>>12270>However I think it's technically incorrect to say that "copyright" is compatible with free-markets. It's a monopoly which is not a free market.Hi, Proudhon.
I mean, I said "free-market
liberal." Though "market liberal" is more accurate ig.
>Valve makes an open-platform hand-held console while Nintendo makes a closed platform handheld console.I said "Steam," not "Steam Deck."
>Valve supports FOSS projects, while Nintendo is attacking FOSS projects.I mean, Google does it too but FOR SOME REASON people hate it and call it evil. It's as if opportunistically supporting certain FOSS projects isn't enough.
>Obviously we have to prioritize struggle against Nintendo.No, it's not obviously. You're trying to redirect people's anger onto single issues which is a very liberal thing to do. "First we need to deal with this, then we can move to this." We must tackle issues all at once.
>your basic message is don't attack Nintendo, attack valveNo? Where did you get that from? If anything, you're the one who's saying "Don't attack Valve, attack Nintendo."
>Can you justify your position ?Uh, anti-capitalism?