[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/edu/ - Education

Learn, learn, and learn!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble   Telegram   Discord

| Catalog | Home

File: 1626768276992.jpg ( 146.59 KB , 856x1662 , cecf993689bba2afb82b2dee01….jpg )

 No.6516[Reply]

Where is it possible to find modern and materialist history of things?
Why everytime i search for something I always have to to through pile of positivist brainlets?
I want a library full of Materialist Analysis of history. Why i cannot find out history of the Mongol Empire and Lamaism without reading through some micky mouse shit about
>lmao they chinks they think like dat
>lmao das tradition mane
>lmao religion says x therfore y happen
why there is no fucking historian who explain the material basis of these thoughts of tradition in the first place? No wonder people are geographically and historically illiterate
5 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6522

I'm also interested in this
>>

 No.6523

>>6522
Thank you
>>

 No.6524

>>

 No.6525

>>6524
Dead board
>>

 No.6546

bumping on /edu/, maybe it will get more responses here


File: 1608528029712.jpg ( 808.47 KB , 1700x2151 , Hegel_by_Schlesinger.jpg )

 No.906[Reply]

I'm trying to learn and understand dialectics, but I think getting some direction for this would be helpful.

Which works should I read to understand dialectical (Hegelian, materialist) thinking and in what order?
63 posts and 15 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5925

>>5924
long winded rightoid garbage
>>

 No.5926

>>5920
>4 hours
I think I'll pass, thanks. lol
>>

 No.6258

>>5565
hilarious. I miss him, comrades. Is he still being insane?

Also, unashamed bump.
>>

 No.6511

best explaination of hegelian dialectics so far
It's in German but with English subtitles just turn them on
>>

 No.6513

>>1413
>Daoism is the ideology of primitive tribal chieftains, who want to return to the simple time of primitive communism. It's not a accident that the more communist you are, the more dialectical you become

I like to think that about Jesus and his Christianity, but I don't see any evidence of dialectical thinking on his part, except maybe for the gospel of thomas, but I'll have to read that one again.


File: 1626503930324.jpeg ( 91.28 KB , 393x500 , a_aaaamoDeleuze.jpeg )

 No.6472[Reply]

Give me the TL;DR on him.
I've skimmed through some introductory materials of his writings and they catch my curiosity yet I am too brainlet to actually read them. What exactly is schizoanalysis and how does capitalism relate to schizophrenia?
>>

 No.6473

There really is no easy TL;DR, he wrote about a lot of very different things. You could start with the SEP article, especially the part about his collaboration with Guattari.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/deleuze/

>I am too brainlet to actually read them

Just do it, anon. Deleuze himself said that you should jump right into Anti-Oedipus even if you have no background in philosophy.

>The history of philosophy has always been the agent of power in philosophy, and even in thought. It has played the repressors role: how can you think without having read Plato, Descartes, Kant and Heidegger, and so-and-so’s book about them? A formidable school of intimidation which manufactures specialists in thought – but which also makes those who stay outside conform all the more to this specialism which they despise. An image of thought called philosophy has been formed historically and it effectively stops people from thinking.
>>

 No.6474

>>6473
> Deleuze himself said that you should jump right into Anti-Oedipus even if you have no background in philosophy.

How can one man be so based? Truly the nu-Marx who wanted to arm the common man with reason against capitalist production. I need to finish AO after Vol 3.
>>

 No.6501

>>6472
Read Jon Roffe's The Works of Gilles Deleuze I: 1953-1969. v02 is set to come out whenever. Avoid Brian Massumi and any secondary lit derived from him as much as you can.
>>

 No.6502

>>

 No.6503

File: 1626756300535.jpg ( 39.8 KB , 484x397 , 1626756296915.jpg )

>>6472
Schizos are outside rationality and therefore are the site of revolution against the logic of capital.


File: 1625415138085.jpg ( 51.67 KB , 620x421 , georges-bataille.jpg )

 No.6273[Reply]

is he a schizo? Are his theories specifically general economy compatible with marxism in some form or are at least of some interest?
Does he have a good grasp on dialectics or his rambling lead to Nick Land tier shit?
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6275

>>6274
You serious bro?
>>

 No.6276

>>6274
Guy praised Stalin's Collectivization too
>>

 No.6482

Post some more Bataille PDFs blease
>>

 No.6490

>>6482
Here you go
>>

 No.6493

>>6490
thanks anon, if you have any more surrealist pdfs please link. i love that shit.


File: 1625546776686-0.mp4 ( 56.05 MB , 908x512 , 1-Preface.mp4 )

File: 1625546776686-2.pdf ( 77.75 KB , 232x300 , Glossary of Hegelian Terms.pdf )

 No.6346[Reply]

Hegel’s ​Phenomenology of Spirit
Presented by Todd McGowan

What follows are some very accessible lectures that will walk you through The Phenomenology. It's a great place to start, not only with Hegel, but even philosophy generally. Don't be scared off if you're a layman. Included along with the lectures are a handy glossary of terms and McGowan's own summary. Everything you need to climb the mountain to Absolute Knowing.

Sorry if the recordings are wonky and i had to cut some of these in half due to file limits
7 posts and 10 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6354

File: 1625547606154.mp4 ( 63.37 MB , 910x512 , 6a-Art Religon.mp4 )

>>

 No.6355

File: 1625547622739.mp4 ( 45.84 MB , 910x512 , 6b-Revealed Religon.mp4 )

>>

 No.6356

File: 1625547647338.mp4 ( 48.87 MB , 910x512 , 7a-Substance is Subject.mp4 )

Almost there
>>

 No.6357

File: 1625547775244.mp4 ( 54.22 MB , 910x512 , 7b-Absolute Knowing.mp4 )

The End.

Wonder if anyone will actually make it all the way through.
>>

 No.6489

>>6346
Very useful PDFs, thanks.


File: 1625902221972.jpg ( 170.69 KB , 720x890 , Screenshot_20210601_125240.jpg )

 No.6382[Reply]

Hey, I've seen this thread before a bunch of times, but upon searching it in the catalog I couldn't find anything.

The site is filled up with amazing PDF's that I really want to read, but because I've spent most of my life coasting on general knowledge and cramming, I have no study habits to speak of. I really want to be able to write theory, but to do so I'm going to need a lot more books under my belt.

Additionally I spent a lot of my life playing lots and lots of video games and browsing lots of social media so as a result my attention span is completely fucked. I want to get back to the attention span I had when I was a kid. When I felt like I could stop playing video games whenever I wanted when I felt like reading books were just ss interesting as everything else i wanted to do.

Largely kicked my addiction to video games but I've just supplanted it with social media. The problem seems to be that I need to use my computer and my phone but the distraction and seduction of fast food media is often too great.

Largely kicked my addiction to video games but I've just supplanted it with social media. The problem seems to be that I need to use my computer and my phone but the distraction and seduction of fast food media is often too great.

This thread is for:

-it's about how to build study habits.
-how to effectively organize your time
-Posting your progress and gaining back their attention span.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
28 posts and 8 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6464

>>6456
Not that anon but this could help.
https://minihabits.com/mini-habit-ideas/
>>6457
This is legit too
>>

 No.6465

>>6464
>This is legit too
what if there's no 'the most important thing' but rather a long, consistently intense task?
>>

 No.6466

>>6465
just do it
>>

 No.6467

>>6465
Can you maybe give an example?
>>

 No.6475

>>6465
You are supposed to break it down into smaller sub-tasks. But if it is related to studying, I would recommend the Pomodoro thing instead.


File: 1618795631870.jpg ( 466.15 KB , 2048x1536 , hola.jpg )

 No.5471[Reply]

Hola /edu/!

Some leftypol regulars and I have had the idea to host a language-learning group for us all to learn together.

The language we are all interested in is Spanish, and we'll be using the Micheal Thomas course (>>1033) to learn it.

Here is the plan:

We each listen to one CD of Micheal Thomas every week.
Then on every Friday we discuss what we learned and practice it by trying to make new sentences with what we've learned as best we can.

Then, after we have completed the 'Foundations' part of said course we all switch to speaking Spanish only to keep practising what we've learned and to practice fluency.

This will all start this coming week.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
9 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5514

>>5513
Amazing thread, what is it doing on that site?
>>

 No.5526

>>5512
Im >>5509. Id be super down to help anons learning spanish, if only to be someone you could have a conversation with. If there is a matrix server I could join or whatever Id be happy to
>>

 No.5527

>>5526
It's in the OP comrade: https://matrix.to/#/!uDgkvHYaUmWfGUtETA:matrix.org?via=matrix.org
We would love to have you.
>>

 No.5575

File: 1619940198137.png ( 18.49 MB , 5787x4093 , TaniaRodinaFlags.png )

Greeting from /ref/! Just wanted to stop by and ask how the learning is going. I am not able to join in sadly but I want to make sure it’s going good
>>

 No.6451

File: 1626399414488.jpg ( 129.84 KB , 900x1263 , ll_fr_web_3.jpg )

Is there a book for learning Spanish like pic related? It's entirely in latin, and starts with very simple sentences and pictures, and you end up reading poetry and weird myths in the original Latin.


File: 1608528143018.jpeg ( 32.45 KB , 400x367 , Phil-book.jpeg )

 No.2014[Reply]

I've been doing a bit of reading on the economic aspects of Marxism, however it occurred to me that I don't know where to start with the more philosophical aspects. I've seen people post Stalin's, "Dialectical and Historical Materialism" and I've occasionally been recommended some works by Bukharin, however I really don't know what order would be best to understand concepts such as dialectical materialism or the base and superstructure or ideology, and so on. Could one of you anons help me figure out how exactly I should educate myself on such topics?
22 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6365

>>6271
>Frankfurt School
>No Benjamin or Lukacs
>>

 No.6366

>>6365
I don't think Benjamin or Lukács was part of the Frankfurt School. Then again, Debord wasn't either, so idk.
>>

 No.6368

>>6366
Lukacs was simultaneously an intellectual forefather and early critic of the franky boys, and Benjamin's debates with Adorno are well documented.
>>

 No.6406

File: 1626114803152.jpeg ( 25.44 KB , 400x602 , images (95).jpeg )

Wiki said Lukacs 'repudiated' History and Class Consciousness, whatever that means, which doesnt make me so enthusiastic to read it.
>>

 No.6407

>>6406

It's one of the most important philosophical book of the marxian tradition. Love it or hate it, but def. unavoidable.

The repudiation come after the harsh criticizm his book take from the Comintern at the time (if I rermember right, espc. from Zinoviev and Bukharin). It nonetheless make Lucaks take a more "orthodox leninist" turn, that culminates in his "ontology of the social being".


File: 1608527927010.jpg ( 79.24 KB , 597x424 , antique-painting.jpg )

 No.79[Reply]

Post any weird and obscure history facts that you know of
42 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.6340

>>6339
It probably did have a great influence, I wont deny that. If the british empire had Rome-levels of slavery in the British isles at the time, the steam engine probably wouldnt have been invented.

But this doesnt imply the inverse is also true, that if we would somehow transfer the economic situation of Britain at the time to Rome, they would have magically overcome all these technological issues. Building a workable and economicly useful steam engine during the roman empire would be a technological impossibility. similarly, the roman empire could never have invented the transistor, however hard they tried.

>wheelbarrows

ofc this is something where your argument makes sense, but only because wheelbarrows are relatively simple objects. They are not comparable to steam engines.

>cotton gin

dont know too much about this specific piece of technology. But after a quick glance it seems quite simple and not comparable to a steam engine.
>>

 No.6373

>>417
>lets not acknowledge the leading heroes that fought the independence struggle
faggot.
>>

 No.6374

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Boniface_VII

>The pope issued a bull, Ausculta Fili, in which he declared that both spiritual and temporal power were under the pope's jurisdiction, and that kings were subordinate to the power of the Roman pontiff. Philip disobeyed and had Ausculta Fili publicly burnt in Paris in 1302. Boniface excommunicated Philip and all others who prevented French clergy from traveling to the Holy See, after which the king sent his troops to attack the pope's residence in Anagni on 7 September 1303 and capture him. Boniface was held for three days and beaten badly.


>Boniface died a month later, on 11 October 1303, of high fever and was buried in a special chapel. Philip IV pressured Pope Clement V of the Avignon Papacy into staging a posthumous trial of Boniface. He was accused of heresy and sodomy. Pope Clement V referred the process to the 1311 Council of Vienne, where two knights challenged the claim to a trial by combat. With no one willing to fight them, the Council declared the matter closed.
>>

 No.6378

File: 1625832217632.jpg ( 83.54 KB , 599x840 , EbeVLSGVcAAvgQd.jpg )

The conservative opposition leader of Australia (1972-1975) died having sex with his son's ex-girlfriend (apparently he'd fucked a number of his son's exes).
>>

 No.6398

>>6378
>named sneeden
>died sucking and fucking
kek


File: 1617655547553.jpg ( 354.23 KB , 762x1100 , PP030.jpg )

 No.5376[Reply]

Who did it? Soviets? Nazis?
Why were the polish officers killed? What was the motive for the massacre? Were they preparing a revolt?

Are the documents fake? Whose investigations are trustworthy?

Discuss
15 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.5711

>>5710
https://www.net-film.ru/film-51471/
cadres from Leningrad trial with the nazi war criminals (1946) including Arno Düre, who was accused of war crimes against the polish officers in Katyn
>>

 No.6250

>>5376
the nazis had a motive but the NKVD version is very well documented
>>

 No.6259

Nazis, anyone telling you otherwise is one themselves.
https://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv16n2/katyn.htm
>>

 No.6261

>>6250
>very well documented
The only "proof" I've ever seen is Closed Packet no.1, whereas the evidence the Nazis did it is considerably stronger. https://www.revolutionarydemocracy.org/rdv16n2/katyn.htm
>>

 No.6377

>>6261
>whereas the evidence the Nazis did it is considerably stronger.
well, with the soviet version we at least know that the POW camps existed, we know who worked there.
In the case of the version with germans being behind the crime, we have no single document that took the POW camps, or that they created new ones (so called ON camps mentioned in the Burdenko report), we have no proof of existance of the supposed commanders of these camps.
After Burdenko comission the soviets never even attempted to do another investigation, they didn't even try to find the supposed nazi criminals who did the massacre. The only nazi who was ever put on trial for Katyn was Arno Düre who was supposedly burying the dead officers but he was released from prison in 1954 and when he returned to Germany he claimed that he was forced to make this testimony.

so even if we completely disregard the version that NKVD did it, we still don't know what actually happened. The only proofs for Katyn massacre being done by nazis are those brought by Burdenko commission, which is also not much.


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home