[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1693590623252.jpg ( 58.07 KB , 931x706 , f19dc1dd1e527d1c44640252e4….jpg )

 No.3464[Reply]

Are fictional women still based (as in positive opinion) if they are based off of real life women?

If we assume real life women existed before imaginary women did, then don't traces of real life women exist within the concepts of fictional women? Thoughts?
34 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11963

>>11961
Just the same way you don’t like women being fat and ugly
>>

 No.11964

>>11961
It’s fiction and I don’t like how they disregard beauty for male characters always maxing out aesthetic points for female characters.
I know you don’t really care and just wanna yank my chain but how would you like it if 2d fetishization always had women being fat or tattooed up?
>>

 No.11965

>>3649
What if that’s not true? What if said male character was a chad but not the typical kind of chad?
>>

 No.11966

>>3647
Wrong. Even in fiction,”pathetic losers” have some stats going for them. In fact, “pathetic loser” is a vague term.
>>

 No.12014

>>11964
I don't care about fat women unless they carry that weight well. I only care about me, myself, and I.


File: 1779981489719-0.jpg ( 153.46 KB , 818x620 , 3amtlw.jpg )

File: 1779981489719-1.jpg ( 180.66 KB , 1080x1080 , leftists vs incels.jpg )

File: 1779981489719-2.png ( 399.76 KB , 1180x2076 , A Comprehensive Guide to L….png )

File: 1779981489719-3.png ( 101.1 KB , 1180x416 , DarkStarDowns' LDAR Guide.png )

 No.10858[Reply]

Laying Down And Rotting thread (LDAR)

Discuss doing nothing… Or don't post at all.
8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11294

none of you seem to get it
there is no movement and there is no left and there is no theory
all of it is LDAR in disguise and even pure LDAR itself is ultimately cope at its core
all just ways to override the fundamental anxiety that the future has been erased and history has ended
and we will continue to be trapped in this mourning for a lost future until a genuine utopian impulse is recovered from the failures of the past
>>

 No.11609

it's over…
>>

 No.11788

>>11287
>At least read theory.
Lol he doesn't know that it's over. NGMI
>>

 No.11990

Anybody else get bored?
>>

 No.11997

File: 1786436539500.jpg ( 29.02 KB , 485x534 , 51faaf02fffe1d18e1b9ff6fa6….jpg )

>no reply in a few minutes


File: 1752904618347.jpg ( 198.15 KB , 1175x1763 , Bodies_Bodies_Bodies_poste….jpg )

 No.8908[Reply]

Should a woman's body count not matter to man? Why do so many women insist it shouldn't matter? Are men just insecure as women claim? Or do men have a legitimate reason to worry about marrying women that has a slutty past?
Women who have had more partners do tend to have higher divorce rates. Should it even matter what the reason men have for avoiding promiscuous women if it's their life, or do men have some kind of obligation or social contract to push aside their reservations? If so do women have any obligations to men.
What is a high body count to you. For me, anymore than 20 would be a red flag.
73 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11954

>>11952
More often or not, it’s the man that cheats.
Dead bedrooms are often due to decaying libido and stress of adult life.
Men will be married to the most beautiful intelligent docile of women, have the most intelligent beautiful obedient of children, and these family men will still feel bored. They still will feel they’re “missing out”. They still go out seeking new thrills.

I mean seriously, not everything is about sex.
>>

 No.11968

>>11908
>Women want you at exactly the time they've run out of options.
>It's because they've changed anon! They really want you now, no this won't blow up in your face in seven years when her contempt for you has reached a boiling point, honest!
OMG STFU you white knight.
>>

 No.11971

>>11908
People often change “for the better” when they don’t have any prospects anymore
>>

 No.11986

>>11954
>it’s the man that cheats
[citation needed]
>>

 No.11987

>>11908
If you believe that shit I have a bridge to sell you.


File: 1782689407746.jpeg ( 111.29 KB , 1200x1200 , IMG_6452.jpeg )

 No.11329[Reply]

I have looked through some posts about incels here. How do you even come up with such ideas? Does the world really looks like this to you? All hostile and greedy evil women who want to manage sex market? They don't give us sex so they shut our mouths?

How many layers of irony I'm losing here? Is it what not having sex does to a man?

I would be happy to listen your thoughts on this.
32 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11561

>>11556

Feminist liberal cucks consider sex for women as something worse than death for men
>>

 No.11562

>>11370
>Celibacy is a choice, not a sexual orientation

It's neither of those. If it was a choice, incels wouldn't be complaining about not having sex.
>>

 No.11565

>>11562
Funny how incels get told "just turn gay bro" by libcucks when these same fucking cunts say that being gay isn't a choice.
>>

 No.11566

>>11565
I'm legit gaycel anon.
>>

 No.11980

broken homes and abusive parents can really mess up people.


 No.7428[Reply]

A thread for all of your politically incorrect whining and complaining that wouldn't be allowed in leftypol-ORG or left-wing/progressive organizations irl.
32 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11960

>>11950

> Cosmetic surgery


It might be a solution for a one incel, but it's not a systematic solution. In South Korea lots of men do it, but there's still huge amount of incels there. It's like, let's say, everyone would get 200k salary a year. Would everyone become rich then? No, because the standards for being rich would just rise up, as well as prices for everything. Same with mass look-maxing. Women would still choose a small percentage of men.

> selective service for sex work


So prostitution? How do you imagine a socialist/communist society with prostitution? It's nonsense. But nevertheless, even it would be ethically appropriate in a socialist state, let's do some math. I hope you meant state-sponsored prostitution for incels? Because otherwise it just makes no sense.

First of all, the majority of men are incels. Sex is required once a day. Let's suppose that a state-sponsored prostitute can "work" with 5 men a day. So, we have 50% of population (men) * 50% incels / 5 = 5% of total population or 10% of female population are required as prostitutes. Also we must exclude non-adolescent girls and old women. If we take, let's say, 14-30yo females, that's less that 20% of female population, so we multiply 10% by 5, which gives up 50% of 14-30yo females who are required to be such state-sponsored prostitutes. It will be impossible to voluntarily hire a half of young females to be prostitutes, especially in a socialist society when women have guaranteed job, free medicine, education etc.

So this idea is mathematically impossible. And that's not even saying that those men who would get sex only from state prostitutes, will not feel themselves well about it, as they will compare themselves to other men, who get sex for free. And this will lead to yet another wave of social envy and hate from incels to other men. That's why I state that there must be equal distribution of sex between men. State-sponsored prostitution doesn't provide it.

> You’re forgetting about personal choice. And that not all men are gonna be up to par in hygiene, looks, manners, talent for female preference

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11967

>>11960
> It might be a solution for a one incel, but it's not a systematic solution. In South Korea lots of men do it, but there's still huge amount of incels there. It's like, let's say, everyone would get 200k salary a year. Would everyone become rich then? No, because the standards for being rich would just rise up, as well as prices for everything. Same with mass look-maxing. Women would still choose a small percentage of men.

You sure? I think cosmetic surgery would do wonders to increase mens chances of getting laid. Women as well. You’re also mistaking looksmaxxing for wealthmaxxing.

>Agree, all ideas like teenagers don't need or don't want sex must be abolished.


I find it peculiar that our culture permits and even encourages bullying because it “toughens up people “. This same culture even says “cringe phases are necessary for adolescence otherwise you become a horrible person”. But they draw the line at romantic/sexual experiences.

> So prostitution? How do you imagine a socialist/communist society with prostitution? It's nonsense. But nevertheless, even it would be ethically appropriate in a socialist state, let's do some math. I hope you meant state-sponsored prostitution for incels? Because otherwise it just makes no sense.


>First of all, the majority of men are incels. Sex is required once a day. Let's suppose that a state-sponsored prostitute can "work" with 5 men a day. So, we have 50% of population (men) * 50% incels / 5 = 5% of total population or 10% of female population are required as prostitutes.


I think you mean to say the majority of incels are men.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11969

>>11967

> You sure? I think cosmetic surgery would do wonders to increase mens chances of getting laid. Women as well. You’re also mistaking looksmaxxing for wealthmaxxing.


If everyone is rich, no one is rich, if everyone is handsome, no one is handsome, I mean that. By the way, good looking is not the only female filter that men have to pass. There are others, and in case of mass looks-maxing, they will play the decisive role.

> I find it peculiar that our culture permits and even encourages bullying because it “toughens up people “. This same culture even says “cringe phases are necessary for adolescence otherwise you become a horrible person”. But they draw the line at romantic/sexual experiences.


The elites don't want people to have sex, and especially young people. It's insane how there are already discussions that the age of consent should be 21, while the age of military draft is 18.

> I think you mean to say the majority of incels are men.


No, I said it correctly. Majority of men are incels, and all or almost all incels are men.

> thirties and early forties aren’t old.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11970

>>11969
>If everyone is rich, no one is rich, if everyone is handsome, no one is handsome, I mean that.

Now this is bullshit. This logic is what sore losers say. I’d rather have a society where the average person is handsome and sexy.
It may not result in excessive sex overnight, because libido isn’t infinite, but it will make life a lot easier in the dating realm.

>By the way, good looking is not the only female filter that men have to pass. There are others, and in case of mass looks-maxing, they will play the decisive role.


Of course looks aren’t the factor. There’s wit and talents.

>Who would want to be a volcel if he can fuck any young beautiful female for free? Highly unlikely. About women - it's a question of current women mentality. If we allow them to be volcels now, when they hate incels and do not want to have sex with them, there will be no difference with the current situation. Incels will remain incels. If women would become different, understand that every man needs sex and give it voluntarily, there will be no need to point them out to this.



Women want men to paneled them but women don’t get that all the time. Feminists want society to have men act as butlers for every non-essential whim of women. Your proposition is like that but for men. It’s coercive.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11974

>>11970

> I’d rather have a society where the average person is handsome and sexy


Who minds that? I'm just saying that it won't enough by itself to provide sex to all men, if we don't change the system.

> Your proposition is like that but for men. It’s coercive.


Why? If women understand the importance of sex and provide it voluntarily to men, there is no coercion.

> There’s people who have sex without all the sentiments that come with it.


Maybe. But does that mean that other don't need them?

> Friendships are more sincere than sexual intimacy in the hear of the moment.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.


File: 1658609814628.jpg ( 125.2 KB , 1526x531 , heartbeat.jpg )

 No.451[Reply]

Feminism has failed to defend one of it's core tenants, the right to abortions. This shows what leftcels and some non-spooked Marxists have always said about feminism, that it is the ideology of the bourgeois. Feminists had 50 years since the Roe vs Wade ruling to codify the right to abortions into law but were unwilling to pay the political price for such self-assertion and passed on the burden to future feminists year after year until we come to now, where Republicans are now on the cusp of passing an official federal abortion ban with the "heartbeat bill".
During these 50 years feminists were far more interested in chasing idealists ghosts like male gaze which lead to cultural wars over pornography, prostitution, and even silly things like bikini clad female characters in videogames.
More destructive was their successful passage of female supremacist laws that made men guilty until proven innocent of any sexual assault allegations with cancel culture or of domestic violence accusations because of the Duluth model. Made men personal debt serfs to their children's mother via brutal child support laws. They also tirelessly attacked their masculinity and very being with the weaponization of the LGBT rights movement which frames all men and masculinity as wrong and harmful to women and society and upholds androgyny and male homosexuality as the only "safe" way a male can be a sexual being. And finally made males forfeit half their property and future with no-fault-divorce even, as the name implies, when they've done nothing wrong.
This has gone on to completely destroy gender relations as evidenced by the consistently declining marriage rate, the growing number of sexless men and the explosion of incels in the west.
Which has alienated men from women and their struggles, which is why the groundswell against the end of Roe v Wade has been about as impactful as a wet fart. Men do not care about women, and in fact cannot care about women because feminism has made doing so be to their own determent.
With abortion being banned, there is literally no point in feminism. It is an ideology with nothing to offer materially, and is little different than a religion or Marvel Movie fandom, and this all due to feminists hatred of men.
Feminism now shuffles off into the dustbin of history, whatever ideology replaces it will have to offer liberation for BOTH genders because it will generations before people forget about the damage a female only gendePost too long. Click here to view the full text.
21 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.4544

>>455
>The bourgeois feminists got exactly what they wanted,
Nah the booj feminists definitely wanted abortion access. You can make up conspiracy theories about how they'll be able to get secret abortions regardless but this has becomes a fault time between booj men and women and booj men would love to see women ejected from the ruling class because they can't plan their parenthood.
>>

 No.5122

File: 1709538440477.jpg ( 695.52 KB , 1080x1015 , RDT_20240303_2321056261700….jpg )

Looks like they are going hardcore on toasties that won't make babies. Will women have to actually have kids with men that will raise them now?
>>

 No.5135

test
>>

 No.10653

‘Chaos’ followed ruling on abortion drug access, and providers say more uncertainty lies ahead
https://edition.cnn.com/2026/05/06/health/abortion-providers-mifepristone-chaos-court
>>

 No.11945

File: 1786305850423.mp4 ( 9.15 MB , 576x1024 , 309ea108da24e34e7b91c287aa….mp4 )



File: 1782240612918-0.png ( 62.6 KB , 140x249 , ClipboardImage.png )

File: 1782240612918-1.png ( 2.31 MB , 1440x1800 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.11289[Reply]

>oooh Anon, you were never supposed to figure it out
>you are too smart for your own good
>I rove you
>goodbye!
God I want this
Why cant China just go imperialist already and state-issue CCP certified wives after genociding the beckies and stacies?
>>

 No.11943

File: 1786299285190.png ( 2.29 MB , 1080x1390 , ClipboardImage.png )

crumb bump


 No.11509[Reply]

>Example of Severely-Autistic Behavior

Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jrqpn60d4A

A good looking mentally disabled guy. It's over…
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11644

>>11638
What’s even more discomforting is the fact that physically/cognitively disabled male youths still have the drive for sex and romance
>>

 No.11645

>>11638
>mentally younger

Wtfdtm

Mental disability isn’t having a “younger” mind

Like, a mentally well teen isn’t the same as a mentally disabled adult
>>

 No.11646

>>11638
They’re more okay with mentally disabled women wanting sex/romance
>>

 No.11880

>>11645
>a mentally well teen isn’t the same as a mentally disabled adult
Can you expand on this? I can't wrap my head around it
>>

 No.11882

>>11880
Age numbers aren’t personality traits.

Putting a disabled adult on the same cognitive level as neurotypical teen is insulting if not incorrect.

Kids aren’t “disabled” by default.
“Brain development” is mainly used for sociological context but often mistaken for direct neurophysiology.

Teen behavior is mainly socially conditioned anyway by parents and teachers.

A mentally disabled adult is socially infantilised like teens are which may make it seem like they’re neurocognitvely replicate of a neurotypical teen but they’re not the same

Do you consider traps to be the same as ciswomen?
No, even if their physique and mannerisms APPEAR like women, they aren’t biogenetically women.


File: 1693312356009-0.jpg ( 29.21 KB , 461x664 , ClipboardImage.JPG )

File: 1693312356009-1.jpg ( 42.13 KB , 630x665 , ClipboardImage.JPG )

File: 1693312356009-2.jpg ( 51.29 KB , 571x668 , ClipboardImage.JPG )

File: 1693312356009-3.jpg ( 69.94 KB , 728x668 , ClipboardImage.JPG )

 No.3407[Reply]

how do we stop losing incels to the right?
73 posts and 15 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11823

>how do we stop losing incels to the right?
Stop simping for liberal feminism. I swear to god 99% of "the left" which includes tankies and socialist, just take their takes with regards to gender relations straight from social media.
There's ZERO attempt to reconcile their politics with our continuously improving sociology.
So when men are scolded about the patriarchy whenever they voice any grievances, it never ever squares with anything they're experiences.
As bad as the far right is, they are will to give deference to men, at least initially, something that the average leftist equates to femicide.
>>

 No.11845

>>11823

Based
>>

 No.11854

>>11823
Rightists are just as big simps as “muh left”

Also, “the left” you’re describing is mainly radlibs, not tankies nor socialists
>>

 No.11866

>>11854
Name me a tankie or socialist or any prominence that's said anything pro male that wasn't hedged with "muh patriarchy".
>>

 No.11874

>>11866
Can you show me posts of tankies that are “simps”?


File: 1786027564150.jpg ( 5.19 KB , 140x140 , images.jpg )

 No.11838[Reply]

I don't know about anyone but i cannot stand anyone outside of my own generation, ive literally been going insane at just how ridiculous these people can be with millennials being useless and doing nothing to the boomers ruining everything, i hate you all and i worship the future
8 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.11864

>>11863
You’re kidding, right?
Why do people keep repeating this meme?

Zoomers are no more conservative than millennials are

If anything, millennials are becoming more conservative due to age.

They’re complaining about new memes and new media.

Also, there’s been a lot of right wing sympathy from millennials.
>>

 No.11865

>>11864
I'm talking about politically and socially conservative. I don't care about memes or movies, that's just a matter of taste.
And zoomers are absolutely more conservative. Not as conservative as boomer but way more than millenials. It is so bizarre to watch zoomers that discovered their homosexuality on Tumblr now say pornography and gooning are dangerous or destructive some how. Not to mention how fucking mainstream straight up Nazism is among them now.
>>

 No.11869

>>11865
And again, these are mere stereotypes.
Most zoomers are not politically conservative by majority.
The “neopuritan craze” isn’t a zoomer thing exclusively.

Millennials and Gen X began that.

The SJW craze of equating fictional characters to real life characters? That’s not a right wing thing, that’s a radlib thing.

Also, the alt right was also started by Gen X and millennials

Idk if you remember but 2016 thru 2020, Gen Z was accused of being too progressive/trans-friendly.

And the people saying this were millennials

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.11870

>>11869
>The Nazi sympathizers? Also mainly millennials.
The people that follow Nick Fuentes, Asmongold or Andrew Tate are not millenials.
>>

 No.11871

>>11870
They are.
Do you seriously think the alt right was mainly teens and vicenarians from the beginning?


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home