[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix

IRC Chat

Pleroma

Mumble

Telegram

Discord


| Catalog | Home

File: 1668686490025-0.epub (7.42 MB, (History of Terror) Phil ….epub)

File: 1668686490025-1.pdf (31.73 MB, 67x118, Samuel Igra - Germany's Na….pdf)

 No.460940[Reply]

Sexual perversion and Nazism always have gone hand in hand.

In 1945 just after the war a jew, Samuel Igra, wrote Germanys National Vice
In it he noted how the homosexuals of the Nazis SA were intrinsically linked to the militaristic "bonding" of men who hated women and saw them as subhuman and only fit to rear children. In this book Samuel notes how one of the powerful reasons the Nazi's so violently turned on the jews was their abhorrence to homosexuality

Today we are witnessing the imperial core become degenerate and corrupt and the most violent nations on earth. Their sexualities to be spread "by the sword" (one can remember the "we need to bomb iraq/syria because ISIS are throwing gays off roofs")

I fully expect the West to bomb a third world country in my lifetime over "trans rights"

Under Nazi Germany this "third sex" was pronounced and became absolutely mainstream. The two leaders of the SA Ernst rohm and Edmund Heine turned the SA headquarters into a homosexual brothel at a time that the SA were considered the "spear tip of the nazi revolution"

<One American journalist even went so far as to write that every single senior SA officer was a practising homosexual.

Night of the long knives
<The vices of Captain Roehm, commander of the storm troops, with three million men under his control, were a matter of world-wide knowledge and comment. Baldur von Schirach, Reich Leader of the Youth from the time of Hitler's accession to power until 1939, was arrested by the police for perverse sexual practices and liberated on the intervention of Hitler, who soon afterwards made him leader of the Hitler Youth. Among the S.S. and S.A. group leaders and gauleiters the more outstanding criminals in this matter were Edmond Heines, S.A. group-leader at Breslau, Julius Streicher, gauleiter of the Nuremberg district, and Kube of the Frankfort-on-Oder district. Heydrich, Deputy Chief of the Gestapo, was dismissed from the Navy for immoral sexual conduct.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
62 posts and 13 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.461294

>>461133
>people have been gay through out history this is well documented.
yeah retard good morning, people have been homos for all the existence of class society, exactly what we want to eliminate. LOL
>>

 No.461295

>>461178
he's correct. overpopulation can only be relative. e.g. if people is not involved in reproductive labour. So I agree with the WEFcel that western people need to be culled, because they are useless, just read this board and you'll see it.
>>

 No.461296

>>461190
>I hate lib-leftoids
lmao uyghur you follow the church of greta HOW DARE YOU to call others lib-leftoids?
Resource are in fact infinite. Water is infinite. The soil constantly regenerates through life itself. We don't need anything else.
The only thing that will kill the Earth is the progressive cooling of the Sun. No escape from that.
>>

 No.461301

>>461296
>The soil constantly regenerates through life itself.
No, it absolutely does not. When phosphorus and potasium are removed from the soil by plants and the plants are consumed elsewhere, that phosphorus and potasium is gone permanently. It can only be replaced by taking phosphorus and potasium from elsewhere and spreading it over the soil, which is what fertilizer is. You can grow plants in nutrient-dead soil with enough fertilizer (see: Nebraska), but it is far from efficient.
>>

 No.461302

>>461301
On top of that, different fruits require very specific climates. Mediterannean climates are where most of the species that we eat need to be grown, and they are uncommon.


File: 1669164647091.jpg (23.03 KB, 160x240, The Doomsday Machine.jpg)

 No.461211[Reply]

Would the ruling class choose to destroy civilization in the final moment of crisis, facing with the alternative of the ultimate overthrow of their system? If so, what does this mean for revolutionary strategy?
6 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.461226

>>461216
>So not all civilization can be ended.
If the nukes fly there won't be an middle ground. This isn't a case of regional partial collapse, nuclear exchange will kill most of humanity.
>>

 No.461228

>>461225
Found the person who isn't a total midwit
>>461226
Ya, but much of it will be after a few months and likely from starvation
>>

 No.461230

>>461225
That's what I'm talking about you goober wtf.
>>

 No.461231

>>461228
How the fuck did you people read that as saying "individuals evolve" You have your head up your own ass.
>>

 No.461297

>>461211
Jesus, that's what they started doing in 2020 with the virus con. They are doing because they need to do it and they think they will come on top. Any revolutionary strategy would have needed at least recognizing the virus bullshit but you know…


File: 1648437287853.jpg (106.08 KB, 861x635, media_221016_en.jpg)

 No.454912[Reply]

What's your current thoughts on strategies towards socialism?

From what I have gathered there's at least a guiding principle. That is that the proletariat can only come into its own through practical experience. This means that the transitional movements into socialism should treated with more interest and enthusiasm(rather than only a temporary evil). Local councils and credit unions should have control over their own capital. City capitalism instead of State capitalism. Give all workers experience and responsibility with the production and distribution of the social product.

Then transition into labor vouchers. With an empowered social body all around, there's not a need, and likely a disincentive, for any bureaucratic managers trying to leech off society. An actual withering away of the state and its old politics.

I think the left took a wrong turn somewhere that emphasized the vanguard as too much of an academic mission. Leading to a lot of the bad politics we see today, where the fight over consensus is the main struggle. If someone doesn't agree with a particular interpretation of their own economic experience then they're an enemy. Education really happens through practical hands-on experience and not (only) book reading.
16 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.455230

>>455212
damn, its good old religious wars + balkan countries suddenly unite agains common enemy (who ?) (by themselfves…)
>>

 No.455235

>>455226
>show me a socialist country that wasn't a capitalistic monarchy with "socialism" painted of it.
There have been no socialist countries that were monarchies. You may want to check up what a monarchy is. One very striking feature of monarchical systems is formal hereditary rule. The only socialist country where important political figures came from the same family more than once is the Democratic people's republic of Korea. They have intra party elections that just turned out that way, not a formal hereditary succession. And no member of the Un family actually held the same position. By claiming the Soviet Union was a monarchie you'd be saying that Lenin, Stalin, Malenkov, Khrushchev, Brezhnev, Andropov, Chernenko and Gorbachev were all related.

Some socialist countries use capitalist elements in their economy because they do not yet have a sufficiently developed techno industrial base to switch to a fully socialist mode of production.

>national socialism is based on socialism

No it wasn't, they just called them self socialist, but they were fascist. The Fascist economic policies had more in common with neo-liberlaism than anything else. Both Fascism and neo-liberalism like to privatize a lot of the economy, increase exploitation of the workers, reduce worker earnings, and spend a lot on military. Both have issues with inflation.

>it's known that national socialists were quite frenly to marxists before Hitler

It's not known to me, but since we know how history turned out that can't have been genuine friendship.

>it's also known that NatSoc and Marxists were trying to perfect this ideology called socialism

Known to whom ? I have never heard of this. I have read a lot of Marxists from that time they don't write anything about this.
>>

 No.455571

The revolution will happen when it happens. Normal people will never read manifestos or theory we will be a very very small minority always no strategy towards socialism is based in reality.
>>

 No.461282

bump
>>

 No.461291

>>454912
The best strategy when you are not quite certain how capitalism will contort as its contradictions become fatal is to keep an open mind and always attempt to get as much of the means of subsistence and the means of production under the control of workers as possible. Shit isn't going to play out according to plan. Just stay focused on the goal, and take what opportunities present themselves.


File: 1668931217472.png (154.69 KB, 4000x3248, Twitter.png)

 No.461029[Reply]

Both of them got taken over by free speech retards. And this extreme free speech backfired and now they're dying website, of course Leftychan is dead as fuck not so much Twitter - yet…
37 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.461243

>>461242
I largely agree. Unfortunately, a lot of people think that Twitter and 4chan aren't the modern equivalent of newspapers or vehicles for radical propaganda. Too many people on the left either want to try to reproduce the past with lame printed newspapers or sequester themselves into hermetic echoboxes.
>>

 No.461248

>>461243
I think that a big part of that problem is that we all think of each other as fools. The anarchists are idealist fools who can't get their theory straight. The maoists are sophomoric class collaborationists whose program collapsed in Mao's own lifetime. The leninists are nostalgic adventurers who keep stupidly banging their heads on the same hundred-year old wall. The leftcoms are addled drunks who are possessed of an infantile disorder and a general sloth that compells them to do nothing but drink and read Capital. Liberation theologists are deluded basic bitches who have read neither Capital nor their Bible. Primitivists are kooks.

Worst of all, we have all become so practiced at picking one another apart that all we do when we argue is to throw low-effort gotchas at one another. We don't learn anything or challenge each other's theory in any meaningful way. Other leftists are just people for us to verbally fight with. It's rather depressing.

One of the things that makes it possible for the rightards to get along despite the ancaps and the nazis being theoretically irreconcilable is that each of them is constantly shitting on people who are outside their group. Up until the end of the Cold War the same was true of liberals where they had their ideological differences with one another but all rallied together to oppose the communists. We don't have an outside group that we rally in opposition to. We all oppose the interests of the bourgeoisie, but we don't do so based on any perceived qualities that bosses possess. We oppose the interests of the class, and that is not as unifying as just hating people is. Maybe we on this end of the political spectrum are getting too used to hating each other.
>>

 No.461249

>>461243
>Unfortunately, a lot of people think that Twitter and 4chan aren't the modern equivalent of newspapers or vehicles for radical propaganda.
Oh fuck off Body Odor
you fucking bitch ruined things enough with your "imageboards are a serious business!!"
fucking transhumanist sperg
If I ever meet you in a grocery store - I will fucking bash your head in the nearest glass shelf!
Pot on your whole family
>>

 No.461250

>>461249
>'I'm the real left'
>Does nothing
Kek, you might be right!
>>

 No.461251

>>461213
I thought that philosophers were just angry old men who have dedicated their lives to proving that they personally are more clever than the other angry old men.
>>461249
I don't think that's Che.


File: 1629358835657.jpg (83.69 KB, 512x458, crytpto-reverse.jpg)

 No.448093[Reply]

This is a bit tangential to socialism which strives towards materially planning an economy with cybernetics and so on, but bear with me.

Why do most crypto currencies pander to financial speculators ?
Why aren't they trying to pander to merchants, producers and service providers instead ?
Maybe even try to avoid having financial speculators ?
One would assume that at least the people who are in it for the blockchain based commerce would be trying to get their system to prioritize hosting actual trade with physical goods and services.

It looks like they are trying to do capitalism in reverse order: beginning with the financialisation-stage and then going back to material trade later.
30 posts and 6 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.461171

>>461169
who should control the data centers?

>Am I talking to the local poltard right now?

you've not provided any arguments as to why your "syndicates" or whatever the fuck would not just produce for profit

also, are you planning to use blockchain only in full communism or something?
>>

 No.461172

>>461166
I have yet to see a single person actually justify the use of blockchain in any other context than funny money. Bruce Schneier has a good set of questions for one to ask themselves whenever they're considering blockchain:
https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2019/02/blockchain_and_.html
>Does the blockchain change the system of trust in any meaningful way, or just shift it around?
>Does it just try to replace trust with verification?
>Does it strengthen existing trust relationships, or try to go against them?
>How can trust be abused in the new system, and is this better or worse than the potential abuses in the old system?
>What would your system look like if you didn’t use blockchain at all?
>>

 No.461179

File: 1669116832476.jpg (42.86 KB, 225x350, 1653705101084.jpg)

>>461161
>What are you doing with it.

My phone and Cable are both paid in Bitcoin. Granted they aren't major consumer industries but non the less they are paid for in BTC. Monero is obviously used to buy drugs and also mullvad accepts monero which is dope.

>>461161

What inefficiencies? Point out these inefficiencies.
Are you upset cause it's slow…? I'm not following what you are talking about here. Name inefficiencies outside of the realm of currency.

I legitimately don't think you understand technology, let alone Blockchain tech and you deff don't seem to understand how socialism and communism function economically. This is all clear by >>461171

You don't understand; Who controls the i2p network? No one controls peer 2 peer networks. That's the whole point. Well, everyone does. Every node on the network is a peer which is responsible for hosting other parts of the network. So, in a socialist economy where the means of production are owned collectively by the workers who control them and work on them then obviously it would be the working class themselves who operate the network. Sure it's a pipe dream but it's just an idea. You have no ideas cause you are a just a bitter upset faggot.

Exchanges as we understand them don't take place in a communist society because production is not centered around the exchange of commodities but the production of useful resources that people need.
All I am saying is Blockchain could be useful for allocating "transactions" (for lack of a better word in such an economy. If I go to the market and pick up a carrot and the shelf registers to the farm that grows this particular carrot that 1 carrot unit has been consumed then we could use that calculation to what next year's harvest should theoretically be needed to yield. Paul cockshot actually talks about such technologies in his book but I don't think it ever occured to him that Blockchain could actually fulfill this roll rather nicely. Like I said, this is nothing more that pure hatred and ideology pointed at a technology you don't understand.
>>

 No.461181

File: 1669121476004.jpg (33.72 KB, 403x335, 13.jpg)

>>461179
>My phone and Cable are both paid in Bitcoin. Granted they aren't major consumer industries but non the less they are paid for in BTC. Monero is obviously used to buy drugs and also mullvad accepts monero which is dope.
of COURSE cryptoretard would be a fucking junkie lol

also, what, you pay for cable and vpn daily lol? are you genuinely retarded?
also, what is the point of paying for cable with monero if they would know your physical location anyway? What is the point of paying for phone with monero if your operator would know your IMEI anyway lol?

>What inefficiencies? Point out these inefficiencies.

you gotta be fuckin kiddin me
I'm talking to a literal debiloid..

you want some inefficiencies cryptodebiloid?
1. Energy and time requirements to write an entry into a database
2. Immutability of the database with no garbage collection
3. Not being p2p because miners are not equal nodes
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.461201

>>461181
>Being this childish and pedantic because he got blown out

Grow up, kek

Blockchain is literally a p2p network lmfao. You don't understand computer science at all.

All I said was I think it could. If it has flaws the wecoulf literally use a p2p database or yes fork the chain to allow off record editing. Or have a validator system where we have specific validators to validate transactions. I never said I was invested in this ideologically that is you being a cum crusted dick wad putting words in my mouth kek. People like you are why we live in a new dark ages.
You're cancer


File: 1668353252046.png (128.53 KB, 1737x469, bye.png)

 No.460660[Reply]

Hi! Will I fit in here? I'm done with leftypol's moderation shittery. They literally ban anti-(US)democrat posts by now. They have become the cancer that must be removed from the communist movement and I'm ready to participate in this necessary surgery.
44 posts and 17 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.461020

File: 1668881517256.jpg (85.45 KB, 646x1024, 1668858716659951m.jpg)

>>461019
On one hand, I'm glad the demented transhumanist Leftypol mods (pic related) are digging their own graves by banning anything as part of their mentally ill purity spiraling.
On the other hand, most of the people they ban and thereby send our way are just other faggy liberals.

You seem cool though, anon
>>

 No.461091

>>461000
Dprk is absolutely not neutral to lgbts

<Deformation in the spiritual and cultural life, this is the means by which the capitalist state and the capitalist class attempt to turn the working masses into modern-day slaves.


<The bourgeoisie is spreading reactionary ideology, culture, and rotten bourgeois lifestyle in order to paralyze the working masses' consciousness of independence, make people obey the capitalist system of exploitation, and further degenerate into slaves to money. Thus, in a capitalist society, a perverted hobby of pursuing animalistic "pleasures" that has no relation to people's healthy demands has arisen, paralyzing people's bodies and minds.


<Comrade Kim Jong- il , the great leader , taught:


<“Even in the countries where capitalism is said to be the most developed, the number of illiterate and mentally handicapped is increasing day by day, and many people are degenerating into vulgar humans who pursue only momentary comfort and pleasure without any ideas or aspirations . ” 》 Supplemental Edition Vol. 12, p. 422)


<In the United States, where normal human thinking is completely paralyzed and intelligence and civilization are deformed, the issue of same-sex marriage, which cannot be imagined in human society, is an important topic of discussion every presidential election.


In the United States, the issue of same-sex marriage has been a major topic of discussion during the presidential election since 2004 and has been raised as a political issue. Following the 2008 presidential election in 2012, the views of the presidential candidates against same-sex marriage became a concern of the electors. In the United States, voters generally refer to candidates who support same-sex marriage as innovative and those who oppose it as conservatives.

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.461104

>>461091
Very educational post.

But we shouldn't assume that troonie cultoids are grounded in reality.

It doesn't matter that the actual policies of Stalin or the DPRK are. If a troonie can imagine something, that's good enough for them.
>>

 No.461106

>>460660
Report this guy. reactionary propaganda NIGHER SAGE ZAGE ZAGE ADHAS ZGAE NIGHER
>>

 No.461196

>>460660
I'm also visiting from Leftypol.org and I hope to stay here more often.


File: 1668564057698.jpg (58.29 KB, 1140x715, il_1140xN.3041907335_hdc9.jpg)

 No.460829[Reply]

Does leftychan support Trump 2024? Idk there are a lot of Trump supporters here, like half of the board seems to unironically support Trump.
39 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.460935

>>460932
When I say that there is no viable alternative I mean that currently there is not reason the left has given the working class really to align with or not vote for the dems or republicans.There is not party or no org that isn't dead and totally fangless as I mentioned before that really mattters. Of course we know why there should be but the left hasn't managed to build something like that yet and imo the only option is to vote pragmatically and secure my interests as a worker.

That brings me to why I have an issue with the idea that maga communism is some how subversive to the status quo when it really isn't. Trump and the maga fags all want one thing and that is the strengthen their own class and political agenda under the guis of faux populism; I.E Tax cuyts for the wealthy, abolishing labor protections, enforcing fundamentalist christian dogma on the population, etc etc etc. It's only aesthetically appealing (and even then by a slim margin) but the actual substance is lacking, imo. Dems might be moronic fucks but at least I can get roe v wade, weed, right to repair and making it easier to unionize with the dems. Republicans HATE that.
>>

 No.460946

>>460829

I suppose this means you idiots now will start spamming this stupid trump shit everywhere on the internet like in 2015-16

>>460843
This does not work now. You repeated this stupid shit for years, nobody believes you now.
If you relentlessly repeat far right talking points while attacking the left, you're fascist, case closed.
>>

 No.460948

>>460935
>at least I can get roe v wade, weed, right to repair and making it easier to unionize with the dems
Is this a joke? None of these have happened under Democrats, you fucking moron. In fact the original Taft-Hartley Act was passed with Democrat support.
>>

 No.460954

>>460948
Are you fucking high? Biden passed a bill that decriminalized marijuana use. We can't get it totally decriminalized till we get a dem controlled senate.

>Muh taft heartly


Yeah and so what that was literally 100 years ago at this point. biden passed a lot of laws that secure labor protections and make unionization easier. I know, I was in a union.

We can get roe v wade back. Once again leftist ultras have no plan and just wanna brow beat anyone who wants to do anything other than stay at home and shit post on a computer. Cope
>>

 No.461195

File: 1669132695017-0.jpg (50.45 KB, 1024x424, 1650485343022.jpg)

File: 1669132695017-1.jpg (66.32 KB, 1080x561, 7355d99ec54638e6775a9edf83….jpg)

>>460832
The Democrats are nothing but controlled opposition. If you do end up getting them in, it'll just be a delaying tactic until the Retardicans get into power after two or 4 years or so and screw over the working class and continuing to suck the cock of the bourgeoisie.

Both parties are lapdogs of the bourgeoisie.


File: 1629099807591.jpeg (21.17 KB, 474x355, download (1).jpeg)

 No.446212[Reply]

Why has advertisement become such an absolute shit show? When I see ads on YouTube at this point they make little to no sense. Is capital just desperate? Is it just reaching exponentially trying to force as kuch shit down out throats? What's the deal?
26 posts and 5 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.447808

I love those bullshit ads with a model waving a red flag and it's some pretentious statement about what equality means to them or something then just comes up "Tommy Hilfinger" or some other shitty brand ware.
It's so on the nose it's hilarious.
>>

 No.447868

>>447808
Yeah but do they know what they are doing? If they don't it's hilarious, but, in this day and age it's more likely they are aware of it which just makes is depressing.
>>

 No.461027

>>446212
Advertising on tiktok is the new hot shit, it's ridiculous how well ads fit there. I think the whole app was a plot to get you accustomed/addicted to the format
>>

 No.461028

>not using invidious
cry more bitches, you're not getting a penny out of me
>>

 No.461052

>>446212
I never see online ads, but I imagine that effect is the result of targeted advertising algorythms being a bit screwy.
>>447515
Who still watches TV for anything other than sports?
>>461028
I can't imagine that anyone who knows what Invidious is ever uses YouTube. There is absolutely no way in which Invidious is not superior.


File: 1628214690929-0.jpg (71.31 KB, 602x401, 1628211931632.jpg)

File: 1628214690929-1.jpg (47.43 KB, 430x640, 87d1060eb64a0fba6ea0bdf83c….jpg)

 No.425759[Reply]

Do you ever wonder why low-status white men can go to Southeast Asia and can easily get brides compared to the United States? Because even if he's poor in America, he's relatively richer there, meanwhile women in his native country wouldn't give him the time of day because by American standards he's poor, ugly and fat. In other words, that man has been cockblocked in his own country by the rich who have brainwashed everyone. That poor bastard doesn't have millions of dollars, so he's not attractive in America.

Then /pol/yps wonder why white birthrates are declining. Or why men drop out of the dating game. They don't feel like they can live up to these impossible and disgustingly filthy bourgeois standards.

It's all part of a theme, really. A system that benefited men – and particularly white men – in the past is not benefiting them now. Worse for them, the system that white people in America built (although they weren't the only ones who built it) and based their living on is beginning to betray them, or so they feel. Even worse than that, they fear that might end in righteous revenge from the growing ranks of angry black men, angry brown men, and maybe even some angry Asian men too who have been oppressed by the same rich, white elite this whole time, leading to a white "doomsday."

Because after all, someone came to pick the cotton and do the "dirty jobs" that white plantation and business owners or their kids with their inheritances didn't want to do. Or it was fine as long as the people who came to do the jobs (sometimes against their will) "served" as nice, obedient "Uncle Toms" and "Uncle Pedros" and "Uncle Chens" who were oppressed – and still are oppressed – by the same white elite beauty standards.

But you can't expect that to last forever.

So Americans simply need to reeducate themselves. Unite. Protest against the rich. Protest against the beauty standards that the rich, white elite have used to brainwash everyone and that makes poor, ugly, fat white guys hate themselves in their own country so much that they'd rather move to Thailand or Vietnam or the Philippines so they can get married.

While we're at it, the American monopoly capitalists who have enslaved and brainwashed the oppressed masses should refund the third-world countries for the amount of money and blood they suck from them. Americans – and this goes for people in the West generally – should dPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
82 posts and 16 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.461022

bump
>>

 No.461046

>>455502
>What's wrong with eugenics?
It's pseudo scientific bullshit that didn't/doesn't work.
In the past it became popular in rich-people circles because it was useful for ideological class-war.
They got rich exploiting the proletariat, but they preferred saying that they had genes that made them rich.
Ideology that supports class-society has this tendency to fuck with science.

>Genetic engineering is only scary to those who don't understand it.

The scientific field of genetics today has virtually nothing in common with eugenics. Eugenicists believed that traits=genes.
Today genetics believes that traits=environment+genes.

i know 5 months to late
>>

 No.461047

File: 1668955314538.jpg (48.44 KB, 960x540, dog-group.jpg)

>>461046
>It's pseudo scientific bullshit that didn't/doesn't work.
The irony if you were the anon who also posted the dunning kruger graph
>>

 No.461048

>>461047
I didn't post the Dunning Kruger effect graph.
It kinda doesn't fit, because the anon that falsely equates eugenics with genetic engineering, didn't pretend to know everything. It's just kinda ironic that he doesn't understand why Eugenics is dangerous.
>>

 No.461049

>>455520
he wasnt a whitoid chud tho


File: 1628564255191.jpeg (592.52 KB, 1920x1080, 1628521120696.jpeg)

 No.435848[Reply]

Bros, I'm a bit confused.

On the one hand, I want a socialist society that provides for the needs of the people, makes investments into the nation, and guides the commanding heights of the economy in a planned way. A society where the collective is more important than the individual, where people strive for something higher than self-indulgence and money.

But on the other hand, I absolutely despise contemporary art, architecture, and all of the ugliness of our modern world. Every Western city is full of litter, graffiti, shit, and filth. Every new building is hideous, and nothing beautiful is ever made. Everyone lives materialist, hedonistic, selfish lives and the cult of individualism has consumed everything.

Material conditions and 40 years of neoliberalism aside, I think one of the reasons for the West's apparent decline stems from our loss of tradition. In every aspect of society, whether religion or social relations, tradition has completely broken down. Shared traditions are what binds a people together, and almost every single one has been shattered either deliberately - often by the left, or as a byproduct of capitalism.

So am I even a communist, or am I just a left-wing fascist?

In either case, the working classes seem to prefer patriotism, religion, and national traditions in some form to the Avant-garde intellectualism of the left.
74 posts and 11 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.460945

>>

 No.461014

>>435848
If that is true why are a majority of the working class staunch dems?
>>

 No.461015

>>461014
>Your brain on a constant stream of MSNBC and reddit leftism
>>

 No.461025

>>461014
My ass. Even presidential elections can only get about 60% of Americans to vote. The "None of the Above" party has the plurality, and if you count mid-terms it almost has a full majority.

https://ballotpedia.org/Voter_turnout_in_United_States_elections
>>

 No.461026

>>461014
The majority of the working class are non-voters or noncommital.


Delete Post [ ]
[ overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / 777 / posad / i / a / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home