money, aka their relationship to the means of production.
>An increasingly large swathe of first world workers are deliberately lumpenized, yes.
No, their status as simply employees is just obfuscated for political and legal reasons. If you have a boss that tells you when, how and at what wage you work, you're a prole or employee. Even libs recognize this and have been trying to change the rules governing gig workers
https://nysba.org/reimagining-workers-rights-in-the-gig-economy-bridging-the-gap-between-independent-contractors-and-employees/
>He literally alluded to Bohemians in his original description of lumpenproles lol.
I'm talking about modern workers now, the type of 'informal work' doesn't exist in modern times. There are no 'ragpickers'. At best I could think of someone like a scalper falling into this 'informal work' category, but they're a negligible part of the work force.
>The only reason that there weren't large swathes of "illegal immigrants" in the US, specifically, at that time is that the US didn't require any documentation for legal entry until the 20th century. There were massive waves of migration from Europe (Ireland is especially notable, also Germany and Italy) for which no identification or registration was required, and there were also large waves of immigrant laborers from China, which led to the Chinese (specifically) eventually being refused entry and citizenship entirely based on race/nationality, so technically the Chinese (and the Chinese alone) did kind of become the prototypical "illegal immigrants" before "illegal immigration" was properly codified as a more general concept.
OMG, the 1800's immigration wave from Europe were not lumpen. They were settler brought on to complete the American settler-colonialist project aka 'Manifest Destiny' and their legal status as settlers (read: white) was established as far back as 1691 after Bacon's rebellion. It's just a honky sePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11307

>>11305
>settlers
here we go again…


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home