/tech/ - Technology

Name
Email
Subject	Spoiler Image
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1622872497177.jpg ( 10.9 KB , 400x469 , giga.jpg )

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 05:54:57 No.8999 [Reply]

https://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2021/06/03/stealth-data-anonymous-online-traffic-data-mining.html
Chad is going to reveal people's names, job titles and other private information from web traffic. Beware!

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 05:57:33 No.9000

>Chad Sneed
This CANNOT be real.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 18:07:18 No.9008

https://archive.is/ZmC07

File: 1621315184303.png ( 250.61 KB , 1024x576 , nexus2cee_Magisk-Generic-H….png )

Android Rooting Anonymous 2021-05-18 (Tue) 05:19:44 No.8582 [Reply]

>Umm sweaty, looks like you have root access to your phone and are using a custom rom, Looks like we're going to ban you from our app

<MAGISK HIDE ACTIVATE

Such a based app.

18 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-27 (Thu) 20:57:23 No.8812

>>8795
Fair phone us friendly towards rooting and custom roms

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-28 (Fri) 09:45:49 No.8822

>>8786
What? It shows up fine

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-28 (Fri) 11:17:51 No.8823

>>8822
not when i clicked 2 days ago
does nitter self-host the twitter post?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 15:32:17 No.8912

File: 1622561537470.png ( 19.81 KB , 1823x142 , disqus.png )

Unrelated but is this trick really possible?
Can I trick the behemoth to get free storage by editing some files?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-05 (Sat) 10:42:50 No.9005

>>8912
okay idk why but i'm uploading google photos (lots)

and it isn't counting any storage as used? wtf is going on here

it's a new phone with no root or anything

File: 1619521363360.webm ( 1.54 MB , 1280x720 , 1618793533492.webm )

Anonymous 2021-04-27 (Tue) 11:02:43 No.8132 [Reply]

how much it would cost to build something to shoot that down, or maybe EMP the drones

9 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-12 (Wed) 19:53:42 No.8441

>>8153
this isn't Final Fantasy the military doesn't use airships

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 03:55:52 No.8943

File: 1622692552552.jpg ( 372.24 KB , 2120x1422 , blimp.jpg )

You will ride the blimp and you will be happy.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 16:18:45 No.8958

>>8441
Yes and no, airships for recon still have uses if there is no risk of them attacked and DARPA is devloping drone airships that job would be just sit on a boarder and listen in to radio signals with a nation they are technically not at war with.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 17:04:14 No.8960

Hover your drone in front of it. Then when it crashes into it, you sue Amazon for $100000000000000000000000000000.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 18:25:50 No.8964

>>8960
Is making money off suing companies really as comically easy as they show in TV?

File: 1620954221727.jpg ( 38.21 KB , 400x500 , 8f30a118bfe78df8b04e1d6248….jpg )

Vim or Emacs? Anonymous 2021-05-14 (Fri) 01:03:41 No.8464 [Reply]

Explain.

17 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-31 (Mon) 20:28:17 No.8885

>>8884
*The last two patterns are unnecessary, unless you want to add an EOL($).

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-31 (Mon) 20:29:14 No.8886

>>8880
> A, I, gg, G, gd
This is some kabbalist secret code, don't deny it.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 06:24:10 No.8903

File: 1622528650601.png ( 63.77 KB , 800x184 , communism().png )

OP back again, thanks >>8880 for the bindings, ive been able to speed up my scripting as well as have an overall better quality of life.

>>8879
this should be a banner.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 15:10:45 No.8955

>>8903
Made the banner, >>>/leftypol/294250 (with a extra shebang line)

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 17:16:56 No.8961

>>8471
this is the correct take

File: 1622434116742.png ( 47.55 KB , 873x675 , 1622408458090.png )

Anonymous 2021-05-31 (Mon) 04:08:36 No.8875 [Reply]

notepad++ is radical centrism gang.

12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 18:28:38 No.8914

>>8901

Better is subjective but you could use Visual Codium or even Emacs if you have enough time to learn it.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 01:33:09 No.8919

>>8914
>Better is subjective
Brain worms. Stop defending proprietary trash.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 13:39:55 No.8924

>>8914
Visual Copium

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 13:01:51 No.8953

>>8911
your FLOSS won't protect you. the NSA has an entire division dedicated to infiltrating FOSS projects. The Linux kernel is MILLIONS of lines long and i no Linus and friends are not sitting there auditing every single line of code. it's a pipe dream. just use mac or windows and air gap the fucking thing. your welcome.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 15:53:13 No.8956

>>8953
>just give up bro, you've already lost
t. NSA

File: 1622681139430.jpg ( 69.41 KB , 600x404 , 1613301273006.jpg )

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 00:45:39 No.8933 [Reply]

Opinions on suckless? I kinda like the concept but the idea of sharing the space and potentially looking for problem solutions together with alt-right retards who unironically rant about "social marxists" makes not wanna use their stuff. I know it's kind of illogical but I get a weird feeling whenever i'm about to git clone their repos or if I'm trying to look at examples and all I get is Luke Smith's videos about it.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 00:48:48 No.8934

How convert them if no interact w/ them?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 00:49:27 No.8935

>>8934
You think I should appropriate their technology and do a leftie takeover?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 00:50:48 No.8936

>>8935
How that convert them to communism?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 01:36:31 No.8939

>>8938
what did he mean by this

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-03 (Thu) 08:11:11 No.8951

>>8937
and I cant believe people are actually able to be this fucking retarded yet here you are

File: 1622580315641.jpg ( 821 B , 20x20 , 1622565767176s.jpg )

What are some easy ways to set random shit on fire? Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 20:45:15 No.8916 [Reply]

.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 20:47:00 No.8917

File: 1622580419975.mp3 ( 5.9 MB , molotovcocktailparty.mp3 )

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 01:32:36 No.8918

A magnifying glass.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-02 (Wed) 05:27:03 No.8921

lighters work pretty well, and are reusable to a point. More than matches at least

File: 1622361248628.png ( 268.56 KB , 640x500 , 1622303584785.png )

Anonymous 2021-05-30 (Sun) 07:54:08 No.8860 [Reply]

https://arstechnica.com/science/2019/11/these-rats-learned-to-drive-tiny-cars-for-science/

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-30 (Sun) 07:57:09 No.8861

It relieves stress to travel long distances and imagine never going back

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-30 (Sun) 08:01:27 No.8862

introduce them to traffic jams

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-30 (Sun) 09:14:31 No.8864

File: 1622366071311.jpg ( 225.18 KB , 1311x1842 , 89863791_p0.jpg )

Nazrin is a mouse!

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 11:09:12 No.8908

I really really like this

File: 1622476207625.png ( 49.34 KB , 853x391 , wearable_technology_health….png )

Wearable technology Anonymous 2021-05-31 (Mon) 15:50:07 No.8882 [Reply]

I think it's moronic and doesn't have much practicality but might be used in a better way in a communist society

What do you think about wearables and do you think it would exist in an advanced socialist society?

https://youtu.be/ud6uNY5E2wQ?list=TLPQMzEwNTIwMjFsed4l0KCO_A
Just look at how stupid this shit is

>>

Anonymous 2021-05-31 (Mon) 17:53:33 No.8883

No it's truly useless.
It's only purpose is surveillance and harvesting useless consumer data.

Computers are general purpose tools, but everything after that was designed to collect useless data on people and nothing else. It belongs in the trash.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 00:05:40 No.8892

Yeah I've come to feel everything more mobile than a laptop is pointless and life-wasting in current year. Definitely necessary to reach extremely small computers so whatever, let the normies fund it.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 02:17:31 No.8894

Useless unless you have heart problems or something and I'm sure there are gadgets better suited to keep that in check.
This is only something PMCs buy to count their daily steps or something retarded like that.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 05:37:05 No.8900

>>8882
A big tech corporation might see this as a "new market" or a way to extend the reach of their sensors, but from a user perspective this is a useless gimmick. And it's not new, when mp3 players were all the rage you could get a jacket with an integrated mp3 player. People prefer separate devices because they can use the functionality with all their clothing.

Wearable technology is not going to be a thing until it stops trying to attach stuff to clothing, and start improving clothing. The obvious improvement for a jacket would be including a thermostat that regulates the temperature.

File: 1622518835551.jpg ( 50.38 KB , 500x500 , 79ee33dca5ab8ad0c3f9647b98….jpg )

Easy to digest material to get normalfags interested in privacy? Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 03:40:35 No.8897 [Reply]

Keywords being "easy to digest". I heard there was a netflix (I know) documentary on datamining and surveilance but I haven't see it yet, anything else?

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 04:20:47 No.8898

It's called The Social Dilemma.
It's as dumbed down and dramatized as you can possibly get. If that doesn't make them think about privacy and what the tech companies are really up to, nothing will.

>>

Anonymous 2021-06-01 (Tue) 05:12:55 No.8899

File: 1622524375708.jpg ( 80.14 KB , 640x640 , nothing to hide nothing to….jpg )

>>8898
>Author and digital media researcher Wendy Hui Kyong Chun argued that the film gives an inaccurate portrayal of how social media algorithms work and exaggerates how much control they have over their users.
<"The idea that somehow they control you is overblown," she said. "At the same time, you can say that a lot of what they know about you is accurate. But then the question you have to ask yourself is: So what?"
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

>Facebook released a statement on its about page that the film “gives a distorted view of how social media platforms work to create a convenient scapegoat for what are difficult and complex societal problems".
Epic.

>Mozilla employees Ashley Boyd and Audrey Hingle note the film's lack of "insights from women and people of color who have been important voices on these topics."
Thank you Mozilla, very cool.