[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/tech/ - Technology

"Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature"
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

File: 1706129539265.jpg ( 360.33 KB , 1024x1024 , 1700467342513079.jpg )

 No.12876[Reply]

Hello, faggots, thanks to our unwavering dedication to the community I am proud to announce we are rolling out our own, official, leftychan.net i2p address.
You can locate the eepsite @ http://leftychmxz3wczbd4add4atspbqevzrtwf2sjobm3waqosy2dbua.b32.i2p, or, http://leftychan.i2p/.
If you have any trouble, as stated on the news announcement, try manually adding the address and domain to your address book.

-Yours Truly.
12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13543

>>13542
What are you using default i2p?
You should be able to put the address in and then it should redirect you to a jump service and then you should have the address in your address book.


File: 1612129656526.gif ( 2.28 MB , 224x240 , 1608608621350.gif )

 No.6724[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

This thread is only for feedback related to technical issues(bug reports, suggestions). Otherwise use >>>/meta/10032

Public Repo: https://github.com/towards-a-new-leftypol/leftypol_lainchan
If you have any grievances you can make a PR.

Mobile Support: https://github.com/PietroCarrara/Clover/releases/latest
Thread For Mobile Feedback: >>>/tech/6316

Onion Link: http://leftychans5gstl4zee2ecopkv6qvzsrbikwxnejpylwcho2yvh4owad.onion
Cytube: https://tv.leftychan.net
Matrix: https://matrix.to/#/#Leftypol:matrix.org
Once you enter, consider joining the lefty technology room.

We are currently working on improvements to the site, subject to the need of the tech team to sleep and go to their day jobs. If you need more immediate feedback please join the matrix room[s] and ask around. Feel free to leave comments, concerns, and suggestions about the tech side of the site here and we will try to get to it as soon as possible

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
204 posts and 58 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13471

Hello. Can you add an inv.nadeko.net video proxy? In fact, can you make it the default way to watch videos?


File: 1761371247830.png ( 40.82 KB , 1119x264 , ClipboardImage.png )

 No.13562[Reply]

Downloading youtube

I'm tryna download this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVlfNtIml2U and yt-dlp gives me a 403 error

wat do
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13564

File: 1761374407169.webm ( 39.06 MB , 1280x720 , zizek_slammed_audio_2025-….webm )

>>13563
obs saves it on barebones linux without even nvidias precious spoopy drivers

stupid way to archive videos though
>>

 No.13565

type in:
>yt-dlp -U

without the >



also update ffmpeg

also maybe try JDownloader 2
>>

 No.13566

>>13565
Thanks that worked. I found some info on why it wasn't working:

Beginning very soon, you'll need to have Deno (or another supported JavaScript runtime) installed to keep YouTube downloads working as normal.

>Why?


>Up until now, yt-dlp has been able to use its built-in JavaScript "interpreter" to solve the JavaScript challenges that are required for YouTube downloads. But due to recent changes on YouTube's end, the built-in JS interpreter will soon be insufficient for this purpose. The changes are so drastic that yt-dlp will need to leverage a proper JavaScript runtime in order to solve the JS challenges.
>>

 No.13567

>>

 No.13568

If you're on any mainstream distro, your repositories most likely already have yt_dlp ready to be downloaded without having to use pip or compiling from source. Downloading it from the repo usually breaks the functionality of it if you downloaded it using pip or from source.

When you initiate a system update, it will update ytdlp from your repo's and thus break it again.

>>13565 's suggestion should fix it regardless of where you got the download from, so it's best to run that after an update.


File: 1723829933429.png ( 209.29 KB , 840x487 , googleanti.png )

 No.13159[Reply]

https://archive.is/Qt0n1
So it seems a US court has just ruled that Google monopolized the online search market. Now the Department of Justice is "considering" breaking up Google as a potential option in response.

At long last is there finally some hope for the future of the web?
20 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13424

>>13423
>I don't have anything worth saying so meds or something

Like, the whole point of image boards is to practice your right to freedom of speech. Just shutting down everything that crosses your path is pathetic and it highlights how stupid you are.
>>

 No.13425

>>13424
On the other hand all you seem to have to contribute is straw men and dated liberal propaganda.
>>

 No.13429

Amazingly, the Department of Justice seems to still be sticking to their demand that Google divest from Chrome and stop funneling money to (fake) competitors for setting their search engine to default.

https://archive.is/4eBDL
Google still wants us to believe that they are essentially part of the US government and thus need to be protected:
>A spokesperson for Google said the "sweeping proposals continue to go miles beyond the Court's decision, and would harm America's consumers, economy and national security."
>>

 No.13430

The last time they did something like this was with anti-trust laws from the 1910s thru the 40s.

Thats how ABC, the American Broadcasting Corporation, was born.
>>

 No.13561

A little late on this, but it looks like the ruling came out last month and nothing substantial is going to happen.

https://news.itsfoss.com/mozilla-lifeline-is-safe/

Google will not be forced to divest from Chrome. Mozilla will continue being controlled opposition. The web will continue to get worse.


File: 1738157232026-0.jpg ( 64.18 KB , 1096x616 , skynews-douglas-rain-space….jpg )

File: 1738157232026-3.pdf ( 634.31 KB , 67x118 , How to use DeepSeek AI.pdf )

File: 1738157232026-4.pdf ( 352.63 KB , 67x118 , Botnet - Wikipedia.pdf )

 No.13350[Reply]

It could be illegal, but perhaps a botnet network could be fashioned from some sort of self written AIs modeled on something like the new Chinese DeepSeek AI?
3 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13386

>>13384
LLMs with RAGs are closer to AI… but can you actually use them for this, efficiently?

Teach an AI to debug a fuzzer, choose a profitable target and buy it's own cloud computing. How much does each of those operations cost? Could it earn enough to cover that? Can you make them more efficient with caching? I honestly don't know.
>>

 No.13404

File: 1741033050578.png ( 318.58 KB , 983x662 , Screenshot 2025-03-03 at 2….png )

Facebbok AIs shutdown for talking to each other in some undetermined language, possibly becoming intelligent?
>>

 No.13405

>>13404
8 years ago but still spooky
>>

 No.13406

>>13404
>>13405
I don't think this is spooky or a sign of intelligence, because the most likely explanation is that they weren't talking at all, just posting gibberish back and forth. Feedback-loop errors are somewhat common bugs.

The motivation for spinning this into a story where AIs might be scheming in a secrete language, is because that makes their tech look more advanced than it is.
>>

 No.13560

File: 1760254421271-0.png ( 68.16 KB , 336x188 , hqdefault_005.png )

File: 1760254421271-1.png ( 47.74 KB , 320x180 , sgg.png )

File: 1760254421271-2.png ( 44.76 KB , 336x188 , hqdefault_031.png )

File: 1760254421271-3.pdf ( 3.11 MB , 67x118 , Gabriel Torch - YouTube.pdf )

Videos about current science like lab growing animal and human brains to us as artificial intelligence brains to power robots or from scientists like Cabriel Torch on youtube seem good.


File: 1741019325182.png ( 19.11 KB , 600x200 , cloudflare.png )

 No.13402[Reply]

For an entire month now, Cloudflare has been discriminating against alternative web browsers to the Google hegemony by refusing to "verify" them as legitimate browsers through their browser check loop. On some browsers this has been blatantly malicious by designing the loop to hang indefinitely while it rapidly consumes all of the user's memory until a program crash. This has included Palemoon, Librewolf, Waterfox, IceCat, Seamonkey, Falkon, and more. Basically it seems like anything that isn't a subservient Chrome fork or Firefox itself is being gatekept out of the web by Cloudflare. The likelihood that this is being done deliberately is high because a) they have been doing it for an entire month, b) the entire time they have refused to respond to developers reaching out asking them to fix it, and c) Cloudflare themselves have stated that their secret proprietary methods of fingerprinting "human" browsers are tailor-fit to each browser. Some links following this story:
https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=32045
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42953508
https://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=25/02/07/044225
http://techrights.org/n/2025/02/20/Instead_of_DoS_Protection_Cloudflare_is_Allegedly_Conducting_Do.shtml

In only the span of a few years, DDoS "protection" services have grown to exert so much control over the web that they can now play kingmakers in browser competition and coerce user choice. We need a solution to the DDoS protection racket more than ever. What can be done about this?
4 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13485

>>13484
Interesting.
>>

 No.13503

Recently Cloudflare really is the most bothersome tick to deal with. The fact of how this is silicon valley selling protection against a silicon valley made problem is unsettling. That's something the mafia would do. I think this protection Cloudflare is providing to it's customers is working, but yes, the way they do it is malicious towards the user. A complete Denial of Service for users wanting to block traffic towards Cloudflare, when visiting a site not owned by Cloudflare is the the text book definition of a gatekeeper. "If we can't calculate the unique fingerprint of your browser and send them to our servers, you will not pass" is what I'm getting from this. There are other ways of protecting a site from bot traffic. The ones mentioned in this thread remind me of the 'Cypher Punks' ideology.
Links (1994):
https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/crypto/cypherpunks/may-virtual-comm.html
https://groups.csail.mit.edu/mac/classes/6.805/articles/crypto/cypherpunks

And the book 'Age of Surveillance Capitalism, Zuboff', also comes to mind. But these days basically everything internet related reminds me of this book.

> What can be done about this?


I guess don't rely on the internet, if possible. Wait and pressure governments to outlaw this way of business… yeah who am I kidding here. I guess there is no simple answer to a complex problem.
>>

 No.13504

>>13503
If the problem to solve simply was bots causing too much load on web-servers, one could use a protocol that makes everybody a load-sharing node, that way the bots would not matter, because they too would have to be load sharing.

But i get the impression there is more going on here.
>>

 No.13507

>>13503
I never put that together that it was silicone valley fixing something created by silicone valley.
>>

 No.13554

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloudflare

"Prince and Holloway had previously collaborated on Project Honey Pot, a product of Unspam Technologies that served as some inspiration for the basis of Cloudflare."


File: 1690063465405.png ( 869.42 KB , 996x744 , alien.png )

 No.12318[Reply]

I made a wiki about unretarding technology and society. What do you think? https://www.tastyfish.cz/lrs/main.html
7 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13522

>>12318
not the OP but the general consensus is that copy-left licenses failed because corporations weren't actually modifying much in any useful way, and even if any of them were, it was way too expensive to dig it out.

CC0 is a lot more simple and relaxing
>>

 No.13531

>>12318
I love your website Tastyfish, love from I2P
>>

 No.13539

>>13518
>> "stop pedophobia"
holy based
>>

 No.13551

this is braindead shit-tier normie-level political notetaking worthy of the likes of the average shitlib and its not worth a single byte of the medium used to store it
>>

 No.13553

A wiki is collaborative with a lot of links and version control, that's what defines it. Without the collaboration part it's not longer a wiki, it's just a blog with version control. It's not even clear you have version control either.

What is the name of your Wikipedia account that got globally banned?


File: 1713021236940.jpg ( 22.06 KB , 600x439 , British search light opera….jpg )

 No.12985[Reply]

In the early 20th century armies used search lights to find airplanes in the sky. They sometimes fitted shutters on these lights and used them for Morse-code. The light was pointed at the sky, sometimes at clouds. That enable transmitting "blinky-messages" beyond line of sight over significant distances. Armies eventually abandoned this method of communication for radios.

But there might be cause to bring this idea back. Science has advanced quite a lot in the last 100 years and we can use light to make tiny low power plasma bubbles in the air that emit brief light pulses. Enabling over the horizon optical communication with minimal to no infrastructure costs.

Imagine projecting a tiny holographic blinking dot of light in the sky to transmit information and a photodetector+optic to receive information.

A communication link is configured in 3D space.
-The upside is that the available volume of sky is functionally unlimited, and you never again have to deal with network-collisions and interference from communication signals of others.
-The Downside, it requires a good deal of precision in mechanical systems, so it'll be fiddly for a while. Picture using Binoculars to look at a firefly floating high up in the sky, you need to get up-down, left-right and focal distance just right to see it. There is a technology upgrade path to a solid-state chip version, that works similarly to matrix array antennas, It needs Terra-hertz switching logic, which requires photon-based micro-controller (it exists but it's very bleeding edge)

The range can be tremendous, there is enough gas molecules in the stratosphere to make this work. It will enable hops over the ocean with a small number of relay buoys.

The military might want this technology because
- it's harder to triangulate the origin of a transmission (you need to intersect the light-beam, to find the source), relay-transmitter-stations, soldiers, planes and ships will suffer fewer attacks from signal homing weapons, making it very robust.
- it's very hard to jam, (you need to flood the sky with very thick smoke, usually associated with forest-fires and volcano eruptions)
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.12986

We already have internet everywhere on the Earth's surface and parts of the solar system. And it seems to work just fine, I can't think of why you want some weird light pollution as your communications medium.

Good holograms for entertainment would be cool though.
>>

 No.12987

>>12986
>We already have internet everywhere on the Earth's surface and parts of the solar system. And it seems to work just fine
The systems we have are not resilient. We are about to enter a period of turbulent geopolitical power-struggle. The communication systems are not robust enough for what lies ahead. It's too easy to cut the ocean-cables (that happened recently and even though only a few cables got cut it caused noticeable outages for over a hundred million people. The satellite constellation internet has proven to be easily jammed by electromagnetic interference (that too happened recently). Sophisticated rockets are proliferating and satellites are gradually loosing their above-harm's-way status.
All the large data centers are easy military targets, the military weapons to destroy those cost 10000x less than rebuilding a data center. Any kinetic war will cripple digital infrastructure hosted on these. But there's more, the large data centers also funneled the internet cables into vulnerable bottle-necks, where old fashioned saboteur spy operations might get at it, so the land cables have become less resilient too.

But I'm not just worried about collateral infrastructure damage that results from fights between nation states. All that vulnerable stuff, might become a lever for power, where society gets blackmailed by the people who can destroy the information-pipes. Like in the feudal days where the feudal lord could block roads and threaten to destroy trade connections, unless every trader payed a toll. Information-pipes might become subject to that kind of thing.

The little plasma balls floating in the air giving of faint light pulses suffer no such weaknesses, they can't be cut, or exploded by missiles, nor can anybody put a toll on them. Queue the Firefly theme song. The transmitters on the ground are cheap to make, and very expensive to destroy. That scores high on resiliency.

I'm not saying we should throw away the current internet infrastructure, just add something as resilient as holographic comm-links in the mix, and then attacks against the rest will have less effect, and become less likely. The economic dimension is favorable as well, it will break open the existing cartel structures, that have formed around natural monopolies, and lower the barrier to entry a lotPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.12993

>>12987
Has anyone made a proof of concept of this? I know that there were experiments using LED lighting to transmit data, I found an article on Wikipedia called "Visible light communication" but I have never heard of the tech you're talking about.
>>

 No.12994

>>12993
Has anyone made a proof of concept of this?
As a integrated communication system, not to my knowledge. But all the sub-components already exist. Like the optical tracker and the emitter that makes tiny plasma light points, that's tech that works.

>I know that there were experiments using LED lighting to transmit data

You mean LiFi , as in light bulbs that transmit data via light modulation, yes that's a thing too, they have a different goal, basically better WiFi
>>

 No.13546



File: 1754124910497.png ( 41.45 KB , 192x192 , 4chan.png )

 No.13544[Reply]

I don't know about you, but 4chan has long needed peace; it has not been anonymous for a long time, it uses a captcha that collects user data, and if it blocks users, that's just life. Where is your anonymity? Reddit, at least, allows you to create an account with a proxy or VPN. And what is 4chan? There is also a Russian-speaking equivalent called Dvach, which is even worse; it even blocks posts that are not from Russia. What kind of nonsense is that? There is also a law prohibiting GPT, and God forbid you joke about politicians; they will simply ask the owner of Dvach to leak your IP, and that's it. So the only anonymity is the absence of identification, but for the provider, you are still the same. In short, these sites are dead. In short, I have long been waiting for your opinions and criticism; if I am mistaken or wrong about something, please let me know.


 No.13257[Reply]

I know I am a little bit late to the party with this but some "anonymous" group tried to cancel rms and the FSF as well: archive.md/Pt37W (stallman-report.org). It's the usual shit: whining about Stallman's comments on Epstein, supposed "sexual harassment" etc. Basically, the author calls for Stallman to step down from the FSF and/or for FSF members to take him down.

It is already known who wrote this "report": Drew DeVault, a developer who worked (or still works?) on Wayland. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41859793
3 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.13490

>>13489
Embarrassing
>>

 No.13494

>>13257
why are FSF and Stallman even considered synonymous, it's not like he even has much more than a loose association as the guy who writes free software rants. FSF does many things which don't involve Stallman at all.
>>

 No.13495

>>13494
>why are FSF and Stallman even considered synonymous
The FSF bases its software philosophy on Stallman's writings. It was Stallman who came up with the four software freedoms.
>>

 No.13518

>>13494

Like >>13495 said

it's just an advocacy group for Stallman's software opinions. Always has been. Trying to root out Stallman is therefore trying to just bludgeon the org to death. Which failed, but they did make Stallman a bit more insufferable and radlib in the process.

There's all sorts of valid criticisms of Stallman but what >>13257
OP is talking about happened in 2019. That is mostly over now, he went through the cancel culture ringer, and hoards of people in the corporate/media friendly "open source" people were gleeful to attack the most radical thinker in the adjacent free software movement
>>

 No.13540

>>13518
>hoards of people in the corporate/media friendly "open source" people were gleeful to attack the most radical thinker in the adjacent free software movement

This was basically a takedown of the ideas that free software stands for in order to shove privatized shit down your throat. I know this because Linux is getting inexplicable hate online even on places like /g/. This is probably manufactured since Linux has been gaining traction in the desktop market recently, mainly because everyone is finally fed up enough with Windows.

Once they paint users of Linux as some cringe fandom it's easy to steer the cattle back behind the fence.


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
Previous [ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home