/R9K/ - Robot - 9000

>>1294
>centrists are chads

That's it.

>>1294
>plurality of incele are left-wing
it's happening bros

99% of the internet is bots, post-ironic trolling, astroturfing or mindless normies.

>>1296
It's always been like that. The idea that incels were right wing was always a liberal cope.

>>1298
All the virtue signal maxxxing to no avail

>>955
Dude isn't even ugly just looksmaxxed it's fucking over

>>957
Dudes a faggy simp and gets treated appropriately

how?where?

>>1197
orbiter alert

>>694
Junko posts here every now and then. Get bee over here fuck it lmao.

>>1197
Tripfag or doe she post anon?

>>1204
Bee posting on /r9k/ would be fucking cursed lmao

>>1203
yeah I know lmao. but whatever I don't let it get to me it's just nice having someone to chat with sometimes and I make myself not take it too seriously.
>>1208
she posts anon, she told me she was gonna stop posting (at least recognisably) cuz people were being annoying to her tho lol

>>694
>she doesn't wear earrings
okay, that's actually hella cute
tho painted nails ruin it

the last femoid being shilled on fagchan I remember was some brit physics scientist femoid or something that was making youtube videos
but that was long time ago

>>1198
they're low-wage blue collar workers

>>1205
lol you don't need to be a Bezos to be a betabux

betabux just means that you get regularly materially exploited in a sexual relationship

do your cousins have a mortgage? other debts?

chad never gets materially exploited in a sexual relationship because women are naturally attracted to him
just like men don't care about material things when it comes to women, so women don't care about material things when it comes to chads

>>1206
>just like men don't care about material things when it comes to women, so women don't care about material things when it comes to chads
and that's what I'd wager is the apple of fbi.gov here and why all betabuxers get so aggressive-defensive at incels

redpillers can't fathom a possibility that women can not care about material things when it comes to mating
obviously because of their material conditions (being a betabux) determining their psychological and ideological state

some of them go as far as to claim that women are actually frigid lol and don't enjoy sex

and bluepillers can't fathom a possibility that women care primarily about material things when it comes to non-chads that they are not sexually attracted to
of course because of their material conditions too

as you can see, marxist materialist framework is really good at explaining these ideological phenomena

>>1207
Simple explanation

Incels are narcissistic fags with low social status and a repulsive victim mindset.

I'm short, broke, spend nothing on women, and can still get laid with attractive females. The problem isn't women or the culture. If you can't get laid, the problem is you.

>>1209
>spend nothing on women
imagine bragging about spending money on women

>>1161
about to watch the burgers get btfo in glorious fashion

>>1163
I didn't even know the US had a fucking soccer team

>>1164
Yeah they're pretty shit but they managed to qualify for the world cup.

>>1163
well fuck.

>>1165
USA USA USA

>>758
>some sleazy grifter in a 5000$ jacket wearing 7000$ watch says "you're a cog in a matrix"
waow!
such revelation

>>759
Jealous?

>>760
🙄

>>758
This is like reading a 2000's livejournal blog.

bump

I'm not sure why they haven't, especially in Japan where their population is crashing. I suspect it's because the booj can move capital so easily internationally now that they really aren't concerned with nationality anymore. Or that to enforce a brutal child support system like the US you need a sprawling police apparatus which isn't possible with states with smaller governments.

Asian women are better partners because their native country governments have banned single mothers, so they date with intention.

In Asian countries women cannot turn men into their personal debt slaves via child support so they are forced to date men that will actually stick around and raise any child they give birth to, so their standards are way way lower because no one is stupid enough to think Chad will raise any of his bastards.

If Asian countries ever adopted the similar child support laws, Asian women would go right back to being as scornful of low status men as Western women are now.

The spectacle of attractive Asian women jumping into relationships with loser Western men lays this misandrist scam bare. Which is why feminists try to make it out to be about racism or Orientalism which it's not.

Slim, young women with clear skin and symmetrical features will always be desired by men.

What's funny is that Asian women are not even particularly feminine. It's just that Western women have gotten drunk off the tremendous power they have over men and long ago stopped trying to take care of their appearance and instead started demanding men find them attractive no matter how sloven they let themselves be. See the "fat acceptance movement" for an example, acceptance that is never extended to men.

The brutal child support and anti-male family court system keeps western women pumping out babies, but at the expense of ugly poor men who lose the chance to have their own children without at least raising one of Chad's children.

Asian countries could boost their population numbers by copying the US and EU misandrist system. I'm not sure why they haven't, especially in Japan where their population is crashing. I suspect it's because the booj can move capital so easily internationally now that they really aren't concerned with their own nations issues anymore. Or that to enforce a brutal child support system like the US you need a sprawling police apparatus which isn't possible with states with smaller governments.

>>666
No one going to comment on my bomb ass thesis.

>>671
Anon there's no need to respond when you have those numbers… but yeah you're correct.
Foids demand abortion rights to "give women a choice" but then support turning men into their serfs with child support payments. The state should cover all costs of raising a child, but in absence of this women should take more things than just looks into account when looking for a partner to have a family with.

bump

WTF bros

This bitch could literally go find any dick to fuck her. Men die alone and clod fuck her feelings.

>he's friendly and handsome
say no more
another case of the so-called """femcel""" thirsting for chad

"waaah! why doesn't chad notice me!!"
because he's a chad, and you're beccy, you stupid bitch

>>51
Capitalism has two factions:

The first faction (that has existed for longer) wants men to buy women as property.
The second faction (that is more recent) wants men to rent women as commodity from a capitalist service provider.

OP strikes me to have aligned with the second faction. And might be trying to manufacture consent by rebranding capitalist development as socialists. This is mildly irritating. Saying this is about monogamy vs polygamy is missing the point, because it lacks class analysis.

Socialist will not pick one of these capitalist factions, they are both very reactionary forces. Commodification of social relations isn't any better. The propertarian faction wants to reduce women to a household appliance and a baby maker for the owner. The commoditarian faction wants to reduce women to a whoring service and surrogate womb provider for the customers. There is no progress here, it's just variation in the method of subjugation. Both methods of subjugation are instruments for the reproduction of class society, and a way for the ruling class to control access to sex and reproduction.

Socialism is going to put the interests of the working class above other interests. If i had to make a guess, a lot of workers, both man and women, will continue to form something similar to traditional families, because that's what they prefer. Other workers will chose to live in different social arrangements. We will try to build appropriate structures regardless. Socialism will have fewer constraining factors because it only needs to reproduce it self at the level of society. The additional hurdles that have to be put in place for reproducing a ruling class will fall away. Without the extra burden of a ruling class social relations will improve somewhat.

>>58
I don't get how you could get that from what I was saying at all considering that several times I explained that its not monogamy that's fucked up bit the expectation that one is owed a monogamous relationship that is fucked up and our society through the inclination of profits drives us to treat eachother (namely women) as commodities where our loves is only valuable to the investments we put into it through our purchases on the market and through mass media that has played a role in sculpting out expectations and enforcing the nuclear family along with the general development of capitalism as a whole.

I don't get how you interpreted what I said as this false dichotomy of "monogamy vs polyamory"." You're missing the point of what I am saying whole still, more or less, getting to the conclusion.


As I said, people should be free to enter into relationships with one another voluntarily and autonomously as they see fit, but, you have to do some level of development on yourself to be able to participate. Or, get a robot wafui.

Bumping

Holy shit those poor desi

>>921
Very bad bob to benus ratio

brittons wtf

>>920
If I was a currycel I would probably just rope tbh