No.13496[Reply]
I believe both sides can be quite extreme so here's my balanced take:
>supplementary use of AI (chatbots, TTS, NPCs, enemy AI, RPGs, level generation, self-driving cars, AI assistants and code generation) are pretty based actually as long as they produce correct outputs and don't get you into any legal trouble
>non-commercial use of AI is also fine and can create something unique and interesting (memes, AI covers, AI dubbing)
>AI art is mostly slop except for some rare exceptions so people should at least be able to easily filter it and it should be marked appropriately
>commercial use of AI other than what was already mentioned is NOT cool and leads to more layoffs, more enshittification, more plagiarism and more mass surveillance
>proprietary AI software is ALSO not cool since it can be spyware that sends your data to the NSA
32 posts and 7 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.>>
No.13805
>>13804I can't believe this idiot actually said something based for once.
>>
No.13806
Whats up with AI companies destroying books? Is that just a middle finger to everyone?
>>
No.13807
>>13806Maybe, but the price of books that survive the bonfires will skyrocket.
>>
No.13817
I keep flip flopping on AI being a meme, and AI being super powerful and transformative and replacing humans in most tasks. Last year I remember saying "well if AI is so good, where are all the middle school kids making their own AAA games?" but now I see that AI can merge games, like put minecraft mechanics into GTA, and skateboarding game mechanics into call of duty, and also it's being used to de-compile games for consoles to make them run on PC. It's sort of crazy.
I'm sure we'll get there but my bar for AI is whether or not a robot can fully solve doing dishes. Just never have to worry about dirty dishes again. At that point we will be living in the Future and living through a new technological revolution.