>>491625>I think that they're guilty of heinous crimes but won't the ruling class just immediately invent new political faces to replace them?My first thought - yes,
make them do it. The more effort they have to put forth to maintain this the better. The instability of this project must be
felt by them, and western politicians who support this project, who presently fear blackmail and blacklisting (and possibly Mossad assassinations), should be made to fear the people more.
Right now they have no incentive whatsoever to turn on one another, because the meaningful threats come only from their own Zionist clique, and they are allowed to take whatever they want from the general public without repercussions.
My second thought is that Netanyahu is a particularly effective leader, at doing what they want him to do, for a few reasons. Firstly, he is criminally liable for things he has done in the past - they dangle his trial in front of him all the time. Do you think he'll ever do the time, in Israel, for his corruption?
Not if he takes the genocide & "Greater Israel" to its conclusion.
He is also ideologically committed to this, and ruthless and shrewd in ways which other politicians might not be. He grew up in Pennsylvania, and he is more presentable to the US than a lot of Zionist politicians who grew up in "Israel." In "Israel" he is seen as a centrist, and he has more political competence than most and knows how to manipulate the Israeli public.
My third thought is this - "wouldn't they just replace Hitler?" would miss a crucial point as a question that doing so would be an inconvenience to the Nazis. It rings like an excuse. Everyone in the Israeli state could be replaced eventually, and so there isn't any excuse not to make them do it. From the bottom up, the IOF, Mossad, Likud, Unit 8200, Shin Bet, the Zionist Lobby, etc. members should be made to be replaced, but there is nothing wrong with going straight to the top either.