[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

 No.13588[Reply]

Can we please Have a moment and talk about the current state of anonymization networks, and how to best fix it for any
metadata and leaks? What to tweak to make it more secure

As we all know TOR is glowing, created and funded by them. Maintained and directory nodes being owned by them, and probably
a majority of nodes. I thought I2p would be better so i just got into it. And started reading about its problems, and beef with devs.
Found following posts on some chans, and wanted some other peoples opinion..

So is it all always glowing? cant we have a network actually made by people for people?
——-
https://paste.coalserver.de/?5eb32f413de27fab#6QdH6kVtsR81E4tcXDfDkp13XQbFWNzsFkyqVx9TF9HE
0x0.st/PZOy.txt


also what r the problems with networks like Lokinet, freenet, gnunet and yggradsil? except for the cheese pizza(tbh aint that hosted
by glowies themselves?)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
2 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13591

>>13590
>how the hell have you heard of yggradsil but not freenet or lokinet?
I only looked into one of them seriously… lol idk what you want me to say
>>

 No.13592

>>13590
>i2problem.txt
Probably FUD if the i2p devs haven't replied to this, someone needs to do a bit more than bitch to break security, like idk post code or a trace… I think it's fine man
>>

 No.13594

>>13588

I share your concern about what appears to be a glowing radius of fuckery emitting from Tor (not TOR), especially given the fact that sketchy-as-fuck Micah F (g)L(owi)ee is involved, as a developer. Their dependancy on firefox is also of growing concern… However, there a are a few considerations that give me pause before assuming the worst, for now.

-the US gov is still heavily incentivized to have Tor working as advertised, perhaps moreso than at any other point in the history of the internet. Not just for glowie activities abroad, but for glowie activitites at home, regardless of glow-faction.

-CCP, cuckflare, many other entities who love killing the internet all hate Tor and block it like the fat lying pussies they are

-many posts stigmatizing or spreading FUD about Tor, are cheaply veiled fedposts, seemingly aimed at severely brainrotted normalfags or GenZ, presumably to prevent wider adoption of the network

-if the glowies are sitting on a massive Tor 0day that would permanently rape the entire network for all time, there is a decent chance, that gets better by the day, they would've burnt it by now

-none of the Tor devs have died by conspiracy theory yet, AFAIK

All that said, given gestures at world, an upgraded Tor, or a better alternative, would be most welcome. For now it seems best to use Tor in conjunction with other anonymizing/privacy enhancing protocalls and methods because Anons are living through what will be remembered as the Glowing Era of CIA Faggotry and the Anon who wraps thine brainrotted head thickly with the gay foil of tin is the Anon who shall weather this most retarded shit-storm of depraved and unrelenting fed-fuckery.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.13617

>>13588
Yggdrasil isn't at all private whatsoever. In fact it's not even meant to be private. Plus it needs systemd to run.
Hyphanet has terrible privacy from what I know.
>>

 No.13618

>>13617

Well, thats why you combine yggradsil with I2p and use some sort of proxy before connecting to freenet and setting it on darknet mode


File: 1692585694326.png ( 153.82 KB , 1200x1200 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.12402[Reply]

Hello, I have a seedbox set up and would like to be able to join a private tracker. I am more than willing to seed at least 3x the original file size. It just needs to have everything as a general private tracker. I do plan on using a vpn but i can route a web browser through it as well so it's the same IP. anyone have any solutions?
13 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12427

>>12426

thanks bb. i appreciate it
>>

 No.12500

>>12421
>buy on Bandcamp
For those who can't afford to buy all their music:
yt-dlp worked fine last time I tried it on bandcamp.
You might have to play around with stuff like –sleep-interval, –playlist-random and –limit-rate to avoid temporary b&.
>>

 No.12508

>>12500
Stop bumping dead threads so much, uyghur.
>>

 No.12511

>>12508
>Stop bumping dead threads so much, uyghur.
Why, did bandcamp disappear or something?
>>

 No.13601

He>>12421
do you know how to integrate kali linux with whonix gateway?


File: 1764480564408.jpg ( 20.27 KB , 474x266 , OIP-3071377281.jpg )

 No.13575[Reply]

hello, this is a test, PHP stil alive
>>

 No.13599

>>13575
I think? I don't know. I did just use it for a personal image board project and it works quite nice. again my programing skills are still quite mid but PHP is one of those programing languages that I enjoy using


File: 1770833611555.pdf ( 136.56 KB , 67x118 , CORE CONCEPT Bioelectromag….pdf )

 No.13598[Reply]

So, i got this concept but stuck, how to move this forward, and mainly i am unemployed, i got great ideas which can affect the current surface market, so let me see the outcomes and results i get here.


File: 1768406995939.png ( 1.06 MB , 1483x1080 , operatsiya_y.png )

 No.13583[Reply]

Picture this:

>Armed citizens surround ICE as they're arresting someone

>ICE calls for backup
>Nobody hears them
>They have no choice but to let the person go

I'm assuming they are using off-the-shelf radio equipment.

Is it easy to jam their signal with portable equipment?

How hard/expensive is it to build a DIY radio jammer?

Would it be more effective to have a directional antenna to avoid jamming everything in the area and concentrate on one area, or it doesn't work that way?
>>

 No.13584

>>13583
IIRC someone I knew once got into HAM and they ended up hearing about a gold heist in Brazil
>>

 No.13585

>>13584
That's sick!


File: 1764845524732-0.png ( 125.3 KB , 1915x976 , 1764649385093h.png )

File: 1764845524732-1.png ( 49.53 KB , 1915x968 , 1764650136303s-1.png )

File: 1764845524732-2.png ( 186.78 KB , 1918x975 , 1764651874513f-0.png )

 No.13577[Reply]

I found this abandoned repository https://gitgud.io/parley/Haruko.
It's imageboard software that's not that old but still works. This is what it looked like: https://archive.is/qiLyz.
and I would like your help in updating it. It would be a project for “new” imageboard software made with PHP because, from what I've seen, there aren't many like this left, so I created this repository: https://github.com/bigdustycheese/AobaIB which I will update and you will also help me with.

>>Why should we help you with this? What do I get in return, OP?


It's simply a collaborative fork. If you want to help me, that's fine. No one is forcing you.

(If you see this on other imageboards, it's not spam.)


File: 1670071029951.png ( 12.63 KB , 539x680 , jpegxl-logo.png )

 No.11235[Reply]

So apparently Palemoon became the first browser to officially implemented JPEG XL a week ago. At the same time, Google just dropped it from Chromium despite supporting it behind a flag for months. What the hell is going on here? Is Google that desperate to push their video-codecs-as-image-formats that they're willing to sabotage a massive step forward for the web? JPEG XL is capable of replacing both original JPEG, PNG, and animated GIF/PNG all at once with a single file type that produces superior file sizes for all three categories of use cases. Neither WebP, HEIC, nor AVIF were ever able to make such a broad, sweeping improvement because they are geared more towards features important to video encoding than still images or lossless animation.

It seems like every few weeks these days I find something new to get mad about in the world of web development.
8 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12399

>>12397
>Read digdeeper:
Have you, contrarian edgelord? They still openly admit that Palemoon is the best of a bad situation.
>>

 No.12400

>>12399
>However, it recently went off the deep end so much that I cannot in good conscience call it an "alternative" to anything anymore.
>Now, the stage is clearly advanced, the cancer has metastasized and cannot be removed anymore.
<Can't even install your own addons to block pozz
Curl back into your arsehole, retarded bitch.
>>

 No.12501

File: 1695975036125.png ( 24.27 KB , 791x680 , botnetmaps.png )

>>12399
>Palemoon is the best of a bad situation.
[citation needed]

On the contrary, they recommend Webbrowser aka WereFox.
And the Palemoon website blocks Tor users so fuck them.

FYI you can use Tor Browser without tor:
network.proxy.type 0
network.proxy.socks_remote_dns false
extensions.torlauncher.start_tor false
TOR_SKIP_LAUNCH=1 TOR_TRANSPROXY=1 ./start-tor...

You're welcome.

For some reason those settings change back to default when I restart the browser, it's seriously about fucking time that someone who isn't evil or an idiot creates a web browser.
Or to ditch the concept entirely and create usable P2P software for content and thought sharing.
>>

 No.13574

Looks like Google could no longer resist the pressure and has been forced to bring JXL back to Chrome:

https://www.phoronix.com/news/JPEG-XL-Possible-Chrome-Back

Seems like the major deciding factor was Adobe's recent decision to support JXL in the PDF format.
>>

 No.13576

oh god please no more image formats on browsers. 9 is plenty, and some of these are incredibly complex formats.


File: 1762659935846.png ( 63.83 KB , 635x627 , thorium.png )

 No.13571[Reply]

So it seems that after decades of neglect and sabotage by the cuclear weapons industry, China has successfully built a fully functional molten salt thorium reactor and is preparing to revolutionize global shipping by sticking it in cargo ships.

https://interestingengineering.com/transportation/thorium-powered-nuclear-cargo-ship

They've even appl the supercritical CO2 generator idea that was a nascent engineering concept by Western thorium power advocates. This could have applications even beyond nuclear power generation.
>>

 No.13572

>appl
applied*

When you're too excited to proofread your OP.
>>

 No.13573

What about me? Where's my breakthrough in nuclear power, fully functional molten salt thorium reactor, and supercritical CO2 generator?


File: 1690679948149.png ( 37.4 KB , 828x851 , drmed.png )

 No.12341[Reply]

Google wants to put DRM into the web, and lock everything into their chrome browser and make privacy violations even worse.

I think this is part of bigG's war on addblocking and of course they're a monopoly that wants to be the entire web. But there is more, web-advertising has been sort of dying a slow death for some time now. Not because of addblock but for other reasons. Neo-liberalism/capitalism is making people poor and that's shrinking the economic pie in general. If people see adds they ignore them more often. And there is of course the scheme for generating fake views for add-farming.

The drm googl wants to insert into the web is super terrible, if they can push this through it will destroy the web. There is no hyperbole here, the web will become like one of those locked down alternate versions of the internet from the 80s that failed so hard that barely anybody remembers that they even existed. It's possible that EU regulations against anti-competitive behavior, and monopoly-busting in the US could cock-block google, but it would be better to fight tooth and nail to kill this one in the crib, before it gets anywhere near that point. And then outlaw DRM for violating personal property (if you can't fully control your gadgets you've been expropriated)

If this monstrosity were to happen, it would probably take over 10 years to polish one of those decentralized peer to peer alternative web-protocols to the point where we get something like an open web back.

For more details see

The Linux Experiment
https://invidious.0011.lt/watch?v=Aj2s3DVSlHw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aj2s3DVSlHw

Brodie Robertson
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
7 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.12466

File: 1695370616370.jpeg ( 51.23 KB , 830x553 , stallman.jpeg )

>>12465
>What would you call the hardware shenanigans?
Hardware Restrictions Management? Physical Restrictions Management?

We should really get out ahead of the IP lawyers and come up with a good name that sticks and describes the injustice unambiguously, before they try to invent their own twisted Orwellian terminology to make the practice seem innocuous. Perhaps something that references rent, since these techniques are used to control what someone can do with their own property.
>>

 No.12470

>>12466
>since these techniques are used to control what someone can do with their own property.
Hm, this is kinda difficult to name:
Hardware based property infringement
Hostile hardware environment
Imprisoned hardware
Tainted hardware

>Perhaps something that references rent

This is even harder, perhaps:
Tollbooth hardware

Technically this would stop it from being a full Von-Neumann machine. So maybe it could be called
compute-incomplete hardware
>>

 No.12479

>>12438
It's interesting how the leftist brain works. You associate thing with "bad" people and that somehow makes the thing bad. Hitler was a big fan of consuming water and oxygen by the way, might want to stop consuming those bad things yourself comrade.

>>12464
>Does not exist. You mean "hardware-based restrictions", "locks", "copy protection", etc.
He obviously means hardware that prevents you breaking DRM like secure enclaves and efuses. Taking the most uncharitable interpretation of somebody's words and pretending that's what they really meant is such a slimy tactic.

>>12392
That's a decent video. I think he oversells it abit though, if the firmware is burned into ROM or cryptographically verified before execution then power glitching will not open up a permanent solution to anything.

The other thing to consider is that some middle class NPC who takes out a $100,000 loan to buy a Tesla is not going to risk his warranty to save $1000 on a DRM locked feature. And if the globalist billionaire class get their way then all cars will be $100,000 EVs that few people can afford to drive and even fewer people can afford to monkey with.
>>

 No.12493

>>12479
>It's interesting how the leftist brain works. You associate thing with "bad" people and that somehow makes the thing bad.
Not really, i think DRM is shit because on a technical level it's basically the same as malware, that fucks up your system. I know that it's intellectual dishonest and pure opportunism to link DRM to Scientology's cringe, but this is how DRM shills argue, and this presents an opportunity to throw some crazy shit back at them.

>if the firmware is burned into ROM or cryptographically verified before execution then power glitching will not open up a permanent solution to anything.

A special chip that works like a walled castle, which will definitely keep out the undesirables is a really old sales pitch, including all the invulnerability claims of this time we build the wall high enough. Don't count on it. In the long run people will probably move towards re-chipping with open chips that aren't locked down.

>And if the globalist billionaire class get their way then all cars will be $100,000 EVs that few people can afford to drive

Well if most people can't afford cars, we'll only need bus-lanes and bicycle lanes.
>>

 No.13569



File: 1723829933429.png ( 209.29 KB , 840x487 , googleanti.png )

 No.13159[Reply]

https://archive.is/Qt0n1
So it seems a US court has just ruled that Google monopolized the online search market. Now the Department of Justice is "considering" breaking up Google as a potential option in response.

At long last is there finally some hope for the future of the web?
20 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13424

>>13423
>I don't have anything worth saying so meds or something

Like, the whole point of image boards is to practice your right to freedom of speech. Just shutting down everything that crosses your path is pathetic and it highlights how stupid you are.
>>

 No.13425

>>13424
On the other hand all you seem to have to contribute is straw men and dated liberal propaganda.
>>

 No.13429

Amazingly, the Department of Justice seems to still be sticking to their demand that Google divest from Chrome and stop funneling money to (fake) competitors for setting their search engine to default.

https://archive.is/4eBDL
Google still wants us to believe that they are essentially part of the US government and thus need to be protected:
>A spokesperson for Google said the "sweeping proposals continue to go miles beyond the Court's decision, and would harm America's consumers, economy and national security."
>>

 No.13430

The last time they did something like this was with anti-trust laws from the 1910s thru the 40s.

Thats how ABC, the American Broadcasting Corporation, was born.
>>

 No.13561

A little late on this, but it looks like the ruling came out last month and nothing substantial is going to happen.

https://news.itsfoss.com/mozilla-lifeline-is-safe/

Google will not be forced to divest from Chrome. Mozilla will continue being controlled opposition. The web will continue to get worse.


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home