[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]

/leftypol/ - Leftist Politically Incorrect

"The anons of the past have only shitposted on the Internets about the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it."
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
Captcha
Tor Only

Flag
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

Matrix   IRC Chat   Mumble

| Catalog | Home

 No.495082[Reply]

What do you guys think of centrists? I think that other than anti-idpol leftists, post-left anarchists and lolberts centrists are the most tolerable people to talk to. Who else do we have? Woketards? Radlibs? Christcucks? Literal fascists? Like, everyone else is kinda dumb and insane at least in some way, there isn't much to choose from. And centrists are the most popular political faction after woketards/radlibs and Christcucks/fascists.
5 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.495108

>>495087
>At least people on the far right (lolberts) know that something is wrong and are willing to engage with others who think something with wrong, you can have quite productive conversations and even ally with them on specific issues.
That's fair. But you can still ally with centrists on culture war, no?
>>

 No.495109

>>495108 (me)
Also, can you blame the centrists for always choosing the middle ground when both sides are full of crazies and when moderate opinions often appear to be the more nuanced ones as a consequence of that? Culture war, AI, even immigration and wars are very, VERY polarizing topics where each side uncritically supports a certain position. It's understandable how one's kneejerk response to it all will be believing that the horseshoe theory is correct. After all, how many people even know about anti-idpol leftists? Seriously.
>>

 No.495120

>>495096
>You're not entitled to my labor value or solidarity. Solidarity is earned.
Who asked?
>It is fundamentally wrong to bring life into the world.
No its not that's just how life works. There are no wrongs or rights in the natural world.
>>

 No.495122

>>495105
>because you gave in to peer pressure.
That's retarded, there is a correct side based on the available evidence.
>>

 No.495127

>>495122
>That's retarded, there is a correct side based on the available evidence.
You can never be certain that this or that side is absolutely correct, you can only be certain that this or that side is correct-er. Learning is a continuous process, you don't suddenly wake up one day and exclaim: "Ewreka! I know exactly how the world works!" Even if you pick a side, you shouldn't just delegate your thinking to it, you should approach all alliances with a critical lens. Otherwise, why are you even on this board? If you are unable to criticize the left then you shouldn't be there, go away.


File: 1772897537331.png ( 2.46 MB , 1200x1118 , liberals.png )

 No.494799[Reply]

the community actually needs a place to live
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.495037

https://www.cpusa.org/article/rise-in-unity-for-democracy-and-our-future/
>Rise in unity for democracy and our future – Communist Party USA

"Housing for people, not profit

Housing is a human right which requires removing the profit motive. Affordable housing, built and maintained with union labor, must be created for renters and homeowners. Rents and mortgages should be immediately rolled back to no more than 30% of income with the goal of pushing housing costs below 10% of income. We need to enact national rent control with protections against evictions and foreclosures. More public housing must be built with first priority to the unhoused. Profiteering by banks and private equity firms must be stopped. The time to organize tenant unions is now!"
>>

 No.495038

>>495037
Now remember to vote Democrat. We have to stop Trump!
>>

 No.495088

File: 1774555671952.mp4 ( 16.75 MB , 720x1280 , EggGodNeedsMorePublicHousi….mp4 )

>>

 No.495089

>>495088
What are you trying o communicate with this video, anon?
>>

 No.495090

>>495089
How would you feel if you didn't eat breakfast this morning?


File: 1774186416232.png ( 755.42 KB , 1729x1215 , IMG_3312.png )

 No.495039[Reply]

I see a lot of talk concerning how Israel should be supported by the USA and European countries for various reasons and, notably, none of them concern with material benefits for either native Europeans or long-time American citizens, instead focusing on abstractions and ideals. As Trump has led the USA into another forever war with Iran (at the behest of Israel, per the words of US Secretary of State Marco Rubio), it is pertinent to talk about a common anti-Zionist talking point that I find counterproductive. Namely: Israel’s colonialism is the same as that of American settle colonialism from the late 18thcentury to the early 20th century.

This is incorrect as, while America is a settler-colonial state, nonetheless was founded on the basis of enlightenment principles like equality before the law and liberty, considering how the American and French revolutions at the time were leftist at the time of the events, with the notion of equality of men itself being already extremely radical at a time when absolute monarchies were the standard in Europe. That’s not all, as contrary to popular opinion the Founding Fathers themselves weren’t conservative. Whether it’s the lack of any mention specifying the USA as a “white Christian country” founded on the basis of theology in the constitution and the federalist papers, George Washington himself coming to oppose slavery before the abolitionist movement began to gain momentum, many of said fathers being at best deists or nominally Christian, the USA being effectively the first democratic republic in history with limited suffrage being a short-lived experiment that was swept away in favour of universal male suffrage, Thomas Jefferson himself owning a copy of the Quran and a version of the Bible excised of all supernatural elements and among other examples show that the USA was far from the hotbed of reactionary politics both liberals and chuds tend to portray it as. Even the Indian Removal Act that led to the infamous “Trail of Tears” wasn’t unanimously agreed upon, with strong opposition by Christian missionaries and other politicians who opposed it based on the shared humanity and parity between white settlers Native Americans.

So it’s no wonder given all this that, despite the reproduction of reactionary politics like Manifest Destiny and Jim Crow laws, the notion of equality (or pretence to it) persisted throughout American history, which laid the seeds for the civil rights, feminist, and gay rightPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
4 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.495048

>>495045
Oh wow he freed a few slaves after winning an entire war fought to preserve it. Truly a great man.
>>

 No.495049

>ITT Honkies recognizing Israeli settler colonialism while continuing to fail to recognize their own perpetuated on Blacks and indigenous peoples.
Top kek
>>

 No.495080

>>495046
Jefferson at least wanted a new constitution every 19 years. If not democratic, it is at least populist. Although probably next to impossible to actually enact kek it would take 17 years of drafting each time


But yeah, there are no elections in a democracy. Every government position, from senator on down to public librarian, should be determined by lot. This is how it was in ancient Athens, which would be considered a democracy if it wasn't for the massive amount of slaves and total lack of rights for women.
>>

 No.495081

>>

 No.495083

>>495080
Athens did have some elected offices. They were the ten military generals and many offices dealing with finance. The general sentiment though, as outlined by Aristotle, is that elections were oligarchic in nature. In fact the popular opinion on this was so coherent that it was actually a justification for making financial offices elected: if someone who handles money embezzles money while in office, that money could later be reclaimed from their estate.


File: 1767941769437.mp4 ( 1.63 MB , 576x1048 , VID_stairs.mp4 )

 No.493465[Reply]

What is the difference between a cop shooting you in the face, and a gang member shooting you in the face? What makes the former 'legit' and the latter 'criminal'?

Has there ever been one example in human history of that invisible entity calling itself 'government' that didn't exist outside of its self-declared right to kill you if you didn't do what it said? That a tiny minority (or even one single person) one day declaring "I am in charge, now. Bow down or I'll murder you." and everybody else inexplicably nodding and going along with this psychotic nonsense?

I'm not being an anarchist nor a lolbert. I fully understand the need for this objectively nonsensical situation in order for humanity to function and prosper. Without somebody holding a bigger stick than someone else, that someone else has no reason to behave himself.

And there is no stick bigger than God.

There wouldn't be ~3 billion Christians and Muslims if somebody didn't convince them all (with violence) that if they misbehaved that after they died an invisible sky fairy would exercise incalculable sadism by trapping them in trillion-degree lava for the rest of time.

And the only reason that this schizophrenic idea stuck is that somebody with a big stick told everyone else that "this bronze age book of barbaric bedtime stories is all true and in fact nothing is more true than it, so do what it says or I'll kill you AND THEN you will 'die the second death' by being trapped in trillion-degree lava until the end of time".

What is the point of this OP? Nothing, really. Just had this on my mind while lamenting that existence in its current form was a ghastly mistake, if there really is some sort of unmoved mover and ground of all things that created it. And that if there is no outside-of-time-and-physicality lawmaker behind the invisible concepts we call the laws of nature, that all there has ever been and all that there ever will be is a fully-automatic universe consisting of incomprehensibly small bits and bobbles bouncing around in the cosmic void, then there is no such thing outside of things, that what we call "concepts" are just us trying to cast invisible nets around invisible nonsense to try and make sense of an ultimately senseless existence.
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.495042

>>493465
>There wouldn't be ~3 billion Christians…
Islam is another story, but this is actually quite ahistorical for Christianity. Christianity wasn't a state-sanctioned religion until several centuries after its founding. Before that its growth was largely voluntary and early Christians had a communal outlook.
>>

 No.495044

>>493465
OP Fuck your AI slop. But also yes, government is a monopoly on violence. The only difference between a socialist government and a capitalist one is who the government is oppressing. Yes you can still get arrested for bullshit you don't agree with under socialism, but at least they will use cops to oppress the bourgeoisie primarily and prevent a reversion back to capitalism.

Nobody knows what happens next. We probably need almost every country to have a socialist revolution before the state can wither away. But I don't like to think too far into the future, things are so fucked in America that we should really take it week by week with some sort of outlook.
>>

 No.495054

>>495044
>but at least they will use cops to oppress the bourgeoisie primarily and prevent a reversion back to capitalism
One can only hope. Sadly most of the socialist governments of the 20th century simply brought the bourgeoisie class into the state apparatus. When you eliminate the undemocratic work arrangements that create the basis of class in the first place, you don't need cops to suppress the bourgeoisie.
>>

 No.495065

It's telling that the only way human society can be conceived is the rule of a particular method of violence asserted for no reason worth considering, and this is seen as wholly natural and automatic. You have to ask if it was always like this, and usually you conclude that it was not, yet not one example against it is "real". Even when the violence is nowhere near what it purports to be and does not have the power it claims, the assertion of arbitrary violence and cruelty is the only Law humans ever regard or grant spiritual authority, because they really don't know anything else.

If this is about a self-declared right to kill, any idiot can claim that. I can get in my car and use it as a weapon for some vehicular murder, and suddenly I'm "God" according to that theory. Whether you kill by direct violence or by habitual lying and institutions that make it "automatic", it's always reduced to the essential acts of killing and torture and never about anything good or useful. Everyone who tried to assemble something on any other basis is immediately attacked, denounced, and edited out of history, even though we know such a thing would be trivial and non-controversial. It would be very easy to not do any of this, but if we did, suddenly the people who did this to you whine about a "human spirit" and "human nature" that they have already declared a monopoly over.

At the end of all of it, nothing really gets done. The real government of humanity, or what counts as such, is always conducted in secret. This is thrown in front of your face and every institution we have ever known exists to laugh at you as you're ejected from the world. You might think this is a modern thing, but if you look at the past and are not trapped by the fetters you are exhorted to believe are "natural", the Roman system was remarkably similar. The Romans didn't even bother lying about it, and Roman historians will tell you it was a bunch of shit from start to finish. Nowhere do the Romans invoke anything like ideology or justice when it came to the purpose of the state. The purpose of the Roman state was to preserve slavery, and it's written in the legal code. The most humanistic Roman leaders would tell you why the state exists, without any glorification of the idea of the state. That perversion is a modern, Germanic invention that has nothing to do with the Law of any country that was at all functional. Yet, here we are, where the only idea permitted is a glorification Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.495066

File: 1774352845132.jpg ( 13.18 KB , 160x389 , thorazine.jpg )



 No.492068[Reply]

>Be Northern Virginia.

>Corporations build hundreds of data centers that receive most internet traffic.


>So much demand for data centers here that they are literally shutting down garden centers to build more data centers



(Not saying we should do any trolling, but AI slop is ruining the internet, sooo…)

https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?layerId=0&layers=ffda13ae2bb8433cb1c97258c6474f56
2 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.494779

Northern Virginia is the hub of the bourgeois in America. It contains both the wealthiest and most powerful people. But it isn't a community in any sense of the word, nor are sub-areas.

They could build picket fences over every parcel and nothing would change. Datacenters, unless they make noise bother few.

People are very isolated and everything in public has a price. The mental health of the state and even its economy is in freefall.

Also nothing is going to slow down AI and neo-Ludditism is cringe, especially when made on internet devices and articulated by developers who are just worried about their jobs.
>>

 No.494780

>>494779
Only thing I disagree with is:
>nothing is going to slow down AI
AI has already peaked. We haven't seen any giant leaps forward from gpt4, so it's slowing down by virtue of the technology reaching it's limits. It's wrong to expect AGI at this rate, rather we will see incremental improvements with diminishing returns.

Economically, the booj are going to ride this bubble until it pops, but then America will truly have nothing left.
>>

 No.494786

Do Iran's missiles have the range to hit Virginia?
If they take out data centers that would be a big W
>>

 No.494791

>>494780
this is kinda like the "internet bubble" did companies over-leverage and make too many businesses at that exact moment? sure.

But the internet itself wasn't a bubble it was just getting started, now we've far exceeded the amount of internet businesses seen during the gold rush phase of the internet, by multiples.

> We haven't seen any giant leaps forward from gpt4


Turns out you can pick the worst performing AI company and say anything you want. But 3 years ago people were saying the big LLM models couldn't do basic math (and many couldn't often), now every other cognitive-task oriented professional is using them to do their jobs for them because they've gotten so much more intelligent.
>>

 No.494826

>>494779
> Northern Virginia is the hub of the bourgeois in America. It contains both the wealthiest and most powerful people. But it isn't a community in any sense of the word, nor are sub-areas.


Does it have to do with the historical cash cow of tobacco plantations?


File: 1771780293990.jpg ( 177.4 KB , 1500x1125 , Hotwheels.jpg )

 No.494485[Reply]

February 21, 1994 – January 10, 2026
8ch founder Hotwheels has died in his sleep at 31. Brennan created 8ch before the site was stolen by feds in a hostile takeover which eventually led to its end.

https://shows.acast.com/im-from-the-internet-a-podcast-about-somethingawfulcom/episodes/the-late-great-fredrick-brennan-part-one
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fredrick_Brennan
33 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.494808

File: 1772928907118.jpg ( 324.86 KB , 1680x1050 , gamergate - a right wing m….jpg )

>>494778
>right-wingers to his site, a space for disgruntled gamergaters
I hope you didn't just do that thing the horseshit games media did. The vast majority of gamergate people were not, in fact, right wing.
>>

 No.494809

>>494808
yea about half of republicans show up as "left-wing" on the Nolan chart, but what matters are people's speech and actions not their test scores. 8chan's main board was rabidly right-wing the entire lifetime of the site.

Brennan explicitly recruited people from 4chan's /pol/ and /v/, like the central hub of sociopathic right-wingism
>>

 No.494815

>>494809
>/v/, like the central hub of sociopathic right-wingism
Nah, you're full of shit. There may have been some overlap with /pol/tards but as a whole 4chan's /v/ community covered a pretty general spread of American politics. The transformation of 4chan into Stupid Boomer Politics only happened after the exodus and gamergate.
>>

 No.494816

>>494815

>may have been


lmao


/pol/ and /v/


you purposefully omitted /pol/ because you know you can't fudge the history on that.


There's only a few readily accessible archives 2014, the year GG hit a peak and then discussion was banned. All I see is right-wingism: hating on jews in multiple separate threads, and promoting right-wing e-celebs like Ed Morrissey and Adam Baldwin

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>

 No.494817

>>494816
Two celebrities (I don't even remember this Morrissey clown) who don't even use image boards are hardly representative of the general opinion on /v/. Here's my counter anecdote: I was involved in a large project to compile all the games journalism scandals over the years and of the 20-ish people I collaborated with only two of them were hardcore right wingers. There were maybe three or four progressives and socialists on the left, while most everyone else was somewhere in the middle.

>you purposely omitted /pol/

I think it's pretty clear that I'm not disputing /pol/'s politics.


File: 1772308583351.jpg ( 298.57 KB , 1200x1200 , a3735177738_10.jpg )

 No.494673[Reply]

Marxism is not about vibes, justice, or who feels bad. It is about material development. Any attempt to condemn American imperialism on moral grounds is liberal humanism and thus idealism. Despite the moral indignation that are likely to follow this post, let me explain…

As you all know, of all the things Karl Marx was, idealist he was not. Nor was he a moralist for he never gave moral judgements when discussing topics as fraught as juvenile prostitution, and would be incredulous as seeing the self-declared "marxists" of our times using the language of liberal moralisms when it comes to the Epstein saga. Sure, as a man of his time, he wasn't immune to contemporary prejudices as was his case with gay people that I don't need to mention.

Needless to say, unlike whig historians, for Marx history was neither moral nor immoral, but amoral.
Indeed, he described the democide of the Native Americans in the New World and the subsequent settling by European colonists and their African slaves, as well as British colonialism in India, and even slavery in Ancient Greece as progressive in that it advanced societies relative to their predecessors (in ancient Greece's case, from tribal society to city-states). For him, European colonialism was a double mission: Destructive but necessary in order to destroy material obstacles to historical development.

It is with this in mind that I can confidently say that Marx would deem modern American imperialism as a force of progress. If historical progress is defined by the destruction of pre-capitalist social relations and the creation of modern productive forces — then American imperialism is not only progressive, but the most progressive force in human history. After all, for Marx the capitalism of his time was a destructive force of progress that was necessary for communism arises through capitalism, not instead of it. Before objections begin, I'll bluntly state that I'm simply engaging in historical materialism to its conclusions and refuse to apply moral exceptions to the infantilised leftism that dominates the current milieu of the western left.

We may object to it on moral grounds, but if we are to be materialist, then we'd have to acknowledge the following facts with regards to American imperialism in this day and age:

First, American imperialism has functioned as an unparalleled mechanism for the destruction of pre-capitalist, semi-feudal, clerical, and patrimonial sPost too long. Click here to view the full text.
6 posts omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.494698

>>494690
>Reza Shah Pahlavi’s white revolution that, if continued, would have brought Iran into the modern age of industrial production rather than having its industry ossified as it is the case in the present.
What is your basis for this prediction? Under the Islamic Republic, Iran actually has become one of the world's leading manufacturers of drones and Iran is otherwise well-known for having an enormous corps of engineering talent. This in spite of decades of attempts to block Iran's access to outside resources through economic sanctions. Conversely, under many vassal regimes in history the puppeteering power has kept economies purposely undeveloped in order to exploit cheap labor.
>>

 No.494699

>>494698

That shows how little you know about Iranian modern history, for the very weapons manufacturing and educated human capital you praise theocratic Iran for is built on the back of Pahlavi's white reforms which not only increased literacy in the country, but also kickstarted a minor Industrial Revolution that today's Iran continues to rely on to this day. Matter of fact, economic growth under Reza Shah approached close to 10%, while today growth has been stagnant even factoring for western sanctions.

If the 1979 revolution never occurred, then Iran would be wealthier than today, and with a more proletarianised populace as well. This are just facts you can easily read on any book on Iranian history, not an endorsement for current attempts by the American empire at re-instituting the bourgeois monarchy.

Just because Iran today sits on the opposite end of the USA doesn't mean that I, a historical materialist, will make a moral exception for that bourgeois theocracy in west Asia solely because it's besieged today. Moralisms and shitlib idealism shouldn't seep into material analysis.
>>

 No.494700

>>494699
>If the 1979 revolution never occurred, then Iran would be wealthier than today
On the one hand there would probably be less economic sanctions and Western attacks on them to contend with over the decades. On the other hand their oil sovereignty would still be in the hands of British Petroleum.
>>

 No.494758

>slavery in Ancient Greece as progressive in that it advanced societies relative to their predecessors (in ancient Greece's case, from tribal society to city-states)
Completely ahistorical nonsense. Not only did city-states exist well before the Greek Classical period, but it was preceded by a historically regressive period at the end of the Bronze Age where creditor oligarchies were allowed form and seize control of governance away from the palace monarchies that had once kept them in check. This gave way to people losing first their land and then their freedoms by creditors. The same thing happened in the late Roman Republic, and a similar, more rigorously documented phase happened in Mesopotamia at the end of Hammurabi's Babylonian dynasty. In all cases they led to the mass enslavement of civilizations, a dramatic reduction in written records, desertion of urban centers, and stagnation in innovation beyond warfare.

It was not slavery that played a progressive role in the Greek Classical period. It was figures like Solon issuing mass debt amnesties that built a body of free citizens to give way to democracy. Or, when city-states like Argos experienced cataclysmic disasters in warfare, they were forced to make new citizenship bodies out of the slave population and the consequent turn over lead to democratic rule. Slavery has never been a progressive force in history, it represents something more akin to a destructive detour on the path of progressive development.
>>

 No.494785

>>494673
Firstly, Kudos on such a great effortpost in the era of AIposting on imageboards.
However, I disagree with your primary thesis. If Marx would alive today he wouldn't be using the same analysis of the 1800s, because he understood that dialectical materialism requires our analysis to adapt to changing circumstances. The US has next to no organized work force and technology has only inched forward since the cold war. Technologies such as AI which only exist to kill jobs and surveille the working class are anything but progressive.

>Iran's archaic mode of production and imperialism

You'll need some evidence for this bold take. To where does Iran export capital? What private monopolies does Iran extend past its borders? Funding groups like Hamas is not imperialism by any definition. I'll admit that I also find the uncritical support given by "tankies" to be cringey, but the wholesale destruction of Israel should be celebrated by everyone, Left or Right, Gentile or Jew.

Marx had just begun to investigate metabolic rift and the externalities of capitalism in his final years. I doubt he would have the same productivist focus today when we see the pollutions of capitalism poisoning our bodies, minds, and planet.


All-in-all, a good post. You're wrong, but it's still a good post and I hope you have a good day.


File: 1737719939860.gif ( 82.37 KB , 768x576 , LesMaitres_1299754253 uno ….gif )

 No.487075[Reply][Last 50 Posts]

Big massive thread for American politics.
600 posts and 163 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.494557

>>494556
Cuban DEA neutralizes Miami fentanyl boat
>>

 No.494566

Get the fuck out of chagos you yank baboons
>>

 No.494696

LIVE STOP TRUMP’S IRAN WAR Protest in Chicago
>>

 No.494722

https://x.com/BNONews/status/2028006740466274316
BREAKING: Multiple people shot at music venue in Cincinnati, Ohio
>>

 No.494759

File: 1772598990402.png ( 229.3 KB , 504x283 , ClipboardImage.png )

the americans killing iranian children


File: 1772118600952.jpg ( 87.92 KB , 642x906 , spider-bug Setapedites abu….jpg )

 No.494560[Reply]

BREAKING
A gusano terror boat carrying 100% fishscale Miami fent has been neutralized after its occupants were discovered by the Cuban coast guard and opened fire. A tactical intervention by the Cuban DEA resulted in the permanent neutralization of 4 gusano narcoterrorists and the mild injury of 6 further Florida fentanyl traffickers. The 6 surviving Miami narcos were reportedly very upset abut their booboos, and cried a lot and blamed gommunism and would not shut up even though nobody cared or liked them. The FBI (Federal Booboo Inspectors) is reportedly investigating it as a major booboo incident.

Pic unrelated
>>

 No.494563

Was it really narco traffickers? I thought it was some dumbass CIA "Archer" style subcontractor trying to reenact the Bay of Pigs.
>>

 No.494564

>>494563
some "true patriots" of god=trump's army…
how the hell did some dudes in a single boat think they were going to take down the Cuban government on their own?
>>

 No.494565

>>494564
With American grit and spirit


File: 1743260901897.jpg ( 51.75 KB , 415x562 , workers of the world unite.jpg )

 No.488376[Reply]

Thread dedicated to /leftypol/ original content & memes
Post original content you've made, or OC someone else recently made
which you want to share.
Or ITT collaborate on improving content already made.

This is the place where you can find all leftypol memes n' shit:
https://lefty.booru.org/

Webm sister thread: >>361470
30 posts and 20 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.
>>

 No.494420

>>494403
>The difference is an artist made something using other people's art, versus the machine making it. The difference is who controls the creative process. A prompt isn't creative as an art piece, it's creative as a prompt.

>Best I can do to explain it.


This sentiment is hypocritical.
AI art is sampling. Just because a machine determines the end product doesn't mean it's entirely automated.

AI art uses pre-existing data.
It often requires multiple samples of the same type of art to get it right
>>

 No.494426

Can you guys plz just focus on making memes
>>

 No.494491

>>490860
where's that first clip from?
>>

 No.494492

>>494491
Lebanon.
>>

 No.494548

File: 1771944287909.png ( 1.28 MB , 688x1178 , Bret Stephens 4.png )

A rare moment of self-reflection by America's own Streicher!


Delete Post [ ]
[ home / overboard / sfw / alt / cytube] [ leftypol / b / WRK / hobby / tech / edu / ga / ent / music / 777 / posad / i / a / lgbt / R9K / dead ] [ meta ]
[ 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5 / 6 / 7 / 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 / 14 / 15 / 16 / 17 / 18 / 19 / 20 / 21 / 22 / 23 / 24 / 25 / 26 / 27 / 28 / 29 / 30 / 31 / 32 / 33 / 34 / 35 / 36 ]
| Catalog | Home