[–]▶ No.3935[Reply]>>4506
Are women's mate preferences responsible for the perpetuation of capitalism
According David Buss and most evolutionary psychologists, the most notable distinction between the biological sexes are mate preferences. Whereas males are more likely to choose mates based on physical appearance (signs of youth, health, and beauty), women are more likely to choose a partner based on relative resource acquisition ability. This desire by women for men who can acquire the most stuff leads to intense competition for status and acclaim by men, which is often channeled into competing within (and thus tacit support for) capitalism. Especially when men can't simply forcibly take young attractive women like in the old days, they basically have to become multi millionaires to secure a steady stream of young women. Most attractive women, for their part, won't tolerate for long a guy who substitutes fighting the system for getting ahead within it.
Thus, we have to ask the question, to what degree are women's preferences and unfettered ability to pursue them responsible for the perpetuation of late stage capitalism?
As a correlated question, since this mate preference distinction applies to biological sexes, should we reject the normative position of ciswomen as 'real women' and instead insist that, politically speaking, transwomen are the only women who serve any use to the anti-capitalist revolution. That is, we ought to not simp for biological females and only associate, on a political and romantic level, with transwomen?
Thoughts?
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click to expand. >>
▶ No.3971
>Thus, we have to ask the question, to what degree are women's preferences and unfettered ability to pursue them responsible for the perpetuation of late stage capitalism?
OP what concretely do you think happens for that to be the case? Wouldn't that mean that men "do capitalism" because women want them to or reward them for doing so?
>>
▶ No.3972>>3973>>3974
>>3942For sure socialism would be better for women. They wouldn't have to be whores. And men could compete for mates based on more meritable traits other than richest daddy.
>>
▶ No.3973
>>3972What makes you think women want that. Revealed preference states otherwise
>>
▶ No.3974
>>3972>And men could compete for mates based on more meritable traits other than richest daddy.yeah, compete based on bones lol
This is a major problem for communist theory. And I'm not joking.
>>
▶ No.4506
>>3935>evilutionary psychos👉🧱.
Eternal end of history fags' existence is a crime against the universe.
>so women or trans-womenAny person who have an aspiration for pursuing actual knowledge of this world gets our support, whatever body these consciousness-carrying eyes-infused neurojellies found themselves in. This is why we end all discrimination which is based on appearance.