>>483104I think maybe we need to replace the word facists with nazis for you to grasp exactly what I'm getting at. Yes, we need an organized proleterian revolution to combat systemic repression. This is a different issue.
In systemic repression, the opposition is (usually) established in power. This is (currently) a different situation with the nazis. The nazis have been stewing in the background using coded language (dog whistles) and mustering strength. Now they are openly organizing. We don't need a proletariate revolution to stop the nazis from gaining power. In fact, it probably wouldn't even impact the issue of literal nazis organizing in the streets and establishing themselves within organizations like law enforcement, first responders, etc. In fact, they are using the same proletariate revolution tactics (like parallel polis) to gain power that the left should be using, but for the opposite ends.
You seem to want to dismiss and typecast me, rather than engage in any kind of good faith discussion. No, facicsm does not stem entirely from a group of baddies. But you can't stick your head in the sand and pretend like groups of baddies don't already exist. They do exist. They are organized. I'm not trying to stop facism as a whole, though we can certainly work towards that end. What I am trying to do is bring light to (we're going to change this term again) authoritarian nationalists (literally nazis) publicly brandishing their agenda who will in all likelihood take over at the national level.
We can oppose both capitalism and facism at the same time, but it's important to be able to distinguish between the two.