>>498321Aren't tactical lasers actually extremely expensive and inefficient?
They're already deployed by "israel" after decades of US research, and they appear to have been completely useless not only against actual ballistic & cruise missiles, but even drone swarms. See
>>>/777/1564The US seemingly hasn't even bothered deploying tactical laser systems at its own bases.
>>498328>The question is how to combat them, worded in a joking way. What don't you get?I wasn't sure what you were asking, maybe in part because my angle is totally different - drone warfare is cheap and accessible, and incredibly difficult to combat, so when I think of a solution in relation to it, what I think of is a workers' movement which modifies agricultural drones for warfare and sabotage. The potential here is incredibly high and hasn't been met so far, and I would prefer a solution which involves maximum drone warfare striking at US tyranny while the iron is hot above anything else. There's more than enough money floating around in western socialist orgs to do it, but, unfortunately, none of them seem willing to take risks like that.
Drones can bypass advanced radars, escape or drain interceptor systems, resist or even (in the case of FPV) bypass jamming entirely, enable quick low-cost reconnaissance, and enable military forces with little money and few resources to suddenly be able to launch aerial attacks against tanks. Today they are becoming the air force of the poor, and it doesn't look like there will be an efficient counter which doesn't solely benefit the rich.