>>12031>well assuming there are hundreds of millions of nodes to compromise the network you would need to compromise hundreds of millions of machinesThere is evidence that pretty much all consumer computers are already back-doored.
You can't brush this off, you would be handing over political-power to what ever organizations are able to exploit the backdoors.
There is no inherent security in having large numbers of computers.
You have to assume that all the computer technology you can't inspect is compromised.
independent vote-verification can't fix vote-manipulation on the massive scale that's possible with computers, the verification process doesn't have enough through-put.
>how you would control this institution You develop all the technology in the open so that everybody can inspect it, we'll be able to make it secure enough that, it'll cost more to break the security than what can be gained from doing so. Additionally we could fund competing security checking organizations.
>look man, in any assembly there is a speaker and a public he is speaking to>the public needs to have control over the speaker, which is done through moderationPost too long. Click here to view the full text.