>>470637>if you need to add epicycles to your theory to make it work then it's probably wrongI mean,
I do stuff like that. Personally, I find it weird that anyone
only clicks the first result. That seems like the way a goldfish would use a search engine. Your assumptions about other people's behavior seem bizarre to me, because it makes it sound like finding leftychan.net is some kind of Herculean effort, when it's actually quite easy. Like, "ohhhhh, I'm straining my muscles to click the 4th result on google, ohhhh it's so hard…"
Nukka do you read the things u type?
>JUST NO. That's absolutely, utterly ridiculous.No it's not, and I told you why. The first time you write something, it isn't a copy. I have only ever heard people use copypasta to refer to
actual copypastas. This could be a shitpost, but it's not a copypasta, and I doubt that it ever will be.
>you can write a copypasta that doesn't get copy-pasted EVEN ONCE and it STILL would be a copypasta by the end of the dayNo, it would be a failure. Learn the difference.
A copypasta is defined by users' interaction with it, not its
structure. There's no utility in saying "copypasta" to refer to an original post nobody ever copies when you can just say it's a shitpost or bait or something. Like, there are words for the thing you're trying to describe, but "copypasta" isn't it.